Eh, keep in mind you’re basically arguing that this interpretation is correct because a woman told you so.
Women are notorious for making up their own version of reality and generally not actually knowing what they’re talking about. This has not changed in thousands of years, and it really has not changed now.
Historically speaking, there were no corporate office jobs and no promotions given out. You either had a family business, worked on a farm, or were a slave. No matter how good of a peasant/serf you were, you weren’t going to get promoted to noble/aristocrat.
I am aware of where I got my information from. But, everything else she taught me checked out, so I will give her the benefit of the doubt.
I used the corporate example because it is an easy example to understand. But, this networking applied to women going to church every Sunday, to a wife privately to talking to the local mayor’s wife.
If you started out as a noble, sure maybe some women would play political games with each other, but for the most part the men would call the shots. Women were chattel, and depending on the area and era, were not allowed to own property themselves or do much of anything.
Most people in history, of both genders were either slaves or masters.
What you need to understand is that we all need to realize that much of the behavior we see in women is not solely because they are women, but because they have been spoiled since they were children.
The women of today were never taught any mental discipline.
My paternal grandmother, and many of the women of her generation were taught mental discipline. I could see the steel behind their eyes.
You can easily see what I am talking about by looking at the way women look around with their eyes. Most women today have unfocused eyes, that look around and do not really focus on anything in particular.
If you know a lady. A true lady. Look at their eyes. They are always focused and direct towards someone or something.
Men of the past were far more likely to want to just be bachelors. With bachelor taxes and exhortations by emperors to marry annoying women, even though they’d also admit how worthless women were.
Never forget that there is some truth in the saying. “The hand the rocks the cradle, rules the world.”
The first teachers babies have are their mothers. Fathers can be there, but the mothers usually are the first teachers for babies. And spoiled teachers make for poor students. As we have seen in society as a whole.
There is a lot of about society that is behind the scenes. Much of which the feminists have destroyed in western civilization.
We could list the eras and cultures where women had roles outside of the home, or were slaves. But, that would would just create a circular argument.
Though, to call women, in general to be “worthless” is an insult to everyone’s intelligence. You believe that a woman cannot be successful in business without government help. That is very incorrect.
Genuine success by women is much rarer than men, but it does happen.
I even know of an female ancestor of mine, from a hundred and fifty years ago. From the southeast U.S., she became a successful business woman. And from what I was told, she hated the “Yankee” government with a passion that would rival fires of hell.
Though, this society does not reward success, from anyone, it punishes the successful. It is that more successful men are tore down by this society than women. But, successful women have been known to be tore down in by this society. It is just rarer.
There was no female positive aspect that built anything. Civilization is built entirely by men, with women not allowed to damage their work. When a civilization becomes wealthy, that is when women come in and destroy everything. These cycles are a very part of humanity apparently.
Building civilization is a group effort. And to say that only women are tearing down civilization is very incorrect.
This is not intended as an excuse towards women. Though, how women are today is symptom of a much worse problems, such as emotional immaturity and lack of responsibility that is prevalent in this society. From many women and men.
If have read my posts, you would noticed a major difference between how women today and in the past look for in men.
In the past, many women were taught to look for men that have the “potential for success” and work with their husband to achieve success. This may for a strong family unit as a whole.
Women today look for men that are already successful, to take all their wealth from in divorce. Back then, ladies had an insult for that. They call such women to be “gold diggers”. And it was an endearing term.
Anonymous 4 years, 2 months ago.
