Sanity, Anyone?…

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

I simply have to ask this question. Theres another thread in MGTOW CENTRAL discussing pedophelia. I realize it got out of hand. Why it did, I dont understand.

I have one, simple question:

isnt the deviant desire to have sex with a child wrong?

I believe its repugnant and disgusting.

I really dont think this is a debatable topic. Some members wanted to debate it.

Opinions please.

Resident cynic.

[Silpheed1975Participant 355]

If some piece of s~~~ Pedo is saying its ok to have sexual fantasies with kids, but not to act on them, should have no problem asking to be put on the sex offender registry. Pedos deserve no symptathy. There is no debate. If some creepy pedo was watching my little nephew play at the park and smiling, he would get his face punched in. I have a gift, I can spot those sick f~~~s a mile away.

Silpheed's Mom Quote: "Having PMS is no excuse to be a bitch.."

[HitmanParticipant]

100% WRONG. pedophiles should be tried by law and executed .

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Why the f~~~ is a thread about pedophilia in the “Fun Stuff” board?

[UntamedParticipant]

There are all kinds of sick mental illnesses that make me puke and pedophilia, even thought or implied as “ok”, is at the top of that list. What happened in that thread I wasn’t online for, and I thank God for that. Then I tried reply to another of your thread concerning that, AW, but my replies were rejected by the server.
Of course it is wrong, any which way you look at it and I don’t see why we need a thread to say it. This is MGTOW, Men here don’t have any such desires and I’m sure KeyMaster will boot anyone out even suggesting such filth is “ok”.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[MaxParticipant 887]

Untamed wrote:

There are all kinds of sick mental illnesses that make me puke and pedophilia, even thought or implied as “ok”, is at the top of that list. What happened in that thread I wasn’t online for, and I thank God for that. Then I tried reply to another of your thread concerning that, AW, but my replies were rejected by the server.Of course it is wrong, any which way you look at it and I don’t see why we need a thread to say it. This is MGTOW, Men here don’t have any such desires and I’m sure KeyMaster will boot anyone out even suggesting such filth is “ok”.

Except that no one is saying that pedophilia is ok, it’s just that the Ancientwisdom is unable to understand what others are trying to explain to him!

I became a MGTOW because this was the only logical solution for a man survive in a world replete of gynocentrism and biased against men!

[Anonymous 9]

What is there to be opinionated about?

There’s nothing to discuss imo.

[Anonymous 1]

Is it ok, or normal, for a person to have urges towards children? No.

Is it unavoidable? I don’t know. I am not a doctor.

I think people that have such urges are sick and should seek help. Hell, maybe even alternatives (virtual reality? dolls?) are better than to have REAL CHILDREN out in danger.

I see this thread again and again, and there is a lot of emotion going on here. Yes, it is a sensitive subject, and the CRIME of abusing a child is abhorrent. But one must be careful on distinguishing the crime from the sickness. In fact, by having this type of emotional response, in the end you end up hurting the victims more than punishing the guilty. By not identifying the disease and trying to deal with it, and instead appealing to emotion you may end up spreading stereotypes (such as victims of abuse will inadvertently become abusers themselves) and you end up hurting the VICTIMS instead.

But hey, don’t take my word for it, take his:

And this is what makes me lose “faith” in humanity. In the end, it is not reason prevailing. It is emotion. All you need to do is throw the right “word” (rape apologist, holocaust denier, pedophile sympathizer? Really?) and you shut down the argument. This p~~~es me off to no end. Trying to make a point with appeals to emotion instead of logic and reason, feelings over facts, assumptions over science, force over diplomacy.

But that is just me.

Now, how the f~~~ did we get here in the first place?

[Anonymous 9]

Mention some of the points.’

I edited an earlier post, but I’d rather see more threads on escorts/prostitutes.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

isnt the deviant desire to have sex with a child wrong?

“Wrong” ain’t the least of it. “Hanging is too good for him / or her” is closer to what is right.

That said, I am willing to believe recent apologists for child molesters who say “that is their culture” or “they were born that way.” Yes, dear perverts, I believe you. No, you are criminals. You are criminals because you acted upon your mere urges and impulses. Had you abstained, then absolved you would have been.

Hanging is too good for you.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RennieParticipant]

And then we get into the issue of whether 17 yr old women, with well developed bodies and “hair there” are actually children.
If you need an ID to determine if someone is a child there might be some wiggle room.
“Hello lovely, would you like to visit my wiggle room? I have candy.”

What kind of 17 year old would be stupid enough to be lured by a promise of candy? You’d have to be pretty dumb to fall for that.

In America the law about age of consent varies from state to state. Ranging between 16-18. In Canada it’s 16. Previously 14 in 1890 until 2008 when the law was updated. In many other countries it’s 16 as well.

[Big Viking Chef BVCParticipant 1286]

sidecar wrote:

Why the f~~~ is a thread about pedophilia in the “Fun Stuff” board?

I was wondering the same. This topic does not belong next to Dilbert.

BVC

Swallow this RED PILL ===> Men will lay down their lives for their brothers, their women and their children. This makes Men useful as slaves. Women will lay down their lives for ONLY their children. To expect more from women is just a FANTASY created by society and reinforced by the unconditional love that we experienced from our Mothers. The key to freedom is the understanding that the woman you meet is not going to fantastically love you like your Mother did. If you buy into the fantasy, then she is your new master. If you do not buy into the fantasy, then she is nothing, and you retain your freedom.

[Anonymous 9]

And then we get into the issue of whether 17 yr old women, with well developed bodies and “hair there” are actually children.
If you need an ID to determine if someone is a child there might be some wiggle room.
“Hello lovely, would you like to visit my wiggle room? I have candy.”

Uggghhhh…NO.

There’s no wiggle room with a child sicko.

Age of consent applies for those 16 and above where I’m at.

But even then f~~~ that s~~~. It’s a whole lot of grey area in that.

The real question is can you guys not f~~~ women 18 and above?

[RennieParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Survivor wrote:

And then we get into the issue of whether 17 yr old women, with well developed bodies and “hair there” are actually children.If you need an ID to determine if someone is a child there might be some wiggle room. “Hello lovely, would you like to visit my wiggle room? I have candy.”

Uggghhhh…NO.
There’s no wiggle room with a child sicko.
Age of consent applies for those 16 and above where I’m at.
But even then f~~~ that s~~~. It’s a whole lot of grey area in that.
The real question is can you guys not f~~~ women 18 and above?

In 2008 (Canada) they had a national debate about what the age of consent should be. The line was drawn at 16. That’s the law here, that’s the way it goes. At that age they are allowed to decide if they want to “do” someone or not. It’s not like most of them aren’t active before then anyways, so nothing precious is being saved by withholding AOC another two years.

Now I don’t do things with anyone in those age ranges, but I’m not going to pretend they don’t look nice either. Hate me for if you must, but at this point in my life that’s the way it is. Perhaps it will change in the future though.

Anonymous wrote:

The real question is can you guys not f~~~ women 18 and above?

[нσтησσвParticipant 830]

In ancient Greece 14 year old boys would have sex with 18 year old women… and then go off to fight in wars and die.
That was how society was.

The real question should be, at what point does a child turn into an adult?
Age of consent is 16 in most countries, as low as 12 i think.

Personally, i think that after 16 women tend to go all down hill from there; if they are not already fugly.
Maybe if they took better care of their bodies they would be more attractive at 18 vs 16.

On another note, when i look at today’s 18-20 year olds, all i see are immature, irresponsible manginas and feminazis. So in that sense, adulthood should be pushed even further out.

Based soley on the bodies of people, 16-17 should be the age of adulthood… but based on the behaviours of people… it has to be closer to 40…
Perhaps the world would be better if everyone under 30 were to not be allowed to vote.

On a side note, Why does porn require 18 years yet the age of consent is 16 or less in most places of the world?

—
Edit:
Btw,
Under-aged Teens who trick older men into having sex with then should also go to jail; they know what they did was wrong!
Of, make sure to teach that it is an offence for under aged teens to trick peeps into having sex with them… would solve a lot of problems.

My Goal: To Leave Society.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

And this is what makes me lose “faith” in humanity.

This is precisely the sentiment I have.

In the end, it is not reason prevailing. It is emotion. All you need to do is throw the right “word” (rape apologist, holocaust denier, pedophile sympathizer? Really?) and you shut down the argument

But apparently for polar opposite reasoning. There is no “argument” to be had. Your acting as though I interfered with someone seeking help for a desire they realized was wrong; and in so doing reframing the topic. That is not the case.

All you need to do is throw the right “word”

This isnt about semantics. Words have f~~~ing meanings. Which “word” did I use to inadequately describe the desires of a perverted mind?

I can recognize morally repugnant desires when I see them. I dont need to discuss the varying shades of colors within the prism of their peverse mind, in some futile psuedo ‘intelectual’ exercise

The strongest expressions of passion and emotions are those that are set fire by the most deeply held of convictions of philosophical and moral significance. What do you think drives men to subjugate the single most imortant value in all forms of life, survival, to risk their lives and fight in war? It is the deeply held philosophical conviction of a peoples right to freedom; and it is expressed with passion and emotion.

I started this thread because quite honestly the fact that there was even an “argument” about the topic, made me question if I even want to be on here. That “topic” shouldn’t even be an after thought. Its too perverse and morally repugnant to even occupy any space of an after thought in a rational mans mind.

Resident cynic.

[RennieParticipant]

нσтησσв wrote:

Personally, i think that after 16 women tend to go all down hill from there; if they are not already fugly.Maybe if they took better care of their bodies they would be more attractive at 18 vs 16.

I know one thing they don’t last and if I was going to marry/invest in a t~~~ I would expect to be able to enjoy her youthfulness and beauty for atleast a few years. Perhaps as you said if they looked after themselves better they would stay hot until 30.

нσтησσв wrote:

Why does porn require 18 years yet the age of consent is 16 or less in most places of the world?

Perhaps liability reasons. Many girls look younger than they are and many look older than they are. I know of one who has the looks of 15, but she’s actually 18-19. It’s hard to determine the exact age, even a court prosecuting someone could get it wrong and put people in jail for not illegal material. Also alot of porn sites are hosted in America, possibly in states where the law is 18.

[Anonymous 29]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

I simply have to ask this question. Theres another thread in MGTOW CENTRAL discussing pedophelia. I realize it got out of hand. Why it did, I dont understand.
I have one, simple question:
isnt the deviant desire to have sex with a child wrong?
I believe its repugnant and disgusting.
I really dont think this is a debatable topic. Some members wanted to debate it.
Opinions please.

The only debate we need to have about it is what sort of punishment and that should not take too long.
My suggestion is something that will not cost the taxpayer $ 150000.00 per year but rather $20 for a bullet and a cardboard box.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Well as long as we’re on the subject of “sanity”….

I mentioned before the 2005 film called “Heading South” — with Charlotte Rampling — about middle aged / post-menopausal women traveling to have sex with underage Cuban male prostitutes. The Washington Post did a story on women in their 40s, 50s, and 60s who flocked to the theatres in droves because they got off on this s~~~. The Times quoted them as saying “we have the right to seek love wherever we can find it”… and “I WANTED TO SEE MORE SEX!!”.

The fact the NEW YORK TIMES & Washington Post finds this s~~~ fit for print is totally insane.

You’ve got people here arguing against it… and you have THE MEDIA OUT THERE ARGUING FOR IT.

Just 2 quotes:

“Brenda, who had visited three years earlier, returns, convinced that what she feels in her loins is love, not want. She races across the sand to find the boy sleeping and stares at him as if Botticelli just painted him”

“on the hunt for yet more young, smooth-skinned men of color. Here’s what she’s learned from the tragedy: She’s gotta have it. In its way, “Heading South” is a piercing indictment, though it makes its point without much screaming, hectoring or preening. It’s quietly terrific.”

You hear that?. It’s TERRIFIC!!

Even in prisons among the most vile population of criminal scum minds that exist, sex with a minor is the LOWEST status of criminal there is. You can’t do any worse in prison than that. You get “more respect” in jail for murder. Yet these middle aged women roam free(!!) and they sell tickets to that s~~~! We know it’s f~~~ing sick. But women think it’s terrific!

And we’re going to talk about what’s “sane” about this???

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 42]

That’s f~~~ing sick! When I was a little kid, boys had crew cuts, and girls had ponytails or long hair, innocence has been destroyed by the empowerment of women, everything their free to do has eclipsed all meaning of the word “insanity”!

Purging all liberal mass media from my life has brought me much sanity, TV now only p~~~es me off! Dressing up little girls to look like hookers is supposed to be cute? WTF! And the future always gets progressively worse? Only utter f~~~ing destruction will clean up this endless mess!

[Author]

Posts