Search Results for 'custom signature'

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant]

I would agree with all of this if we changed the words “WOMEN” and “WOMAN” to adult female Human Beings and being..

This would be more close to their way of shaming..A real woman would act more like the man she wishes to be equal to..

A real woman would become a teammate instead of an opponent!

This site as a whole should use the term female human being..

My reasoning is that No one could say we are hating or even saying anything bad about Women…

If MGTOW.com is attacked it will be attacked as a woman hating group… I do not hate women or females
but If they can define a real man or a good man then it stands to reason and logic we should be able to define
what a real woman is or what a good woman is..

once defined we must differentiate their actions from the actions of most of the female populous..

read my custom signature as this is what I believe..

we talk about what a woman should do, and why.

We talk about how and why what she really does is different,

yet we won’t shame her back with the same tactics..

Females and feminist are less than real women..

stop attacking the qualities we would really admire
if shown by a female…

If you believe they are all the same just refuse to call any female a woman.

All The Females Are Undeniably Like That..females are ATFAULT not those who have the qualities we would admire if actually observed in a female human being..Those I would consider REAL WOMEN and I will not talk bad about them..

When faced with the NAWALT statement correct it with what my custom signature says and deny ever having said anything bad about any women..

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

The FBI Hand Behind Russia-Gate
Ray McGovern
The Unz Review
January 11, 2018

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington. He was an Army and CIA intelligence analyst for 30 years; prepared and briefed the President’s Daily Brief for Nixon, Ford, and Reagan; and is co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS)

Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton in the third presidential debate in 2016, during which Clinton called Trump Vladimir Putin’s “puppet.

Russia-gate is becoming FBI-gate, thanks to the official release of unguarded text messages between loose-lipped FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok and his garrulous girlfriend, FBI lawyer Lisa Page. (Ten illustrative texts from their exchange appear at the end of this article.)

Despite his former job as chief of the FBI’s counterintelligence section, Strzok had the naive notion that texting on FBI phones could not be traced. Strzok must have slept through “Surity 101.” Or perhaps he was busy texting during that class. Girlfriend Page cannot be happy at being misled by his assurance that using office phones would be a secure way to conduct their affair(s).

It would have been unfortunate enough for Strzok and Page to have their adolescent-sounding texts merely exposed, revealing the reckless abandon of star-crossed lovers hiding (they thought) secrets from cuckolded spouses, office colleagues, and the rest of us. However, for the never-Trump plotters in the FBI, the official release of just a fraction (375) of almost 10,000 messages does incalculably more damage than that.

We suddenly have documentary proof that key elements of the U.S. intelligence community were trying to short-circuit the U.S. democratic process. And that puts in a new and dark context the year-long promotion of Russia-gate. It now appears that it was not the Russians trying to rig the outcome of the U.S. election, but leading officials of the U.S. intelligence community, shadowy characters sometimes called the Deep State.

More of the Strzok-Page texting dialogue is expected to be released. And the Department of Justice Inspector General reportedly has additional damaging texts from others on the team that Special Counsel Robert Mueller selected to help him investigate Russia-gate.

Besides forcing the removal of Strzok and Page, the text exposures also sounded the death knell for the career of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, in whose office some of the plotting took place and who has already announced his plans to retire soon.

But the main casualty is the FBI’s 18-month campaign to sabotage candidate-and-now-President Donald Trump by using the Obama administration’s Russia-gate intelligence “assessment,” electronic surveillance of dubious legality, and a salacious dossier that could never pass the smell test, while at the same time using equally dubious techniques to immunize Hillary Clinton and her closest advisers from crimes that include lying to the FBI and endangering secrets.

Ironically, the Strzok-Page texts provide something that the Russia-gate investigation has been sorely lacking: first-hand evidence of both corrupt intent and action. After months of breathless searching for “evidence” of Russian-Trump collusion designed to put Trump in the White House, what now exists is actual evidence that senior officials of the Obama administration colluded to keep Trump out of the White House – proof of what old-time gumshoes used to call “means, motive and opportunity.”

Even more unfortunately for Russia-gate enthusiasts, the FBI lovers’ correspondence provides factual evidence exposing much of the made-up “Resistance” narrative – the contrived storyline that The New York Times and much of the rest of the U.S. mainstream media deemed fit to print with little skepticism and few if any caveats, a scenario about brilliantly devious Russians that not only lacks actual evidence – relying on unverified hearsay and rumor – but doesn’t make sense on its face.

The Russia-gate narrative always hinged on the preposterous notion that Russian President Vladimir Putin foresaw years ago what no American political analyst considered even possible, the political ascendancy of Donald Trump. According to the narrative, the fortune-telling Putin then risked creating even worse tensions with a nuclear-armed America that would – by all odds – have been led by a vengeful President Hillary Clinton.

Besides this wildly improbable storyline, there were flat denials from WikiLeaks, which distributed the supposedly “hacked” Democratic emails, that the information came from Russia – and there was the curious inability of the National Security Agency to use its immense powers to supply any technical evidence to support the Russia-hack scenario.

The Trump Shock

But the shock of Trump’s election and the decision of many never-Trumpers to cast their lot with the Resistance led to a situation in which any prudent skepticism or demand for evidence was swept aside.

So, on Jan. 6, 2017, President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper released an evidence-free report that he said was compiled by “hand-picked” analysts from the CIA, FBI and NSA, offering an “assessment” that Russia and President Putin were behind the release of the Democratic emails in a plot to help Trump win the presidency.

Despite the extraordinary gravity of the charge, even New York Times correspondent Scott Shane noted that proof was lacking. He wrote at the time: “What is missing from the [the Jan. 6] public report is what many Americans most eagerly anticipated: hard evidence to back up the agencies’ claims that the Russian government engineered the election attack. … Instead, the message from the agencies essentially amounts to ‘trust us.’”

But the “assessment” served a useful purpose for the never-Trumpers: it applied an official imprimatur on the case for delegitimizing Trump’s election and even raised the long-shot hope that the Electoral College might reverse the outcome and possibly install a compromise candidate, such as former Secretary of State Colin Powell, in the White House. Though the Powell ploy fizzled, the hope of somehow removing Trump from office continued to bubble, fueled by the growing hysteria around Russia-gate.

Virtually all skepticism about the evidence-free “assessment” was banned. For months, the Times and other newspapers of record repeated the lie that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies had concurred in the conclusion about the Russian “hack.” Even when that falsehood was belatedly acknowledged, the major news outlets just shifted the phrasing slightly to say that U.S. intelligence agencies had reached the Russian “hack” conclusion. Shane’s blunt initial recognition about the lack of proof disappeared from the mainstream media’s approved narrative of Russia-gate.

Doubts about the Russian “hack” or dissident suggestions that what we were witnessing was a “soft coup” were scoffed at by leading media commentators. Other warnings from veteran U.S. intelligence professionals about the weaknesses of the Russia-gate narrative and the danger of letting politicized intelligence overturn a constitutional election were also brushed aside in pursuit of the goal of removing Trump from the White House.

It didn’t even seem to matter when new Russia-gate disclosures conflicted with the original narrative that Putin had somehow set Trump up as a Manchurian candidate. All normal journalistic skepticism was jettisoned. It was as if the Russia-gate advocates started with the conclusion that Trump must go and then made the facts fit into that mold, but anyone who noted the violations of normal investigative procedures was dismissed as a “Trump enabler” or a “Moscow stooge.”

The Text Evidence

But then came the FBI text messages, providing documentary evivdence that key FBI officials involved in the Russia-gate investigation were indeed deeply biased and out to get Trump, adding hard proof to Trump’s longstanding lament that he was the subject of a “witch hunt.”

Justified or not, Trump’s feeling of vindication could hardly be more dangerous — particularly at a time when the most urgent need is to drain some testosterone from the self-styled Stable-Genius-in-Chief and his martinet generals.

On the home front, Trump, his wealthy friends, and like-thinkers in Congress may now feel they have an even wider carte blanche to visit untold misery on the poor, the widow, the stranger and other vulnerable humans. That was always an underlying danger of the Resistance’s strategy to seize on whatever weapons were available – no matter how reckless or unfair – to “get Trump.”

Beyond that, Russia-gate has become so central to the Washington establishment’s storyline that there appears to be no room for second-thoughts or turning back. The momentum is such that some Democrats and the media never-Trumpers can’t stop stoking the smoke of Russia-gate and holding out hope against hope that it will somehow justify Trump’s impeachment.

Yet, the sordid process of using legal/investigative means to settle political scores further compromises the principle of the “rule of law” and integrity of journalism in the eyes of many Americans. After a year of Russia-gate, the “rule of law” and “pursuit of truth” appear to have been reduced to high-falutin’ phrases for political score-setttling, a process besmirched by Republicans in earlier pursuits of Democrats and now appearing to be a bipartisan method for punishing political rivals regardless of the lack of evidence.

Strzok and Page

Peter Strzok (pronounced “struck”) has an interesting pedigree with multiple tasks regarding both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump. As the FBI’s chief of counterespionage during the investigation into then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a personal email server for classified information, Strzok reportedly changed the words “grossly negligent” (which could have triggered legal prosecution) to the far less serious “extremely careless” in FBI Director James Comey’s depiction of Clinton’s actions. This semantic shift cleared the way for Comey to conclude just 20 days before the Democratic National Convention began in July 2016, that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring charges against Mrs. Clinton.

Then, as Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division, Strzok led the FBI’s investigation into alleged Russian interference in the U.S. election of 2016. It is a safe bet that he took a strong hand in hand-picking the FBI contingent of analysts that joined “hand-picked” counterparts from CIA and NSA in preparing the evidence-free, Jan. 6, 2017 assessment accusing Russian President Vladimir Putin of interfering in the election of 2016. (Although accepted in Establishment groupthink as revealed truth, that poor excuse for analysis reflected the apogee of intelligence politicization — rivaled only by the fraudulent intelligence on “weapons of mass destruction“ in Iraq 15 years ago.)

In June and July 2017 Strzok was the top FBI official working on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible links between the Trump campaign and Russia, but was taken off that job when the Justice Department IG learned of the Strzok-Page text-message exchange and told Mueller.

There is no little irony in the fact that what did in the FBI sweathearts was their visceral disdain for Mr. Trump, their cheerleading-cum-kid-gloves treatment of Mrs. Clinton and her associates, their 1950-ish, James Clapperesque attitude toward Russians as “almost genetically driven” to evil, and their (Strzok/Page) elitist conviction that they know far better what is good for the country than regular American citizens, including those “deplorables” whom Clinton said made up half of Trump’s supporters.

But Strzok/Page had no idea that their hubris, elitism and scheming would be revealed in so tangible a way. Worst of all for them, the very thing that Strzok, in particular, worked so hard to achieve — the sabotaging of Trump and immunization of Mrs. Clinton and her closest advisers is now coming apart at the seams.

Congress: Oversee? or Overlook?

At this point, the $64 question is whether the various congressional oversight committees will remain ensconced in their customarily cozy role as “overlook” committees, or whether they will have the courage to attempt to carry out their Constitutional duty.

The latter course would mean confronting a powerful Deep State and its large toolbox of well-practiced retaliatory techniques, including J. Edgar Hoover-style blackmail on steroids, enabled by electronic surveillance of just about everything and everyone. Yes, today’s technology permits blanket collection, and “Collect Everything” has become the motto.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, with almost four decades of membership in the House and Senate, openly warned incoming President Trump in January 2017 against criticizing the U.S. intelligence community because U.S. intelligence officials have “six ways from Sunday to get back at you” if you are “dumb” enough to take them on.

Thanks to the almost 10,000 text messages between Strzok and Page, only a small fraction of which were given to Congress four weeks ago, there is now real evidentiary meat on the bones of the suspicions that there indeed was a “deep-state coup” to “correct” the outcome of the 2016 election. We now know that the supposedly apolitical FBI officials had huge political axes to grind.

The Strzok-Page exchanges drip with disdain for Trump and those deemed his smelly deplorable supporters. In one text message, Strzok expressed visceral contempt for those working-class Trump voters, writing on Aug. 26, 2016, “Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support. … it’s scary real down here.”

The texts even show Strzok warning of the need for an “insurance policy” to thwart Trump on the off-chance that his poll numbers closed in on those of Mrs. Clinton.

An Aug. 6, 2016 text message, for example, shows Page giving her knight in shining armor strong affirmation: “Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace [Trump].” That text to Strzok includes a link to a David Brooks column in The New York Times, in which Brooks concludes with the clarion call: “There comes a time when neutrality and laying low become dishonorable. If you’re not in revolt, you’re in cahoots. When this period and your name are mentioned, decades hence, your grandkids will look away in shame.”

Another text message shows that other senior government officials – alarmed at the possibility of a Trump presidency – joined the discussion. In an apparent reference to an August 2016 meeting with FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Strzok wrote to Page on Aug. 15, 2016, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk.” Strzok added, “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event that you die before you’re 40.”

Insurance Policy?

Senate Judiciary Committee chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, says he will ask Strzok to explain the “insurance policy” when he calls him to testify. What seems already clear is that the celebrated “Steele Dossier” was part of the “insurance,” as was the evidence-less legend that Russia hacked the DNC’s and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails and gave them to WikiLeaks.

If congressional investigators have been paying attention, they already know what former weapons inspector Scott Ritter shared with Veteran intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) colleagues this week; namely, that Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson, who commissioned the Russia dossier using Democratic Party money, said he reached out to Steele after June 17, just three days before Steele’s first report was published, drawing on seven sources.

“There is a snowball’s chance in hell that this is raw intelligence gathered by Steele; rather he seems to have drawn on a single ‘trusted intermediary’ to gather unsubstantiated rumor already in existence.”

Another VIPS colleague, Phil Giraldi, writing out of his own experience in private sector consulting, added: “The fact that you do not control your sources frequently means that they will feed you what they think you want to hear. Since they are only doing it for money, the more lurid the details the better, as it increases the apparent value of the information.

The private security firm in turn, which is also doing it for the money, will pass on the stories and even embroider them to keep the client happy and to encourage him to come back for more. When I read the Steele dossier it looked awfully familiar to me, like the scores of similar reports I had seen which combined bulls~~~ with enough credible information to make the whole product look respectable.”

It is now widely known that the Democrats ponied up the “insurance premiums,” so to speak, for former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele’s “dossier” of lurid — but largely unproven — “intelligence” on Trump and the Russians. If, as many have concluded, the dossier was used to help justify a FISA warrant to snoop on the Trump campaign, those involved will be in deep kimchi, if congressional overseers do their job.

How, you might ask, could Strzok and associates undertake these extra-legal steps with such blithe disregard for the possible consequences should they be caught? The answer is easy; Mrs. Clinton was a shoo-in, remember? This was just extra insurance with no expectation of any “death benefit” ever coming into play — save for Trump’s electoral demise in November 2016.

The attitude seemed to be that, if abuse of the FISA law should eventually be discovered — there would be little interest in a serious investigation by the editors of The New York Times and other anti-Trump publications and whatever troubles remained could be handled by President Hillary Clinton.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, who chairs the Judiciary Subcommittee of Judiciary on Crime and Terrorism, joined Sen. Grassley in signing the letter referring Christopher Steele to the Justice Department to investigate what appear to be false statements about the dossier. In signing, Graham noted the “many stop signs the Department of Justice ignored in its use of the dossier.”

The signature of committee ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, however, was missing — an early sign that a highly partisan battle royale is in the offing. On Tuesday, Feinstein unilaterally released a voluminous transcript of Glenn Simpson’s earlier testimony and, as though on cue, Establishment pundits portrayed Steele as a good source and Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson as a victim.

The Donnybrook is now underway; the outcome uncertain.

Ray McGovern
http://raymcgovern.com/

+++++++++++++

Sample text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, released to Congress and the media on December 13, 2016

++++++++++++++

03/04/2016

Strzok – God Hillary should win. 100,000,000-0.

Page – I know

++++++++++++

04/02/2016

Page – So look, you say we text on that phone when we talk about Hillary because it can’t be traced, you were just venting, bc you feel bad that you’re gone so much but that can’t be helped right now.

++++++++++

07/08/2016

Strzok – And meanwhile, we have Black Lives Matter protestors, right now, chanting “no justice no peace” around DoJ and the White House…

Page – That’s awful.

+++++++++

07/14/2016

Page – Have you read this? It’s really frightening. For Whites Sensing Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance http://nyti/ms/ 29WCu5!

Strzok – I have not. But I think it’s clear he’s capturing all the white, poor voters who the mainstream republicans abandoned in all but name in the quest for the almighty $$$

Page – Yeah, it’s not good.

Strzok – Poll Finds Emails Weighing on Hillary Clinton, Now Tied With Donald Trump http://nyti.ms/29RV5gf

Page – It is

+++++++++++++

07/26/2016

Strzok – And hey. Congrats on a woman nominated for President in a major party! About damn time! Many many more returns of the day!!

Page – That’s cute. Thanks

++++++++++

08/06/2016

Page – Jesus. You should read this. And Trump should go f himself. Moment in Convention Glare Shakes Up Khans American Life http://nyti.ms/2aHulE0

Strzok – God that’s a great article. Thanks for sharing. And F TRUMP.

++++++++

08/06/2016

Page – And maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace. To that end comma, read this:

Page – Trump Enablers Will Finally Have to Take A Stand http://nyti.ms/2aFakry

Strzok – Thanks. It’s absolutely true that we’re both very fortunate. And of course I’ll try and approach it that way. I just know it will be tough at times. I can protect our country at many levels, not sure if that helps

++++++++++++

08/09/2016

Page – He’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!

Strzok – OMG did you hear what Trump just said?

+++++++++++

08/26/2016

Strzok – Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support…

Page – Yep. Out to lunch with (redacted) We both hate everyone and everything.

Page – Just riffing on the hot mess that is our country.

Strzok – Yeah…it’s scary real down here

+++++++++

10/20/2016

Strzok: I am riled up. Trump is a f***ing idiot, is unable to provide a coherent answer.

Strzok – I CAN’T PULL AWAY, WHAT THE F**K HAPPENED TO OUR COUNTRY (redacted)??!?!

Page– I don’t know. But we’ll get it back. We’re America. We rock.

Strzok– Donald just said “bad hombres”

Strzok– Trump just said what the FBI did is disgraceful.

END

Citation
[1] http://www.unz.com/article/the-fbi-hand-behind-russia-gate/

[Blood AxeParticipant]

This alien topic reminds me of a forums custom signature that used to be on here. I can’t remember who’s it was or if they’re still here, but it went like this. “I’ve never f~~~ed an alien, but I’ve f~~~ed a illegal alien”. It always made me laugh.

Back off Barbie!

[MGTOW_MikeParticipant]

Our MGTOW Hobbit friend here, decided to keep the ring and pawn it off:

Before marriage:

After marriage:

DanceMyOwnWay wrote:

tranquillity to no longer dealing with the stress, drama and bs that women create.

As stated in my custom signature.

A tranquil mind is neither happy nor sad, it is uninfluenced by external conditions.

[UltimaThuleParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Carnage wrote:

Maybe precious metal are the wrong horse, but I will bet on it anyway.

You can’t mold and pour Bitcoins into tangible hardware or electronics, the intrinsic value is 0, useless to all manufacturing.

Bitcoin is a permissionless, censorship-free, global digital ledger secured by vast reserves of computing power (it uses more power than Nigeria or Ireland). It is the oldest cryptocurrency and has weathered many crises and survived them all in a stride. It has high-quality developers and it is very secure. Bitcoin has been hacked exactly once in its infancy, in 2010. Those transactions were forgotten and the chain was hard forked from a block before the hack. Almost nine years of operation without a major incident with a current market capitalization of over 130 billion USD.

Bitcoin is independent of any particular government or other central authority. China banned Bitcoin exchanges in its territory and the Bitcoin price took a hit but recovered rapidly. Some nations, such as Japan, are very Bitcoin friendly whereas some are not. Shutting down Bitcoin would require coordination by most of the 200 governments on Earth.

If you want to cross borders carrying an arbitrary amount of money, all you need to do is remember a string of 20 words from which you can generate a wallet. Try walking through customs with half a million dollars in bank notes in your bag. You can’t buy a very large amount of bitcoins anonymously and all transactions in the blockchain are public. But you can easily exchange your bitcoins into a privacy oriented cryptocurrency (that uses ring signatures, for example) on an exchange and then transfer the funds into another address using a fully private transfer. Then you can easily go back to bitcoin small amounts at a time if you need to. There are Bitcoin vending machines in most large cities that allow you to exchange bitcoins into fiat or vice versa. You can print the private keys (encrypted with a simple, easy to remember password) to the addresses where you hold your money on a paper and keep the paper in a stash somewhere if you prefer a paper wallet. Or you can keep your wallets on a phone without a SIM card and use public WiFi’s only. If you worry about your phone (the device itself) being tracked, you can keep changing the devices as long as you remember to copy the wallet files onto the new device.

Gentlemen, as mgtows, cryptocurrencies are your friend. Should you ever fall victim to the worst excesses of family court or something and need to disappear, cryptocurrencies are your #1 tool when it comes to money.

[bladeParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Dumb question : How do i put a signature at the end of my reply like you have ?

Go into your profile and edit forums custom signature .

Like star is top right corner . When people hit your star it increases the number beneath your name .

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Anonymous]

Everyone is a slave to one degree or another.

Your employer (if you have one), your customers (if you have them), daddy government, etc..

The best you can do is cut out the masters you can.
Don’t sign a marriage contract.
Do not coha…
Ah, f~~~-it read Old Bills signature.

[Sky-☯️Participant]

Porn star chicks might still be relevant in the sense that they can sign deals with the manufacturers of sex robots for signature series sex-bots.

Like, if a guy is into a certain porn star, having there be an exact replica model of that slut.

Programmed too in terms of actual audio (her voice) and be designed with her exact measurements.

So, like if they wanted to make a Karlee Grey series robot (or Aubrey Addams, Romi Rain, Taryn Thomas, Edyn Blair, Rachel Starr, Abigail Mac, Kendall Kayden, Mia Malkova, Casey Calvert, Riley Reid, Danica Dillon, Tasha Reign, etc, etc)

It could be done with the outside being just as realistic as like the recreations in wax museum. With custom audio preprogrammed with the actual porn star’s voice. Thousands of responses, etc. And even have options to select from based on prior scenes that porn star has done. Like ‘Select option 24b for Riley’s scene from Anal Whores Vol XII’

Etc, etc

The possibilities are endless.

[MGTOW_MikeParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Modern women are like chickens, they don’t think, and when you’re dead in the water, they’ll eat the eyes out of your head!

I posted the chicken video, above, before noticing your custom signature. The funny thing, is that this chicken can sing better than most female singers and is more popular.

A tranquil mind is neither happy nor sad, it is uninfluenced by external conditions.

after doing a lot of reading in the forums & participating I decided to do a little more intro.First, I say ” I aint got nothing for ya ” b/c that is my mindset toward the so-called women of today. I was raised by a narcissistic, chronically depressed, alcoholic woman. Dad left early behind some infidelity on mom’s part. i was about 5. My sister 3. Mom would often dissappear for days leaving my sister & I alone with a blind grandmother who was pretty much confined to her rocking chair. mom was a bar drinker & I was the kid you would see sitting at a table drinking orange soda & eating Wise potato chips while the boys would try to pick up mom.Mom was what as known as a milf today. at about the age of !3 grandma died. mom ( literally ) abandon the house ( gave it away ) & we moved into a cold water flat above a bar. i carried a thousand tons of shame which was added to daily, lived in a type of terror which is indescribable,developed a nervous cough & bit my nails to the quick. mom would often scream at me drunk ” Be a man. When you going to be a man? ” i quickly found alcohol & became alcoholic after my first drink. At !9 I got a DWI & the judge took my license away & said I could not get another one until I was 21. I was forced back to mom’s & finally in a rage I threw a coffee cup against the refrigerator & stormed out & joined the Navy. ( my first act of real rebellion ) needless to say I was your typical drunken sailor while in port, Having said that I had a high level job as a radar tecnicion on F-4 J’s. Served aboard 2 carriers in the Gulf of Tonkin during the Viet Nam. i was well respected among my crew & was good at my job. Yes! I’m an old guy. it took a long time to get from there to here,but I had a sort of awakening just before I turned 40. i kept my own counsel & was shown mgtow by a fellow vet. theres a lot more to this,but thats enough for now. I do want to say my dad proved to be areal good man. he stepped into my life when I needed him most & helped me out. i, also want to add that this year is 30 yrs. without alcohol or drugs of any kind in my system. finally, my custom signature is what I would say to female overnight guests

[Anonymous]

Some more her, 2 years ago
/forums/topic/levels-of-mgtow/

Anonymous wrote:

A question I have though is how some members have a quote under their posts. I just copy/paste my Favorite Red Pill most of the time.

Edit Profile, look for “Forums Custom Signature”

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

Oh damn, the original post here is quite accurate.

It is, but don’t you think it’s fishy that a self-proclaimed “overlord” would use “Flagellis Et Fustibus Acriter Verberare Uxorem” as it’s custom signature?

Look it up on Google translate.

That’s not an “overlord” complaining about bullying.
That’s a position of weakness.

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

I didn’t know about the other thread.

Barely anyone did. It lasted about 30 seconds. It was addressed to me too – as “the solution” but instead of posting it here, it thought grand-standing would be fun.

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

The intent to oppress women seems to be some sort of MRA extremism.

….or an attempt to color MGTOW as “extremists”.
It can go over to controllingwomen-dot-com for that.

Needs to still brush up on MGTOW basics.

We had another Hillary Clitlicker sign up today using Hillary as the avatar and and a great big black “FEMINISM” as the poster image. As black as the hole in her chest.

Her bio? “Oh s~~~. I’m probably gonna get banned”.

Canned . . . . tuna. + a little mayo. Yummy.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous]

I like your Bike, and your custom signature.

Happy Motoring!

[Savage WillParticipant]

Learning to cook has cut down my monthly costs by a decent margin.
BTW like your forums custom signature

Don't fucking tell me it's nighttime when the sun is clearly shining in the sky.

I wrote about robotics a few days ago here. Just saw this article below about employee-less banks.

Bank of America opens branches without employees
(http://www.thestar.com.my/tech/tech-news/2017/02/08/bank-of-america-opens-branches-without-employees/)

In an unprecedented effort to screw over both staff and customers at the same time, Bank of America Corp has opened three completely automated branches over the past month, where desperate customers can use ATM’s and have video conferences with bored employees hiding at other branches, according to spokeswoman Anne Pace – all for fun and profit. Or else – what would be the point – right?

One of the new ‘I win – you lose’ self-serve banks

New branches are typically smaller, employ more technology, and are aimed at selling mortgages, credit cards and auto loans rather than simple transactions such as cashing cheques.

Did I also mention it would be much easier for a victim customer if they went naked cashless?

Pace said there is one completely automated branch in Minneapolis and one in Denver, both of which are relatively new markets for the bank’s consumer business. They are about a quarter of the size of a typical branch.

And what was the main reason behind this?

A study released by the National Employment Law Project (NELP) in 2015 found that 30.4% of the 1.7 million retail banking employees across the country — more than 500,000 workers — are paid less than $15 an hour. Nearly three-quarters of low-wage bank workers are bank tellers.

The introduction and proliferation of automated teller machines n the 1970’s helped put the brakes on frontline staff wages, leading to a 1% growth over the next decade. As Timothy Noah noted for Slate in 2010, banks tellers earn “slightly less than [they] did in 1970,” putting the job at the center of wage stagnation that has become common-place throughout the middle class, especially within the context of expectations of higher productivity.

By shifting traditional banking services toward automation, low-wage bank workers now become the frontline for pushing financial products on to customers in an effort to increase profits. The pressure of sales quotas imposed by management and executives at the top keeps low-wage bank workers under more scrutiny than ever before.

Customer service employees in retail banks must not only attempt to hook patrons onto core retail banking services like checking and savings accounts, but must also resort to hawking mortgages and credit cards in ways CBB organizers say can be predatory. These staff risk termination if they fail to meet quotas for such products.

A 2013 Los Angeles Times investigation reported that the pressure of sales goals, which increase U.S retail banks’ profits, has led some bank workers to commit fraud, forging signatures, opening secret checking accounts with fees attached, or even credit lines for customers in order to keep up with their sales goals. This has led to lawsuits from customers and even cities decrying the rigid and unfair sales culture fostered by the banking industry. When these practices become public, banks fire employees and managers in alleged attempts to uphold ethical finance.

But as Khalid Taha, one of the first Committee members in California, currently employed at Wells Fargo in San Diego, describes it, the “impossible” sales goals come from the top and workers ultimately have no other option. “They fire the entry level employees which is us, but if you think about it, yes we are responsible for it, but we are also victims,” says Taha. “We have to keep our jobs, pay our rent. We have no way but to go a little bit shady when we deal with our customers because the company wants to meet their quota. They don’t care how.”

According an April 2015 report by the Center for Popular Democracy, since 2011, 17 different lawsuits across the top five banks in the country (JPMorgan Chase, Bank of America, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, and US Bank) have been settled for nearly $46 billion, “highlighting a range of alleged illegal and unethical business practices.”

Back in 2010, SEIU’s new plan was to organize bank workers. Mike Elk described that effort as emanating from his realization that banks influenced the rest of labor organizing through its close connections to the pensions and investment banks that intertwined with financial decisions made not only by workers but their communities, as well.

Stephen Lerner, the architect of SEIU’s famed Justice for Janitors campaign, summed up the wealth disparity among bankers at the top and bottom of the pay brackets in a 2010 New Labor Forum article, writing, “We could increase pay by $2.00 per hour and provide employer-paid health insurance for over 550,000 tellers with just 3.6 percent of the bonuses paid out to executives.”

An April 2015 rally in Minnesota delivered 11,000 signatures on a petition calling for an end to sales goals, the Committee for Better Banks released a proposed bill of rights for bank workers.

CEO and President of union-owned Amalgamated Bank, Keith Mestrich announced in early August 2015 that the bank’s employees would be making at least $15 an hour under their new collective bargaining agreement. He told Buzzfeed, “We think it’s the right thing for our bank to do, and frankly we think it’s the right thing for all banks to do. … If any industry in this country can afford to set a new minimum for its workers, it’s the banking industry.”

“It was a little bit scary at the beginning, but we have to do it. If we don’t talk then the banks will do whatever they want to do,” says Taha.

However it appears things did not go according to plan – again people forget about technology in the fight between rights and profits ……

The following list from an Oxford study shows the susceptibility of jobs ending up with robots within 20 years.

https://www.replacedbyrobot.info/

[Anonymous]

Rennie wrote:

I came in as number 4551. My tenure will be 2 years old this coming January.

Yea Rennie, I think I’m somewhere around 42 or 4,300, I joined Jan 1st 2015, I know Puff was here before us, I came on just before Nina Jame’s Bitch disappeared, Soul Man too. C-P was in our group also, Sandman went down a few months after we joined. Every member under the 5,000 mark was granted Ghost participant status.

KM has made some really talented graphics over the last couple years, he made that silver ball clip with our names done in custom signature graffiti, some cool s~~~!

Hats off to KM for the time and devotion he’s made to saving lives, property, and fortunes!

Not that money’s everything, but getting f~~~ed for EVERYTHING is!

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Silver Fox wrote:

Back to the point: In proverbs 31, the commonly-cited chapter on Biblical womanhood, we are greeted with a warning that is all-too-often overlooked.

Verse 10: “A virtuous wife who can find? Her worth is far above rubies.”

This passage was written by King Solomon, the [2nd] wisest man to ever live. He had 700+ wives and another 200+ consorts. That’s a pretty robust sample size for an experiment and to draw his conclusions from.
I’m partial to Ecclesiastes 7:28 [see my custom signature].

Note: The wisest man to ever walk our planet [Jesus of Nazareth] NEVER MARRIED at all.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

JT: Welcome! Looking forward to hearing more from you.

If you want to quote and entire post, just hit the quote button on that post and go to the bottom of the page. Go past the very end and type away. If you want to quote a section, just highlight that section with you mouse and hit the quote button. Then it will only quote the highlighted section.

EDIT: Sorry, what you are looking for is the Forum Custom Signature on your profile page.

Order the good wine

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Welcome to the machine, TNW. Glad to have you with us.

RedRojas wrote:

The Bible says that a virtuous woman is valued “far above rubies” I think it’s Old Testament somewhere.

Note my custom signature.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[Anonymous]

Anonymous wrote:

GOOD! I goimg to start by saying ive lost women I love in my life to cancer. Ok.

Is there any one on the freaking planet that has never heard of breast cancer? Am I missing the obvious here?

Breast Cancer Awareness. Hhhmmm….gee never heard of it. WTF

Me too, Old Sage,
And I will add this:
When my late wife was going thru her 2 1/2 year battle with cancer, the clinic right here in Canada couldn’t do enough for her. Everything from flowers to the latest chemo drugs and during the process, even though the staff and doctors all knew who I was, I was treated as her driver. Not once in all the counciling was I ever asked how I felt or how I was going to cope after she died. There is NOTHING in place for men whose wives have died but lots of in place for women whose husband’s have died.
Two years after I buried her, I was diagnosed with prostate cancer. I went back to the VERY SAME CLINIC, and was told that prostate cancer IS NOT REALLY A CANCER by a liberal educated, work boot wearing, feminist dyke bitch. That was the moment I became MGTOW.
When I found this site, it really was like being welcomed home from the war. My custom signature reads ” Retired from the wars” Meaning that I no longer care about womens’ issues.
After nine years I am still furious about the way men are treated in the Canadian health care system. If you are a man, don’t get sick in Canada.
I have said enough