Ronda Rousey Loses !!!

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

Finally good riddance to this feminist,I can beat a man talking c~~~! Now back to sports…………….

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

http://www.smh.com.au/sport/ufc-193-ronda-rousey-loses-to-holly-holm-20151115-gkzhj6.html

Beat me by 9 minutes…

[RoyDalParticipant]

She is so liberal, it makes one wonder if she hasn’t been kicked in the head three times too many. Thus, I’ve been ignoring news about her for some time now.

I had to look this one up. Here’s what I found:

Holly Holm KO’s Ronda Rousey to win women’s bantamweight title
ESPN
MELBOURNE, Australia — No one is unbeatable in mixed martial arts. Not even Ronda Rousey. Former world boxing champion Holly Holm (10-0) scored the biggest upset in the sport’s history Sunday, knocking out Rousey (12-1) with a left head kick in the …

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[RennieParticipant]

Finally, about time she got put in her place. Not just beaten but knocked out. Guess you weren’t so tough after all, eh ronda?

Pretty much proves she’d lose trying to fight against any average male fighter.

[RoyDalParticipant]

Rennie wrote:

Pretty much proves she’d lose trying to fight against any average male fighter.

I will admit she could beat the tar out of me — that is once she recovers. That is what a man does. in my opinion: He admits his weaknesses as well as acknowledges his strengths. All we got from her was bragging and foolish political pronouncements.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 18]

Female sports (admittedly women in better shape than me) reminds me of my first PC running Windows 98 ®.

Something sweet about it. Innocence. Reps for trying. But no thanks.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Not surprised. I had a short debate with a guy who believed she could beat men. I told him there’s no way she would and it’s impossible to tell how good she is or isn’t because the competition in the women’s division is scarce. She’s a one eyed queen in the land of the blind. Of course he disagreed. Now I can rub his face in it.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[RennieParticipant]

uchibenkei wrote:

Not surprised. I had a short debate with a guy who believed she could beat men. I told him there’s no way she would and it’s impossible to tell how good she is or isn’t because the competition in the women’s division is scarce. She’s a one eyed queen in the land of the blind. Of course he disagreed. Now I can rub his face in it.

Also had a discussion like that with the now vanquished facebook guy. He insisted she could beat up men. Now she got destroyed by another woman in a landslide and knocked out to boot.

Be interesting to see if that guy had anything to say if I ever met him again. I doubt he would have to guts to admit she sucks.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

Australia only

you can view the video here but you have to be in Australia or use Hola or something.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[Anonymous 26]

Sounds to me like the vanquished facebook guy was afraid of Ronda kicking the s~~~ out of his mangina!

There is no way in heaven, or hell, or earth, or one of Saturn’s f~~~en moons that she could take guys down like Matt Hughes or GSP! It would be a slaughter. Now any guess how long it will take to make a come back, or will she get into a big ol tub of ice cream first.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

ALWAYS someone bigger and better out there ….. ALWAYS.

Don’t think so?

Look in a mirror & if a female stares back …… YOU’RE WRONG.

This is because men respect strength in all forms …. even Ronda.

But women can HAVE IT ALL and can do every thing better.

That’s why you became unconscious MMzzz Rousey.

[RennieParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Sounds to me like the vanquished facebook guy was afraid of Ronda kicking the s~~~ out of his mangina!

There is no way in heaven, or hell, or earth, or one of Saturn’s f~~~en moons the she could guys like Matt Hughes or GSP! It would be a slaughter. Now any guess how long it will take to make a come back, or will she get into a big ol tub of ice cream first.

I hope she limps away in shame and spends the rest of her life in disgrace and poverty. Her mission a failure…

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

Sounds to me like the vanquished facebook guy was afraid of Ronda kicking the s~~~ out of his mangina!

There is no way in heaven, or hell, or earth, or one of Saturn’s f~~~en moons that she could take guys down like Matt Hughes or GSP! It would be a slaughter. Now any guess how long it will take to make a come back, or will she get into a big ol tub of ice cream first.

She can’t take down any healthy male of a decent size, or even any male of her size or smaller that has had any training and isn’t in some way physically impaired.

The different in strength between a man and a woman is absurd. A woman has to be roughly a foot taller and 50+ lbs heavier before she will be as strong or stronger than an equivalent male, and I’m not even sure if that even works if said male is very fit.

[MGTOWmonkey aka No More Fucks To GiveParticipant 6635]

As the stakes get higher and higher (marketing,popularity,money,investors,feminist worshippers) men know to get in a zone/zen state of mind to stay focused on the task at hand to maintain as well as enhance his brand,this t~~~ just chose to run her mouth on talk shows,news outlet,social media about her ability to beat men,wage gaps ect, now look a female knocks your ass out with a stellar roundhouse kick!

Never lose sight of what brought you here.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Repeat after me: “There is always a bigger fish.”

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

In the words of Dean Martin, “Ain’t that a kick in the head”. I’m always happy when some overhyped celebrity gets hit in the face with reality. Her over the top behavior, trash talking and crying at the weigh-in made it clear that Ms. Everything had lost it. She was exposed as an attention whore who likes to make out with women at parties and once said before a match that since her opponent was hot she would like to make out with her as much as fight her. Looks like Holly Holmes gave her some rough sex.

[Anonymous 26]

Anonymous wrote:

The different in strength between a man and a woman is absurd. A woman has to be roughly a foot taller and 50+ lbs heavier before she will be as strong or stronger than an equivalent male, and I’m not even sure if that even works if said male is very fit.

aye and that’s if she not doping!

Am not ashamed to admit it… she could kick my ass, am not in tip top shape and haven’t had the MMA training!

“There is always a bigger fish.”

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

Rennie wrote:

Pretty much proves she’d lose trying to fight against any average male fighter.

Considering the fact that she is a bantamweight (not a heavyweight), the male fighter could be below average and still kick her
ass sideways.

[JasonParticipant 282]

Anonymous wrote:

Paul_LeC wrote:

Sounds to me like the vanquished facebook guy was afraid of Ronda kicking the s~~~ out of his mangina!

There is no way in heaven, or hell, or earth, or one of Saturn’s f~~~en moons that she could take guys down like Matt Hughes or GSP! It would be a slaughter. Now any guess how long it will take to make a come back, or will she get into a big ol tub of ice cream first.

She can’t take down any healthy male of a decent size, or even any male of her size or smaller that has had any training and isn’t in some way physically impaired.

The different in strength between a man and a woman is absurd. A woman has to be roughly a foot taller and 50+ lbs heavier before she will be as strong or stronger than an equivalent male, and I’m not even sure if that even works if said male is very fit.

I’ll just repost, since a lot of people still live in La La Land (no offense, Phoenix; I feel fairly certain it comes down to a lack of experience rather than self-delusion):

Jason wrote:

I don’t know anything about this Ronda person, nor will I pretend to, but I would like to point something out in regards to martial arts and fighting.
Many people, including many people I’ve seen here on MGTOW.com, have a very skewed view of what constitutes fighting. Most (but not all) of the “fighters” involved in boxing, MMA and many other popular sports haven’t undergone fighting training – they’ve undergone sports training. They have learnt techniques and tactics tailored to work under certain conditions, with certain rules and safety precautions. Nothing wrong with that, but many people mistake their success under those conditions to mean they would have equal success under all conditions.

I mentioned this in another thread, but I’ll repeat the brief info: I’ve practiced martial arts for 23 years. I have engaged in hundreds of fights. I have engaged in thousands of sparring matches. I have fought hundreds of opponents of all skill levels, of dozens of different fighting styles. In all this time, I have only ever lost when fighting five or more opponents at once or when facing a single opponent of roughly my own size or smaller and with roughly equal or greater speed and skill.

Now, with that out of the way…
The most common misconception I see in regards to fighting has to do with body weight, size and muscle strength. By which I mean that many people – indeed, most – mistakenly believe that the larger, stronger person automatically has an advantage. In no-holds-barred fighting between opponents with even a modicum of skill and experience, this only holds true in wrestling and grappling. In unarmed striking and weapons fighting, on the other hand, the smaller opponent almost always has a distinct advantage. Why?
To calculate striking power, you need to take into account acceleration rate and mass. Most people know this. However, most people do not know that acceleration plays a much, much bigger part in this calculation than mass. To illustrate this, let’s use an extreme example:
Two people. One weighs, oh, let’s say 150 lbs/68 kg. The other, 300 lbs/136 kg. Now, let’s say the lighter person has twice the acceleration rate of the heavier.
What does this result in? The lighter person – yes, the one weighing half as much as the heavier person – hits a helluva lot harder. Not only that, the person probably has a smaller frame, and thus smaller fists, meaning that greater force gets concentrated onto a smaller area, causing even more damage.
For an example that some people will have an easier time understanding, consider a car, going 10mph. This will have a certain amount of kinetic energy. Now, imagine that same car going 20mph – at first glance one would think that this car would have exactly twice the kinetic energy, right? Wrong. The car going 20mph has four times the kinetic energy of the same car going 10mph. The reason? Speed/acceleration plays a much bigger part than mass when it comes to determining kinetic energy. The simplified calculation for an object in motion goes: Mass * speed * speed. Yup, you multiply the mass by the speed by the speed. So a doubling of speed means a quadrupling of kinetic energy.
When it comes to weapons fighting, as long as you meet the “minimum requirements” to properly wield the weapon, any excess strength doesn’t do much to help, and in many cases can actually work to your disadvantage, depending on the weapon and technique used. Again, then, speed/acceleration plays a much bigger role than size, mass and strength.

Now, with the (simplified) science out of the way, let’s move on.

So, given the above, why do these gross misconceptions exist? Some (most?) of you have probably figured it out already – modern martial sports, and their prevalence in mass media (also Hollywood and comic books, with their ridiculously inefficiently proportioned action heroes). In modern boxing, MMA, sports karate, and so on, official matches operate under certain rules and safety precautions. Most notably, they ban killing and crippling techniques and most nerve and vital strikes. In addition, they usually force the participants to make use of protective gear such as padded gloves. What does this all mean for the fighters? Answer: Many things, but two stand out.
Firstly, the ban on techniques skews the fight heavily from the beginning. Why? Because smaller, faster fighters have a huge advantage in making use of (most) such techniques when compared to larger, slower fighters. If you want to put it in “game terms”, the smaller, faster fighters just got nerfed something fierce.
Secondly, the use of protective gear. Padded gloves do not only provide padding – which would confer more-or-less equal disadvantage to both fighters – they also increase the striking surface. Percentage-wise, if we assume the fighters use the same model of glove, they increase the smaller fighter’s striking surface area a lot more than the larger fighter’s. The additional weight – and thus decrease in acceleration – also has a greater percentage increase for the smaller fighter. Same goes for worn padding; the percentage decrease in efficiency becomes significantly greater for the smaller, faster fighter compared to the larger, heavier fighter. In game terms, again, the smaller, faster fighter just got nerfed something fierce.

Chiefly because of the two above points, many, many people have a very skewed view of actual fighting. Indeed, even many so-called “fighters” have this view, due to a lack of experience with fighting without the aforementioned rules and limitations.

Now, some people may want to protest the above, citing instances of “traditional” fighters going into the ring against “sports” fighters and losing. Now, setting aside that most “traditional” fighters that have done so have had middling skill at best, remember the two points above. These traditional fighters suddenly see as many as half or more of their techniques rendered illegal (forcing them to grossly revise their tactics on the fly), and of their remaining techniques, virtually all suddenly got a helluva lot less effective. Going the other way around – with the sports fighter going up, no-holds-barred, against the traditional fighter – the sports fighter likely wouldn’t last more than a few seconds, at best, against an opponent of equal skill. Why? Because he uses techniques and tactics tailor-made for use under certain rules and safety precautions, which don’t exist outside the ring. Of course, some sports fighters also practice traditional martial arts in addition to martial sports, so don’t take this as applying in every single case.

For something more illustrative: Imagine a tiger, raised in captivity. In its youth it had its teeth and claws pulled out – not just trimmed, pulled out. Its owners then set it up to fight against other, similarly crippled tigers. The years go by, and the tiger becomes more and more proficient at fighting without its natural weapons. Then one day, its owners manage to capture a wild tiger, and decide to have it fight the first tiger. However, to make the fight “fair”, they pull out the recently-captured tiger’s teeth and claws before putting the tigers into the ring together. Who do you think will win – the tiger that has spent its entire life fighting without its teeth and claws, or the one that only just had them removed? Now, imagine that same match-up, but with the second tiger retaining its teeth and claws. What do you think will happen?

I hope this helps people understand the difference between martial arts and martial sports and why you really, really shouldn’t confuse or conflate the two (which a helluva lot of people do, sadly).

Now, lastly, how all this relates to the thread: I do not know this Ronda person, nor will I pretend to. However, with this post I wanted to point out that many – indeed, perhaps most, for all I know – of the protests against her ability to go up against a male fighter stem from peoples’ misconceptions about fighting, based on the points I’ve made above. Again, I don’t know anything about her, nor any other famous sports fighter, male or female (I don’t follow sports), so I have no idea how she would actually fare in a fight against any one particular fighter.

Just my two cents.

There lies serenity in Chaos. Seek ye the eye of the hurricane.

[UntamedParticipant]

Experts said Holm delivered “the perfect fight”, standing up to Rousey’s aggressive approach, an approach that ultimately backfired.”

It’s the feminist approach and it always backfires, that’s why they’re so mad all the time.
How could Rousey beat a man when she got beat by a woman? Wishful thinking much?
Feminists’ logic still has a few hundred years of evolution to go through before it can be viable for the masses. Problem is they don’t have much time, Doomsday clock puts us at 3mins before midnight.

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[Author]

Posts