Search Results for 'echo chamber'

[KeymasterKeymaster]

( Isn’t that kinda passive aggressive? )

We won’t ban you unless you give us reason to. And even then, it’s a very last resort. I was going ban someone on sight today, and actually allowed him to continue anyway. Then all he did was give us more reasons to ban him. So I should have gone with my first instinct. It really doesn’t need to come to that.

If you want your account deleted, just send a formal request to delete it and we will honor it. Just give ample time because we’re not staffed around the clock. – especially depending on where you are in the world.

We have talked about this before, but NOBODY can expect anyone to agree with them on the topics politics (and religion). They are two topics that create nothing but friction. Now if members don’t like friction, they don’t get to have a problem with an “echo chamber”.

So what is the problem exactly?
It is the “echo chamber”? or the friction??

( I’m not asking you. I’m directing the question “out there” )

IGMOW (I Go My Own Way) wrote:

other pro-Trump supporters who happened want those who are opposed to Trump……

That’s why you don’t discuss politics or religion with people.

That’s why when anyone asks, I tell them I’m voting for Monica Lewinsky. Everyone starts laughing and we have a great time.

• If I say “voting is just giving consent to being governed” I’m unpatriotic.
• If I say “GO TRUMP!” I’m a misogynist.
• If I say “I’M WITH HER!” I’m aiding and abetting a criminal.

See why no answer is the right answer?

“Monica Lewinsky for president!!”.

Wins every time.

Who I / you / they vote for is nobody’s f~~~ing business. It’s tacky to talk about it in my opinion. It’s like talking about sex in public. It’s “normal” nowadays, but it’s really kinda sick.

—–

Received your email too, Thanks. But it’s really not “agree or get muted” because the one thing that men here will consistently spit back out is ANY kind of gynocentric nonsense. It puts such a bad taste in a MGTOW’s mouth. They are highly senstitive to it and REACHED THEIR LIMITS with it. It’s one of the things that drives men here by the thousands in the first place.

Done with gynocentric stuff on TV.
Done with gynocentric stuff in media.
Done with gynocentric opinions everywhere you look.
Done with gynocentric emotional “news” anchors trying to provoke a reaction and showing cleavage instead of just delivering the f~~~ing news…..

So in that way, this is really the last place on Earth where someone can expect to shout “Go Hillary!”. (as an example)

If you really want to be deleted, I have to honor your request. It’s VERY difficult to do that seeing all your genuine contributions. But I can’t ban you this way. I’m just not built for it. You’re welcome here as long as you want to be. You don’t have to use your account for 6 months or a year or 5 years….. but deleting you means all of your posts get “anonymous” next to them. I hope you can understand how difficult that is after all your participation.

Respect.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous]

Did he say

Echo chamber???

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

Anonymous wrote:

That’s a cute spin, it is the individual, not the organization huh? You get paid for social media damage control? We have all seen all we need to see from CNN to know it is nothing more than a tool of the State.

You can keep trying to row on that boat as it sinks, most jumped ship long ago.

It starts with individuals. They then collude and do things. And who is this “We” you speak of? If this is a “We” here, then this place is a damn echo chamber consisting of nothing more than conspiracies that have little fact. The reality is people have biases and agendas, and line up, trying to pander to news. The end result is what looks like conspiracy and being a mouthpiece for certain demographics to pander to them. If these news organizations were just mouthpieces for the state (like Russian Times, which you used, is for Russia), then you wouldn’t have partisan, you would have supporting whomever is in power. Fox News is tilted Republican because that is its audience. MSNBC is tilted progressive, because that is its audience. You can choose to believe otherwise, but that is your choice.

It is entirely possible if the bulk of news sources not being to your likely is a sign you could be wrong.

The fact you ask if I get paid for social media spin, is really a sign bordering on delusional and conspiratorial reasons. No, I just waste my damn time you, talking to individuals who don’t want to listen, because I feel I want to say something of my own view in the world. The same goes for those who are in the alt-right side of things.

Anyhow, assume Trump loses, you will then go off and either become an alt-right keyboard warrior, or some other slacktivist, make noise outside the mainstream, and become relatively irrelevant. Or, what you will do next is actually organize politically, find the world doesn’t change to your likely, and then go increasingly oddball, maybe going off to shoot someone, in honor of your conspiracies. You can do either. There is also maybe you have a chance maybe you go alt-right version of Full McIntosh and start a Patreon account and make money like Anita does, pandering to some alt-right minions. Heck, maybe if you suck up enough, you can get a spot on the Trump News Network standing in sometime for Alex Jones when he goes on vacation.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

Anonymous wrote:

Come up with something that is not a half story like the Trump turning on his supporters one, or something that is not fringe nonsense that very few here would support anyhow and even fewer will take the bait on and I will respond with something other than-

<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/k6p1Ck0ab80?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

And here is something: Maybe what I write isn’t for you. And to be blunt, if everyone else here feels the same way you, this forum is a damn echo chamber of like minded individuals. What I wrote here is of valid concern, more than the rest, like your “rigged election” comment. You complain about myself being “fringe nonsense” and you do this. And engaging in this, you then go off on me about things. To be honest, your comment here is a sure sign you have a filter bubble going on, where you only want to hear what you want to hear.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

Anonymous wrote:

<iframe width=”500″ height=”281″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/k6p1Ck0ab80?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

You can ignore me or go ahead and complain to Keymaster to get myself banned. Please feel free to do either, and demand support for Trump be the top litmus test for being MGTOW. I am sorry if I am failing to make MGTOW.com an echo chamber to your liking. I can pass on your concerns to Keymaster if you like also.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant]

Anonymous wrote:

RTAmerica (Russian backed news out of D.C.)
CCTV (Chinese)

I don’t know if I would use credible for any news source as most have some sort of slant, and varying things will be off limits, but for me listening to news from outside my country as well as other’s listed here gives me the most well rounded view of everything.

What the Internet has done, has made it possible for someone to have information filtered to preferences to such a degree, they never have to see any point they find disagreeable. Things to cluster into such biases, without being aware of such biases, because one believes such is selected by free choice. So you end up in places which end up being echo chambers, and end up echoing what you want to hear, that matches one’s views, and seems to make sense. This bias adds a narrative to make sense of information, and is used to make sense of just raw information, which would just be noise. To be unaware of what is going on, is particularly dangerous.

Even if one uses Google, one will end up getting filters Google picks, based on your own personal biases:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filter_bubble

When you are seeing individuals on the Internet going about with such conviction they are right, and they end up are being seen as contradicting one another, it is because of these biases that the Internet helps entrench. Such is dangerous, but goes with the territory. Myself, I do seek to try to avoid this, and am aware of how much I also can end up getting spun with things. Let’s just say I do end up falling short on things. But I would say my attempt to do things my own way on it, does make me aware of much I don’t fit anywhere. I end up anti a lot of things, from anti-SJW to also anti alt-right, which makes me really not fit anywhere.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[FullMetalExoParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Shin wrote:

Parasite free I see where your coming from. Wouldn’t want to prove ole snake right and make this place an echo chamber. To each their own.

Snake is one of the most real people that I’ve seen here.

I have no idea who he was. He was full of s~~~ and went full retard.
One moment he says ‘dont even listen to music if it got women voice in it/avoid them 100%’ ….and month later he was dating.’He probably was just trolling/getting his anger out.

-----------

[Anonymous]

Shine wrote:

Parasite free I see where your coming from. Wouldn’t want to prove ole snake right and make this place an echo chamber. To each their own.

Snake is one of the most real people that I’ve seen here.

[ShineParticipant]

Parasite free I see where your coming from. Wouldn’t want to prove ole snake right and make this place an echo chamber. To each their own.

"Society is to blame" Denton

[RusskyParticipant]

<<>> wrote:

Russky wrote:

He’s one of our few local democrats, get used to him. I don’t mind, because I don’t want this place to turn into an echo chamber.

Sure the democrats were great up until they couldn’t convince the republicans NOT to give women the “right” to vote. My how things have changed!

Yes, those old school bigoted democrats – party that gave us KKK. Now they don’t like to reminisce those good-ole-days LOL

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[<<>>Participant]

Russky wrote:

He’s one of our few local democrats, get used to him. I don’t mind, because I don’t want this place to turn into an echo chamber.

Sure the democrats were great up until they couldn’t convince the republicans NOT to give women the “right” to vote. My how things have changed!

[MeisterParticipant]

Russky wrote:

Meister wrote:

Poster “Nathan” seems to object …

He’s one of our few local democrats, get used to him. I don’t mind, because I don’t want this place to turn into an echo chamber. I used to be democratically leaning myself 5-10 years ago. Albeit I support Trump, I don’t consider myself a republican either. I want to restore the Republic, but I hated the Bush dynasty as much as I hate Obama, and all warmongering authoritarian RINOs can suck my dick

I 100% agree.

Monk

[RusskyParticipant]

Meister wrote:

Poster “Nathan” seems to object …

He’s one of our few local democrats, get used to him. I don’t mind, because I don’t want this place to turn into an echo chamber. I used to be democratically leaning myself 5-10 years ago. Albeit I support Trump, I don’t consider myself a republican either. I want to restore the Republic, but I hated the Bush dynasty as much as I hate Obama, and all warmongering authoritarian RINOs can suck my dick

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Jim01Participant]

Jim01 wrote:

eqlife wrote:

Jim01 wrote:

Sky-O wrote:

There was a thread in another MGTOW sub forum yesterday where numerous reasons were given / proposed as to why women have sex. I didn’t post because although most of the reasons stated were true, it was shocking to see that nobody mentioned: Women want to get off too.

After reading this thread and seeing guys on this forum continually ask why a woman like her would want to be with a ‘thug’, ‘creep’, etc – One of the reasons might have been the fact that his bad boy personna was a contributing factor in her allowing herself to get off harder, longer and better than she could or would with other guys.

And i say, allowing herself, because a woman can have sex with any guy, but she decides which ones she is going to have an orgasm with.

a whiff of tuna about this post

Cut the paranoid s~~~ already. This is why I stopped posting here. The accusations of being a woman when your views don’t 100% align with this forum is f~~~ing retarded in the worst kind of way. Why do you want this place to be an echo chamber?

I don’t but I thought I would enquire and then it was explained by Sky-O in his next post

I could say to you stop being such a cry baby as it wasn’t a big deal but you clearly went into drama mode

bump

[Jim01Participant]

eqlife wrote:

Jim01 wrote:

Sky-O wrote:

There was a thread in another MGTOW sub forum yesterday where numerous reasons were given / proposed as to why women have sex. I didn’t post because although most of the reasons stated were true, it was shocking to see that nobody mentioned: Women want to get off too.

After reading this thread and seeing guys on this forum continually ask why a woman like her would want to be with a ‘thug’, ‘creep’, etc – One of the reasons might have been the fact that his bad boy personna was a contributing factor in her allowing herself to get off harder, longer and better than she could or would with other guys.

And i say, allowing herself, because a woman can have sex with any guy, but she decides which ones she is going to have an orgasm with.

a whiff of tuna about this post

Cut the paranoid s~~~ already. This is why I stopped posting here. The accusations of being a woman when your views don’t 100% align with this forum is f~~~ing retarded in the worst kind of way. Why do you want this place to be an echo chamber?

I don’t but I thought I would enquire and then it was explained by Sky-O in his next post

I could say to you stop being such a cry baby as it wasn’t a big deal but you clearly went into drama mode

[eqlifeSpectator]

Jim01 wrote:

Sky-O wrote:

There was a thread in another MGTOW sub forum yesterday where numerous reasons were given / proposed as to why women have sex. I didn’t post because although most of the reasons stated were true, it was shocking to see that nobody mentioned: Women want to get off too.

After reading this thread and seeing guys on this forum continually ask why a woman like her would want to be with a ‘thug’, ‘creep’, etc – One of the reasons might have been the fact that his bad boy personna was a contributing factor in her allowing herself to get off harder, longer and better than she could or would with other guys.

And i say, allowing herself, because a woman can have sex with any guy, but she decides which ones she is going to have an orgasm with.

a whiff of tuna about this post

Cut the paranoid s~~~ already. This is why I stopped posting here. The accusations of being a woman when your views don’t 100% align with this forum is f~~~ing retarded in the worst kind of way. Why do you want this place to be an echo chamber?

[The Missing ManSpectator]

You can only know your in the red pill mind set if you can suffer the blue pillers nonsense.

Don’t live in an echo chamber.

[BoarParticipant]

Atton wrote:

Hatred requires that you care.

Exactly, after the red pill rage is through all that is left is indifference.

Snowflake needs a tire changed? Well, she looks like a strong independent whimyn that can figure out a lug wrench.

Cupcake needs her phone bill paid? Well, somewhere there is someone hiring unskilled labor for 3rd shift.

Womanatee needs her computer fixed? Anything a man can do a whimyn can do better, so good luck with that.

When men refuse to be utilities the shaming language will kick into high gear. Unfortunately, it will be screamed in a echo chamber as its target audience has already left the plantation.

Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

[sidecarParticipant]

LightBringer wrote:

because I think it ‘may’ be okay to date or get married with very cautious outlooks somehow I’m a female traitor?

It doesn’t mean you’re a female traitor.

It does mean you’re one of those men who insists on learning his lesson the hard way, because no amount of “cautious outlook” will keep you from being burned in marriage. Once you foolishly agree to sign on th dotted lines your life is literally in the hands of others, and you cannot know their intentions ahead of time. It’s a roll of the dice, the odds are extremely against you, and the house always wins (and takes your house).

As such, while you may not be a female infiltrator or mangina or whatever other accusations are being made, you cannot actually be a MGHOW, because Going Your Own Way and getting married, even with a “cautious outlook” are mutually exclusive. That’s not an echo chamber speaking. It’s just what it is.

Bear in mind, that I personally, am not against you getting married, just as I am not against you poking out your eyes with a blunt stick. In either case I will wager any amount of money you will end up regretting it and know I will win that bet.

So go ahead and get married. Just don’t call it Going Your Own Way. Because it isn’t.

BrainPilot wrote:

But a marriage contract has many terms in it that are not determined until after it is signed. And most often, those determinations are made by a third party, over whom I have little influence, who is at best indifferent to my interests, and at worst openly hostile to them.

Exactly.

The actual terms of a marriage contract are only ever determined in divorce court.

And even when the contract is broken, the man is still subject to its terms.

Why the f~~~ would any sane, intelligent man sign up for that?

[LightBringerParticipant]

Mr. Man wrote:

LightBringHer blended in long enough to collect a respectable number of stars, but in the end she just had to let her lady bits show.

You’re a joke, someone expresses SOME DEVIANT THOUGHT and I must automatically be a female/wrong/troll etc etc?

My god guys, what is wrong with some of you?

Keymaster is legit and takes all things at face value (thus his thoughtful response) but you and others like Chaff/flare seemed legit but I say one thing and suddenly off the reservation?

This is the same infighting that femenists and SJW are known for.

Pathetic as f~~~. I had my heart torn apart by a cheating BPD girl, took the redpill, went my own way etc and because I think it ‘may’ be okay to date or get married with very cautious outlooks somehow I’m a female traitor?

The echo chamber here is getting toxic, I like how free speech it is and tremendously respect it, but these circle jerks scare me.