women hate softboys

[Old BuckParticipant 3596]

ghost wrote:

All the rich guys now are softboys. That is the world we live in. You no longer win with muscle. We don’t live in the stone ages anymore. It has always been and will always be about RESOURCES. She wants MONEY. Every woman is a gold digger. You will never convince me otherwise.

She might cheat on her rich softboy with a Chad but she will never marry one if she can nail down a rich softboy.

Couldn’t say that any better.

You can work out all you want, been there done that. They might talk to me but when they don’t see 100 dollar bills being flashed around, its on to another ATM

Don't chase tail. Turn yours around, walk away, and live free!

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

I smell tuna.

Did you noticed guys that one of the links is outdated and not working anymore?

It doesn’t seem a spontaneous thing…it seems like it was PREPARED.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[ghostParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

I smell tuna.

I just checked the history on this c~~~.

100% tuna.

Time to nail this bitch to the cross.

[FreedomGuyParticipant 51]

ghost wrote:

Women can go f~~~ themselves. Who cares.

MGTOW.

Exactly!!! Who the f~~~ cares what they think!!!

[Anonymous 12]

Women are frustrated because men no longer play by their rules. Women still want to be taken out, have the man pay for everything, be spoiled etc etc. Even women who try and become sugar babies still want to be wooed.

Men, even Blue Pillers know that there are plenty of women who will give it up for little effort exerted.

So it is not all women who are frustrated. Just the ones who expect too much and give too little.

Like the women who join dating sites and write stuff like “Looking for marriage” that’s great, but even if I were looking for that, how do I know I want it with you?

Women also think the world revolves around them so they are not aware that men are also confused and many of us simply don’t care.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

From the second link

Such men are convinced that it is perfectly fine for him to be “a gatherer,” but the problem is, women are not natural “hunters.” Nevertheless, because women are ever the adapters, they have chosen to compensate for the rise of the culturally androgynous male, aka, the “male gatherer.” She has now assumed his previous role—that of protector and provider.

This is actually a false narrative, it’s a mix of tradcon and feminism.
It may be rare in USA, but in my country is mainstream, and it’s really toxic: even more than the intersectionalist feminist nuts.
There’s no such thing as women assuming the role of provider (even less “protector”): if there would be, then feminists would be right.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 3]

ghost wrote:

I just checked the history on this c~~~.

100% tuna.

Time to nail this bitch to the cross.

What’s with all these tuna troll accounts that joined 2+ years ago? OP and the Michael guy in the thread down below both joined in November 2015. WOTGM joined like 2.5 years ago.

[ghostParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

What’s with all these tuna troll accounts that joined 2+ years ago? OP and the Michael guy in the thread down below both joined in November 2015. WOTGM joined like 2.5 years ago.

I think we are more vigilant now.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

ghost wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

I smell tuna.

I just checked the history on this c~~~.

100% tuna.

Time to nail this bitch to the cross.

It’s probably the author of the second article.

I didn’t even check the history of the account, it was quite clear.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[ghostParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

It’s probably the author of the second article.

Yes, that is a definite. Great catch, Eric.

Keymaster will flush this bitch soon.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

Gambit wrote:

I just checked the history on this c~~~.

100% tuna.

Time to nail this bitch to the cross.

What’s with all these tuna troll accounts that joined 2+ years ago? OP and the Michael guy in the thread down below both joined in November 2015. WOTGM joined like 2.5 years ago.

Different situations:

Michael probably joined in good faith, but he also frequented ROKs: now Micheal finally got some pussy so now he thinks he’s a great man. He don’t even grasp the idea that a man could be really uninterested about getting pussy because the juice isn’t worth the squeeze.

WOTGM is a guy who can’t get laid and have a lot of frustrations, he never evolved because he lacks something really important: he’s not able to hear what other tell him. He’s like a walking eco-chamber.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

ghost wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

It’s probably the author of the second article.

Yes, that is a definite.

Keymaster will flush this bitch soon.

From the comments to her article, she’s discussing with a man:

Furthermore. I continue to reject the reasons that MGTOW give for avoiding women. These excuses—are only that. Women are fearful too, mostly of potential violence or cheating.

Anyway, the most obvious problem here is that MGTOW take the wrong approach. Their expectations are unrealistic. They need to approach dating with a more relaxed attitude. My article: “Savvydating 101” might prove helpful.

It’s clearly the same person of our OP.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

On an earlier post Gilgamesh said:

“Of course, the assumption of many of you would be that I am some sort of troll, living in mom’s basement, swilling beer, or a repressed homosexual. Actually, I have a degree, own a truck and a classic car, a house, and have land and substantial savings. I am 5-feet-11 (oh, just short of that magic 6 feet!) 172 pounds, fit enough to backpack at 11,000 feet, and brave enough to climb into the wreckage of a pickup truck to treat a little girl trapped there, all while the fire department tears the truck apart around us (sorry, ladies, but unfortunately, we are not paid well for doing that). I don’t like to brag but I am also not a virgin maladept—I’ve made love to 25 women in my life.

I am what women used to want in a man, but because I am not a wealthy sociopath, I don’t excite the ladies.”

I think the last sentence is the gravamen of the current post. He’s wondering why women aren’t chasing him.

[ghostParticipant]

Men hate ugly c~~~s like you who have nothing better to do than illegally join male-only forums.

We get it. No one wants you anymore. Guess what? We don’t give a f~~~. Go f~~~ yourself, bitch.

[IRuleMeParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

You might recognize a common MGTOW theme in some of these posts from women—frustration with wimpy men. We call them “blue pills,” or “betas,” they call them “soft boys.” These single sadsacks are even making catlady and vibrator jokes, just like MGTOW. And they also blame feminism to some degree, but also the Sexual Revolution.

Who cares! Women are equal players of the game. In fact, generally speaking they’re better at it than men. These so called “soft boys” are the byproduct of being raised by whom? That’s right, women!

Anonymous wrote:

The last few decades have truly f~~~ed up relations between men and women. Feminism wanted to make the genders interchangeable, hell, even make our plumbing interchangeable. Gender differences were just cultural and would blow away eventually. Feminism got lesbianized. Tragically, some of us stupid SOBs fell for it, for far too long.

It doesn’t work. Men are p~~~ed. Women are frustrated. We are drifting into a hateful mitosis in which no one trusts anyone.

The simple fact is genders can’t change. Women want men to be men, and men want women who are women. Hell, I’ve noticed that even young, hot women will talk to you if you pick the right moment and walk right up. You might not win her immediately, but a woman does respond to a man being a man. Women don’t want softboys. We don’t want female competitors. Some men and some women are starting to get the message

Act like a man, and only go after feminine women. Watch what happens.

Who cares, women created this mess in the first place. And men by and large let them get away with it because today’s “men” are too pussified to set them in their place and tell them otherwise. The state of affairs is what happens when you let women run things.

Your reasoning gives the impression of a mangina. Worried about society, and worried about men’s interaction with females. I’ve done some investigating of my own of your threads and methinks it’s time to kick the can with this mangina.

Mr Meeseeks… Time for a c~~~ punt.

[ghostParticipant]

PistolPete wrote:

He’s wondering why women aren’t chasing him.

It’s a she, Pete. See Eric’s post.

[Anonymous 11]

Women are getting exactly what they deserve as are simps.

[goodkid43Spectator 550]

I read the second link of gilgamesh’s opening post. And guess what!!!! The author asserts numerous times throughout the article that it is…..are you ready???…. ALL MEN’S FAULT!!!! Who would have thought…….

For example, they blamed the sexual revolution on MEN and all that free love (cant blame the feminist movement…no you wont go there).

And the last paragraph suggests that what women really want are “soft men”!!!!

“From now on, let the male gatherer do whatever he wants to do, just so long as he isn’t doing it with you. Your responsibility as a woman is to turn your attention toward the man who shows you that he cares—through his actions. Listen to your woman’s heart and mind. Only then will you be assured of love that will stand the test of time.”

A hard man is controlling; a soft man is weak!!!!!?????

When asking what a woman wants, NEVER ask a woman!

God bless, Michael

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

ghost wrote:

It’s a she, Pete. See Eric’s post.

Sorry missed it.

I concede the distinct possibility—some of the other threads are ‘questionable” and there is no introduction. I think I’m catching the scent.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

OK Tuna!

I note the thread was a “fire and forget” the OP is no longer logged on and failed to respond…that is the hallmark of a tuna. Launch a turd then leave. YUP

[Author]

Posts