Legalized prostitution and male confidence.

[OldBillParticipant]

While I’d legalize prostitution in a heartbeat, because I’m a local control kind of guy, I’d also leave the both the yes/no question and most of the details up to each community much like how liquor sales are currently handled in the US.

I’ve done a lot of work in Nevada over the years and have many professional and personal contacts there. Please trust me when I tell you that Nevada’s current system is not one you’d want to “import” to your state.

The state and not the counties or municipalities in question determine where brothels are legal. That creates a situation where localities have brothels the inhabitants don’t want. It also foists any enforcement, licensing, and inspection costs onto those localities along with all the other problems. The state gets to pocket the tourist dollars the brothels bring in while the relatively poor counties foot the bill for hosting those brothels.

Las Vegas, for example, would love to have legalized prostitution and is rich enough to easily handle the various costs associated with their legal, health, and other regulations plus any problems. The state won’t let Vegas have brothels however.

The situation has led some counties to enact passive-aggressive licensing requirements and other laws aimed at legally harassing brothels and the women working in them. One county, for example, does not allow brothel workers to register cars in that county.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

FunInTheSun wrote:

I don’t have a problem with prostitution, but I think every city or state should have a red light district. I think some government regulations are appropriate—I don’t want to see street hookers in front of elementary schools and churches.

Agreed. They are professional whores after all. Away from schools and churches. Red light district is ideal. Police can offer better protection as well when they are in one designated area.

ghost wrote:

PUAs like Roosh V would be out of business.

Right, along with this homo who goes by the name Mystery. What a fairy. And they call this “game”. Wow.

Beer wrote:

Society is a joke

Beer wrote:

I think it would be pretty awesome to have hot young pussy on demand for less than the cost of taking a girl out for a few drinks here in the states…plus I’d get to entirely cut out all the dating/relations~~~ bulls~~~ from the equation…just suck, f~~~, take your 12 dollars, and go away.

On the same page here. Cut out the dating. A nice young “lady”. $25 later. She leaves. No drama. No cohabitation.

Just really young tail, minus the bulls~~~. When I hit an older age. Then maybe full monk mode. But I’ve got some time before that. So why not enjoy women for what God created them for?

Society and government are a really bad joke. And it takes years for the brainwashing to be reversed. I also did not see things this way all the time. The Red Pill has helped to start a process of continual examination. Both internally and externally. And the more I think, the more I see that what I believe or feel to be true is very different from what I have been taught to believe is correct or true.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

OldBill wrote:

I’ve done a lot of work in Nevada over the years and have many professional and personal contacts there. Please trust me when I tell you that Nevada’s current system is not one you’d want to “import” to your state.

The state and not the counties or municipalities in question determine where brothels are legal. That creates a situation where localities have brothels the inhabitants don’t want. It also foists any enforcement, licensing, and inspection costs onto those localities along with all the other problems. The state gets to pocket the tourist dollars the brothels bring in while the relatively poor counties foot the bill for hosting those brothels.

Well, this is definitely not good news.

OldBill wrote:

The situation has led some counties to enact passive-aggressive licensing requirements and other laws aimed at legally harassing brothels and the women working in them. One county, for example, does not allow brothel workers to register cars in that county.

That is just wrong. A woman is allowed to earn a living. Where are the feminists when you REALLY need them?

OldBill wrote:

While I’d legalize prostitution in a heartbeat,

And this part right here, proves that Old Bill is not only an erudite, as his post about the ebola strains suggests. But an OG as well. (Original Gangster). In a heart beat gentleman. Learn from the best.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[GnosticParticipant 2491]

The government made prostitution illegal because they want to eliminate competition.

They run a sky-high expensive prostitution called marriage.

Cheap prostitution hurt their business.

There is no magic in MGTOW, just recognition of the truth and logical decision how to avoid dangers. The red pill is but the truth, it is no magical potion. Do not think in this modern world men have no longer have natural enemies, men are prey to women and government.

[narrow road travelerParticipant 1680]

I’m of the belief that if no threat of violence, theft, or fraud can be proven against a real life individual. No criminal action, is justified from the state.

Local ostricizing, and refusal to do business with nuisance individuals is more effective. Than petitioning state action.

Local geographical ordinances, I think are more effective than ham handed federal laws. Though local shunning would be most effective.

From what I’ve witnessed. Street walker prostitutes operate anywhere poverty is. Churches and schools are in poor neighborhoods. So using them in county legislation is less affective.

People in general don’t like seeing street walkers. Same as they don’t like seeing strung out homeless men urinating everywhere. Being nuisance individuals.

HOA rules could also curb the practice at a local level. The association could prove fraud in court. Because the individual signed the association papers that they’d be subject to specified rules to be able to buy the property. My two cents.

The supreme art of war is to subdue the enemy without fighting. --Sun Tsu

[StentorianParticipant 1690]

Gnostic wrote:

The government made prostitution illegal because they want to eliminate competition.

They run a sky-high expensive prostitution called marriage.

Cheap prostitution hurt their business.

“He who takes an eel by the tail, or a woman at her word, soon finds he holds nothing.”

[ghostParticipant]

Stentorian wrote:

Right, along with this homo who goes by the name Mystery. What a fairy. And they call this “game”. Wow.

What a f~~~ing f~~~~~.

[AllenParticipant 146]

I think prostitution is a much better deal than marriage. At least it’s a straightforward transaction where each party is clear on expectations.

Government prohibition of prostitution is just stupid… all it achieves is to make it a much riskier proposition and does very little to actually stop it.

Woman - I picture a man, then take away reason and accountability. - Melvin Udall

[ghostParticipant]

Allen wrote:

I think prostitution is a much better deal than marriage. At least it’s a straightforward transaction where each party is clear on expectations.

Government prohibition of prostitution is just stupid… all it achieves is to make it a much riskier proposition and does very little to actually stop it.

This violates my principles, but makes more sense in our current society from a logical perspective.

[trader1913Participant 1577]

Porn is basically the new prostitution, and with fleshlights easily available, you can get a more satisfying experience with a toy than with a prostitute a lot of the times. Only the high end ones will give you a better experience because they are good at their craft.

I’m all for legalized prostitution, because I don’t like the government prohibiting something done between two consensual adults. But it probably won’t do much.

[ghostParticipant]

trader1913 wrote:

Porn is basically the new prostitution

Sex dolls are going to take a big chunk out of this market in the future. They are the “in” thing in Japan at the moment.

trader1913 wrote:

I’m all for legalized prostitution, because I don’t like the government prohibiting something done between two consensual adults

Likewise.

[Branched offParticipant 10929]

What is wrong with prostitution? It is a mutual transaction.

It is no coincidence that in places like Sweden a man is a criminal if he goes to a whore but a whore is not a criminal. That is total raving mad asymmetry. Yes prostitution is suppressed more in places where men are suppressed more. Why should men have any fun, even if they pay fair market value for it?

A woman is like fire -fun to play with, can warm you through and cook your food, needs constant feeding, can burn you and consume all you own

[ghostParticipant]

Branched off wrote:

What is wrong with prostitution? It is a mutual transaction.

It is no coincidence that in places like Sweden a man is a criminal if he goes to a whore but a whore is not a criminal. That is total raving mad asymmetry. Yes prostitution is suppressed more in places where men are suppressed more. Why should men have any fun, even if they pay fair market value for it?

I am with you, brother.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Branched off wrote:

What is wrong with prostitution? It is a mutual transaction.

It is no coincidence that in places like Sweden a man is a criminal if he goes to a whore but a whore is not a criminal. That is total raving mad asymmetry. Yes prostitution is suppressed more in places where men are suppressed more. Why should men have any fun, even if they pay fair market value for it?

I’m looking forward to watching the feminized population of Sweden eradicated by Muslims. I consider it a public service to the world. I’d even consider helping pay for a few boat or plane tickets to help import more Muslims into Sweden, especially if they are sex offenders or radicals.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[ghostParticipant]

Ranger One wrote:

I’m looking forward to watching the feminized population of Sweden eradicated by Muslims. I consider it a public service to the world. I’d even consider helping pay for a few boat or plane tickets to help import more Muslims into Sweden, especially if they are sex offenders or radicals.

Classic Ranger One. I like it.

[narwhalParticipant]

I’m ok with legalizing prostitution, but I really doubt it would have much of an impact. Regarding the issue of sexual confidence, absolutely. If you’re a virgin, lack experience or just want to confirm everything still works, then it’s a good place to practice. I just don’t think legalizing prostitution is going to have much impact on society.

I say that living in Houston, which has a plethora of strip clubs. Strip clubs aren’t prostitutes, however if prostitution takes away the power of women by providing alternatives, then you would think strippers would have a smaller impact. I really don’t think Houston men are less blue pill then men in other cities.

Besides that, prostitution will remain taboo even if it’s made legal, they same as going to a strip club is. People don’t talk about going to strip clubs. You don’t tell your mom you went to the strip club, or that you visited a prostitute. Sure many/most MGTOW won’t care, but that’s not the point. Most of society will still ostracize anyone who visits a prostitute. Heck porn has been around for decade, yet it’s not something people talk about, and would be shunned for admitting to.

As Old Bill pointed out, legalizing it is bound to be done with loads of government control. Government will use it for taxes, political advantage, and generally trying to control our lives. I would be more in favor of the industry developing it’s own regulations, and created a 3rd party entity that is responsible for certifying prostitutes and Johns.

There also would need to be something done regarding protecting those involved, in terms of privacy and rape allegations. That’s going to be a hard line since you obviously don’t want sessions recorded.

As for government regulation on where brothels could be located, I’m on the fence on this. Like I said, I’m in Houston, and Houstonian’s often go to Louisiana for gambling. Although it’s not good that the money leaves the states, we also avoid the issues that come with gambling since it takes some effort to gamble. I would think the same is true with prostitution. I’d prefer it to be legal, but not so accessible that it runs rampant.

Ok. Then do it.

[MonkParticipant 16988]

Allen wrote:

I think prostitution is a much better deal than marriage.

Marriage is prostitution, but it’s a business deal in which the customer has no rights.

Put them both on the same legal footing. Short term contracts for the one, long term for the other.

[ghostParticipant]

Monk wrote:

Marriage is prostitution, but it’s a business deal in which the customer has no rights.

Put them both on the same legal footing. Short term contracts for the one, long term for the other.

That’s right, Monk.

[WPLParticipant 2390]

I personally believe that prostitution should not be illegal. Provided that there is no coercion and that all parties are over the age of consent, then it’s a private contract between adults. Government has no legitimate or compelling interest in outlawing such.

I’d rather save my money, but to each his own…

[Tim941Participant 68]

Holy crap, Batman! Gambit! You freaking acted on my suggestion. Thanks for taking the heat in starting a thread on this subject. I wouldn’t presume at my neophyte rank on this forum. Besides, out of thousands of topics here, sex is where I’m at.

We pay them not just for the sex. We pay them for absence of commitment! (“I pay her to leave.” This is maybe the oldest joke.)

Wow, Gambit. What a kind act. I’m impressed. I re-read my statement. I find it true and candid and necessary. The feminist howl these days would make the legalization of commercial sex (predominantly FOR males worked by females) seem highly unlikely—insert favorite overused cliche simile—”Yeah right! When Norah O’Donnell does a pole dance!” Whatever.

I tried to find out this morning what exactly Matt Lauer lost hos job over. It’s buried. What the hell did he do? Him? He has trouble getting laid? Jesus! Can’t be. Must be a power thing. Power to control people. What a wasted effort.

[Author]

Posts