"Repeal the 19th"

[Governor Megachris%Participant 3584]

I’ve been hearing a lot lately about how if only women were voting, Hillary Clinton would win. If only men were, Donald Trump would.

Hilarious.

Even funnier is there’s a joke movement out there right now saying “repeal the 19th amendment”, which granted women the privile–AHEM–“right” to vote.

I was listening to Rush Limbaugh just now and he was playing an audio clip of a woman journalist who was FURIPUS over this. I can’t stop laughing.

Women today are delusional. Ask any conservative/liberal/feminist/”anti-feminist” woman today and they will ALWAYS call you a sexist if you believe women shouldn’t vote unless they have some kind of responsibility attached.

How DARE you say women should face responsibility, you sexist!

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Wait, you think it’s reasonable not to allow women to vote? What other groups of people do you believe shouldn’t be able to vote?

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

So, they want nobody to have the right to vote? They don’t even see us men as human beings.

Cause, you know, they want it “equal” and all that s~~~.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

Well, in America vote is optional, but in my country is mandatory. That’s a hell, the big mass vote in random people, just because they’ve seen them on TV.

IMHO voting should not be mandatory, and should be earned by passing in a well made exam, containing questions about economy, history, human rights (so they will understand that equals mean equals), logic and what ever people will find useful.

Having a bunch of idiots voting without analysing what they are doing is worst than live under a regimen that you aren’t allowed to vote.

[Anonymous 24]

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

Wait, you think it’s reasonable not to allow women to vote? What other groups of people do you believe shouldn’t be able to vote?

Whatever group you are affiliated with.

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

Solid wrote:

Having a bunch of idiots voting without analysing what they are doing is worst than live under a regimen that you aren’t allowed to vote.

Not if it is someone like Hitler. I have no desire to be on the receiving end of that, that kind of destruction/torture/death is just hell no, even if it means idiots are voting.

I’d rather shoot myself with a mercy killing first.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

@MGTOW-Age well, where I live we haven’t those killings, but we have lived in a dictatorial extreme right wing regimen. Only military people were allowed to vote and/or being a politician. And that wasn’t that bad, at least people have their basic needs satisfied, like having a job, food, security, medical treatment and excellent schools.

Our former president was a commie feminazi woman, she absolutely broke our country, thousands of people are dying on hospitals every day because there is no money, no medicines and almost no medics. Here we pay one of the highest taxes in the world. Our economy collapsed, things are so f~~~ed up, that we are trying to form a new nation in a separatist movement, because those “feminists” politician are so corrupt and incompetent that is suicide to continue being part of this. Possibly we will have a civil war next year.

But I completely agree, there is no one like Hitler (or Stalin, or any of his “friends”) they were cruel. I apologize for not putting my answer in a clear way.

But imagine, choose between a political correct hypocrite commie feminazi as president that don’t give a s~~~ to your country and send millions of dollars to cuba, or live under the governance of a military president, that at least love his country and have some patriotism. What would you choose ?

That’s why I’m trying to get out of here.

[PhantomParticipant 3328]

Don’t want to hijack the thread here. @solid Thanks man for sharing in detail like that. Really enjoyed reading your whole post.

Solid wrote:

at least people have their basic needs satisfied, like having a job, food, security, medical treatment and excellent schools.

That is awesome news…gives me some hope in humanity. I know Hitlary is just foaming at the damn mouth to get elected…I will sleep better once I KNOW that Trump IS President, instead of her.

Solid wrote:

But I completely agree, there is no one like Hitler (or Stalin, or any of his “friends”) they were cruel. I apologize for not putting my answer in a clear way.

Nothing to apologize for, imho. My point was, Clinton being our next president, because of us not being able to vote, was where I was coming from on it. Why I posted I would rather have idiots voting, instead of her just assuming power w/o the people having any say so in the matter.

Solid wrote:

But imagine, choose between a political correct hypocrite commie feminazi as president that don’t give a s~~~ to your country and send millions of dollars to cuba, or live under the governance of a military president, that at least love his country and have some patriotism. What would you choose ?

Well, under those circumstances, I concede, it’s a no brainer. No feminazi in power…just hell no!

Solid wrote:

That’s why I’m trying to get out of here.

Wishes you every success in that endeavor & plan!!

[NerevarParticipant 8040]

Anonymous wrote:

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

Wait, you think it’s reasonable not to allow women to vote? What other groups of people do you believe shouldn’t be able to vote?

Whatever group you are affiliated with.

Hehehe 😀

"One of the best things internet exposed is just how insane women are." - Freeman_K

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Anonymous wrote:

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

Wait, you think it’s reasonable not to allow women to vote? What other groups of people do you believe shouldn’t be able to vote?

Whatever group you are affiliated with.

That would have a huge impact on the election – the MWFYM (Men Who F~~~ed Your Mom) group has a very large membership!

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Solid wrote:

MHO voting should not be mandatory, and should be earned by passing in a well made exam, containing questions about economy, history, human rights (so they will understand that equals mean equals), logic and what ever people will find useful.

Having a bunch of idiots voting without analysing what they are doing is worst than live under a regimen that you aren’t allowed to vote.

Damn, you sound like my clone account. I’ve been foaming at the mouth everywhere lately about having voters hold civics exams before they vote. I came up with this idea after watching Mark Dice’s Monday’s man on the street videos. How have you come up with this idea?

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Nathan R. JessepParticipant 1102]

Russky wrote:

Damn, you sound like my clone account. I’ve been foaming at the mouth everywhere lately about having voters hold civics exams before they vote. I came up with this idea after watching Mark Dice’s Monday’s man on the street videos. How have you come up with this idea?

See, now this I can get on board with.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I have no problems with people who hold educated opinions as long as they know what this country was founded on, importance of constitution and civil rights, and checks and balances on the power structure, even if I don’t agree with their political inclinations. Even if they want to change all of it.
What I’m genuinely scared of – is the vast majority of sheeple who blindly vote on what MSM force feeds them, regardless of sex, race or whatever

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Here is a thing with joke movements. Due to how weird the internet is, no one knows if you are serious. Things tend to take a life on of their own. Meninist was also a jokr, but now it is picked up a slur. Poe’s Law refers to this. The whole Pepe as Nazi thing is another. Altright has been doing this awhile and it took a life on of its own picking up extremes and ruining the mucking of thevgears of the media angle.

What happens is you get ongoing a bit and then some nuts join in and take it literally and you then are made to look bad by being associated with it.

In other places you may do this, but it causes problems on the internet.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[<<>>Participant 435]

Women should not vote, it’s true for many reasons the first being that they haven’t the ability to reason properly they value security over freedom because they are weak and can not defend themselves they take whatever route is safest, this in and of itself is actually irrational. Secondly, women are pathologically altruistic they actually believe that life should and could be fair which is simply a delusion. Egalitarianism is a very dangerous social construct it is race and gender that are empirical, biological, and rational realities. This has nothing to do with superior or inferior bigotry it has all to with the reality of differences, women are better at having babies than men and Blacks are better at basketball than Asians. We owe the welfare state to giving women the vote and it is women who chose a larger government and less individual freedom to ensure the survival of their offspring. Women do not understand rationing, that less today ensures some two tomorrows from now. That an illegal alien is not the same as a legal immigrant, that male refugees of fighting age are not refugees but cowards. They also will want to spread their legs for invaders because it suits them biologically not rationally. There are some harsh realities out there brothers if we look at women and the vote across the world all we see time and time again is a welfare state within 15 years of the advent. We have seen what feminism has done to the western nuclear family, it is what brought us here, to this very forum to begin with. I wholeheartedly believe in repealing the 19th amendment and completely reinstating and reinforcing our beloved, and immaculate patriarchy and any bitch who has a problem with that can f~~~ing fight me for it. I will hold the ring ropes open and welcome her entry.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

@russky I can talk a lot about how I think like this, but instead talking, I will give just one single example.

In the elections for congressman in 2010, the most voted for candidate was Tiririca (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiririca)

Well, he was a circus clown, he got to the media after creating this song:

Just take a look on his slogans:

“It can’t get any worse, vote Tiririca”

“What does a federal congressman do? I really don’t know – but vote for me and I’ll let you know”

“If elected I promise to help all Brazilian families… especially mine”

Let’s face the real problem, he was an illiterate that never have the opportunity to study because he, since was a child, worked in a circus. A great discussion after he was elected started, the “proof” that he knows at least how to write was he wrote down his own name.

What kind of people you think that vote for this kind of guy ? Didn’t you think that should be at least one small filter, just to separate people who took the thing seriously as it should be taken from people that don’t know how much they joke will cost.

At least a congressman should know what he is doing.

We have so messed up candidates, and people vote for them using the most futile excuses, some of them they didn’t even have a government plan, and get elected.

Our former president, Dilma, get many votes because “she is a woman, just like us”, told by a lot of women. “She is a lesbian like me”, by the lesbians. “She is homosexual”, by homosexuals. “She looks for the poor and minorities”, by someone who believed in her commie speeches.

BTW, we vote using a electronic system, a 19 years old hackers showed how anyone can change the elections results remotely.

http://www.folhapolitica.org/2013/07/hacker-de-19-anos-revela-como-fraudou.html

[HitmanParticipant]

repeal the 19th..
if only it was that simple..
the genie is out of the bottle,
it aint going back in..

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Hitman wrote:

repeal the 19th..
if only it was that simple..
the genie is out of the bottle,
it aint going back in..

There’s no repealing 19th. But civics exams would circumvent the problem. I doubt many women would go out of their way to pass those. But yeah, even that would be almost impossible – they’d claim this is some elitist unconstitutional move oppressing dumb people and women. S~~~ is f~~~ed up. Idiocracy here we come

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Men gave women the vote and men could take it away again. What are women going to do, cut off the pussy and then starve in the streets?

This whole notion of “rights” is full of s~~~ from the get-go. There are no “rights” except for what people claim for themselves and are willing to fight and die for.

A man will fight another man and die at his hands, if necessary, to guarantee himself a voice in his own governance. Do you really believe women would be willing to fight men and die at their hands for the right to vote? I do not.

Therefore, women enjoy the privilege of a voice in government only by the indulgence of men. Asking if it’s moral or ethical is irrelevant. It’s a fact of our very nature.

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

It’s unbelievable that on this forum there are members who don’t want to repeal the 19th.

What is wrong with you people?

Monk

[Author]

Posts