Sick and Getting Sicker

[Anonymous 42]

Tchh, tchh, Roger that base,,,tchh, over the target now, and releasing the device,,,, Mike-Tango,, over and out!!!

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

megatoad69 wrote:

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Have a good day and hope you’ll get well sometime.

I already am well. Apparently youre not because you have a problem with me not accepting pedophilesAgain my only position is thatmen should NOT sexually desire or RAPE childrenWhich part of this do you have a problem with?

YOU!

My only position is that sexualy desiring or raping children is wrong, and somehow you still have a problem with this….

Youre seriously a sick f~~~.

I can’t state my position any clearer than above. So which part do you have a problem with?

Child rape cool in your book?

Sexual lust of children/ pedophileo?

Please tell me where Im wrong.

Im against CHILD MOLESTATION AND RAPE…

Youre telling me Im on the wrong side of the fence? Please state how….

You sound like a f~~~ing freak.

Resident cynic.

[MaxParticipant 887]

I became a MGTOW because this was the only logical solution for a man survive in a world replete of gynocentrism and biased against men!

[AttonParticipant]

Its only a matter of time until we class this s~~~ like we do with the whole trans things.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Max wrote:

http://laughtertab.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Grab-the-popcorn.jpeg

I seriously dont understand what the argument is.

The desire to have sex with chikdren is wrong.

who is arguing against this and why????

Somebody f~~~ing tell me….

Me being agaisnt adults RAPING children is wrong?

Tell me why and how?

This is some sick s~~~ that its even a “debate”.

You f~~~ing freaks that have a problem, please tell me why SEXUALLY DESIRING CHILDREN IS OK???

Please…Tell me.

Resident cynic.

[Anonymous 9]

Atton wrote:

Its only a matter of time until we class this s~~~ like we do with the whole trans things.

I don’t think so.

[megatoad69Participant 449]

AncientWisdom
Arguing with you is pointless, you’re stuck in some sort of a flawed mindset.
We disagree with you and your venom and accusations, and then we are pedo lovers in your minds eye?

AncientWisdom said:

I seriously dont understand what the argument is.

It’s obvious.

You are just not getting our POV, nobody here is condoning pedophilia and you are doing nothing but insulting and calling pedo sympathisers for not seeing it the way you do.
So go gather some wood, some matches, a sturdy pole and some rope, there is heresy and witchcraft about!

You can't reason with unreasonable, there; women, figured out, there is nothing to reason.

[MaxParticipant 887]

megatoad69 wrote:

AncientWisdomArguing with you is pointless, you’re stuck in some sort of a flawed mindset.We disagree with you and your venom and accusations, and then we are pedo lovers in your minds eye?
AncientWisdom said:

I seriously dont understand what the argument is.

It’s obvious.
You are just not getting our POV, nobody here is condoning pedophilia and you are doing nothing but insulting and calling pedo sympathisers for not seeing it the way you do.So go gather some wood, some matches, a sturdy pole and some rope, there is heresy and witchcraft about!

And look at this: /forums/topic/sanity-anyone/
This moron is still doing the same s~~~, over and over again!

I became a MGTOW because this was the only logical solution for a man survive in a world replete of gynocentrism and biased against men!

[RennieParticipant]

Aww, the forum’s first crisis. How cute.

[MaxParticipant 887]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Max wrote:

http://laughtertab.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Grab-the-popcorn.jpeg

I seriously dont understand what the argument is.
The desire to have sex with chikdren is wrong.
who is arguing against this and why????
Somebody f~~~ing tell me….
Me being agaisnt adults RAPING children is wrong?
Tell me why and how?
This is some sick s~~~ that its even a “debate”.
You f~~~ing freaks that have a problem, please tell me why SEXUALLY DESIRING CHILDREN IS OK???
Please…Tell me.

If you were not able to understand even after you have received several explanations, why you do think that I’m going to waste my time to repeat what others talked

I became a MGTOW because this was the only logical solution for a man survive in a world replete of gynocentrism and biased against men!

[Dcue95Participant 78]

AW reminds me of the Denko Guy, lol

[Anonymous 42]

Tchh, tchh, roger that base tchh, delivering egg number two tchh, we are over the target now tch, bombs away! tch, tch,,, Mike-Tango returning to base for egg number three, tchh, over and out…

[megatoad69Participant 449]

Dcue95 wrote:

AW reminds me of the Denko Guy, lol

Yes, The Denko files.

Dense stuff dude!

You can't reason with unreasonable, there; women, figured out, there is nothing to reason.

[TheBardParticipant 974]

FrankOne wrote:

Sure, when I drive by the high school, and see a well-developed, scantily clad hottie, I may get hard, but driving by the elementary school, seeing pre-pubescent children? No way!

To me this right here is the issue in a nut shell.. High school girls have hit puberty and are able to bear children so from a biological standpoint I think you can argue there isn’t anything morally wrong with a grown man being turned on by a 16 year old girl. 200 years ago a 26 year old man and 16 year old girl would be kind of normal and a 16 year old girl is at least able to more or less understand what she is consenting to. On the flip side a child cannot reproduce and no way they can give proper consent for sex so it makes no sense biologically to be attracted to children. Plus if you break it down to how humans lived in the beginning a girl who was 16 would probably have had children and be doing adult work while a girl who was 7 would not be living the same life as an adult. As creepy as it is to me the idea of a late 20’s man being attracted to a high school girl I don’t think that should be considered pedo and wouldn’t think less of anyone for thinking that way. Plus I just don’t see how any grown ass man can look at a 7 year old girl and get horny. She doesn’t even look like an adult, can’t talk or think like an adult, she isn’t even done developing mentally.

What I find really messed up is how the SJW’s are defending pedo’s and I can’t believe they are getting away with it. I work at a high school and if I started dating student and kissed her and held hands on campus and defended it you know what would happen to me? I would be fired, led off of campus in hand cuff’s, sent to jail, and black listed from working in education. The girl could even be a senior who is 18 and while I probably wouldn’t get arrested I would still be fired and black listed and that is with high school girls. These SJW’s are talking about children. I am all for free speech, but when we have people talking about how they see no problem with having sex with a child that is really starting to push it.

[HitmanParticipant]

Thinking, or acting, pedophiles are 100%WRONG! It’s that simple. No mercy for them. .EXECUTION !

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

You are just not getting our POV, nobody here is condoning pedophilia and you are doing nothing but insulting and calling pedo sympathisers for not seeing it the way you do.

1. Who is the “our” you speak of?

2. What is the way you see pedophilia?

Simple. F~~~ing. Questions.

You see pedphilia differently?

Please explain…

You wont, because there is no exolanation.

please explain where I went wrong stating the desire to rape a child is wrong…

Ive asked this 20 f~~~ing times to understand any naysayers:

WTF DID I SAY ABOUT CONDEMNING CHILD RAPE DO YOU DISAGREE WITH?

Have an answer? Speak it.

You wont. Because you cant.

Do tell….

Resident cynic.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

insulting and calling pedo sympathisers for not seeing it the way you do.

please quote me in the way I “see it” and you disagree with it. I have requested this 20 F~~~ING times.

Tell me and quote me where my notion of not having the desire to rape a child is wrong.

Please….f~~~ing please quote what Ive said that you disagree with.

Resident cynic.

[megatoad69Participant 449]

Double Denko’ed

You can't reason with unreasonable, there; women, figured out, there is nothing to reason.

[LazParticipant 44]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

insulting and calling pedo sympathisers for not seeing it the way you do.

please quote me in the way I “see it” and you disagree with it. I have requested this 20 F~~~ING times.
Tell me and quote me where my notion of not having the desire to rape a child is wrong.
Please….f~~~ing please quote what Ive said that you disagree with.

You do not understand. They do not disagree that desire to rape a child is wrong
They disagree about your approach about it.
You want those with pedo thoughts to drink molten lead and be dismembered, regardless of whether they actually commit a crime or not, or whether they are trying to fix themselves or not.
Others want to punish those who do commit crime, but show those haven’t that what they’re thinking is wrong, and have them get treated and fix themselves, not burn them alive simply because they have the wrong thought.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

They disagree about your approach about it.
You want those with pedo thoughts to drink molten lead and be dismembered,

I never said that. Another member did. And noone came here seeking “help” nor even recognizing it as a problem. In fact it WAS explicitly stated that “the desire wasnt wrong“.

Again, misconstruing the facts, and twisting them, then telling me I dont “understand”.

All actions stem from desires, and when someone states the desire themselves are fine you have a problem. Hell we even have a member here who happens to be a doctor posting studies showing that those with the desire ACT upon it in 85% of cases.

1. One guy says the desire is fine.

2. Another guy says its not.

Guess who some of you are attacking? Its YOU who doesnt “understand”.

Resident cynic.

[Author]

Posts