Who you are Vs. Who you HAVE to be with Independent Women

[Anonymous 3]

Joey Brooks wrote:

It is statistically impossible for all men or women on this planet to be a-holes.

You are using th NAWALT argument: not all women are like that.
Sure, statistically it is possible to find the Unicorn. The same way it is statistically possible to pull the pin of a granade and it doesnt explode.

Care to try with the granade?

We say AWALT! All women are statistically significantly like THAT.

And since EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM tries her best to fool you into thinking she is an angel, GOOD LUCK FINDING THE UNICORN.

Add with the laws that protect them, only a fool would want more than meaningless sex. And even THAT is not without risks, less the “independent and powerful” girl decides AFTERWARDS that she was raped.

And you come here, not to save young men from this gynocentric hell, but to blind them to the risks with fairy tales and devious talk.

[Anonymous 3]

Joey Brooks wrote:

So if you want a guy in here with REAL first hand experience in NOT getting screwed by women, I am your man.

Would you care, Oooh great Master, to explain how you react when a lunatic female hits you?

Because young men have to deal with this s~~~, and they either get abused or end up in jail.

And how does a young man avoid losing most of his possessions in one of those starter-marriages?

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Joey Brooks wrote:

So for you guys who are determined to change NOTHING for a good woman, you won’t have any worries because you won’t keep one for long.

Seriously??
Why would I want to change for anyone else let alone this unicorn you speak of. She could be the ultimate NAWALT and I would not change for her. I spent too much time being who I am; shaping my mind, body and soul even my environment to be the person I want to be. To live how I want to live. To even suggest throwing it away to please someone else is beyond arrogant. You are too self righteous to be take seriously. You believe you know what is best for others without even knowing who they are. So naive.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Joey BrooksSpectator 29]

Anonymous wrote:

Joey Brooks wrote:

It is statistically impossible for all men or women on this planet to be a-holes.

You are using th NAWALT argument: not all women are like that.
Sure, statistically it is possible to find the Unicorn. The same way it is statistically possible to pull the pin of a granade and it doesnt explode.

Care to try with the granade?

We say AWALT! All women are statistically significantly like THAT.

And since EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM tries her best to fool you into thinking she is an angel, GOOD LUCK FINDING THE UNICORN.

Add with the laws that protect them, only a fool would want more than meaningless sex. And even THAT is not without risks, less the “independent and powerful” girl decides AFTERWARDS that she was raped.

And you come here, not to save young men from this gynocentric hell, but to blind them to the risks with fairy tales and devious talk.

I believe most young men have the mental capability to see that my argument holds water better than many of the butt-hurt extremists around here that “ONE woman fooled me, hurt me, and robbed me, ergo…ALL women suck”. Until I get locked out I will continue to express my opinions based on facts and a wider sampling of females than most here have to pull opinions from.

If you could walk through walls, would you still use doors?

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Joey Brooks wrote:

Until I get locked out I will continue to express my opinions based on facts

Still waiting for those facts. Please present them anytime.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Joey BrooksSpectator 29]

FrostByte wrote:

…You believe you know what is best for others without even knowing who they are…

Isn’t this the status-quo here?

I know what worked for me. I am expressing this. Anyone here is free to take it or toss it in the heap. And calling me names has absolutely no effect on me. I played baseball – 3rd base – for 25 years and have heard it all, continuously, from the opposing team in the nearby dugout. So feel free to bring it.

If you could walk through walls, would you still use doors?

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Joey Brooks wrote:

toss it in the heap.

Done

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Anonymous 3]

Joey Brooks wrote:

ONE woman fooled me, hurt me, and robbed me, ergo…ALL women suck”.

You are simply ignorant. What we speak about is a set of female traits that everyone tries very hard to ignore.
Once you see those traits you will see them everywhere.
It is not ONE experience, but taking out the blinders and be able to see the truth everywhere.

The truth is that women use men. They use their victim cards, lie and manipulate emotionally other people.
Women themselves confess that they cannot trust other women. They rather be with men that are gullible to their manipulations.

And men are not dumb, they are just honest and operate logically.

My wife just told me I did not love her because I wanted her to die for taking a bath after eating. And she was pretty upset about it.
But since I didn’t tell her to take a bath or not, why was that?
Because she wanted me to do something for her before the bath, and since I didn’t do it, its her way of bullying me.
She has already pestered me with 3 or 4 other stupid stuff, like setting a watch for her.

Now, this is standard female behaviour. They just can stand a man doing something he likes in peace.

In fact, they will work very hard to destroy all his hobbies and his friendships, because THEY have to be the most important thing in their Jen’s lives.

And if a man sacrifices everything for what they say they wanted, THEY WILL DESPISE HIM FOR IT!

How f~~~ed up is that? Is that an exception or a general rule?

And what will say EVERY WOMAN and EVERY BOOK OR AUTHOR ABOUT RELATIONSHIPS? It will say that you have to do everything and sacrifice for women.

You said it yourself, but you fail to grasp the enormity of it!

Everyone is deceiving young guys! Everyone is setting them up for failing!

Women are especially active at teaching the wrong thing, the opposite of what you said before.
And you see nothing wrong with that?

How do you teach boys that THEY WILL BE DESTROYED BY THEIR GOOD INTENTIONS?

Are all men supposed to become PUA’s and Chads?

You are the one that is very wrong and very harmful.

MGTOW is not and will never be mainstream. This philosophy is so disruptive of the normal worldview that most men will never accept them.

Go away. Preach young guys your pernicious ideas, they will welcome you. And they will prefer your false message of hope to the harsh reality, until they get utterly destroyed.

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Joey Brooks wrote:

Peaceful Warrior wrote:

Joey Brooks wrote:

It is statistically impossible for all men or women on this planet to be a-holes.

You are using th NAWALT argument: not all women are like that.
Sure, statistically it is possible to find the Unicorn. The same way it is statistically possible to pull the pin of a granade and it doesnt explode.

Care to try with the granade?

We say AWALT! All women are statistically significantly like THAT.

And since EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM tries her best to fool you into thinking she is an angel, GOOD LUCK FINDING THE UNICORN.

Add with the laws that protect them, only a fool would want more than meaningless sex. And even THAT is not without risks, less the “independent and powerful” girl decides AFTERWARDS that she was raped.

And you come here, not to save young men from this gynocentric hell, but to blind them to the risks with fairy tales and devious talk.

I believe most young men have the mental capability to see that my argument holds water better than many of the butt-hurt extremists around here that “ONE woman fooled me, hurt me, and robbed me, ergo…ALL women suck”. Until I get locked out I will continue to express my opinions based on facts and a wider sampling of females than most here have to pull opinions from.

Is your wider sampling of females larger then the national marriage and divorce rate?

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

Even if there is a real unicorn, she cannot make your life better then bachelor life.

Sex is more frequent and cheaper when you are single. You can get threesome or more.

A housekeeper is cheaper then a wife / girlfriend

A dog makes a better friend.

Your male friends can hold more interesting conversations.

You retain all your freedom.

So whether a NAWRLT exist or not is irrelevant as she cannot beat bachelor life.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Joey Brooks wrote:

Just because some of us here have made some bad choices does not give any of us the right to eff-up the lives of young people.

MGTOW already has a proven record of SAVING lives, futures and fortunes. This is not an exaggeration. So any recommendation you have about “Who you HAVE to be with Independent Women” pales in comparison.

This is “Men Going their Own Way” and they don’t HAVE™ to be anything other than the man they always wanted to be. Whether it includes a woman or not is a secondary consideration at best.

Joey Brooks wrote:

Until I get locked out

Don’t forget we GAVE you posting privileges.

Joey Brooks wrote:

I will continue to express my opinions based on facts

Anytime you’re ready. Here’s a fact for you… MGTOW saves lives.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[trader1913Participant 1577]

Joey Brook is the super alpha male that believes that if youre alpha enough then you can find a good woman. The more female validation you’ve been given the more valuable your opinion is, and ofcourse he has been with 200 women so he is the authority on everything.

Joey Brook is either a c~~~ or a man that worships the feminine form. Every time he has sex his opinions are validated; every time he does something manly for his wife his opinions are validated. He is an addict; how dare someone insult the all-divine being known as the human female.

Don’t waste your time, it’s like telling a heroin addict to stop taking heroin. The only way he’ll stop is if he has a life changing experience or overdoses.

[Anonymous 1]

Joey Brooks – it’s so sad to see so many words from good men wasted on you.

I have but 2.

F~~~ you.

[GreekDragoonParticipant 460]

Joey Brooks wrote:

I haven’t really experienced this problem of women wanting to make dramatic changes to me. I guess the ones that tried got frustrated and disappeared on their own.

Now I will say that I married an independent woman later in life in our 40s (neither of us were married before because neither of us wanted to compromise much or give up our opposite-sex friends)
and she “stuck” because she liked me for most of who/what I am. Not all of course. Of course she tells me what she LIKES or does NOT LIKE about me without any bulls~~~ manipulations. It is my choice to comply, or not without fear of reprisal. BUT…and this is important for you guys who have not given up on women yet…I enjoy making my woman happy when I CAN. She is not wild about beards and I don’t care either way – so I stay clean shaven. I don’t mind shaving every day. I do not identify with my facial hair. I like my wife to shave her legs and underarms. This is a pain in the ass for her I am sure, but she does it because I like it.

I could give you a long list of things we do to make each other happy, and things we DON’T DO because we feel strongly about it. For one…I hate sitting in a movie theater on a beautiful day to be outdoors. She LOVES movies. This is what her old boyfriends or girlfriends are for – go to the movies with her. It keeps both of us happy at the same time even though we are apart. My wife loves watching the evening news and I freaking HATE that. So I plug in my earbuds and vanish to my office for 30 minutes to surf porn on the web (or whatever) and blow my eardrums out with music. Yes, it is OUR house and I have a right to some peace and quiet when I get home from work and she has a right to watch what she wants on the TV. When the news is over we get together if we feel like it.

Sure I had to date a lot of women to find this one, but point is…giving up would not have done me much good. I kept swinging the bat until I finally connected and sent one out of the park in center field.

So for you guys who are determined to change NOTHING for a good woman, you won’t have any worries because you won’t keep one for long. For you dudes who aren’t so attached to your “Batman mustache” that it turns you Monk, keep swinging for the fences. Even if you never find a “keeper” the hunt can be a blast!

Tuna?

[Anonymous 1]

Joey Brooks wrote:

Until I get locked out I will continue to express my opinions based on facts and a wider sampling of females than most here have to pull opinions from.

A wider Sampling of females? Lolz. Did I read that right??

Hahahaha f~~~.

Dude. I vote you stick around for a while.

Do you have females in a petri dish?

Can you share the samples of females?

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

it’s so sad to see so many words from good men wasted on you.

It would be, if it was for him.

But he already has a wife, with lots of good friends… The stage is set…

I am speaking for the lurkers that ear these Siren songs. It is hard enough for people to swallow the red pill, and then comes another mythological creature, the blue pill Alpha Centaur, to lure them to the great hunt for unicorns.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Joey Brooks wrote:

Until I get locked out I will continue to express my opinions based on facts and a wider sampling of females than most here have to pull opinions from.

Anonymous wrote:

A wider Sampling of females? Lolz. Did I read that right??
Hahahaha f~~~.

He’s a f~~~ing idiot. He can pull out his dick and try to compare notch counts, but has no idea who he’s talking to. You can bang 5/ 50 / 500 women and arrive at exactly the same f~~~ing conclusions.

Joey Brooks wrote:

So for you guys who are determined to change NOTHING for a good woman, you won’t have any worries because you won’t keep one for long.

And how is that a problem exactly?

You should really stop behaving like changing anything for a woman – even your shirt – is any measure of a man. It’s embarrassing. You can “keep” her yourself. She’s not all that.

A woman will drag a man to divorce court for being “too nice”. Ask her if she thinks she’s a “good woman”.

Joey Brooks wrote:

Good one! Made me laugh!

We’re laughing harder.

GreekDragoon wrote:

Tuna?

The other, other white meat.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[experiencedParticipant]

Joey Brooks is a c~~~ guys, it’s not a man, we have a c~~~ infiltrator.

this

Joey Brooks wrote:

Marriage was the problem. Without that, a man (or woman) can generally just walk assuming no kids are involved.

Total Bulls~~~!
TUNA ALERT

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[GrumpyParticipant]

Meh
I’ve handled both women and grenades (among other explosives) for a long time. I still prefer explosives as they are less volatile and will only kill you once.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Elric GreenstoneParticipant 1637]

I think Joey is tuna, or a pathological liar. I don’t buy half the s~~~ he claims.

I also, from only skimming his garbage, get the feeling he’s been married for a brief period of time, if his marriage isn’t also bulls~~~.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

We wish ya’ well, buddy. I’m sure you’re completely different than the rest of us. Different than Brad Pitt. You are different than Tyler F~~~ing Durden. ‘Course ya are, buddy! Your wife is Princess Perfect, you are Chad Alpha the Third, and you’re done gonna learn us neckbeards how to luvs a modren womyn and makes it work out.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

I do also note that you seem to be implying that your Princess is a professional woman in her 40s or early 50s. By any chance has she hit the Wall? By any chance do you have a fair amount of coin? I would posit that, while the Xenomorph you currently have in your living room may *seem* friendly, it may be less docile than . . . what’s that? Sorry, can’t hear you over all your screaming and yelling. Goodness, I’m glad that we had that 10000M Butyl Lithium reservoir above your flat to keep everything safe-safe . . .

*cough* I digress. I think that all of us, who have experienced the same happy Addictive Hormone C~~~tail that you are currently experiencing, are familiar with its effects. We’re delighted that you and your souuuulllmateunicorn are so wildly happy, and that you’re happily host-ing your wife in her new digs that she’s enjoying differently because she’s a professional and you’re a third baseman with a high notch count who was a sniper and whatever the f~~~.

We just don’t, in fact, think your relationship is particularly stable, and have experienced firsthand just how dangerous ‘professional’ women are. Particularly in a court. Or when they feel slighted. Good luck with that.

The final thing we think you can go f~~~ yourself with is the idea that you, oh munificent statistical differential, should be giving advice to the masses about how awesomez womyn are and how everyone should be as happy as you.

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Yeah.

There is nothing more powerful than an idea whose time has come, as Victor Hugo said. Nothing. Reproductive rates and marriage rates have been plummeting for decades – and are now falling off a demographic cliff – because of third-wave feminism and its wildly toxic and possibly civilization-ending effects. This is the collective experience of the entire goddamn planet. Many of us – educated probably rather beyond you, newb – also had illusions that we were going to buck this very evident trend and have some kind of unique relationship with our unique wives in a unique blah blah blah inventing a new wheel building a better mousetrap blah blah blah.

I name you tuna. I name you naive. I name you newb.

But don’t give advice, newchum. You don’t have the experience to do so.

Oh, also. What happened to the legions of women that made up your c~~~ count? That was all you, ditching them? You never got ditched? They weren’t special? Only your current, Addictive Hormone Producer Meatsack is special?

Hahahahahahahahahahahahahaha.

Hope you got a pre-nup! 🙂 🙂 🙂

"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."

[Author]

Posts