So is anyone here NOT against marriage/dating?

Topic by LightBringer

LightBringer

Home Forums MGTOW Central So is anyone here NOT against marriage/dating?

Tagged: ,

This topic contains 85 replies, has 41 voices, and was last updated by Sidecar  sidecar 3 years, 4 months ago.

Viewing 5 posts - 81 through 85 (of 85 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #307118
    +1
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    So how do you go when you want to take a s~~~ with no toilet seat?

    I seat on the WC without the toilet seat.
    You have to get used to it, but it’s very easy getting used to it.
    And even my ex-partner did so, for almost 1.5 years, every time she slept in my house – that happened about 3-4 nights each month (other 3-4 nights each month I was sleeping at her home).
    And even all the girls who slept in my former apartment in Sweden did so.

    It was, in Sweden, my reaction to anti-urinal propaganda.
    After the separation, I resurrected the practice.

    When feminists will finally manage to ban the urinals, I’ll p~~~ all over the floor and the toilet seat within unisex public bathrooms.

    The funniest part is that before hearing anti-urinals propaganda I preferred the stall, I urinated standing up but within the stall. But such propaganda really p~~~ed off me.

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #307121
    +1

    Anonymous
    54

    @eric. Thanks but I dont need any pics!ha

    #307137
    BrainPilot
    BrainPilot
    Participant
    7640

    I’m not against marriage or dating for other people. Other people are free to do whatever the hell they want (none of my business really).

    But for myself, when I enter into a contract (verbal or written) I require to know all the terms, all the parties involved, all the benefits and all my obligations. I have never failed to meet my obligations under any contract I have ever signed.

    But a marriage contract has many terms in it that are not determined until after it is signed. And most often, those determinations are made by a third party, over whom I have little influence, who is at best indifferent to my interests, and at worst openly hostile to them.

    A check that I write at the grocery store or a credit card ticket that I sign are both a sort of contract wherein I agree to pay a certain amount for a certain item. A marriage contract is more like a blank check, or more accurately, like a credit card with my name on it in the hands of someone else who will decide what they are going to buy for themselves, and how much I am going to pay for it. I see no reason to willingly place my credit card in the hands of some other person.

    Under a marriage contract, I work, and someone else owns my earnings before they are ever paid to me. I only get what they choose to allow me to have. I perceive that arrangement to be indistinguishable from plantation era slavery. I work, someone else owns the benefits of that effort, and this arrangement is enforced by the government. If you see a difference that I may have overlooked, please feel free to enlighten me…

    As for dating, it seems more to me like paying cash at a garage sale for everything I need. At my age, anything I’m likely to find is used. Nothing is new. But I can change my mind and stop buying anytime I want. I can negotiate price item by item. Each person has a right to walk away from the transaction without it ever being completed. But if I get something, I pay a set amount known to me in advance and with clear terms. And once I pay, item belongs to me and I don’t have to go back and pay again and again, unless I decide I want to pay again and again.

    You can volunteer for slavery if you choose. It’s none of my business if you do.

    I will stick to paying cash at garage sales… item by item as I choose.

    Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

    #307410
    JollyMisanthrope
    JollyMisanthrope
    Participant
    3356

    I’m not against dating. I’m against marriage as it currently stands.

    The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.
    #307419
    +1
    Sidecar
    sidecar
    Participant
    35837

    because I think it ‘may’ be okay to date or get married with very cautious outlooks somehow I’m a female traitor?

    It doesn’t mean you’re a female traitor.

    It does mean you’re one of those men who insists on learning his lesson the hard way, because no amount of “cautious outlook” will keep you from being burned in marriage. Once you foolishly agree to sign on th dotted lines your life is literally in the hands of others, and you cannot know their intentions ahead of time. It’s a roll of the dice, the odds are extremely against you, and the house always wins (and takes your house).

    As such, while you may not be a female infiltrator or mangina or whatever other accusations are being made, you cannot actually be a MGHOW, because Going Your Own Way and getting married, even with a “cautious outlook” are mutually exclusive. That’s not an echo chamber speaking. It’s just what it is.

    Bear in mind, that I personally, am not against you getting married, just as I am not against you poking out your eyes with a blunt stick. In either case I will wager any amount of money you will end up regretting it and know I will win that bet.

    So go ahead and get married. Just don’t call it Going Your Own Way. Because it isn’t.

    But a marriage contract has many terms in it that are not determined until after it is signed. And most often, those determinations are made by a third party, over whom I have little influence, who is at best indifferent to my interests, and at worst openly hostile to them.

    Exactly.

    The actual terms of a marriage contract are only ever determined in divorce court.

    And even when the contract is broken, the man is still subject to its terms.

    Why the f~~~ would any sane, intelligent man sign up for that?

Viewing 5 posts - 81 through 85 (of 85 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.