Sick and Getting Sicker

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

but the way you read things and distort what others actually write is disturbing.

Im sorry, what did I say that was disturbing?

I dont think adults who have a desire to have sex with children is “ok”.

What aspect of that is disturbing to you?

Sick f~~~.

Its hillarious that others in this thread have stated that desires to have sex with children isnt wrong.

Yet you find fault with my vehement attitude against ANY form of pedophelia, in thought or action.

My universal views against pedophilia are disturbing?

Why dont you write in opposition about men stating sex with children is ok?

Youre another example of a twisted f~~~. Get it straight.

P F~~~ingS:

If ANY desire to have sex with a child is wrong, as I believe it is, then whats the BIG F~~~ING DEBATE?

You cant agree the DESIRE to have sex with a child is wrong?

Resident cynic.

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Im sorry, what did I say that was disturbing?
I dont think adults who have a desire to have sex with children is “ok”.
What aspect of that is disturbing to you?
Sick f~~~.

For starters, that you somehow manage to insult people with no other merit than not completely agreeing with you. And this in several threads, of which you started at least some.

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Im glad with the way this situation concluded, but I have to ask:
[b]Why were some of you not up in arms at first sight of what was being presented?[/b]
Im not a hot head or a violent guy, but the s~~~ that was said was grounds for casF~~~INGstration in my book.
Am I the only one who thinks this way?
You dont get a f~~~ing “pass” when you say that s~~~ and see if we can “sway” you into a normal moral compass. No – youve crossed the line into an animal not worthy of possessing your b~~~~ when you say that s~~~.
I dont give a flying rats ass about your sentimental millennial, weird ass porn fetishes involving stuffed animals, hyper gay s~~~, or anything else.
you crossed a f~~~ing line
And the perversion for which you desire will cost you.
i do NOT want some pervert like you near my family or in a society close to me…[b]you can F~~~ OFF[/b]
Wtf do you guys think about this? Please – speak freely even if you disagree with me. I want to hear some no holds barred opinions on this.

So, guilt by association, aggressive language, shaming language, should the list go on or don’t you see what you are doing with your own eyes? This is almost female class rhetorics.

I agree with CP; let KM shut this madness down. As you yourself said it; this has no place here.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

For starters, that you somehow manage to insult people with no other merit than not completely agreeing with you

The agreement here is to NOT RAPE CHILDREN.

Are you in opposition to that?

Resident cynic.

[Anonymous 11]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Im sincerely confused. What is the “madness”?

You initiated the topic, and I dont f~~~ing blame you – its SICK! I appluad you for bringing this to light. Truly.

Thanks AW, it is a worthy topic for discussion and your passion is much appreciated. I have zero tolerance for peds, and when I see the progressives trying to normalize it. I will fight this tooth and nail.

Look at cultures like Afghanistan’s, and they are dysfunctional as hell. This is what condoning this utter depravity brings.

The madness is we are justifiably so charged that we have some serious thread drift here thanks to AppleJack injecting trying understand these sickos motivations. I don’t care about understanding them. I only care about the lives they destroy. The recidivism rate is so high that peds are not redeemable.

Maybe, castration is the answer for the ones that want help if that would even work. We have to draw the line somewhere.

Also, false ped charges are possible with single moms so yet another reason to never date one.

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

The agreement here is to NOT RAPE CHILDREN.
Are you in opposition to that?

No, definitely not. And tbqh I havn’t seen anyone in opposition to that argument. Have you?

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

This is almost female class rhetorics.

Yes, my ONLY objective is NO CHILD MOLESTATION

And your against that?

Please do voice your gay pedophilia opinion.

Didnt know me being against child rape was an issue.

Please place your name and adress in your reply.

Resident cynic.

[Anonymous 42]

Keymaster wrote:

I trust everyone of you will respect the decision.

Respect it? I applaud it! burn it! Throw it overboard! These are not joyous issues, too much negativity! We know society is is on fire! Perhaps not so much focusing on the carnage from planned parenthood dissecting live children at the beginning of childhood, to the monsters that destroy children on the inside in later childhood, It’s f~~~ing madness and outrageous to the endth degree!
We should focusing on warning men to not have children, nor marriage to feed this behemoth from the depths of hell! Don’t feed it, and let it consume all the people that do.
Keep your heart pure, and your mind clean! Don’t give these corrupted women any children in the first place!
I’m going to start a new thread: Words that infuriate feminists, and are music to a unicorns ears…

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Scandinavian wrote:

Ancientwisdom wrote:

The agreement here is to NOT RAPE CHILDREN.Are you in opposition to that?

No, definitely not. And tbqh I havn’t seen anyone in opposition to that argument. Have you?

I have seen people saying

“the desires of child rapists are ok

I am against ANY: Thoughts, desires, or actions of CHILD MOLESTERS.

If you arent for pedophiles, then why are you arguing with me?

Resident cynic.

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Yes, my ONLY objective is NO CHILD MOLESTATION
And your against that?
Please do voice your gay pedophilia opinion.
Didnt know me being against child rape was an issue.
Please place your name and adress in your reply.

Oh, now isn’t that rich? Now I almost suspected you had a history of abuse as you reacted the way you did, and using that language against me I was proved right, cause if someone did not f~~~ your fecus so hard it ended up in the place your brain should have been, you could have given a more intelligent answer….

[Anonymous 11]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

If you arent for pedophiles, then why are you arguing with me?

Because MGTOWs like to argue for sport????

Seriously, it’s time to drop it. No one here is condoning this so further discussion is only inflammatory.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

scandinavian

The only point in this entire thread I have made is this:

the desire or action of having sex with a child is wrong

Please tell me which part you disagree with.

Resident cynic.

[Anonymous 9]

Pedos grind my gears like no other.

All of the grown ass women roaming around looking to be f~~~ed, and these f~~~ers look to play on a surface with no grass?

WTF?

They’re some of the most vile creatures around. Some lurking on park benches scoping out the latest victim to lure with tales of adventure; it usually starts off with candy, and then POW!

In the blink of an eye.

I’d never hesitate to put a bullet in the head of the guy who abused my child if that ever were the case.

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

scandinavian
The only point in this entire thread I have made is this:
the desire or action of having sex with a child is wrong
Please tell me which part you disagree with.

The part I disagree with is where you call other members pedophiles, pedophile sympathisers or gays (now the last part I personally have no problems with) just by not agreeing without questions or doubt. Some here have voiced opinions that desire and actions are not the same per se. I think this is a reasonable question. But attacking people using guilt by association just for asking questions? Guys that in no way has defended abuse, that I can’t see having expressed any lust for children in any way. Calling them names and going on using the same questions when confronted and namecalling in-between? Sorry, I don’t approve, and you can call me gay and pedophile as much as you want. You are just a bully, nothing more than that, thinking you can shame and force your will and your views on anyone just by using foul language. You are making enemies out of friends, and that is not a good trait.

[megatoad69Participant 449]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

“MegaToad” quite the fitting handle you CHOSE

????????

So you were molested as a child
Im sorry to hear that. Truly. You should seek help…

Crotch grab is all that happened, I felt violated, but molested…..Hardly.[/quote]

Ahhh yes, lets victimize the perpetrators. This is the summon bonum of liberal logic! That POOR pedaphile: such a VICTIM!

So f~~~ing what, I think pedos were born pedos, I am not defending or sypathising for them, I don’t think a person just decides to be a pedo.

So you agree its SICK, then what is the debate over calling his DESIRES “sick” (?).
Youre splitting hairs and making victims and martyrs out of crime perpetrators, in this case CHILD RAPISTS is tantamount to feminists and PC liberal thinking.
Lets feel “sorry” for the child RAPIST and better understand him rather than JUDGE.

OK, you are going way overboard here, I don’t feel sorry for pedos, I would hope they didn’t even exist, but saying I am a sypathiser and creating victims and martyrs is out of bounds sir!

I don’t like you accusatory tone.

You can't reason with unreasonable, there; women, figured out, there is nothing to reason.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

you can call me gay and pedophile as much as you want. You are just a bully, nothing more than that, thinking you can shame and force your will and your views on anyone just by using foul language. You are making enemies out of friends, and that is not a good trait.

I state the simple fact that:.
the sexual desire of an adult for a child, or the act of child rape is wrong

And somehow you find a problem with me? How f~~~ing rich.

I think any adult desiring to have sex with a child is wrong.

And YOU fualt me for this?

You make a specious argument

ohhhh, he was BORN that way

F~~~ that.

What if a man RAPED your daughter?

he was BORN that way!

A man KILLED your wife:

he was BORN that way!

Any other f~~~ing excuses?

I dont like adults who sexually desire children. Please tell me how Im wrong.

Resident cynic.

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

I state the simple fact that:. the sexual desire of an adult for a child, or the act of child rape is wrong
And somehow you find a problem with me? How f~~~ing rich.
I think any adult desiring to have sex with a child is wrong.
And YOU fualt me for this?
You make a specious argument

ohhhh, he was BORN that way
F~~~ that.

What if a man RAPED your daughter?
he was BORN that way!

A man KILLED your wife:
he was BORN that way!

Any other f~~~ing excuses?
I dont like adults who sexually desire children. Please tell me how Im wrong.

Hehe, oh man, if he killed my wife (if I had one), I would give the guy a medal! Besides that, I have no daughter, I don’t like kids (don’t like, don’t love, don’t lust for).

I’m not making excuses here, you are; I have expressedly told you what my problem is with your arguments; that it goes on persona even if they have not claimed any of those traits you go on and on and on and on and on and on about!

As you seem to not actually understand what is written in clear text, I find no reason to waste my time talking to a wall. Have a good day and hope you’ll get well sometime.

[Anonymous 9]

So now pedos were born that way?

GTFOH.

I have a hard time accepting the biological excuse for homosexuality. As in people were born that way.

So I’m definitely not buying that s~~~ about pedos.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Have a good day and hope you’ll get well sometime.

I already am well. Apparently youre not because you have a problem with me not accepting pedophiles

Again my only position is that

men should NOT sexually desire or RAPE children

Which part of this do you have a problem with?

Resident cynic.

[megatoad69Participant 449]

Anonymous wrote:

So now pedos were born that way?
GTFOH.
I have a hard time accepting the biological excuse for homosexuality. As in people were born that way.
So I’m definitely not buying that s~~~ about pedos.

I can spot a homo from across the street, I think homos were born homos.
I think pedos were born pedos.

I myself, nor anyone else who thinks this in any f~~~ing way condones pedophilia.

Thanks for your OPINION.

You can't reason with unreasonable, there; women, figured out, there is nothing to reason.

[megatoad69Participant 449]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Have a good day and hope you’ll get well sometime.

I already am well. Apparently youre not because you have a problem with me not accepting pedophiles
Again my only position is that
men should NOT sexually desire or RAPE children
Which part of this do you have a problem with?

YOU!

You can't reason with unreasonable, there; women, figured out, there is nothing to reason.

[Author]

Posts