Search Results for 'chivalry'

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

women have devalued themselves to the point of no interest for men. it’s cheaper for a man to employ a cleaner and housekeeper on minimum wage than get married. it’s cheaper for a man to buy a fleshlight than chase and date women.

Great post Mac!

I do all my own housework and cooking, the whole enchilada! Throw such a liability as a modern woman into the mix? For what? Loose everything and become homeless after being sued for being a man? It’s pure insanity from a stable and logical standpoint. When you value your own quality of life including being stress free and happy all a modern woman has to offer is in STARK CONTRAST! PURE MISERY!

Anonymous wrote:

now they face a choice:

1) raise what they have to offer and compete; or
2) go extinct

After 50+ years of conditioning I don’t think I’ll be rushing in to save any bitter old bags from being devoured by their cats, the hatred of men by women is so thick it chokes the air we breath day to day, was it not Princeton University in New Jersey that BANNED THE WORD MAN? Any young men reading our words should be FRIGHTENED out of their MINDS! A man in any legal relationship with a woman is at a severe disadvantage!

Women have had the government grant them every wish they want, now all their nightmares are coming true, they’ve collectively destroyed everything that means what it means to be a man, with the only exception being the brotherhood of MGTOW.

Good luck running ruining civilization ladies, men are over and out! Rodger that?

Anonymous wrote:

based on herbibore in Japan there’s no signs of women being prepared to go for option 1. Give them a few decades of extinction and the only ones left may eventually figure it out

Chivalry is dead, I’m sure the ladies will form some new branch of government to replace it.

Good riddance!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

I have never regretted treating someone with basic respect, though.

Okay. But you’re confusing “respect” with basic COURTESY. Holding a door open for a woman isn’t “respect” like they think it is . . . . and it sure as f~~~ isn’t “chivalry” ether. It’s a free basic courtesy which I would also extend to another man. It’s got nothing to do with “respect”. It’s something we do without expecting anyone to earn anything.

Not stepping on a cricket is technically called “having respect for all kinds of life”, but it’s still not “respect” as we mean it today.

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Men earn trust, they don’t demand it to be given.

Twice I bolded it and was clear.
You don’t demand it because it isn’t up to you.
And you can’t “earn” it in advance either.

That’s what a business handshake is for . It does not have the same meaning between a woman and a man.

A handshake between men is an unspoken bond that says “OK we’re gonna trust each other now – going forward – and we will take each other’s word at face value . . . our agreement is as solid as it can be without any history…. because trust must be given – or not – until it is abused”.

You don’t have any other choice.
You can only know if it was a mistake when looking backwards.

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Most of my biggest regrets in my life involve me giving my trust away.
I have never regretted treating someone with basic respect, though.

I was clear…. giving your trust away is the ONLY thing you can do.

– OR –

You can choose not to.

So you made some bad calls. Who hasn’t?

But you can not expect anyone to jump up and down and do backflips to prove they are trustworthy when looking forward. It would be unreasonable. No matter what they do you can still simply chose not to trust them, so it’s not up to them.

RESPECT is actually something I can earn – even without your assistance. A woman can try to disrespect you , but you can flip that around and MAKE her respect you even against her own will. RESPECT is up to you, and you have a reasonable amount of control to earn it – even when someone doesn’t like you at all.

But when it comes to trust, someone either will trust you – or they won’t.

You can’t PROVE you’re trustworthy looking forward. You can only not abuse someone’s trust – which they had to give you upfront.

*****

To be clear, I do understand what you mean by “men earn trust, we don’t demand it”. And in a way you’re right on both counts. But you also said your biggest regrets were giving your trust away.

And that means — >> trust is freely given – or it is not.
You either will or you won’t.

Even when someone signs up here, we have to trust it’s a man. It would be unreasonable to expect you to “prove” it in advance. It would be silly for us to say, “well you need to earn it first”. Trust is up to us to give.

RESPECT will be up to each member to earn over time.
And that’s up to THEM.

This is the BEST example I have ever seen on how “trust” works.

http://www.movieclips.com/videos/nuts-official-clip-do-you-trust-anyone-here-573152323833

She freely trusts (and is more likely to trust ) the person who can’t hurt her.
And she doesn’t trust the people who can.

Exactly what I said previously.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Shadow1275Participant]

Because the Baby Boomers and Generation X decided that Feminism should be a moral imperative

In other words for the sake of egalitarianism we must all be brought down to the level of women.

Think about it for a second, how many transexual men who decided to become women existed 50 years ago?

Or the fact that any sort of Masculine virutues such as defending one’s country and requiring Foreigners to assimilate to the native culture are despised by feminists and marxists alike.

Women know the power of men and will do anything to bring them to heel

And thanks to the Baby Boomers and to a lesser extent the Gen Xer’s they have accomplished a lot towards this goal.

Women challenged Men with Feminism and instead of standing up to them Men yielded out of “Chivalry” and “Virtue” giving them rights without consequence or responsibility.

Millennials are just following what their Parents instilled in them, the Boomers (And the Roaring 20’s generation) Screwed the pooch big time.

He who is Brave is Free - Seneca

[Anonymous]

Manspread Mansplainer wrote:

What a f~~~in cuck.

Did “he” look like a total mangina all depressed?
Or was “he” happy and chipper to do this?

Was there an age difference? Was she a land whale?

I’m curious to study these specimens of the blue bill.

I find it f~~~ing amazing how men and society can’t see how f~~~ed up it is to hand outdated Victorian chivalry on a silver platter to their great great granddaughters that have dropped all things “patriarchal” p~~~ed on it, threw mud on it, and shoved a steak knife through it’s heart!

Talk about casting pearls before the swine?

Today’s irresponsible, unaccountable, entitled, and obtuse woman has transformed herself into a dirty diseased pig by Victorian standards, those were the days of discipline when men ruled over the world, the family, the law, and the government, now everything is mired in the anarchists nature of women that was allowed to blossom and thrive.

Welcome the end of Western civilization, a civilization built by men, ran by men, and utterly destroyed by the liberation of women,

Via con dios mi darling diablo!

Anonymous wrote:

In the old days we would have called him ‘henpecked’ neither depressed or chipper,

In the old old days we would have called her a lady and him a man, but now with a rainbow of genders to choose from we can call one a mouse and the other a giraffe!

F~~~ CHIVALRY!

F~~~ THE VICTORIAN MENTALITY!

F~~~ EVERYTHING!

[Anonymous]

Early 50s normal looking folk. In the old days we would have called him ‘henpecked’ neither depressed or chipper, just their normal routine. Had she not been driving I would have written it off as old fashioned (if excessive) misplaced chivalry.

Evidence that entitled bitches is not a new thing, only now it’s openly celibrated.

[Joey AlfioParticipant]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Not as good as this:

Of course this c~~~ was throwing bottles and fireworks at people, so she deserved a little more antichi (anti- chivalry).

BTW the new meme name for this antifa slut is: moldylocks. LOL

She started a gofundmepage asking $45,000 for her hospital treatment even though at an interview she said she was fine and not hurt at all. I think she raised $5,000+ so far.

She was originally asking for $85,000 but notched it down.

Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Not as good as this:

Of course this c~~~ was throwing bottles and fireworks at people, so she deserved a little more antichi (anti- chivalry).

BTW the new meme name for this antifa slut is: moldylocks. LOL

[Manspread MansplainerParticipant]

Vlad wrote:

I would go through all the motions I thought constituted being chivalrous (yes I know, chivalry has long been dead) and would always end up with things never going past the first date. I would buy them stuff and bend over backwards to do what I thought would make them happy. Honestly, I did not really know why I was doing it other than that’s what I thought the norm was.

Feminism killed chivalry – they all strong, independent don’t need no man.
Don’t blame yourself for this.

We have all been brainwashed to believe flowers, gifts, trinkets, aphrodisiacs will woo the woman into spreading her legs.
How wrong we were.

Girls give sex during last call at a bar simply by licking your lips and winking at them. They always run to a Chad because he knows how to give the drama they crave (attention seekers, emotional vampires women are) and enforce the ‘all men are scum’ doctrine they love to boost themselves up with.

In short – if you want pussy become a c~~~y, arrogant asswipe and really pile on the narcissism. They will be begging for you to pay off their debts and offer their bodies as a reward.

Not worth it as you said.
Sex is pounding a skin hole, it’s pathetic how many hours I’ve wasted dreaming of such an activity. After your marathon f~~~-fest it’s nothing but shopping, gossip, paying for s~~~, watching the stupidest TV shows and all the while an invisible, subtle message ‘men are scum’.
Not worth it man.
Let them be lesbians and destroy each other.

Women are like cats – give them attention they claw you. Ignore them and they jump in your lap.

23 is young, don’t let the simps and sluts shame you for being a pure virgin. Believe me, EVERY slut wishes she was still a virgin at heart.

You have tons of life ahead of you, at 23 all I had was dead-end relations~~~s that made me depressed and feel worthless because I couldn’t compete with Chads flashy game and bulls~~~ stories weemen love.

If women ran the world = It would become the shithole you are seeing.

Hi Guys,

Been awhile since I last posted. Have been busy with military training and taking care of my father who got cancer. I apologize in advance if this post gets too “personal.”

I’ve posted some threads before about myself but I’ll quickly recount a few things. I’m almost 23 and a virgin. I lived with an emotionally abusive bi-polar mother half the time when I was growing up. I learned at a young age how to put on a fake face around her to keep her happy. She never knew the true me and I never gave her the opportunity, having cut her out of my life completely when I turned 18.

I carried this insecurity and lack of confidence being around women as I got older. I never dated anybody in school but I would try occasionally as I got older to date girls I found attractive. I would go through all the motions I thought constituted being chivalrous (yes I know, chivalry has long been dead) and would always end up with things never going past the first date. I would buy them stuff and bend over backwards to do what I thought would make them happy. Honestly, I did not really know why I was doing it other than that’s what I thought the norm was. I did not realize it at the time but the problem was: I was a nice guy. I was taught growing up to charm the woman and seek her approval and this mentality followed me well into my 20’s.

Up until mid-2016, I was going crazy trying to figure out how to get women to like me. In fact, the older I got, the more attractive women started to initiate conversations with me. They would quickly lose interest when I did not turn out to be a Chad they were hoping for, and it was frustrating the hell out of me. I came across MGTOW and it was like a light bulb going off in my head. I had been playing an un-winnable game simply by being myself.

Cut to the present and my interest in women has diminished significantly.I’m not in any social circles with any females, and my military occupation has no females in it, so all the women I meet are strangers. Often I will be talking to a woman I find attractive and we could be having a good conversation, but all I can see are the red flags and side effects of having a sexual relationship. It does not seem worth all the hassle just for a warm meat hole attached to an emotional roller coaster, and then the logistics afterwards.

BUT

I Can’t help but to feel like I might be missing out on something great by not seeking sex at this stage in my life. Its so unnatural for me to put on a Macho Alpha persona just to get sex, and if that’s what it takes, then I can’t justify “squeezing the juice.” A fleshlight and porn works wonders for me as it is. I would really like to hear the insight of you more experienced guys. I’m not an indecisive person but my logical brain is clashing with the instinctual brain over this matter.

Thanks in advance.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Personally,
I believe it would have originated in the early medieval time frame along with “Chivalry” and could be properly referenced as originating as “Courtly Love”. Over the last few centuries the concept and meaning of both have been bastardized and misused to such an extent that most people do not know the actual premise or use of either.
IIRC
“Romantic Love” is the commoners/serfs/slaves imitation of “Courtly Love”. As people more learned than I have stated before, the “rules” of love change constantly solely to appease women, and force men to conform to whatever the ideal version for any particular woman at any given time.

Keymaster wrote:

every single story has some schlub pouring endless amounts of unrequited attention onto some bitch until she’s so overwhelmed by it, the decision to put out is made for her.

KM nailed it.
This is what the whole love industry is about. HER…. and it is fully reinforced by one single word in every story.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unrequited

Ironically (for me at least) is the constant quoting of John 15:13 to reinforce the cost of love, as I see it as the metric that a lot of women use to measure the payment they desire.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[GrumpyParticipant]

Personally,
I believe it would have originated in the early medieval time frame along with “Chivalry” and could be properly referenced as originating as “Courtly Love”. Over the last few centuries the concept and meaning of both have been bastardized and misused to such an extent that most people do not know the actual premise or use of either.
IIRC
“Romantic Love” is the commoners/serfs/slaves imitation of “Courtly Love”. As people more learned than I have stated before, the “rules” of love change constantly solely to appease women, and force men to conform to whatever the ideal version for any particular woman at any given time.

Keymaster wrote:

every single story has some schlub pouring endless amounts of unrequited attention onto some bitch until she’s so overwhelmed by it, the decision to put out is made for her.

KM nailed it.
This is what the whole love industry is about. HER…. and it is fully reinforced by one single word in every story.
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/unrequited

Ironically (for me at least) is the constant quoting of John 15:13 to reinforce the cost of love, as I see it as the metric that a lot of women use to measure the payment the desire.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Frank V.Participant]

Wow ! So much is in this article, a great spot !

Specifically, I admire men who are controlled, confident and who fulfill their biological destiny as protectors and providers. ….

Men – trained, manly men – are necessary for a balanced society. They take on the tough ugly hard jobs women can’t or won’t do. ….

[Describes various hard and hazardous labors]

Yes, no reason to doubt her at all ! She never outright says who is doing the training and controlling and who gains. She loves trained men, men trained like a good dog to obey and serve like good pets. Controlled, by women like her. And yes, for the benefit of women like her.

Which is why I get so ticked off when feminists belittle men.

Which really means:

“Because the poor saps may rethink about how much of a rotten deal it is, especially since I have never mentioned a single Goddamn thing I might offer in return other than some pussy, and don’t expect that too often after the honeymoon !”

Hard to be more self centered than this !

The “civilized” countries of Europe looked at the approaching horde with panic because they knew their courtly, politically correct knights had no way to repulse these violent bands of men who had a simple, single goal: to conquer. In short, when the barbarians were at the gate, you had something to worry about.

Clearly this dim Dora has not bothered to even read a Wikipedia article on Chivalry ! It was nothing like what we today would consider “Politically Correct”. Ignorant, or possibly intentionally deceitful, attempt to make her view of today’s world retrofit onto a fantasy she has of “gentleman knights”.

This is history , not a cheap ass romance novel you stupid bitch !

The rest of this almost doesn’t matter. The points are clear.

1: Traditionalist Women do not fight with Feminists because they give a damn about you, they don’t want their scam of being parasites ruined !

2: Like many Tradcon Women, she is thinking only of what she can get from you, what resources she can extract, even to the point of your own life in defense of her comfort.

3: As well, you see the total lack of even a thought of what she might even consider giving back to a man in return. I don’t care what she offers on wedding night, nor the rapidly diminishing frequency of it in the coming months or years (if you are lucky), clearly it won’t be even close to worth it and she doesn’t give a damn.

At least a Whore is smart enough not to overcharge and price herself out of the market !

4: Big Red and some other Feminists are at least honest enough to hate me to my face. I don’t give a s~~~ if they don’t like me, but to be talked down to by these Tradcon women like this is insulting. I am not stupid enough to fall for this pandering garbage and neither should any self respecting MGTOW.

Be it Milo or this “World Nut Daily” Tradcon, I will say it and keep saying it:

TRADITIONALISTS ARE OUR ENEMIES, NOT OUR FRIENDS !

Feminists, in spite of their intentions, are our biggest recruiters. They have done more for MGTOW than any other group on the face of the Earth. They also have damaged our worst enemy, Traditionalism. Sure they hate us, but when the tally is added up, they actually help us, and they cannot help themselves from doing so.

TradCons are the ones who come to us, smiling and acting like our friends and hold a large dagger behind them, just waiting to sink it into our backs and drag us backwards.

Much better a MGTOW than a TradCuck. And I use that term because the rate of cheating and odds of raising some other man’s bastard are proving to be far greater than most people thought.

As far as she is concerned, she can take her “Judeo-Christian” bulls~~~ and blow it out her ass.

Frank V.

[DaveVParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Does the rage end when you start to pity the poor creatures?

I think it’s a slow process, you have to detach yourself from them, accept you can’t change their nature, but more importantly decide you are going MGTOW, live your life by your own rules, don’t harm others – but don’t accept social convention that you have to be a slave to debt, be married/have kids (certainly under the legal system we have now), and most importantly stop caring what feminist think. Leave them to their own devices, they will actually be detrimental to women in the long run, as more men go MGTOW.

yeah, get equality as you think it. yes, go to foreign lands and fight and die whilst the people who send you there aren’t as honorable as the men we send there. Yeah, do high risk construction jobs, in dirty/dusty/extreme conditions. Yeah, take on a lifetime of debt, to then be underappreciated by whoever takes care of your family. Yeah, wonder how you are going to have kids without men. Yeah, realize that working all your life sucks, being a driver, odd job man, cleaner, and bill payer is f**king stressful. Then after all that, get screwed by the family courts, who will take off you everything you earned, and deny you access to kids, and make you pay alimony until the are all 21……..oh and don’t forget, chivalry, thanks to feminism, is now truly dead, no special treatment, learn to p*ss in a urinal/standing up…………..

Feminists/women, be careful what you wish for, because you just might get it and if you get it then you just might not know what to do with it.

D. G. I. Don't. Get. Involved. (Be happy, and stress not)

[JackinovParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

you guys have misunderstood the ‘trained men’ comment. She is talking about men who have had a strong male role model who has trained them to be a manly and virtuous man. Sounds like a good thing to me

Oh no I understood what she meant regarding that comment, it’s just that her idea of a “trained man” is one that has been trained by another man to fit her idea of “chivalry” and subservience, as she mentions throughout the rest of the article.

are you a chia pet in man drag

[Manspread MansplainerParticipant]

The code of chivalry that weemen like isn’t the part about defending the church.. It’s the part that says a strong man acknowledges weekness and bows down to help the unfortunate.

Thats sexist.
Weemen are equal = goodbye chivalry.
They can thank the feminists and discuss it with thier cats.

If women ran the world = It would become the shithole you are seeing.

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Dude, red states are just as bad as blue. Blue states are gynocentric because of feminism, red states are gynocentric because of chivalry. Just two sides of the same f~~~ing bulls~~~ Susan B. Anthony coin.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

I am saying this using the same “tone” as Howard Dare…..

I recently gained a million man-points when I worshipped a woman correctly and held the door for a female, and she actually accused me of being “chivalrous”!!!

And as a man, when I’m accused of something, I think about what that something is before running my mouth. Since a woman accused me of being it, I chose to define “chivalry” in terms that a woman could understand.

The only reason I held the door open for this woman, is because I thought she was going to walk right into it and give herself a big nasty bump on the head… and we can’t have that.

I don’t like bruised peaches either – and that’s not “chivalry”.

Women don’t seem to be able to open anything correctly without a man’s help.
A jam jar ….. a conversation ….. potato chips…… nail polish…… their legs.

Women have expected me to open all of those for them.
So why would a DOOR be any different??

So ladies, please don’t call me chilvarous just because I don’t like a woman to hurt herself. Persistence, alcohol, and making sure your woman isn’t banging into any doors has worked since the beginning of time.

“CHIVARLY” —>> is when some poor shmuck has to put on his suit of armor and make sure his slutty girlfriend isn’t whoring herself out for more male attention on Match.com / Tinder / Facebook or any other dating websites.

Anonymous wrote:

I think of it as the genesis of new platforms where freedom of expression will be honored kind of like this place. God bless you, Keymaster!

We’re definitely going to need a bigger boat if we’re going to be permitting producers like Howard Dare to upload & archive his videos here, instead.

Wont’ that be terrific?

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

A quick Google search would turn up countless articles of the sexodus of men. Hundreds if not thousands of articles where everyone is scratching their heads to figure us out.

They blame video games, underachievement, the economy, education, the job market, and Bigfoot for our leaving of the game. They will place blame on anything and everything without even thinking that it could possibly be women and the pussy pandering society they have created.

They cannot fathom that the age of chivalry is dying. (And also, they don’t realize that historically, chivalry had nothing to do with women. Chivalry was how soldiers conducted themselves in battle.To have proper battle technique, that’s why the Europeans called Indians barbaric because they fought erratically and not properly, but i digress.) They do not see that women have stolen the world that men worked so hard to create and maintain. They still believe that women should be lifted high upon our shoulders and carried like a protected treasure.

The world refuses to see the damage women have done, and the preferential treatment they receive. Women receive minor punishment for grievous crimes, 2 years for the molestation of a child, and only 10 for the calculated murder of a man. Blame is to be shifted to everything but the cause of our grief. As it couldn’t possibly be the princess who is the problem.

Since time eternal men have been expected to lay down their lives immediately to save the thankless creatures from harm. We are expected to prostrate ourselves in the family court, with a smile, as all broken servants are demanded to do.

With the mockery that is the family courts and the vile nature of women which they no longer care to hide. Is it not as clear as day to why men are walking, no, running away from a society that demands so much yet gives so little.

I wait for the day when MGTOW is actually asked by the public as to why we have turned our backs. Let them hear the truth, let them cry and complain, and let them burn with the rest of our world. We are witnessing what happens when the creators no longer care about their work. Men have walked away, and they have nothing to blame but themselves.

[Eric LauderParticipant]

“Now what do you think are the dynamics behind women – gay men relationships?”

Most gay men have a relationship with women that is the same as a blue pill orbiter, only difference being that exchanges are lighter due he haven’t sexual attraction for her and by so she cannot use pussy power. However protecting women is an instinct even for gay men, and gay men have the same social conditioning of straight men towards chivalry and revering motherhood.
Good proof being gay men donating sperm like good beta cucks while “forgetting” the war that feminists and especially lesbians ALLIED WITH THE CHURCH wage against surrogacy.

“What has feminism exactly to do with gay men?”

Feminist: “gimme gimme gimme, I’m more discriminated than you!”
Stupid gay believes her.
Not all gays are stupid.

“and how do gays fit in MGTOW?”

It depends by their ideas.
My idea is that the weapon of mass destruction against feminism cannot be a gay unaware of how women are, nor even a virgin.
It’s the divorced man or the man who had a long cohabitation with a woman, especially if he’s bisexual (and by so he’s able to make real comparisons and to see a pattern that there’s in all women but lacks in men).

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[FrostByteParticipant]

Wise words
The ol’ open ended question.
This is a PUA’s trick to get a girl talking about herself and just listening. Forcing himself to hear just to stay in the conversation enough to make a reply that will keep her talking about herself. This narcissism is their weakness and it will reveal their true nature.

She will tell you about::
Wants a family – sperm jacking and false pregnancies.
Her financial woes – debt help
Values chivalry – wants you to pay for everything.
Her family – wants someone to support them
Her children – Needs a daddy

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.