Well, of course people are allowed to say what they think. However, think about it—would these trolls say things like that to your face in a bar? No, because they would likely wake up in the parking lot, wondering what happened to their teeth. (this is not a faint threat.I threw down with a 200-pound, 26-year-old male not long ago, and won—OK, he was drunk, and the cops weren’t far away, but point is, I can and do use force)
I mean, we all appreciate what Cassie Jaye did, looking at MRA and MGTOW. I was just pointing out that some women are coming to the same conclusions as we are. Must we declare war on women? If so, why do we have forums on relationships and dating? Most of us are not monk. I think most of us are very wary of women now, but, hell, if a unicorn came along…..right?
This author and article
https://pairedlife.com/dating/Why-Women-are-Frustrated-and-Confused-about-Men-and-Dating
is worse than standard feminism: this is a mix of the worst of feminism and the worst of tradcon.
What she suggest is basically a woman being fully feminist but acting as an “old times lady” when it comes at dating.
Who is the male gatherer? He is the male who claims to have embraced equality, but who actually doesn’t respect women all that much. You’ve come across him. He is the guy who let’s the women come to him. He does not pursue women. He lives solely for his own pleasure. His take is, “If women want equal rights, let her prove herself to me.”
Indeed that’s right and she’s wrong: if women are equal, then they have to prove themselves to a man.
Otherwise they cannot be equal.
Feminists had the right idea about wanting more equality, as in equal pay, but they got a little side-tracked by the free love thing. What they didn’t realize is that most men are more than happy to accept the “No Strings Attached” philosophy of “free love.” His philosophy goes something like this: “If we live together, I will enjoy the convenience of having a quasi-wife, but without any messy responsibilities or financial risk.”
The male gatherer is into “low stress” relationships. In the event he should decide a woman with whom he is co-habitating doesn’t meet his needs after all, he has no problem leaving. His reasons why?
“She was too much trouble. Who needs the drama?”
Meanwhile, he takes pleasure in having sex on a regular basis. Gratification with no commitment and no repercussions—that’s his motto.
Here she attacks even cohabitations, she wants men to sign a marriage contract.
And here there’s the part where she recommend to women full feminism and selfishness
In any event, any woman who truly wants an emotionally satisfying relationship with a man must first decide to place more value on her worth, her time, her career and her passions. In so doing, she changes her own perspective about the value of her life. Women must realize that meeting a great guy is icing on the cake. Icing is delicious; it can make a lovely difference—but it is still optional.
The problem however, is that when the going gets rough, because gatherer guy believes “she has too many expectations that don’t match with my idea of fairness,” it is all too easy for him to walk away. His feeling is, “I’ll go my way and she can go her way.”
Further s~~~, she wants trap men into marriage contract.
So either you’re a tuna (and probably the author of such s~~~) or you’re an idiot who, after so much time here, did understand exactly NOTHING.
What she suggest is basically a woman being fully feminist but acting as an “old times lady” when it comes at dating.
SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.
Romulus 2 years, 3 months ago.
