"Repeal the 19th"

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Meister wrote:

It’s unbelievable that on this forum there are members who don’t want to repeal the 19th. What is wrong with you people?

Of course we do. But I don’t see a scenario (other than US implementing Sharia) to accomplish just that

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

Russky wrote:

Meister wrote:

It’s unbelievable that on this forum there are members who don’t want to repeal the 19th. What is wrong with you people?

Of course we do. But I don’t see a scenario (other than US implementing Sharia) to accomplish just that

Poster “Nathan” seems to object …

Once harmful ideas are introduced it is close to impossible to get rid of them before they end in disaster.

Look at how the womenfolk and manginas are now pushing an outright socialist nanny state.

This isn’t going to end well and all because they didn’t listen to the wisdom of the ages.

Monk

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Meister wrote:

Poster “Nathan” seems to object …

He’s one of our few local democrats, get used to him. I don’t mind, because I don’t want this place to turn into an echo chamber. I used to be democratically leaning myself 5-10 years ago. Albeit I support Trump, I don’t consider myself a republican either. I want to restore the Republic, but I hated the Bush dynasty as much as I hate Obama, and all warmongering authoritarian RINOs can suck my dick

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

Russky wrote:

Meister wrote:

Poster “Nathan” seems to object …

He’s one of our few local democrats, get used to him. I don’t mind, because I don’t want this place to turn into an echo chamber. I used to be democratically leaning myself 5-10 years ago. Albeit I support Trump, I don’t consider myself a republican either. I want to restore the Republic, but I hated the Bush dynasty as much as I hate Obama, and all warmongering authoritarian RINOs can suck my dick

I 100% agree.

Monk

[<<>>Participant 435]

Russky wrote:

He’s one of our few local democrats, get used to him. I don’t mind, because I don’t want this place to turn into an echo chamber.

Sure the democrats were great up until they couldn’t convince the republicans NOT to give women the “right” to vote. My how things have changed!

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Anonymous wrote:

Nathan R. Jessep wrote:

Wait, you think it’s reasonable not to allow women to vote? What other groups of people do you believe shouldn’t be able to vote?

Whatever group you are affiliated with.

He is affiliated with MGTOW though……

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

<<>> wrote:

Russky wrote:

He’s one of our few local democrats, get used to him. I don’t mind, because I don’t want this place to turn into an echo chamber.

Sure the democrats were great up until they couldn’t convince the republicans NOT to give women the “right” to vote. My how things have changed!

Yes, those old school bigoted democrats – party that gave us KKK. Now they don’t like to reminisce those good-ole-days LOL

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[AttonParticipant]

In my view the matter is quite simple no draft no vote, end of discussion end of debate. Even without women’s votes Hillary would still could still secure victory. They could still easily secure privilege by practicing a different kind of voting, lobbying that is how they extract extra power in society.
When men start lobbying for their own interests women’s power over society disappears.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

Not a big fan of drafts or lobbying. Draft is the worst kind of slavery (and completely unnecessary when we have professional military). Lobbying breeds corruption like drought breeds wildfires
Even if there was a draft for women – what good would it do? They’d make s~~~ soldiers and put everyone else in danger, but even before then they’d find a way to exempt themselves

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[<<>>Participant 435]

Russky wrote:

Yes, those old school bigoted democrats – party that gave us KKK. Now they don’t like to reminisce those good-ole-days LOL

Indeed, probably why they are so big on BLM now, they know their party actually does have some systemic racism in its past. This is the only election cycle I have really paid any attention to because only one side is completely owned. The other is full of surprises and it seems to be raining red pills all over the place.

Gnostic wrote:

He is affiliated with MGTOW though……

This is double plus good, as it should be the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

Atton wrote:

In my view the matter is quite simple no draft no vote, end of discussion end of debate. Even without women’s votes Hillary would still could still secure victory. They could still easily secure privilege by practicing a different kind of voting, lobbying that is how they extract extra power in society.
When men start lobbying for their own interests women’s power over society disappears.

Yes , no skin in the game. An awful lot of good men die because women are wearing items of clothing and accessories that they should be washing and polishing such as military fatigues, cop badges, fire(man)s boots and the list goes on and on but POTUS? I mean we are talking commander and chief here fellas . I mean it’s fine to let your children play dress up but you have to draw the line at letting them delude themselves into thinking for instance that because your 7-year-old is drowning in a suit 5 sizes too big for him that a rational adult is going start taking their thoughts on the refugee crisis seriously.

[MeisterParticipant 2093]

I am not partisan either, but the fact is that in 2016 it’s the sane people vs the insane.

And all the lunatics gather on the left side of the political spectrum.

Monk

[<<>>Participant 435]

Meister wrote:

all the lunatics gather on the left side of the political spectrum.

Agreed, sometimes you have to wonder how much of it is just virtue signaling though, no? I have sat across from a few of these people at dinner parties with a look of horrified shock when they ask me what’s wrong (if they are not too oblivious to notice) I reply that it amazes me that someone so stupid or obviously insane is allowed the use of sharp eating utensils, so which is it? I then loudly point out their lack of logic so that they may be pounced on with scathing derision by all in attendance, if no one joins in I know I am at the wrong party and leave exiting with a bit of memorable vitriol for the host/s. I’m sure it is quite obvious that I have very few friends but oh the fun we have not giving f~~~s ad infinitum.

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

There’s no way we can repeal the 19th in this day-of-age. I would like that because there are clearly, CLEARLY, women who vote for Clinton for the sole reason of her having a vagina. Forget Wikileaks, forget Benghazi and Libya and Haiti, forget her racism and her lies and James O’Keefe’s videos, her donors, her uranium deal with Russia, the Democratic voter fraud, f~~~ all of it. Her vagina matters.

F~~~ this gay country.

[<<>>Participant 435]

The Moth Attracted to the Flame wrote:

There’s no way we can repeal the 19th in this day-of-age. I would like that because there are clearly, CLEARLY, women who vote for Clinton for the sole reason of her having a vagina. Forget Wikileaks, forget Benghazi and Libya and Haiti, forget her racism and her lies and James O’Keefe’s videos, her donors, her uranium deal with Russia, the Democratic voter fraud, f~~~ all of it. Her vagina matters.

F~~~ this gay country.

The only way back is revolution or cataclysm. If ___hil LIAR ry___ is elected or coup’ed in and hurls us into an avoidable nuclear war with Russia I can see during the underground interim while we wait for winter above to pass, Patriarchy reasserting itself never to be second-guessed again. Alas we have entered the realms of speculative sci-fi ala ‘the handmaids tale’.

[Author]

Posts