Potheads Are Annoying

[Anonymous 54]

Russky wrote:

All the potheads I ever met were nicest, kindest, down to earth people, who never meant any harm. A lot of them were much more open-minded and smart

Thank you.Personaly ,I would just say I’m a guy that smokes.

[raindogParticipant 313]

"Free your mind and your ass will follow. The kingdom of heaven is within." -Funkadelic

[Ash NrahkParticipant 199]

[raindogParticipant 313]

"Free your mind and your ass will follow. The kingdom of heaven is within." -Funkadelic

[Stan1192Participant 178]

What you did there ,Jack , is tried to convince me , in mathematical terms that “∞ = 1”. You can’t turn infinity in to 1 the same way you can’t generalize people and actions in such a way that you did.

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

I think that people shouldn’t smoke drugs except for medical reasons.

But … yeah … something should not automatically be illegal just because it isn’t a good idea.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[Anonymous 54]

I smoke cause I like to get Fuuuucked up. Don’t give a motherf~~~ing rats was what anyone thinks of that. Now go have a f~~~ing drink. Don’t come looking for a piece of my liver when you need it.

[Anonymous 3]

Russky wrote:

Jack, you know who’s really annoying? Pseudo-intellectual moralists who like to virtue signal, talk in a condescending way – “better than thou”-types. People like you.

Don’t tell me how to live and I won’t tell you where to go. Deal?

All the “potheads” I ever met were nicest, kindest, down to earth people, who never meant any harm. A lot of them were much more open-minded and smarter than regular Joes. You must be living on a different planet or something

And you know what I find really annoying?

Idiots who don’t read posts and just jump on the band wagon with everybody else.

I’m not virtue signalling. YOU ARE. Look at your post. You’re signalling to everybody else:

“Hey look I’m down with you guys.” You haven’t bothered to consider what I said.

Basically, you’re a t~~~.

[Anonymous 3]

Stan1192 wrote:

What you did there ,Jack , is tried to convince me , in mathematical terms that “∞ = 1”. You can’t turn infinity in to 1 the same way you can’t generalize people and actions in such a way that you did.

That makes no sense and I have a degree in maths. But then, I suppose you probably think smoking pot and spouting pseudo-mathematical garbage makes you a genius.

I’ll leave you to your delusions and your fantasy world.

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

Russky wrote:

All the potheads I ever met were nicest, kindest, down to earth people, who never meant any harm. A lot of them were much more open-minded and smart

Thank you.Personaly ,I would just say I’m a guy that smokes.

I think we’d already figured that out.

[Anonymous 3]

Boar wrote:

Folks, it might be best to not post and wait for this thread to be moved to the Litter Box.

Since you’re a c~~~, you’d like that. You hate it when people disagree with you, don’t you? Especially when it’s on your pet subject – gettin’ high.

[Anonymous 3]

Grumpy wrote:

Jack wrote:

They deny there is any correlation or associative link between cannabis and violence, despite the fact that the issue is under learned discussion by academics and clinicians all over the internet.

I’ll bite with this.

Then why the f~~~ would any government accept licensed psychologists and medical doctors recommendations for marijuana to be used by former COMBAT SOLDIERS with PTSD???
Jesus McRatF~~~…
Not dangerous enough before, lets give them grass or any other substance to make them more violent??
Not buying it

Where is the evidence that this is an effective treatment for PTSD?

I think this is another fig leaf for legalisation – military veterans tend to be viewed sympathetically, which makes it difficult to argue against it without upsetting people.

[Anonymous 3]

Samsquanch wrote:

Been smoking pot every day since I was 17. I own a home, car, never been late on a bill, ever. Never assaulted anyone, never stolen money to buy my drugs, no medical conditions, if someone doesn’t like pot, I don’t try to convince them to like it. I know people who are much more successful than me who smoke pot on a regular basis. People who paint pot smokers as all the same annoy me…

Well, all pot smokers are the same – since they all smoke pot, they all do something in common, don’t they.

Tell me something – Why is it such a feat that you own your home, car and never been late with a bill (if we’re to believe that)?

You seem to be implying that we should be impressed that a pot smoker has achieved all these things. Why is that?

[Anonymous 3]

Smitty the Great One wrote:

Dear Jack,
I smoke pot every day, I’m smoking right now. From the bottom of my crusty heart…. F~~~ YOU! Self righteous pricks like you really p~~~ me off. Die in a fire….

-Smitty

Yeah? And f~~~ you, you f~~~ing c~~~.

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

You most glorious bastard Smitty! I wanna be like you!

I suppose it would be an improvement on being like you, you f~~~ing pointless, gormless t~~~.

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

I smoke weed. I also have a steady job, savings, no criminal record.

Again, I’m fascinated about why you think this is some kind of achievement. Is it that you privately think I might be right?

Anonymous wrote:

Humanity has used substances for many applications throughout history. Nobody is going to change that. No government law is going to eradicate drugs from human society. Ever. Thus… it’s not worth getting angry about.

And people say I’m condescending.

Jack wrote:

I realise that other legal substances – I’m thinking here in particular of alcohol – are perhaps more harmful, both medically and socially, but that is not an argument for legalising cannabis or condoning its use.

Perhaps not, but it IS an argument to outlaw alcohol. If you drink alcohol I still think you are a hypocrite for bashing pot users. Not that it matters, one little rant isn’t going to eradicate millenia of substance (ab)use anyway. Not a realistic proposition. I’d check out of this fight, it’s one you can’t win.

[/quote]

Wait a minute, aren’t you contradicting yourself here? You started by telling me how wrong I am to think a substance should remain outlawed.

I’m teetotal, by the way.

[Anonymous 3]

finallyfree wrote:

Dear Jack, you sound like a very whiny man. End of post.

And you’re a c~~~. End of post.

[Anonymous 3]

Tiga K wrote:

When people post non-MGTOW related post in MGTOW Central, I find that rather annoying. This would’ve been more appropriate in the Politics forum. As for the debate, I don’t really have a strong opinion on the matter and it isn’t going anywhere anyways.

Then why comment on it then, you silly t~~~?

[Anonymous 3]

Anonymous wrote:

Jack wrote:

Old Sage wrote:

F~~~ you ,you stinking little c~~~.

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Old Sage wrote:

F~~~ you ,you stinking little c~~~.

Well said, I second that.

Behold – the pothead approach to debate.

It’s soooo intellectual.

Theres nothing to debate you arrogant STINKING little piece of s~~~.
I don’t care what annoyes little pussys like you.
I’ve done things littl morons like you can only dream about.

Anonymous wrote:

HEY F~~~ YOU JACK!
(I’ve all ways wanted to say that,but never ran in to an as whole named jack..till now)

Your annoyed little snow flake?

Your life must be sooo diffulcult.
I am not an intellectual.
I don’t need to be to recognize a pompous little ASS when I see one.

Now you retaalieate ,while I go smoke a bone.
Good day.

It’s so nice to get the reasoned view of a cannabis user on an important subject.

[Anonymous 3]

FrostByte wrote:

Jack wrote:

Cannabis users don’t actually believe in individual freedom in a constructive sense. What they believe in is the freedom to harm themselves and other people. That may be freedom, but it is not a freedom I would like many other people to have. It’s like giving a minority of people the freedom to murder without legal repercussions, while the rest of us are left defenceless. (sic)

Seriously??? That’s is the most ludicrous statement I have heard on all these posts.
When do you get to you speak for all pot users? Did they elect you their spokes person?
I’m part of “the rest of us” and I am not defenseless by any measure of the word. When did I elect you to speak for me?

“It’s like giving a minority of people the freedom to murder without legal repercussions”
No, it’s not like that at all. I can’t even list the amount of fallacies that your argument violates.
THUS
Ad hominem is the only argument you deserve back. So here it is.
“You sir are one dumb mother f~~~er.”

I judge people by their actions. I conclude that cannabis users are not interested in true freedom because they engage in a harmful and selfish activity to the detriment of others.

I judge you by your post above and conclude you can’t reason or argue. I have never said that I speak for cannabis users, only that I have a view on them. I emphasised before that I was using an analogy, but you are not interested in this, you just want to bash me.

[Author]

Posts