- AuthorSearch Results
- 2015-05-03 at 3:08 PM#47846
In reply to: Hmm… female cohabitation
One call to 911 and you’re sleeping in jail tonight. Why the f~~~ would you ever even THINK about putting a woman in this position? Never mind any of the other s~~~. You will not put her in this position. She can’t have it. DENY her any and all rights over you. Remove all power and control from her.
This is the ultimate bottom line, you’re not living with her, you’re a guest. A guest that can be disposed of with the full extent of the law. Any bills you’ve paid, anything she may claim to “owe” you can all be undone with one simple trumped up inexpensive restraining order. Then you’ll have to go through small claims court to get anything back. Which when added to time off of work, legal fees, gas, parking, looking for a new place to live… loss after loss.
You are bending over, spreading your asshole wide and trusting her to not shove a branch covered in splinters and fire ants in it.
You don’t plan for the best, you plan for the worst. The worst is clearly not worth it. I won’t condemn the thread because it’s a genuine question, I will condemn the action, you move in with her … well.. you’re a f~~~ing moron. So don’t.
2015-05-03 at 1:15 AM#47604In reply to: The "I" chick.
It’s even worse when you’re trying to argue a point with them. You can bring up all the statistics, facts, and logic in the world and she will come back with some completely irrelevant (and probably misremembered) anecdote from her own life and think that somehow trumps the reality behind your position. And they all do this. I’ve even seen women do it in things submitted for peer review, which is quite frankly so unprofessional it’s baffling.
2015-04-15 at 6:15 PM#40590In reply to: Hello All. Been married 3 years.
I’ll respond to this original poster as though it is a man, and can still read what’s written here. I’ll also give it the benefit of the doubt that everything in that original post is honest and factual.
Here’s my 100% honest, 100% factual, 100% male response:
You spent a total of 3k on a wedding and honeymoon, and made her buy her own ring. Good for you! You’re a regular Donald Trump. If she accepted that, then congratulations on being deemed a ‘low value target’, and on your ability to trust her to continue accepting your offer…at least for the time being until she finds a better one. If she never finds anyone who will spend more on her than you, then I guess I should congratulate you on being the best she can ever get, you stud you!! Since it’s apparent that she loves you for all your wit, charm and personality, it sounds like you’ve discovered the secret of trusting a woman: find one who can’t possibly hope to ever do any better than the crumbs you’ve thrown this one.
Personally, I aspire to accomplish more… and that makes me a much higher value target. I am acutely aware of the implications of this. First, no woman is going to be happy with a 3k wedding/honeymoon from me. Next, I am not naive enough to believe that any woman is going to love me for my wit, charm and personality for even one minute longer than it takes her to secure a better offer.
What you have there sir, is not a NEWALT. What you have is a NEWALTY (not like that, YET). You want to bet your assets, earnings, loyalty, home, sanity, civil rights, physical safety and children that she will remain a NEWALTY for the rest of both your lives? Go ahead. ‘Sounds like you have already placed that bet.
But I will point out to you that you are paying Russian Roulette using a revolver that has 3 bullets in it. Divorce rates are 50%…the same as a revolver presently pointed at your head with 3 loaded chambers and 3 empty ones. The barrel is already to your head, and the trigger has already been pulled. The hammer is already falling, and it’s far too late to get your head away from the barrel. Here’s me wishing you luck that the hammer continues to fall on an empty chamber everyday for the rest of your life. God help you the first day it doesn’t, because on that day, NO ONE ELSE can…
As for me, I am a mgtow. I no longer have any gun pointed at my head.
You still think I’m the one who needs to change his decision about where his head is?
Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you
2015-04-15 at 11:13 AM#40463I could make a list so long that it would not fit on this forum of all the crap I have been subjected to personally, seen happen with friends and family, and witnessed through others in general — all proof by the truckloads.
From the woman whose lies cost me my family and business, to the ones who falsely accused me of things to get rid of me in the workplace. All sucker punches you never see coming, but as a man can do pretty much zero to prevent. We are always looking over our shoulder now days to expect women to be abusers. It feels like the norm, and I hate it. While the women stand there and enjoy their sick drama that they create no matter who they harm, they are never punished or called on their actions. Such behaviors are pathological and are being ignored by our society as being real. But of course a man can never be a victim, oh no!. That was why I joined the MRA movement at first, because the voices and experiences of men need to be heard. Men need to know they are not the only ones suffering or victimized.
For me it was three years ago really. Several things happened that year involving the crap women do to other. Not the least of which was a friend of mine who felt so much pain from what his ex-wife had inflicted. She was rich, he was a simple peon. She sued him and got the judge to agree to take all his possessions over trumped lies she created. This after years of her being investigated by the police for harassing and stalking him with murderous intent, and the cops telling her to leave him alone. He climbed on a bridge, and ended his life because he thought he had no more options. He was too proud to reach out for help to his brothers. She never spent a day in jail for any of the ten years she spent falsely accusing him of everything under the sun. He was a good father to his two kids, and a an honest man. But in the end he went to get help from the system, and the system failed him. I still that pain even just remembering it and to put it into words. The bytch got what she wanted — him dead.
I have had two best friends murdered by their GFs, both just because they looked at another woman. One was pushed off a boat to drown and the other killed in a murder-suicide. Yes women do commit murder suicides much more then is acknowledged. But of course in all these cases, other women said “it must have been the man’s fault.” Both were good men who never hurt anyone in their life. They did not deserve how their young lives ended.
Such disgusting arrogance I find the normal now. The level of injustice that men are forced to endure I simply cannot tolerate as a rational and adult human being. Yeah there are men who are pricks too. Some guys just suck at being human beings too. We all know that. But women trying to prove they can be bigger pricks is not helping anyone. Women as the caretakers of family life and social ethics — not anymore. Not a chance ever again if they continue the way they are.
Women have so screwed up this society and everything good that it once represented. I don’t hate women, but I do blame them collectively for the damage they have caused. There are almost no women worth respecting in the world anymore. I can count the few I do on one hand (no that is not a bad joke). Feminists that had valid arguments, are now seemingly all joining the man-hate bandwagon. Famous talking heads are siding with the crazies, or being witch hunted by them. The few authors out there like Helen Smith or Naomi Wolf that have something valid to say are being shouted down by their BFF in the media. I look at that crap and find it hard to believe how women in general are so dam blind. It is sad to see our world fall apart.
Make no wonder women are banished to second class status in some of the oldest civilizations in history. The men in those societies have had a few more thousand years of watching what women’s nature is then we have here in the west. In the end women will lose their right to being respected in the west too.
That is why I will never ever marry. Women are the ones who have to make the change with other women, and they need to prove that they have. Without respect, there can be nothing else. There is nothing about modern western female culture or practice that can be respected.
It is on Male shoulders to save the world again, as it always has been.
You know that there are stages in a romantic relationship ? Mine always failed when the woman tries to control you, to make you her bitch, usually using passive aggressiveness, guilt tripping and not putting out. Eventually, I realized this pattern and realized that even though I have flaws, romantic relationships with the human female are relations~~~s because they will always try to control you, try to make you into what you are not, trying to turn you into a utilitarian drone. If they succeed, they eventually get bored of you and move onto some other schmuck. If they fail, they and their hive minded girl friends eject you unceremoniously.
Yeah I can relate. I expect most here can. I have seen this pattern so many times, that I have reached the end of my rope on patience with it.
I have never met a woman yet who did not feel compelled to test that by pushing things to the edge. Then they act all surprised when you leave. Such BS.
"Women have become so full of hatred that they are blind to reason and humanity. That which they practice will be the end of humanity, long before any war that men may fight.." "Women are predators by nature. Why else do you think they are so quick to gang up and go after a man they hate for showing any sign of weakness?"
2015-04-08 at 9:32 AM#37835In atheism, there is no morality. Morality is purely a theological concept because mother nature has no morality.
Incorrect. The only morals that exist are the ones that came from evolution, “mother nature” as you so annoyingly anthropomorphize is it (I guess that’s to be expected since you anthropomorphize everything without ever noticing how vain and bias it is). The world has gotten by on nothing else, but the instinctive moral behaviors that were passed down and fit to each species. You may think they aren’t real but they are visible and actually protect you for being murdered outright everyday. On the contrary, your fake arbiter of morality is suspiciously absent in the cosmos. Where does your ethics come from? Outer Space?
Should there be a God who created the universe and judges us, then there is a moral law.
Who says? This doesn’t seem like a giant assumption to you? Should, would, could and if? You base your world around a giant “maybe.” Reality works without that assumption.
MGTOW can only justify it’s existence in a theological framework,
There it is, Christians, caught red handed, trying to bring bronze age myths and twisted morals into MGTOW. What part of Going Your Own Way don’t you understand? You’ve NEVER gone your own way in your entire life because your mind is locked in a theology of servitude. You haven’t gone your way because you still act as if an invisible sky monster will damn you to hell. You still navigate your life on tip toes around whether Crustian ideology permits your next desirable action. You aren’t a sovereign man. You just happen to think MGHOW are cool and want to act like you are one. Unfortunately, MGTOW and Christianity are oil and water. Mgtow is progressive; its the end game for men who know the facts, the fact is we serve no gods because none exist. Christianity is traditional: it’s the deliberate celebration of avoiding known facts, they celebrate blind obedience to a dictator that can’t be shown to exist. They carry on about plots that are impossible, that violate everything we know about the world. You are about as free a man, as animals are ‘free’ in the zoo.
This is all besides the point and elementary. You need to be brought up to speed on a lot of science. I feel like I’m talking to someone from Sunday School in the nineties. Even your position on a position is outdated by at least 20 years.
You’re determining what another man is to do with his time
Negative. I’ve only pointed out an incredibly obvious contradiction, that if MGTOW is a statement of self ownership, then you can’t own yourself and be owned by god at the same time. Somebodies authority trumps the other. If you think faith is excusable, and that ‘gawd’ has the final say in you life, you are not sovereign, period. You can be celibate and promote men your whole life but your MGTOW status will be hypocritical or at best, amateur.
Take a look at your view of life, completely dominated by wishful thinking, vanity and fear. You don’t even value the truth of life in the way that is readily observed and measured daily. The truth is what we see, not what we pretend or wish is real. Your version makes no sense and infinity isn’t real. Why the f~~~ would you want to live past death? I could understand a desire to live for a few millenniums or maybe more. But your celebration of potentially living forever is frightening! Why would you want that? Same goes for celebrating faith; why do you think betting is admirable? Wouldn’t it make sense to base your world view around indisputable facts and celebrate the only life we know for sure is real? You need to seriously re think your life.
2015-04-06 at 10:50 PM#37340In reply to: Successful Women & Lonely Men
Women, on the whole, aren’t attracted to men because of their education alone.
“Alone”? More like at all. Women view education in a man solely as an indicator of wealth or status she might claim, nothing more, and more immediate indicators of wealth will always trump it. In the dating game, a high school dropout rap star in a Ferrari with spinning rims always beats a tweed wearing triple digit IQ multiple Ph.D. in a Saab 900.
2015-04-04 at 4:00 AM#36585In reply to: Reputations
AnonymousThere’s a double lie to that double standard!
Firstly, it’s the matriarchy or the old hen’s brigade or the women’s committee that spit chips, contort their faces and speak in “possessed” voices when there’s a slut around their guys giving it out for free.
It’s the women of this world who really impose the double standard. Think back to high school when the bitches turned on some poor bitch who was giving it away for free to the boys, especially if one of the boys was considered relationship material of one of the head bitch girls.
The same goes in the workplace and all through any community. It’s the bitches that gang up and go feral and isolate the “slut”
I know from living in a community that the married wives club would get extremely nasty and gossipy if there was a single woman in their own age group giving it out amongst their husbands single friends, They’re all unbelievably insecure about their monopoly on vaginas.
If it was up to guys, we’d be happy if every bitch on the planet started giving it out for free.Guys look down their noses at sluts but only when considering them as relationship material, and for good reason!!!
Women jumping off the c~~~ carousal looking for a beta male provider think the same of male sluts too, so there’s no double standard there.Guys think their partners are sluts when they cheat, but women think the same when their partners cheat too, so there’s no double standard there either.
The second part of the lie is that men sleep with more partners than women.
If you’re a 7/10 and you’re looking at a 7/10 partner, do you seriously entertain for a moment that she hasn’t slept with at least 3 to 5 or more times the amount of partners that you have ?????????????????????????,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,seriously, lol ~wink~, keep it real banana peel!
If you’re a 7/10, and you’re looking at a 6 or even 5/10, do you really believe you’ve slept with more partners than she has?????,,,,,,,,lol…what type of crack pipe are you using?
I reckon if you’re a 7/10, you could go down as low as a 2/10 and at least put even-money on the fact she’s slept with more partners than you.
A tiny minority of Stella Alpha males sleep with 10 to 100 times the amount of partners we average males do,,,and women throw themselves at them. From what I’ve seen in the last 40 years, there’s not many females applying the “Double Standard” to their own sexual practice.
Does anyone here know of any females that adhere to the mythical double standard????
It’s been the same since at least the mid 70’s, probably earlier.To sleep with a partner the average male has to go through an enormous amount of work, time, money, hit and miss and trial and error.
All a woman has to do is smile at a guy,,,and in many cases, all she has to do is drop her guard, lolYet, we still accept this “double standard” accusation imposed by “The Patriarchy” as being real, lol
All that s~~~ changed about a half a century ago with the discovery of women’s birth control, the pill.
It’s hilarious that we still shut up in shame whenever the “double standard” comes up,,,,,,,and it ALWAYS comes up, like some sort of trump card.
The reality is, after a lifetime of indoctrination, we’re far more brainwashed and shamed than we could ever possibly believe we are, and the double standard is an excellent example, and you bringing it up only shows how well it’s still believed and passed off as truth.2015-03-26 at 11:29 PM#34532In reply to: Canadian Propaganda
I already said
“The only problem I can see here is that its always the female portrayed as victim and the male as victimizer.”
Then you’re missing the part where it tells you that the travails of those Strong Independent women, who are perfectly capable of handling these situations on their own, are somehow your responsibility.
This PSA tries to shame all men as victimizers, shame all men for not being white knights, and it uses a bunch of trumped up feminists victim fantasy scenarios to do it.
Everything about this PSA is wrong. Everything.
2015-03-26 at 5:23 PM#34425In reply to: Are any of you Musicians?
Oh I like this thread! I’m a guitar player goin’ on 15 years now. I can hold my own on bass and can hold a beat on a drum kit. I played trumpet in middle school, I wish I would have kept up with that and not let my trumpet go to s~~~. I have some computer recording equipment. I’ve been working on a heavy metal cover of “Carry on Wayward Son” by Kansas.
It’s cool to know a bunch of guys here are seasoned musicians (much more than myself).
2015-03-22 at 6:33 AM#33056Topic: MGHOW, it only gets better
in forum IntroductionsFellas, turned forty-five recently and want you to know life gets better every day. One simple word will help you avoid needless drama in the relationship world. The word is “NO.” NO, you can’t leave your make-up bag overnight. NO, I won’t pick up your child from another man and take them to school. NO, I wont’ help pay your rent or make your car payment. NO, NO, NO, NO!
Also, anything involving an attorney, courts, or combination of the two flee away immediately! It comes down to billable hours and this is all that matters to them. There is no justice in any courtroom anywhere! Compartmentalize your life and allow no one access to your assets, home, investments, etc.
Work hard, work out, eat healthy, earn either an advanced degree or learn a viable trade i.e. plumber, electrician, etc. learn a language such as Spanish, invest wisely and to the maximum always when possible, and enjoy the decline all around while you advance forward. Never, Never, Ever, allow anyone but your own child to live in your home. Hence, no one will ever be able to claim your home, assets, or accuse you of any type of trumped up abuse allegations within your sanctuary.
Fortunately, I had several very successful male role models/mentors in my early 20’s who led me directly to the prize. One in particular asked only that I return the favor to someone else. This is my opportunity to make it so. Good luck fellas!
2015-03-18 at 3:34 PM#31991In reply to: Why I No Longer Date
AnonymousI dont know about you, but I want a few very specific things from a women, sex being one of them. Sex usually being the basis for a hookup, as all you see of a person online is their looks anyway, they can type whatever about themselves. So talk about sex. In public. It gets them off. I don’t know why but most girls like dirty, rough sex and talking about sex. If she doesn’t, she isn’t naturally interested. Why even hide that is what you want from her? Why even hide that it is what you expect from her? My rule is that if she looks nice, smells nice and signals she wants sex, I won’t hide that I want the same.
Online dating material is like a bin full of needles containing several rare gems. You keep sticking your hands in as long as you occasionally dig up a pearl, because you can deal with the pain. It is weak-willed women who have trouble moving things forward to real life and keeping men interested with their inane prattle. However, these women also serve a tactical purpose as leverage towards other women, as they highly value each others opinion of you. This is why social networks can have a cascading effect whereas on deliberate dating sites (where user generated content is usually private) no such exposure does exist.
I’m no PUA but I’ve dated and bedded women in my blue pill days like it was no tomorrow, as a “revenge f~~~ing spree” on the sex I didn’t get when I was young and full of acne. A painfully empty pursuit, but at least one in which the value of sex became very clear. In order to successfully hook up with nice women online, withhold sex, expose yourself truthfully, and ignore all the hate you get from women with a stupid act. Yes, that means you can’t f~~~ 99% of them. Deal with the needles if you want the gems.
Just don’t spend so much time with online dating that it becomes a drag. It’s a game you can easily check out of and MGHOW should feel free to opt out of that game. I personally ditched any mainstream social network (Facebook, Twitter) and opted in on those covering specific areas of interest. I don’t blow a ton of money on dates and I check in on my profiles at set times, background routines trump deliberate searches in my experience.
2015-03-16 at 10:35 PM#31517In reply to: Advice requested
AnonymousI’ve found, through horrific experience,,,,, in the relationship massive-losers game,
that nothing trumps the “White Knight” card to win the worst most dysfunctional, irresponsible jackpot in the game.Any woman with a victim story, will be telling the same victim story about you !,,,,to the next guy.
Be thankful you stuck your fingers into it and not your c~~~.
She only refrained from intercourse on the first night because she didn’t want you to think (know) she was easy.
In other words, she sees you as a beta provider.
If she saw you as a sexually attractive bad boy, she’d still be s~~~ting out your jizz now, and not expecting a relationship at all.She’s already manipulating you in ways you can’t imagine.
2015-03-16 at 6:17 PM#31474In reply to: I fear I lost my looks.
Marla Maples did not fall in love with Donald Trump for his looks.
Jerri Hall did not fall in love with Mick Jagger for his looks.
Bridgette Nielson did not fall in love with Sylvester Stallone for his looks.
Anna Nicole Smith did not fall in love with J Howard Marshall for his looks.
Monica Lewinsky did not fall in love with Bill Clinton for his looks.
Donna Rice did not fall in love with Gary Hart for his looks.
Robin Givens did not fall in love with Mike Tyson for his looks.
Heather Mills did not fall in love with Paul McCartney for his looks.
A dozen different porn stars did not fall in love with Tiger Woods for his looks.Know what all these couples had in common? All these women were playboy material (except maybe Monica and Heather), and all these guys were very good producer/providers… They are not all famous.
Actually, every single one of them was famous, with the arguable exception of Marshall, who wasn’t a household name but was well-known in business circles.
I don’t buy the shopworn assertion that money attracts women. I only see it working when the man also has high status, which doesn’t automatically come with money. Fame, on the other hand, is the ultimate status. A guy with money may get women who make a logical decision to be with him because of what he can provide, but the money doesn’t generate true attraction. Status, on the other hand, creates attraction.
My brother is a multi-millionaire entrepreneur, but you wouldn’t find anything if you Googled him. He hasn’t done any better with women than an average working stiff. But look up some guy who finished next-to-last on Survivor and got $1,000 for his trouble, and he probably has a hot girlfriend. Hell, look at mass murderers like James Holmes. He’s got more love letters from women than he can ever read.
2015-03-16 at 5:40 PM#31469In reply to: I fear I lost my looks.
Marla Maples did not fall in love with Donald Trump.
Jerri Hall did not fall in love with Mick Jagger.
Bridgette Nielson did not fall in love with Sylvester Stallone.
Anna Nicole Smith did not fall in love with J Howard Marshall.
Monica Lewinsky did not fall in love with Bill Clinton.
Donna Rice did not fall in love with Gary Hart.
Robin Givens did not fall in love with Mike Tyson.
Heather Mills did not fall in love with Paul McCartney.
A dozen different porn stars did not fall in love with Tiger Woods.Something was bothering me about what you wrote there, but eventually I figured it out.
I honestly doubt any of those women fell in love with any of those men. I don’t doubt they had a strong attraction to the fame, wealth, and power those men possessed, but was it love? Not likely. And love for the men themselves? Not a chance.
2015-03-15 at 11:57 PM#31315In reply to: Marriage, Mortgage, Kids…f~~~ that s~~~
Welcome brother… and just in f~~~ing time, I might add!
Let me offer you a few points of advice as you prepare for this:
1) Get your fair share of the cash out of that joint account RIGHT NOW. Leave her a little extra if you want to give her a point to score (otherwise she’ll take it out of your ass later) but get your fair share out before she can touch it.
2) Relocate anything particularly valuable you might have in the home (photos of you and your family, your favorite records, etc) because when she gets angry, she will attempt to destroy something you care about.
3) Be prepared to MOVE OUT if things go badly. Make a reservation at a hotel for that night and pre-pay with cash. You might need a place to sleep.
4) When you do tell her your plans, DO IT IN PUBLIC. Pick a very public place and tell her quietly and calmly that “This is how it’s gonna be from now on.” this way if she gets violent or starts thinking to pin some trumped up abuse charge on you, you’ll have hundreds of witnesses to the contrary.
5) Stay calm. Do not stand up, do not raise your voice, do not lose your cool. Lean back, relax, lay your cards on the table and let come what may.
6) If she throws you out, do not go back. Anything she has control over (money, personal items of yours, etc) is now hers as far as you are concerned. She may choose to give them back to you unharmed or she may choose to bleach, burn or give them away depending on how vindictive she is (and from what you’ve said, I’m going to presume maximum vindictiveness).
7) When it’s all said and done, call up a few of your boys and go celebrate. You just took your first step into a much larger world and although it will hurt, it’s just a scratch compared to what would have happened to you had you married this female.
Oh, and I suggest you wear a cup. Angry females love to go for the nutsack and a quick trip to a sporting goods store can save you a lot of pain in this department.
And one more thing… consider the fact that she may respond by sitting quietly and agreeing to everything you say. If this happens, RUN! She isn’t agreeing, she’s plotting to get back at you and she will do so in a way that produces maximum damage… like getting pregnant, f~~~ing your best friends, destroying your valuables and humiliating you publicly.
In fact, I think you should just dump her. There’s no way this is going to go well for you at this point in time, she’s probably far too invested in you being her future meal ticket to accept a demotion to “casual fling” and when this plan of hers dies, it’s going to die very hard.
2015-03-15 at 9:34 PM#31280In reply to: I fear I lost my looks.
Good looking guys certainly do (and should) get laid for it. But good looking unemployed guys…? Maybe once or twice but there will be no staying power to that attraction without producing or providing something.
Marla Maples did not fall in love with Donald Trump for his looks.
Jerri Hall did not fall in love with Mick Jagger for his looks.
Bridgette Nielson did not fall in love with Sylvester Stallone for his looks.
Anna Nicole Smith did not fall in love with J Howard Marshall for his looks.
Monica Lewinsky did not fall in love with Bill Clinton for his looks.
Donna Rice did not fall in love with Gary Hart for his looks.
Robin Givens did not fall in love with Mike Tyson for his looks.
Heather Mills did not fall in love with Paul McCartney for his looks.
A dozen different porn stars did not fall in love with Tiger Woods for his looks.Know what all these couples had in common? All these women were playboy material (except maybe Monica and Heather), and all these guys were very good producer/providers… They are not all famous. They are not all talented. They certainly are not all good looking. Marshall had only a few hairs and fewer teeth. Trump’s hair is a talk show joke. Mick Jagger’s face could scare a freight train down a dirt road. Yet, the two things they all have in common are that 1) they are good producer/providers of whatever those women wanted (money, bragging rights, ego or career boost), and 2) they have all banged these playboy centerfold material women.
Everyone one of those couples above appeared on the national news. It ain’t like any of this is a secret…
By the way, the last thing all those guys have in common? When those women got to a position where they had achieved whatever it was they came for, everyone of those guys got thrown under the bus, and paid dearly for it…
PZ1, I got those same lines on my forehead between my eyes. Know what I did that made me look better to women? I paid off a big ass house that clearly indicates to them that I make money…!
And as long as I live here, I could be a one eyed, club foot, pot belly, purple haired, toothless old hunchback and still be the man of some girl’s dreams…
The reason I don’t take advantage of that…is that I AM NOT GOING UNDER THAT F~~~ING BUS!
@pz1, My advice to you: let no day go by that you don’t either make money, or exert effort toward moving into a position where you can. Work at a job, or work at finding a job… every single day. Don’t do this to please your wife. Do this because it’s the only way to reliably take care of yourself in a world where no one else will.
Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you
2015-03-15 at 3:28 PM#31214In reply to: I fear I lost my looks.
If you have any doubts about the relative value women place on looks vs how a relationship with you can benefit them, then explain Mick Jagger’s sex life…?
Mick Jagger is massively famous, in a glamorous line of work. That trumps all else when it comes to attracting women. Among guys who aren’t famous, I think looks do matter a lot as far as attracting women. But then again, no matter how good you look, there will always be other guys who are more attractive. So “losing your looks” doesn’t create a new problem, it just adds to an existing problem. The best way to deal with it is to be able to do without women, and not be dependent on the ones you do manage to attract (I thought that’s why we’re all here?).
Ouch, you’re right.
7462015-03-15 at 3:25 PM#31213In reply to: I fear I lost my looks.
If you have any doubts about the relative value women place on looks vs how a relationship with you can benefit them, then explain Mick Jagger’s sex life…?
Mick Jagger is massively famous, in a glamorous line of work. That trumps all else when it comes to attracting women.
Among guys who aren’t famous, I think looks do matter a lot as far as attracting women. But then again, no matter how good you look, there will always be other guys who are more attractive. So “losing your looks” doesn’t create a new problem, it just adds to an existing problem. The best way to deal with it is to be able to do without women, and not be dependent on the ones you do manage to attract (I thought that’s why we’re all here?).
2015-03-12 at 11:35 AM#30409Topic: Women's "Silent Suffering"
in forum Relations~~~sMy god. . .is there no end to women’s wretched narcissism and selfishness? He took away her means to have babies, so HE’S the bad guy. Good thing nobody wants to listen to this baby-mad strumpet.
http://www.ncregister.com/blog/jennifer-fulwiler/the-silent-suffering-of-women-denied-children
2015-03-12 at 9:56 AM#30394Well, the interweb is getting saturated by utter bulls~~~. I guess it’s about time Google starts to try something. Sites like WebMD and quackwatch.org are quality sites based on knowledge and science. They ought to have high rankings. However, people love bulls~~~. Take homeopathy. That’s entirely bulls~~~, from beginning to end. Absolutely no redeeming factor whatsoever. You’ll never get over your cold with water mixed with water that was mixed with water (ad 98 times) that was soaking in a ducks liver (poor guy). Yet, people fall in love with homeopathy. My ex’s mother was majorly into homeopathy. She and her daughter spent good money on the stuff when they have other needs. I met a homeopathy practitioner, a young black woman who just gave me the utter creeps (I don’t get creeped out easily). I asked her some scientific questions (nothing seriously challenging), and she dodged my final question. She wasn’t using known science very well in the least.
Keymaster has an article about women and New Ageism. I suggest reading it. It’s about the flaky girl. /the-flakey-chick-phenomenon/
To be fair, neither my ex nor her mother was like that. They were still toxic with issues and felt find to dump them on men in the form of expectation. I’m still pretty frustrated by this after 3 years ago. I’m not allowed to have my decisions based on the facts that I know.
You also have to see it from my shoes too, this is a woman who’s blatantly scamming my then girlfriend. So, I wasn’t liking her much. Her right to quackery doesn’t trump my anger.
One thing I remember is that I was accused of reading computer dribble and needing to gain life experience, a low blow by her mother, during a conversation I tried to make, but not a debate. She just reacted immaturely. She also said she had done her research. Those sites she researched were only saying things. There was no merit in it at all. There are plenty of websites to say whatever you want. “OMG, this duck liver made me feel better!”
Those little quack sites would quickly fall to the bottom of the deck, where they belong. Sites like quackwatch.org and webmd.com would gain a huge advantage.
I’m sorry, but I like my scientific medicine. Viva la antibiotics, baby! Oh, and vaccines, you’re pretty darn cool too.
- AuthorSearch Results

925069
924988
922113
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678