Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › In Praise of Homosexuality
This topic contains 94 replies, has 20 voices, and was last updated by 
Elric Greenstone 4 years, 2 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
even the title of this post is a loaded gun ,.
WTF ? ..do i have to quote myself ? ..Hahahaha !!! ..i got ancient’s back on this s~~~ ..NO. no praise for that s~~~ ..
“In Praise of Homosexuality”? Yeah no. They get enough praise already. Only a homosexual puts on a dress and accepts an award for courage to a standing ovation and an audience of millions. When I get an Oscar for being straight, then I will put my hands together and give them the clap.
100% correct. But OP isnt interested in MGTOW, facts, and society. Hes drunk with his own personal ideologue, which lends itself to the MSM, PC, line which is in fact against MGTOW – straight, single men the liberal crowd hates.
Hes a mental midget, who thinks a “debate” consists of name calling. He thinks toe-ing the line is being pro gay, pro pedophelia, and anything “counter culture” which is in fact itself the PC liberal “culture” which puts straight, single men at the back of the bus in its perverse ideology.
Why praise men who choose a lifestyle of sucking c~~~, which is a perversion of nature, as they cant even procreate, and are diseased ridden, as admonishable?
Why put forward that you think sex with CHILDREN should be lawful, as he has in previous posts?
Why be relegated to name calling and belittling someones spiritual beliefs if they disagree with your views, even though nature, science, and society has rejected them?
Because youre drunk with your own ideolouge, irrespective of the consequences, and you have no grounds to base them on.
Resident cynic.
Why are we praising Cipher for conflating MGTOW with homosexuality when we attacked that other guy not too long ago for something similar?
I do not require any praise; save it for Mr. Turing. Homosexuals are a subset of “men going their own way” and I demonstrated that they went their own way in conditions infinitely more hostile than those that prevail today.
AncientBulls~~~, I am waiting for the reaction or citation + link. I do not like to be kept waiting.
Anonymous3“In Praise of Homosexuality”? Yeah no. They get enough praise already. Only a homosexual puts on a dress and accepts an award for courage to a standing ovation and an audience of millions. When I get an Oscar for being straight, then I will put my hands together and give them the clap.
100% correct. But OP isnt interested in MGTOW, facts, and society. Hes drunk with his own personal ideologue, which lends itself to the MSM, PC, line which is in fact against MGTOW – straight, single men the liberal crowd hates.
Hes a mental midget, who thinks a “debate” consists of name calling. He thinks toe-ing the line is being pro gay, pro pedophelia, and anything “counter culture” which is in fact itself the PC liberal “culture” which puts straight, single men at the back of the bus in its perverse ideology.
Why praise men who choose a lifestyle of sucking c~~~, which is a perversion of nature, as they cant even procreate, and are diseased ridden, as admonishable?
Why put forward that you think sex with CHILDREN should be lawful, as he has in previous posts?
Why be relegated to name calling and belittling someones spiritual beliefs if they disagree with your views, even though nature, science, and society has rejected them?
Because youre drunk with your own ideolouge, irrespective of the consequences, and you have no grounds to base them on.
“He” has had the same issues with multiple members, including me. Very female like meltdowns. One can never know, but there could be tuna involved here.
I have your back on this AW, same as hitman.
I have had my suspicions on Cipher and one other member that I’m not just going to bring up, but have displayed certain very feminine traits seemingly looking to devolve our forum into petty name calling and praising the liberal agenda.
AncientBulls~~~, did you really think that you could get one over on me? First, you cite biased sources, then you cite deceptive data, as I have demonstrated.
Youre “defense” is to:
1. Name call (i.e. ancient bull s~~~)
2. My sources are “biased”? Its the Government website for the Center for Disease Control. How much more unbiased can it be?
3. You want a reference for your promoting the legality of sex with children? You stated the age of consent should be 12 yo. I asked what other “rights” you wish to transfer to these autonomous agents, such as: the right to vote, to serve in the military, to drive, etc, and you left the thread with no reply.
You want to simply call me names and claim victory; how about adressing the issues?
– gay men make up 2% of the population but over 50% of those infected with HIV, as shown by a government website I linked.
– Gay men cant pro-create. I dont care if youre an atheist or what, is NATURE discriminating against them?
Rather than name calling and accusations of bias, why dont you adress the facts as they stand?
I await yet another name calling, mud slinging, post screaming “bias” and “prejidice” like we are accustomed to from feminists. Only it will be from you- our “praise the c~~~ suckers” and “lets have sex with children” UNIQUE mgtow member.
Cant wait.
Resident cynic.
Hes a mental midget
Cipher is as far from a mental midget as one can get. I admire his eloquence and often read his sentences twice. I visit to read more often than I comment, but he provoked a thought and not a reaction. My thought was not in sync with his but it wasn’t directed at anyone in particular. I might suggest a little less reaction and a little more thought. Most of acting is reacting but this is not the place for it. I do not concur with praising homosexuality just as I would not praise a female for being born female. That is all.
Millions of miles of railway was not laid by homosexuals, and until such a day arrives where praise of heterosexual men is put in the forefront for consideration, the concept of praising gays is enough to make me chuckle and up-chuck my lunch simultaneously. No disrespect to CH or anyone else. I won’t even disrespect the gays. When me and my penis are worshipped for merely having one, then I might share that sentiment.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.Cipher is as far from a mental midget
Lets consider the “structure” of his/her arguments:
1. Ad hominen attacks- name call.
2. Tell you, your sources are biased: I quoted a government website. He quoted a website with the word “rainbow” in its address. Which sounds more biased to you?
3. Attacks ones spiritual/relegioud beliefs.
4. Plays equivilancy- “I want to have sex with 12 yo’s, not “children”.
He argues like a woman. There is nothing sophisticated about it. Ill post on my cell and misclick a letter resulting in the word “the” as “thw” and hell tell me Im an idiot who cant spell.
He acts like a woman. Argues like a woman. Defends and praises groups that women and PC liberal groups do which are opposed to single men.
He wont adress a single fact in my argument, but will spew emotional nonsense as a reply.
Resident cynic.
Lets consider the “structure” of his/her arguments…….. He wont adress a single fact in my argument, but will spew emotional nonsense as a reply.
I hadn’t noticed and don’t care much for squabbling, but if CH is a tuna, then there is no god.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.“In Praise of Homosexuality”? Yeah no. They get enough praise already. Only a homosexual puts on a dress and accepts an award for courage to a standing ovation and an audience of millions. When I get an Oscar for being straight, then I will put my hands together and give them the clap.
100% correct. But OP isnt interested in MGTOW, facts, and society. Hes drunk with his own personal ideologue, which lends itself to the MSM, PC, line which is in fact against MGTOW – straight, single men the liberal crowd hates.
Hes a mental midget, who thinks a “debate” consists of name calling. He thinks toe-ing the line is being pro gay, pro pedophelia, and anything “counter culture” which is in fact itself the PC liberal “culture” which puts straight, single men at the back of the bus in its perverse ideology.
Why praise men who choose a lifestyle of sucking c~~~, which is a perversion of nature, as they cant even procreate, and are diseased ridden, as admonishable?
Why put forward that you think sex with CHILDREN should be lawful, as he has in previous posts?
Why be relegated to name calling and belittling someones spiritual beliefs if they disagree with your views, even though nature, science, and society has rejected them?
Because youre drunk with your own ideolouge, irrespective of the consequences, and you have no grounds to base them on.
“He” has had the same issues with multiple members, including me. Very female like meltdowns. One can never know, but there could be tuna involved here.
I have your back on this AW, same as hitman.
I have had my suspicions on Cipher and one other member that I’m not just going to bring up, but have displayed certain very feminine traits seemingly looking to devolve our forum into petty name calling and praising the liberal agenda.
I appreciate you noticing his odd behavior, and I also appreciate Hitman as well.
I only noticed his bizarre behavior in the couple of threads I personally encountered him. But Im not surprised he has more. Always toes some strange line of thought and personally attacks those who disagree with him.
As always, the general community of MGTOW makes me proud to be a member.
Resident cynic.
Now, some concluding business, AncientBulls~~~:
It seems like you are adept at posting stupid things; better that you amuse me than make me cross as you did with the above-quoted text. In your next reply, you will either cite and link the post wherein I allegedly expressed my “desire to have sex with pre-pubescent children”, or you will redact your post. If you fail to do either, I will make sure to remind others of your attempt to smear me as a paedophile in all future threads our paths cross.Argument by repetition does not cut it, AncientBulls~~~. You have not cited a single instance where I have expressed a desire to shag someone below the age of sixteen because I have not done so because I have no such desire as I am of the asexual orientation. Confucius said that the beginning of wisdom is to call things by their proper names, so I call you AncientBulls~~~ and I would wager your unfortunate mother birthed you out of her arse instead of her c~~~. You did not do as you were told, so now I will keep my word.
You dare accuse of me of paedophilia because I believe in autonomy and freedom for people of all ages.
How dare I suggest that young men can go their own way and can decide what they do with their lives!
How dare I suggest that the institution of rendering human beings as chattel for having not attained an arbitrary age is odious!Phoenix, like AncientBulls~~~, denigrates those who go their own way in directions they dislike. In fact, I cannot even cite data that the former does not like without him going apes~~~.
/forums/topic/economic-disengagement-mgtow/#post-136133
It pleases me to denigrate them because they denigrate me for alleged thought crimes.They do not go their own way. They go the way of a Semitic war god, WorldNetDaily, Fox News, and likely a televangelist or two as evidenced by their posts, white knighting, and obsession with sexual attraction, just like said deity. You seem to be big fans of this Yahweh fellow, so why not jump off a bridge and meet him?
“He” has had the same issues with multiple members, including me. Very female like meltdowns. One can never know, but there could be tuna involved here.
I have your back on this AW, same as hitman.
I have had my suspicions on Cipher and one other member that I’m not just going to bring up, but have displayed certain very feminine traits seemingly looking to devolve our forum into petty name calling and praising the liberal agenda.
You had a female meltdown in at least two threads in which I had the misfortune of addressing you.
As to any allegations of being female: I invite you to report this thread. I am willing to e-mail Keymaster a timestamped photograph of my passport if it will prove your allegations to be unfounded like so much of the hot air you put in to your posts like so many balloons.
Anonymous3I’ve never reported anything, because KM is very active on these forums.
But if my vote counts, I vote to c~~~ punt Cipher.
I’ve never reported anything, because KM is very active on these forums.
But if my vote counts, I vote to c~~~ punt Cipher.
Very well; I have reported it for you, and I just e-mailed the passport photographs. I will not be punted by the vote of detritus such as yourself. Go make your own forum and punt me in absentia because I would not grace it with my presence: quid licet Iovi, non licet bovi.
But if my vote counts, I vote to c~~~ punt Cipher.
If this were a poker game and I was the dealer,, I would have to objectively announce Cipher’s holding a full house of Aces and Kings. Dude just emailed his passport photos with a live screenshot of his computer.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.
Anonymous3But if my vote counts, I vote to c~~~ punt Cipher.
If this were a poker game and I was the dealer,, I would have to objectively announce Cipher’s holding a full house of Aces and Kings. Dude just emailed his passport photos with a live screenshot of his computer.
Well. arguendo, even eliminating the tuna option, it doesn’t even matter.
I’ll argue it’s a mangina, and can still be c~~~ punted. Even moreso with this display of childish overcompensation and arrogance.
In fact, being that this person had those photos setup and ready, and offered it…that is kind of a c~~~ playbook to fake it, infiltrate and destroy.
Cipher also promised not to talk to me again and tried pulling the silent treatment option, but that didn’t last more than a couple of days I see (like with most women, who always need to talk to you more than you to them).
As I wrote before, my vote is still c~~~ punt, if it even matters (which I know it doesn’t).
Either that, or he needs to back off this internet tough guy act, and learn to debate like a man. Snake had his meltdowns before too, but he apologized and all was cool. Cipher picks fights, keeps at it, and won’t ever back off or have contrition, instead doubling down.
If it was me, I’d be embarrassed at myself for the posts Cipher is making and the way he is acting.
Cypher wrote:
You have not cited a single instance where I have expressed a desire to shag someone below the age of sixteen because I have not done so because I have no such desire as I am of the asexual orientation
Heres where you said precisely that:
Acts between two or more consenting people should not be penalised by the state. While I favour abolishing the age of consent altogether, setting it to 12 would be a compromise with historical precedent and would be a worthy first step toward the abolition of age-discriminatory legislation.
You, in your own words. Quote sited in link below.
/forums/topic/update-on-the-whole-pedophilia-thing/page/5/
Resident cynic.
In the very same thread about pedophilia, and your ideal age of consent, you wrote:
Twelve, as was the norm in Europe before first-wave feminists and progressive trash got their hands on it.
Any more BS you want to declare?
Resident cynic.
Well. arguendo, even eliminating the tuna option, it doesn’t even matter.
I’ll argue it’s a mangina, and can still be c~~~ punted.Yeah I was gonna add that. Having a penis doesn’t mean free admission. We booted a few dicks in the past. But c’mon!! when your opponent makes a good move in Chess, you say “GOOD move”. AT LEAST nobody gets to call him “tuna” or “t~~~tt” anymore. And MyCocaine (above) gets a consolation prize too. He called it.
In fact, being that this person had those photos setup and ready, and offered it…that is kind of a c~~~ playbook to fake it, infiltrate and destroy.
No man. the photo was a live shot of this thread on his monitor with his passport which he laid out on the keyboard solely for this purpose. It wasn’t a scan he kept in a folder from 2 years ago,
As I wrote before, my vote is still c~~~ punt, if it even matters (which I know it doesn’t).
It DOES matter. But its’ more than this to be booted. Typing the words “Im a woman” will get you booted. Overly criticizing a race or religion will get you booted. But you could tell me “F~~~ you you motherf~~~ing c~~~~~~~~~ sperm-gargler Keymaster ” and I wouldn’t even boot you for that.
Disrespect what a member types – no problem.
Disrespect the member – a bit of a problem.
Waste our members time for your own amusement and to generate attention – BIG problem.You get me.
If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.D- for effort, I won’t flunk you, not just yet. I am against locking people in cages for consensual activities in general, including one who shags a 12 year old with his or her permission. The bar I set was whether I expressed a desire to shag someone under sixteen i.e. my state’s age of consent, and the below post does not meet the criteria.
It is like accusing someone of wanting to snort cocaine if he expresses a desire to end the odious “war on drugs” – it is a non-sequitor. Try again; it might be awhile as I never expressed a desire to shag anyone under the age of sixteen because I do not particularly wish to shag anyone and I am not in the custom of expressing a desire to perform unlawful sexual acts.
Acts between two or more consenting people should not be penalised by the state. While I favour abolishing the age of consent altogether, setting it to 12 would be a compromise with historical precedent and would be a worthy first step toward the abolition of age-discriminatory legislation.
You, in your own words. Quote sited in link below.
WW2 veterans deserve praise.
This s~~~ doesn’t.
Firefighters deserve praise etc.Point is, sexual wants/needs is nothing special or something to be praised.
-----------
I would like to quote my posts in full so that people may view them. As I know Phoenix would accuse me again of using the black magic known as “numbers”, I will demonstrate how to quote specific posts:
[ quote=###### ] (post content) [ /quote ]
I am not only in favour of two or more consenting adults doing as they please, but I am in favour of two ore more consenting people doing as they please insomuch as they do not violate the property rights of others.
To set an arbitrary date where one may be imprisoned for doing something the day before, yet not imprisoned for the exact same act the day after, is absurd, as is the wholesale disenfranchisement of young people.
When the large prey upon the small in nature, it is predation, but in civilisation, it is intergenerational relations. Violence against young people is legitimised, and earning a livelihood and learning vocational skills are prohibited on account of the daily imprisonment in government schools that beget illiteracy and innumeracy. Winston Churchill expressed a sympathy with the incarcerated on account of his sentence to various public schools. The most odious predation of all is when the large borrow in the name of the small, call it a “national debt” or “social security”, and expect the latter to pay it off.
Twelve, as was the norm in Europe before first-wave feminists and progressive trash got their hands on it.
morning cipher , pardon my asking , but what was the age of consent in 1275 ..that’s 740 YEARS AGO ! how old was the age of consent then ?
In the very same thread about pedophilia, and your ideal age of consent, you wrote:
Twelve, as was the norm in Europe before first-wave feminists and progressive trash got their hands on it.
Any more BS you want to declare?
WW2 veterans deserve praise.
This s~~~ doesntI agree completely that AncientBulls~~~’s and Phoenix the Imbecile’s posts are entirely unworthy of praise.
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
