If they want terror we can bring it to them

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

In my infinite sense of humor, this was the original link I was gonna send but then i decided the Jesus eating popcorn gif and meme. It goes perfect with this thread too. But watch the video.

Heal the world

Outside of his political bulls~~~ with terrorism/ Islamic threat, I generally like Joe’s posts about actual MGTOW related matters.
On this matter, He has a lot of SJW in him, even if he doesn’t know it.
If it hadn’t been Hillary and Obama f~~~ing this s~~~ up, but instead Trump, Bush or Reagan, they would be spouting his line exactly. Blaming everything on the actions of the US and acting as if these terrorist states were innocent countries who just want peace.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Roger that Pedal, Run, Row, I enjoy your posts too and you make me laugh also.

[Anonymous 14]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Outside of his political bulls~~~ with terrorism/ Islamic threat, I generally like Joe’s posts about actual MGTOW related matters.
On this matter, He has a lot of SJW in him, even if he doesn’t know it.
If it hadn’t been Hillary and Obama f~~~ing this s~~~ up, but instead Trump, Bush or Reagan, they would be spouting his line exactly. Blaming everything on the actions of the US and acting as if these terrorist states were innocent countries who just want peace.

A Libertarian/Objective/Ayn Rand/Galt perspective can sometimes seem like SJW because YOU have an agenda where as I don’t, I feel that leaving something alone and not giving a f~~~ is better than engaging most of the time. There is nothing SJW about me, that is your projection due to your position of wanting action, where I in fact don’t give a f~~~ and that in turn actually turns out to often be what is best for all.

Many here laud Ayn Rand and Objectivism, the term Galt used for higher ranking members comes from a character of hers in one of her books. Here is the definition of Objectivism by the Atlas Society that many do not completely understand apparently:

“Objectivism holds that there is no greater moral goal than achieving happiness. But one cannot achieve happiness by wish or whim. Fundamentally, it requires rational respect for the facts of reality, including the facts about our human nature and needs. Happiness requires that one live by objective principles, including moral integrity and respect for the rights of others. Politically, Objectivists advocate laissez-faire capitalism. Under capitalism, a strictly limited government protects each person’s rights to life, liberty, and property and forbids that anyone initiate force against anyone else.”

Note the last line. Most here do not adhere to this. Libertarians do. Serious Objectivists do. It is by no coincidence that Ron Paul has a son named Rand and both believe in non-interventionist philosophy.

[Anonymous 42]

Anonymous wrote:

White Christians here. Men from around the world will have no voice here, just Western Christians who want to see Muslim blood.

I don’t want blood, all I ever wanted was justice and I can’t have that either! Therefore all that’s left is blood and I also don’t want that either. So much for freedom of CHOICE!

Anonymous wrote:

I would really like to know who the one guy is that gives me +1’s in all these debates that I seem to be getting my face kicked in from all sides all the time

That be myself and RPB! Being a kicked and abused underdog myself I tend to cling to underdogs, weather they’re right or wrong! They’re my kind of dog! My nation has allowed the cumstitution to utterly DIE where I LIVE! F~~~ THE USA! It’s a F~~~ING MOLESTED PILE OF HYPOCRITICAL S~~~! The only thing more disgusting is watching people that eat it!

Underdog? Yea I’m an underdog, the one that licked his wounds and nursed himself back among the living. Now I F~~~ING BITE!

Christians, Muslims, Jews, Hindu, and atheists, doesn’t matter, they all taste the same once you learn how to BITE!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Really enjoyed the meltdowns in BJS’s two videos he posted. Wow. Bookmarked and shared. Thank you for posting @ bjs

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Mr. SmithParticipant 686]

Keymaster wrote:

Really enjoyed the meltdowns in BJS’s two videos he posted. Wow. Bookmarked and shared. Thank you for posting @ bjs

Me too. 🙂

"I need men, real men, men with balls, certainly not sissies. I would never ask them to take an enemy position, but I insist that they follow me to that position. If you are one of those men, raise your hand." Napoleon Bonaparte

[Anonymous 42]

I logged back in to Mgtow.com just so I could like this post.

Gracious Amigo!

I’m working on a cycle-bar attachment to give MY AREA of B.C.F.C a haircut where the Islamic beard-like forest I cut back with a chainsaw and YodaDozer (for skidding the logs) is starting to grow back!

Warning; Tree Hugers beware: The Brookhaven Tasmanian Devil with the Husqvarna 372xp can not differentiate tree trunks from legs! DO NOT ENTER HIS CAGE! He roams wild within his unique reservation of 280 acres set in the Worcester County hills as unique land reservation set aside by him and for him.

Upon closer examination it was discovered this once believed to be wild animal was in fact found to be an endangered species of man.

NICE!

AMERICAF~~~ THAT!

[bladeParticipant]

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Anonymous 5]

Yes, we should eliminate these CIA lab rats, and cut off the heads of the elites who’re creating all these Insanity.

Order out of Chaos!

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

A Libertarian/Objective/Ayn Rand/Galt perspective can sometimes seem like SJW because YOU have an agenda where as I don’t, I feel that leaving something alone and not giving a f~~~ is better than engaging most of the time. There is nothing SJW about me, that is your projection due to your position of wanting action, where I in fact don’t give a f~~~ and that in turn actually turns out to often be what is best for all.

You are talking about projection, but you are making up my position on the matter in your head. I have not EVEN SPOKEN on my position.
I merely corrected you on your ignorant statement about Libya.
My Agenda is truth. What is yours? Because it isn’t truth.

But hey keep fighting and knocking down those straw man positions you invent for me. It is amusing.

[GregB0Participant]

[/quote]

Grumpy wrote:

I actually take a pragmatic approach, you know Sir Isaac Newton’s 3rd law of motion.
Actually all 3 of his laws of motion can be applied to warfare.
Someone comes at me with a knife, I shoot them. Set fire or blow up my house, I flatten your village.
Trust me, I’ve had to abide by RoE’s, the Geneva Convention, Articles Of War, the f~~~ing U.N, Red Cross, and a f~~~ton of other rules by people not taking hostile incoming fire, excuse me I digress.

A historic issue with democratic, developed, industrial counties within the American Influence (First World) or Former Eastern Bloc (Second World) countries engaging in combat with Forth World nations (Cultural Entities) is that we recognize established civilities and norms and our enemies do not.

The reliance upon technology and historical military doctrine results in a lethargic and cumbersome command structure that does not, and cannot quickly react to changes. We look for strategic and tactical victories and have measureable outcomes that are outlined within strategic goals, where our enemies are satisfied with continuing the fight at any level with no cohesive goal besides continuing the battle.

Conventional forces are rigid and constrained by all the Laws of War as mentioned by Grumpy. As in so many other important areas of United States government, the Armed Forces need to quickly adopt lessons learned to change the institutional mindset that currently dominates military doctrine. “Fighting as the enemy fights” has been proven effective throughout history until those times when the civilized forces had clear dominance over the battle field.

A recent example is the former Yugoslavia, one the largest, most developed and diverse countries in the Balkans. President Tito had no issues with killing WWII prisoners, European foreign nations, anti-communists, or political opponents/collaborators during the time of his leadership. When he died in 1980, there were several conflicts with the former “Republics”. Croatia, Slovenia, Bosnia & Herzegovina, Macedonia, and Serbia/Kosovo. Needless to say there were no professional organized bands of soldiers, instead unconventional warfare became the norm.

We are in for a very long fight…

​"​My father didn't tell me how to live; he lived, and let me watch him do it.​" - Clarence Buddinton Kelland

[Anonymous 14]

Anonymous wrote:

That be myself and RPB! Being a kicked and abused underdog myself I tend to cling to underdogs, weather they’re right or wrong! They’re my kind of dog! My nation has allowed the cumstitution to utterly DIE where I LIVE! F~~~ THE USA! It’s a F~~~ING MOLESTED PILE OF HYPOCRITICAL S~~~! The only thing more disgusting is watching people that eat it!

Yea, me and you are a lot alike, I appreciate this greatly MGTOWER. I have not been through what you have, but I have seen enough s~~~ting on the Constitution without punishment to have very little faith in my Government. When the guys making the rules don’t obey the rules what are we left with?

[The Batman 2020Participant 2112]

Your 20's are for learning, your 30's are for earning.

[Anonymous 42]

The Batman 2020 wrote:

How about more than just a flash card? Present a case for debate or STFU!

[Anonymous 42]

Anonymous wrote:

When the guys making the rules don’t obey the rules what are we left with?

We end up with a nation of broken laws and broken men, eventually the darkness will overtake us again and plunge us into the new dark ages.

We’re on the eve of some very atrocious s~~~ that’s gonna happen! Anarchy has already taken the show where I live and coming to a neighborhood near you!

[Anonymous 5]

Anonymous wrote:

Batman wrote:

How about more than just a flash card? Present a case for debate or STFU!

Why so aggressive?

[The Batman 2020Participant 2112]

Anonymous wrote:

How about more than just a flash card? Present a case for debate or STFU!

The Myth Of The Suicide Bomber

“Why “Suicide Bombing” Must be a Myth and What Purposes it Really Serves

After reading The Logic of Suicide Terrorism–It’s the Occupation, Not the Fundamentalism by Robert Pape, the main idea that we come away with is that suicide bombers are real, very real indeed. Though we were promised a revelation of the logic, these questions remain:

If the purpose of a suicide-terrorist attack is not to die, but to kill and to inflict the maximum number of casualties on the target society, why do they die?

If the purpose of the suicide bomber is to end the occupation of his country, why is the suicide tactic not as old as war and territorial occupation itself?

If the purpose of the suicide bomber is to end the occupation of his country and to inflict the maximum number of casualties on the target society why are the targets so disparate and scattered, without a clear relation to the occupation?

Why are suicide bombings publicized before any proof is brought by investigation?

For me these questions underline the illogical nature of suicide bombings. I believe to find logic you have to see the suicide bomber as a fabrication of the Zionists for their own purposes:

To demonize Islam

To make Muslims look stupid, fanatical, and murderous.

To create worldwide terrorism that they can claim has nothing to do with Israel, but everything to do with Islam.

To attack those who think themselves to be allies, but are not, e.g. America, Spain, Britain.

To shift the blame for any bombing Zionists perpetrate onto the Muslims, simply by calling it a suicide bombing.

To control public opinion in favor of Israel as the most grieved victim of terrorism.

To justify apartheid in Israel.

To justify war in the Middle East with the spoils of war accruing to themselves, while the costs are borne by their “allies”.

So it’s not the fundamentalism, it’s not the occupation, it’s not suicide, it’s not a guerilla tactic, it’s the timeless strategy of the Jews working to advantage themselves on their journey toward dominion.”

Your 20's are for learning, your 30's are for earning.

[The Batman 2020Participant 2112]

“When suicide terrorism is exposed as a hoax won’t all these accolades be a little embarrassing? I mean, really – The Theory and Practice of Suicide Terrorism? I”m afraid it is worse than being an expert in Gender Issues and is right up there with Holocaust Studies. Passé doesn’t quite describe how it will look when the truth is known.”

Your 20's are for learning, your 30's are for earning.

[Anonymous 42]

I was over there, I felt racism, hatred, and attempted F~~~ING INTIMIDATION! Damn near shoved a f~~~ing steak knife in one those motherf~~~ers looking to rob me!

And what about Snorty walking through the market place TERRORIZING AND INTIMIDATING EVERYONE BUT MUSLIMS! I suppose they’re f~~~ing Jews too!

BULL F~~~ING S~~~! Muslims from my OWN PERSONAL F~~~ING ACCOUNT ARE THE MOST RACIST MOTHERF~~~ERS ON THE PLANET!

You can take ^^^that to Israel and nail it to the f~~~ing whaling wall!

Old Holland:

New Holland:

[Author]

Posts