Is AWALT true?

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

Tuneout wrote:

I think you’d have better odds in finding Big Foot
or the Loch Ness monster than that one Unicorn today.

You’d have better luck finding Big foot F~~~ING the Loch Ness monster—in the middle of Piccadilly square at high noon.

[AwakenedParticipant 35202]

AWALT, sooner or later, 99% of the time !!

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Elric GreenstoneParticipant 1637]

Solo MAN’S Wisdom wrote:

4. Everything about every woman is temporary. Her looks/happiness/faithfulness/anger/health/etc
5. All women are chameleons.
6. All women are skilled and prolific liars [worth remembering the next time you encounter a NAWALT].

I have paid, through the nose, to learn these facts in such a visceral way that I just don’t feel like going over, in these forums, how exactly I learned them. That feeling of a bullet going by one’s head reading those facts all in a row. Let’s put it that way.

Silver Fox wrote:

I assumed that divorce would never happen to me because I didn’t believe in it and wouldn’t marry anyone who did either.

Hahahahahahahahhahahahaha.

Yeah, I’ve paid for that belief, too. Just because they speak words out loud doesn’t mean much. They might as well be making pigeon or cat noises. Pledging eternal anything to a woman is as relevant as ordering a pizza. It means that little to them.

"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."

[AutoliteParticipant]

AWALT is just the attitude to adopt if you want to survive. Suppose we say that all Great White Sharks are not the same. Let’s assume that there is a small percentage of Great White Sharks that will allow you to swim right up to them and rub their bellies.

Would knowing this make it rational to try and rub the belly of a Great White Shark???

[Buller100Participant 2189]

They are all the same , of the ones who left their husbands 99% was for a richer guy, when back in dating game lol 15 years ago several divorced women gladly said ‘ I will never be with a poor man again ‘

They have always been hard wired with hypergamy , but I do feel it’s got worse I am almost 60 and really feel for young guys in West, if they want children what are they to do ?

Us boomers had the best of lots of things…

[Anonymous 5]

The Rev. Lawrence Shannon deals with the NAWALT syndrome in “The Predatory Female”
He calls it the Chameleon Syndrome.

The Chameleon Syndrome P16
Q. What is the chameleon syndrome?
A. A quasi-supernatural transformation, the chameleon syndrome is the predatory female’s unholy ability to become whatever the script calls for in “hooking” a man. She will adopt his viewpoints, his attitudes, his hobbies, and his dislikes. Her personality will change to suit his. She will enroll in classes, become a gourmet cook, stop smoking, switch religions, accept his friends, humor his jealousies, develop a relationship with his relatives, or whatever else is called for. She will change colors in the rocks like a chameleon! Of all the traits exhibited by predatory females, this chameleon syndrome is one of the most lethal.
Q. Why?
A. Because, amazingly, the predatory female is completely sincere about her new behavior.
She isn’t consciously aware of any deception. She transforms involuntarily. She could take a lie detector test and pass. There is nothing crooked in her mind. Consequently the male detects nothing amiss because there is nothing amiss. Everything is normal and natural. The
predatory female has matched herself with the surrounding landscape; she adapted to her environment for mating and survival. The male innocently concludes he has met the “right” woman.

Q. How long does the chameleon syndrome last?
A. As long as it takes to subdue the male, which usually means the bonds of holy matrimony and the enforcement powers of the judicial system.
Q. Then what happens?
A. The adaptation is no longer necessary, the spell is broken, and the colors begin changing back to original. “We’ve grown apart,” is the familiar statement. “Our values have changed.” In truth, the chameleon has simply relaxed to its natural, more comfortable exterior.
Q. You say “more comfortable exterior.” Are you implying the predatory female is uncomfortable in the adapted colors?
A. Although unaware of it, she is often ill at ease. Most people have seen an acquisitive woman working hard to bring a man to the altar. She may lose weight, become nervous and fidgety, cry a lot, or develop insomnia. These are signs of a chameleon chafing in her temporary exterior and compose more trademarks of a predatory female.

[Silver FoxParticipant 2766]

Autolite wrote:

AWALT is just the attitude to adopt if you want to survive. Suppose we say that all Great White Sharks are not the same. Let’s assume that there is a small percentage of Great White Sharks that will allow you to swim right up to them and rub their bellies.

Would knowing this make it rational to try and rub the belly of a Great White Shark???

Very well said. You’re absolutely right. Or, to put it another way… if I have 1,000 bottles of Coke, and I know that 999 of them have cyanide in them, there’s no way I’m going to drink any of them. It’s completely irrelevant that one of them is clean, because my chances of being wrong and dead are just too high.

“AWALT is just the attitude to adopt if you want to survive.” I’m going to remember that quote, Autolite. Thanks. 🙂

Re: Elric Greenstone…

Yeah, that was my ex-wife’s attitude. She excused herself from her commitments, vows, and everything else just because she felt like it.

On a related note, it really irks me that it’s harder to get out of almost any other contract than marriage. You can’t even break the terms of your car loan without consequences. But violating your marriage contract? Easy as pie. By any legal standards, marriage would be the most ill-advised contract you could ever sign.

"Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

[Silver FoxParticipant 2766]

I can say that if I won $181 million in the lottery, I would take prompt steps to further my dream of living alone and independent. Think Professor Henry Higgins prior to meeting Eliza Doolittle.

"Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

NAWALT, AWALT, it hardly makes a difference because you can’t TELL the difference if the AWALT is faking. I would never have believed that all the women who have looked me in the eye and spoken with a perfectly straight face, zero guilt, zero remorse, were flat-out lying, if I didn’t have hard evidence to prove it.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[ExecrationParticipant 1496]

Silver Fox wrote:

I can say that if I won $181 million in the lottery, I would take prompt steps to further my dream of living alone and independent. Think Professor Henry Higgins prior to meeting Eliza Doolittle.

Look at how shocked he Looks.

[xenonParticipant 2007]

Damn fellas, I just saw a sam-squamptch in my back yard. Could be a NAWALT there too. Better run out and check, at least I can bring in some fire wood for my efforts.

Channeling Bubbles again.

The s~~~-storm of the century blew through here when ex wife #2 decided her vows were a hindrance to her c~~~ count. Nothing stood in the way of that hurricane of suffering and unhappiness. My entire life got leveled in a nano-second.

Lessons learned are invaluable and many.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Regarding your Christian upbringing, Silver Fox:

Both Adam & Eve were created perfect / sinless. There was NO design defect in either sex. No manipulation/coercion/tyranny/dishonesty/etc. They were equal ONLY in two ways. Their worth [to God, and to bringing forth life in their image], and God’s Design Laws treat both sexes the same. The Laws of Physics, the Laws of Health, the Law of Liberty, and the Laws of Worship/Love/Giving/Exertion/etc treat males & females equally. God did not intend either sex to have dominance over the other. Each is necessary for life. Man gives life [either the X or the Y chromosome], woman nurtures life [she can contribute only the X chromosome].

Apart from the above, men & women are NOT equal — physically, intellectually, or spiritually. Man was created in God’s image from the Earth. Woman was created in man’s image from Man. Man relates to the world around him. He explores it, experiments with it, learns from it. Woman relates to Man. Woman allowed herself to be deceived, however Man sinned willingly. Imagine the world if Adam had said, “No, Eve. I will not take that fruit. I’m sorry you did, but I just will not take it. I wish you well.”

I don’t agree with those here who suggest Eve was created with flaws. Both sexes have deteriorated from their original nobility as they came from the Creator’s hands. I think woman has fallen farther, but that’s another discussion.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[Silver FoxParticipant 2766]

Very good points, Solomon’s Wisdom.

Man was given his mission (tending the garden of Eden, ruling the animals) on earth by God before he received a woman. Adam didn’t need help doing his mission–Eve was created so that Adam wouldn’t have to be alone. But Adam, like all men throughout history, could do his job with or without her.

1 Timothy 2:14-15: And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman who was deceived and fell into transgression. Women, however, will be saved through childbearing, if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control.…

Adam knew the consequences but, having become the first mangina, couldn’t bear to be separated from Eve, and so ate the fruit also. Interesting that Satan didn’t approach Adam, but Eve… because he knew he could trick her.

I think it’s perfectly reasonable to observe that women have fallen further away from their original purpose, since western women today don’t even want to have kids and be dedicated mothers with husbands they love and respect.

You don’t have to be a Christian to see that men are generally the ones with the stronger intellects. Men are the inventors, the pioneers, the explorers. We have keenly developed risk-assessment systems. But adding a woman into that mixture just completely messes him up. Suddenly he’s not an inventor–he’s a provider. He’s not a pioneer–he is domesticated. He is not an explorer–he is chained to his suburban home and mortgage.

"Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Silver Fox wrote:

1 Timothy 2:14-15: And it was not Adam who was deceived, but the woman who was deceived and fell into transgression. Women, however, will be saved through childbearing, if they continue in faith, love, and holiness, with self-control.…

Adam knew the consequences but, having become the first mangina, couldn’t bear to be separated from Eve, and so ate the fruit also. Interesting that Satan didn’t approach Adam, but Eve… because he knew he could trick her.

(Without getting into a theological debate) It’s true to say the female behavior was noted and recorded as a redpill warning since genesis.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Solo MAN’S WisdomParticipant]

Silver Fox wrote:

Man was given his mission (tending the garden of Eden, ruling the animals) on earth by God before he received a woman. Adam didn’t need help doing his mission–Eve was created so that Adam wouldn’t have to be alone. But Adam, like all men throughout history, could do his job with or without her.

Close.

God is Love [1 John 4:8]. Man was created in God’s image [Gen. 1:26]. In order for man to approach the fullness of “God’s image”, he needed someone to love. Someone to give of himself to, even someone to serve. I believe the God designed Love to flow unevenly in one direction as an object lesson for the universe. God [infinite Love] > Man [finite love] > Woman [less finite love] > Child [even less finite love]. God loves man more than man loves God. Man loves woman more than woman loves man. Woman loves her child more than the child loves its mother. Some would argue that this diminishing cascade is a result of the fall of Mankind in to sin and I see the merits of this, however, I think it was designed in to Creation as a teaching tool.
It’s interesting that elsewhere in Scripture there is no command for a wife to love her husband, but to honor him. In fact, in Titus, Paul suggests that women have to be taught how to love their husbands and children [Titus 2:4]. Men, on the other hand, are commanded to love their wives “as Christ loves the Church.” I don’t think God asks women to do anything they are unable to do, and the best they can do is honor their husbands.

When women lead, destruction is the destination. -- Me.

[Silver FoxParticipant 2766]

That’s certainly true. Funny thing is, I’ve actually heard some so-called Christian wives argue that the Bible doesn’t say they have to love their husbands… and then they proceed to disrespect him, too. When I hear a Christian woman claim she doesn’t have to love her husband, the only thing I hear is her trying to make excuses for not respecting him either. Because 99% of the time, they don’t. Most of those wives ended up leaving their husbands.

Disrespect for men is so deeply entrenched into our modern mentality that I don’t see it going away in my lifetime, and probably not for several more generations. There will also have to be some very harsh and negative changes to society that will force women to respect men, or starve.

"Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

[experiencedParticipant]

~ Macro Bible:
Genesis = female added, leads to “Exodus”

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Well I was going to update on this … but the skag keepings littering our email box after saying she was leaving a f~~~-hundred times. Curiously she does it just “before bed” so something about MGTOW really turns her on.

I even said “you’re excused” after she flipped her hair and stormed off… and then she REFUSED to leave in totally predictable fashion and got all “uppity”.

The perfect NAWALT case study. More later.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Silver FoxParticipant 2766]

Keymaster wrote:

Well I was going to update on this … but the skag keepings littering our email box after saying she was leaving a f~~~-hundred times. Curiously she does it just “before bed” so something about MGTOW really turns her on.

I even said “you’re excused” after she flipped her hair and stormed off… and then she REFUSED to leave in totally predictable fashion and got all “uppity”.

The perfect NAWALT case study. More later.

Funny, but predictable. I suspect that most, if not all, women who come here “just trying to learn” about MGTOW are in fact irritated by it to one degree or another and are trying to prove they are NAWALTs. Ironically, if they really were NAWALTs, they wouldn’t be on this site trying to prove it.

Anyway, do keep us informed. I’m really looking forward to reading the conversations. 🙂

"Are you loosed from a wife? Do not seek a wife." --Apostle Paul

[ApexScorpionParticipant 602]

Solo MAN’S Wisdom wrote:

3. All women get pleasure from your misery. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/women/sex/9126265/Research-finds-women-feel-happy-when-their-husband-or-partner-is-upset.html
Let that one breathe for a while . . .

Can’t believe they actually did a study on this bs.

[Author]

Posts