Stop MGTOW becoming a cult

[bladeParticipant]

LURK BEFORE JOINING THEN THERE IS NOTHING TO P~~~ AND MOAN ABOUT DOWN THE TRACK .

These f~~~heads wanting rules will kill this place . One rule then another for that rule . Then those rules get used and abused because someone might not like someone else .

NOTHING NEEDS TO BE CHANGED

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

Amusing.
No leader, No gathering, not even a single meeting of “members”. You could actually meet someone in town and not even know the other person is mgtow. Even if the subject of mgtow came up odds are one would not let the other know they are mgtow. At best you might be able to call it a club, without a list of members.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Billy&The CloneasaurusParticipant]

blade wrote:

LURK BEFORE JOINING THEN THERE IS NOTHING TO P~~~ AND MOAN ABOUT DOWN THE TRACK .

These f~~~heads wanting rules will kill this place . One rule then another for that rule . Then those rules get used and abused because someone might not like someone else .

NOTHING NEEDS TO BE CHANGED

Exactly. I already have enough toilet paper, and don’t need a rule book to supplement my ass wiping needs.

The answer, is no.

[MACHOParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Stop MGTOW becoming a cult

People should definitely lurk more before joining this site! What a lame misinformed Topic title. Declaring us a Cult!

One would think that another Mgtow is coming apart at the seams!

Cult! wow! Stupid and a Good way to create another hunt for an anti mgtow.com member.

Members should be more careful when coming up with titles. Words are very powerful on here since words is all we have to communicate!

You must own a better Crystal ball than I

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

From Gargamel:

We see that in the rising member counts…

33,000 as of yesterday – if anyone noticed…

…that we are “right on reality” and speak what attracts new men to this site.

This^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Men are sick and tired of it all.

We were born to be rebellious, thats our nature. Mens job to reset, correct, build, revolt, etc.

It was men who stopped fascism, while women voted for it. Majority of nazi support came from women, not men.

Long Live the Brotherhood!

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Anonymous 12]

bigboy83 wrote:

From Gargamel:

We see that in the rising member counts…

33,000 as of yesterday – if anyone noticed…

…that we are “right on reality” and speak what attracts new men to this site.

This^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Men are sick and tired of it all.

We were born to be rebellious, thats our nature. Mens job to reset, correct, build, revolt, etc.

It was men who stopped fascism, while women voted for it. Majority of nazi support came from women, not men.

Long Live the Brotherhood!

I’m also noticing. A few years back many forums and comments in newspapers would be 85% Pro Women/Pro Leftard now they are 90% MGTOW/Conservative.

And they aren’t pulling any punches either men and even some women have just had enough of the Liberal bulls~~~.

[Anonymous 14]

Anonymous wrote:

MGTOW.com is fast-becoming become a self-congratulatory club for men who’ve sworn off women.

Links/Proof please?

Anonymous wrote:

Men are called “fools” for merely being with a woman in any capacity, despite many of our members doing the same. It is like there is a small sect of ‘true MGTOW’ who don’t consider you real MGTOW unless you’ve gone monk.

Bollocks. There is no sub-group of Monk-dom, and I have been a Monk for over a decade. There are married men here, “Chads” here, I have spoken with them, I know. There are no prejudices held against these MEN.

Anonymous wrote:

This leaves men who still want to fulfill their carnal desires feeling like they don’t belong here, but neither do they belong to some PUA or trad con forum either.

Go on ahead and knock yourself out man. Have fun!

Anonymous wrote:

But who clearly are not nearly as NFG as they claim to be. Otherwise why the endless linking to s~~~ we already know.

It’s for the lurkers man……

Anonymous wrote:

It was never an elitist club for MGTOW monks, which is what it seems to have become.

I didn’t get the memo it seems. Can you forward it to me in p/m?

Anonymous wrote:

A lot of guys, MGTOW included, will seek to pair bond or have short-term casual relationships. MGTOW here would do well to remember what the acronym stands for, and not to act superior to men who aren’t as monk-like as themselves.

You are misinformed. Is this Sparky part II?

Anonymous wrote:

To lurkers and newer members, never be afraid to post your own truth.

Lurkers, new members, don’t listen to this yob. It’s all BS.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Autolite wrote:

MGTaoist wrote:

Stop MGTOW becoming a cult

We’re not a cult! Not yet anyway. We first need to get funny hats…

And orgies. You cannot have a cult without orgies.

[ChristopherParticipant 2478]

Anonymous wrote:

Saying “ALL women are bad” is pretty pathetic.

With all due respect I think the OP still doesnt get it – being MGTOW simply says the risk of being with a woman in this society is simply not worth it. The OP sounds like a guy who has yet to be burned.

Anonymous wrote:

A lot of guys, MGTOW included, will seek to pair bond

With all due respect to you OP the above quote shows you do not understand MGTOW.

OP I recall a few months back that you said you have a GF or woman that that you are with who you said you monitor and will dump if she or the situation starts to get out of hand – I recall many MGTOW men here (including Old Bill i think) have tried to help you to see the danger in that.

The OP has in the past criticised the concept of celibacy and monk – yet to my knowledge no one here says anyone ‘has to be’ monk. Yet the OP complains and attacks by calling men that choose to be monk ‘elitist’.

Anonymous wrote:

But to say that reciprocal relationships don’t exist is plain false.

Relationships are always in a state of flux/change. What may be deemed reciprocal can change at anytime – then the odds are stacked against the man as the thousands of stories here demonstrate – after divorce the man can lose most of his wealth and access to his kids, or with a woman lying about a DV assault the man unjustly end up in jail.

Feminism was funded by bankers/politicians to create more taxpayers. MGTOW IS FREEDOM https://archive.org/details/mgtowisfreedomblurayready

[CarnageParticipant 22113]

1,2,3 wait for it.

MGTOW = men going their own way.

Of course they don’t belong here, this is not a social club, this is Wikipedia for men.

You come here TO LEARN (some times to teach), NOT TO BELONG.

DO AS YOU WISH WITH YOUR LIFE.

Get hookers, bang your brother wife, go monk, go bananas, who cares.

To those following me, be careful, I just farted. Men those beans are killers.

[GargamelSpectator 29101]

Men don’t need women to be happy.

From “cult” MGTOW Big John.

LOL.

https://ia800103.us.archive.org/28/items/mgtow_is_freedom/0090%20MGTOW%20-%20Men%20DON'T%20need%20women%20to%20be%20HAPPY.mp4

In July of 2018, this honey pot forum was sold out to an unidentified NPC sock puppet and troll organization. Most independent thinkers and writers migrated to other MGTOW forums as a result of the never-ending infighting and deliberate trouble starting caused by members who were given "carte blanche" by the admin to do whatever they want. Before my departure, I only left a few thousand cat pics here to comfort and ridicule the feminist owners who now run this place. Their background agenda is to make MGTOW look like a club of losers the public eye. And during the course of 2019, they actually managed to destroy almost all other MGTOW venues as well. Here is the truth about "theindependentman.org" aka "TIM" which was created as an extended workbench to further divide the community. When you register, they install a spyware Zombie cookie on your browser that does all kinds of things the user does not know of: http://www.filedropper.com/essay-on-the-removal-of-malware-cookies-used-by-tim

[G.O.A.TParticipant 1459]

I want to set one thing straight!

MEN ARE NOT ANGELS.

In some relationships, men are ones who’re cunning, cheaters, liars, and all the attributes we associate with women.

Men, and women, are pieces of s~~~.

I had to write this, because some guys think only men get burn in a relationship.

Money is God.

[SkelatorParticipant 1261]

I come here because I got banned from everywhere else, for speaking my mind.

This is an open forum for men. No fear of being banned by sjw’s and harpies.

I couldn’t care less if you want to screw whores. Just remember, pumkin is only good for pumpin and dumpin. Someone else be hittin that too.

Watch out for that trap. They are schemers.

[bladeParticipant]

Billy&The Cloneasaurus wrote:

blade wrote:

LURK BEFORE JOINING THEN THERE IS NOTHING TO P~~~ AND MOAN ABOUT DOWN THE TRACK .

These f~~~heads wanting rules will kill this place . One rule then another for that rule . Then those rules get used and abused because someone might not like someone else .

NOTHING NEEDS TO BE CHANGED

Exactly. I already have enough toilet paper, and don’t need a rule book to supplement my ass wiping needs.

Tuna thread . I see alot of bros interacting having fun . Maybe a distraction from there bulls~~~ they have going on .

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Anonymous 38]

Some very thoughtful responses here gentlemen. It is great to see so many thinking men posting on one thread.

In Taoism abandoning desires is not necessary. That’s more akin to Buddhism. It’s wise to know the consequences of one’s desires, but a man isn’t less of a Taoist if he ‘eats when he is hungry’.

It isn’t wise for every MGTOW to swear off women. So those that don’t should not be shamed. And those that do should not be smug.

Do what makes you happy and keeps you safe. Know all the risks. Don’t live your life according to the subtle monk doctrine of MGTOW.com if that makes you miserable for years and years. There is a life to be lived gentlemen and sometimes that involves taking risks and doing things which don’t have a clear economic benefit.

Remember it’s GO YOUR OWN WAY not the ‘approved way’ of this site.

Peace out.

[AttonParticipant]

MGTOW.com is fast-becoming become a self-congratulatory club for men who’ve sworn off women. Observations about women get shouted down with “I don’t care about women”, unless you’re a long-standing member and then it’s often a different response. Men are called “fools” for merely being with a woman in any capacity, despite many of our members doing the same. It is like there is a small sect of ‘true MGTOW’ who don’t consider you real MGTOW unless you’ve gone monk.

If your not a woman’s bitch then your a MGTOW I’ve had this in my tag line for years
“A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman’s bitch!”
That is the thing that differentiates MGTOW from the status quo. I don’t think it is reasonable to suggest most men actually go monk for some it is simply impossible. You must either be burned beyond belief, harden by reason or simply lacking in desire.

There is no acknowledgement that there are women who do not fit the mold of your typical nasty gold-digging c~~~. I know not whether this is because the situation in the USA is really bad or because the men have never experienced a good woman. Saying “ALL women are bad” is pretty pathetic. It is totally wrong and intellectually dishonest. It is no better than being one of those women that swear ALL men are bad.

There is no good or bad woman there is circumstance, even a bra burning feminist bitch would adopt pig tales and bake cookies. If war time actually came modern day feminism would be nowhere to be found. That is the first and only reality of the good woman theory.
Islamic no go zones have no problems with feminism take a guess as to why? Well I’ll tell you its pretty simple, they don’t take s~~~ and don’t hand their b~~~~ over. So even in Sweden, France and the UK they can actually have the conservatives wet dream.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Anonymous 2]

MGTOW is not about assuming that every woman is a gold digging c~~~. It’s about realizing that the game is rigged completely against you, so it’s better not to play the game in the first place.

It’s not about assuming that any woman will use the system to destroy your life if given the chance, it’s about realizing the fact that ANY WOMAN CAN!

Pretty much everybody has a best friend, right? How many of us have given our bank account info to our best friends? Pretty much zero, right? Does anybody consider that crazy? No, of course not. So why does society consider me crazy for not giving a woman the power to destroy my life on the excuse that “not all women are like that”? I mean, not all people would drain their friend’s bank account and run off if given the opportunity, but we still don’t expect people to take that risk. Do you see how backwards that is? Society is basically saying “Who cares if the system is rigged and women can destroy a man’s life and the government will gladly assist her in doing so? Women simply deserve to be given that chance anyway, because vagina!”

[Anonymous 14]

“Remember it’s GO YOUR OWN WAY not the ‘approved way’ of this site.”

Many misconceptions cloud your thinking. We each go OUR own way. You are the one singling out people and causing division. I urge you to rethink and revise your stance on this matter.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

There is no acknowledgement that there are women who do not fit the mold of your typical nasty gold-digging c~~~.

Yes, there isn’t WITHIN THE LAW acknowledgement that there could be many (perhaps even most!) women who do not fit the mold of the typical nasty gold-digging c~~~: indeed the law seems to be designed to strongly support just only women who are typical nasty gold-digging c~~~s, just like if…most women would be the typical nasty gold-digging c~~~.

Pretty telling, isn’t it?

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Anonymous wrote:

In Taoism abandoning desires is not necessary.

Free from desire you see the mystery.
Full of desire you see the manifestations.

a man isn’t less of a Taoist if he ‘eats when he is hungry’.

Hunger is not a desire.
Lust is not a hunger.

[Author]

Posts