If they want terror we can bring it to them

[Mr. SmithParticipant 686]

Good evening, Gentlemen

I just spent an hour on Youtube and watched many very sad videos about the Manchester attack. Muslims are terrorizing us by killing us and our children. Their actions cause a lot of trouble in daily life, especially if you have to travel by plane a lot. It’s an endless list.

Obviously talking and being patient does not work. Law enforcement and intelligence community are not very efficient, either. In the current political system it will be hard to expel Muslims just for being Muslims and such actions would cause a massive judicial backlash and costs society a lot of money. So what to do until this is solved?
Very simple. Bring the terror to them. I read some reports and documentaries how other countries like Israel or the Soviet Union dealt with Muslim terrorists. Israel is restricting the movement of Muslims at a large scale and every now and then they start an operation to keep the Jihadists down by bombarding their areas. If an attacker is identified, the homes of his family gets bulldozed. The amount of attacks of Jews and terrorist attacks in Israel decreased dramatically.
The Soviet KGB had a more “surgical” approach. This is from Wikipedia about the Alpha Group:

“Six years later, in October 1985, Alpha Group was dispatched to war-torn Beirut, Lebanon. The Kremlin was informed of the kidnapping of four Soviet diplomats by the militant group, the Islamic Liberation Organization (a radical offshoot of the Muslim Brotherhood). It was believed that this was retaliation for the Soviet support of Syrian involvement in the Lebanese Civil War.[19] However, by the time Alpha arrived, one of the hostages had already been killed. Through a network of supporting KGB operatives, members of the task-force identified each of the perpetrators involved in the crisis, and once identified, began to take the relatives of these militants as hostages. Following the standard Soviet policy of no negotiations with terrorists, one of the hostages taken by Alpha Group had his testicles removed and sent to the militants before being killed. The warning was clear: more would follow unless the remaining hostages were released immediately.[20] The show of force worked, and for a period of 20 years no Soviet or Russian officials were taken captive”

I say, carry the terror to them. If an attacker is identified, send a team to his family abroad and don’t request reports. If it is here, kick them out, flatten their home as the Israelis do. If it does not help, two cruise missile at a mosque somewhere at Friday evening for every terrorist attack here. The first missile has an explosive warhead, the next will carry 500l of pig blood and sprays it over the bodies left over be the first one. This way they will be dishonored and not get their 40 virgins or whatever. Nobody has to know from what ship the missiles started. It just happened. Oops.

Sorry, I am pretty p~~~ed off by this diaper heads. 🙁

"I need men, real men, men with balls, certainly not sissies. I would never ask them to take an enemy position, but I insist that they follow me to that position. If you are one of those men, raise your hand." Napoleon Bonaparte

[ABParticipant 762]

Violence begets more violence…

…but then I’d rather die on my feet, than live on my knees.

No-one's yet explained to me exactly what's so great // About slaving fifty years away on something that you hate // About meekly shuffling down the path of mediocrity // Well if that's your road then take it, but it's not the road for me.

[Anonymous 42]

I don’t understand? Why not annihilate the terrorists bloodline? Why not be just as much prick as they are about killing strangers? They know their own families, not us, they’re strangers to us so why not kill them all?

The only safe enemy is a dead enemy!

[KeymasterKeymaster]

The way t~~~ter exploded ( like an Ariande Grande concert bomb ) was shameful. Their islamoswollenlabias are a disgrace and they continue to push this “love” nonsense.

The very people who use the word “islamophobia” against others — >> ARE the real “islamophobes” who are too afraid to acknowledge the problem. Here’s one of them now.

“We just need to open borders and co-exist!” – Katy Perry
That’s adorable sweetie but are you gonna rebuild it after you c~~~s encouraged it to get f~~~ed up?

—

The left are at war with reality.
They must be ridiculed, rejected and real-talked.

This is how it’s done:

Lets’ see what that is in response to. Ready to unload a withering guffaw? While reporting on migrant squatters loitering in Rome’s streets, an Italian leftoid news anchoress was assaulted live on camera by the same trash for whom she was trying to drum up sympathy.

Her screams are almost comical. This is exactly what they are headed for and asked for. Take special note of her useless white knight shouting “get the hell out of there!” – from the TV studio. What a hero. I for one, will have no sympathy for any of them. They brought this upon themselves.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 14]

The kid’s family was originally from Libya, U.S./Israel brought the terror to his bloodlines country of origin, he likely lost friends and family there when the U.S. jacked it up. Formerly under Gaddafi it was doing just fine, great in fact. I bet he finally had enough and said in his mind exactly the same words as the title of your post. Also, he was a British citizen, you want the U.K. to bomb itself? If you are calling for more actions against Libya for this, there is not much left for Western countries to do there other than continue to usher ISIS into Syria apparently.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t understand? Why not annihilate the terrorists bloodline?

Maybe we’re jumping the gun just a little bit here. I’m thinking about what Canada is doing and suggest that we might want to consider not flying the terrorists into the country and providing them with free housing, food, clothes and medical care.

Perhaps we should think about giving that a try first…..eh???

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Mr. Smith wrote:

I say, carry the terror to them

A reminder that you as an individual American can do your part to wound the Globohomo goliath, and if enough MAGAmen engage their civic duty and report illegals to ICE, the scheming snarling mad scientists trying to raise a globalist frankenstein from the operating slab may never see their hellish creation come to life.

It’s a civilized option.

It’s anonymous, open 24 hours a day, and very easy to use. you can find more info here.

If you live in a major metro or a state like CA or TX, you should dialing them a few times a month. Rundown bindi convenience stores, hotels, laundry mats, and restaurants all rely on slave labor from their relatives on expired visas to keep doors open.

It might also be useful to post on yelp or google reviews that an establishment is employing illegals. if multiple people are encouraged report the same blighted institution, I imagine it would be given priority by ICE.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 14]

Autolite wrote:

MG-ɹǝʍo┴ wrote:

I don’t understand? Why not annihilate the terrorists bloodline?

Maybe we’re jumping the gun just a little bit here. I’m thinking about what Canada is doing and suggest that we might want to consider not flying the terrorists into the country and providing them with free housing, food, clothes and medical care.

Perhaps we should think about giving that a try first…..eh???

What’s this? I am onboard with Autolite? lol

Yea, I don’t understand how this circle of s~~~ is supposed to get better if we keep f~~~ing with countries like Libya who f~~~ed with nobody, then let Libyans into Western countries… You can do one or the other, if we keep doing both, well, the results are inevitable, therefore, once again, I ask: Is this the f~~~ing plan or what? All evidence points to yes. A circle of s~~~ that feeds itself to exponentially grow into a larger and larger circle of s~~~.

Now, I know some of you religious guys may be dying to see the endtimes, but man, I am in no hurry to get there myself. Also, paying for what amounts to modern day Crusades as an Atheist is really f~~~ing brutal, I can’t even begin to describe it…

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Yea, I don’t understand how this circle of s~~~ is supposed to get better if we keep f~~~ing with countries like Libya who f~~~ed with nobody

Your knowledge of international history is severely lacking.
Syria has sponsored terrorism longer than you have been alive.
I know you think it is edgy to blame the U.S. for everything, and make these terrorist states disguised as countries, into sweet innocent victims, but this goes beyond even your low standards of ignorance on the topic.

http://www.pbs.org/newshour/updates/middle_east-july-dec06-syria-terror_09-14/

[Mr. SmithParticipant 686]

I see your point and in general I support it, but I guess it’s too late. We already have an unaccounted number of Jihadists and all they want is to bring terror to us. They will not listen to nice words or good ideas. We have to stop them and traditional police work will not do it, neither. Sanctions against Jihadist are also ineffective. They want to die, it’s hardly possible to put any pressure on them.
The only way to stop those people is to make terror so hard and unthinkable, because it causes direct actions against their own people, the closer, the better.

"I need men, real men, men with balls, certainly not sissies. I would never ask them to take an enemy position, but I insist that they follow me to that position. If you are one of those men, raise your hand." Napoleon Bonaparte

[Anonymous 14]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Joe Bauers wrote:

Yea, I don’t understand how this circle of s~~~ is supposed to get better if we keep f~~~ing with countries like Libya who f~~~ed with nobody

Your knowledge of international history is severely lacking.
Syria has sponsored terrorism longer than you have been alive.
I know you think it is edgy to blame the U.S. for everything, and make these terrorist states disguised as countries, into sweet innocent victims, but this goes beyond even your low standards of ignorance on the topic.

Uh, when did I say Syria did not sponsor terrorism? Also, where do I blame the U.S. for everything? You can’t put words in my mouth then chastise me for them.

Also, you miss circle of s~~~ point entirely.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

if we keep f~~~ing with countries like Libya who f~~~ed with nobody

Anonymous wrote:

Uh, when did I say Syria did not sponsor terrorism? Also, where do I blame the U.S. for everything? You can’t put words in my mouth then chastise me for them.

Geez, I don’t know… You tell me.

Yeah my bad, you said Libya. Same response from me.
LONG history of sponsored terrorism.

We just up and f~~~ed with them? But you are not blaming the U.S. and the west in general…Who is we then? MGTOW?

[Anonymous 14]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Joe Bauers wrote:

if we keep f~~~ing with countries like Libya who f~~~ed with nobody

Joe Bauers wrote:

Uh, when did I say Syria did not sponsor terrorism? Also, where do I blame the U.S. for everything? You can’t put words in my mouth then chastise me for them.

Geez, I don’t know… You tell me.

? Are you reading Libya as Syria ? You ok in there mate?

[Anonymous 42]

Anonymous wrote:

What’s this? I am onboard with Autolite?

I did some killing today, I’m in a killing mood…

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Joe Bauers wrote:

if we keep f~~~ing with countries like Libya who f~~~ed with nobody

Joe Bauers wrote:

Uh, when did I say Syria did not sponsor terrorism? Also, where do I blame the U.S. for everything? You can’t put words in my mouth then chastise me for them.

Geez, I don’t know… You tell me.

? Are you reading Libya as Syria ? You ok in there mate?

I told you I made a mistake.

SAME F~~~ING RESPONSE though.
LIBYA has a long history of state sponsored terrorism. They are not the sweet innocents who we just decided to f~~~ with, as you implied.

[Anonymous 42]

[Anonymous 14]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

SAME F~~~ING RESPONSE though.
LIBYA has a long history of state sponsored terrorism. They are not the sweet innocents who we just decided to f~~~ with, as you implied.

Ease up there cowboy, I posted that last one in response and was then tabbed out. (playing video games)

Libya is actually something I know a bit about. Under Gaddafi much of the radical element was jailed. He was very progressive, especially for that part of the world, and was friends with Nelson Mandela. He Supported Anti Apartheid in South Africa, ended much racism towards Black Libyans in his country, and kept his promises with the West in regards to not pursuing Nukes. The U.S. BACKED the jailed fundamentalist rebels and the first thing that was done when we supported the overthrow of Gaddafi was we broke all the crazies out and armed them. You can find videos on Youtube of them going after blacks in Libya, killing them, and dragging their corpses through the streets tied to cars and trucks supplied by the U.S. C-Pig also pointed out earlier that there are now open air slave auctions in Libya. What the U.S. did was take out the stabilizing element, and used the crazies (ISIS types) to pressure Syria.

So, you are right, Libya does have a history of terrorism, but you are way off the mark if think what was done in 2011 would curb it, no, it has INCREASED IT 100 fold, and oddly enough much of it is being used for U.S./Israeli intentions now.

I have studied Libyan history off and on for a decade. When Trump talked about Obama/Hillary creating ISIS this is one of the defining factors in it all, the removal of Gaddafi that is.

Now I won’t be spending the whole night arguing this s~~~ with people who yell at me saying I don’t know jack s~~~, I got video games to be played mate.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Western nations (read soldiers) fight by rules governed by the Geneva Convention and the Articles of War. Once you meet an enemy that isn’t constrained by the same rules, you should adapt to their rule set and fight them on the terms set by them.
After all, All is fair in love and war as the old adage goes.

Using civilians, schools, hospitals, churches/mosques as a shield/cover for attack positions makes them a legitimate target to engage as the sanctuary aspect is removed by using them as a defensive/offensive position.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Anonymous 14]

Grumpy wrote:

Western nations (read soldiers) fight by rules governed by the Geneva Convention and the Articles of War. Once you meet an enemy that isn’t constrained by the same rules, you should adapt to their rule set and fight them on the terms set by them.
After all, All is fair in love and war as the old adage goes.

Using civilians, schools, hospitals, churches/mosques as a shield/cover for attack positions makes them a legitimate target to engage as the sanctuary aspect is removed by using them as a defensive/offensive position.

I see you take the PragerU approach here.

I am out guys! The uninformed hatefest may continue now.

[53ClicksUpParticipant 1345]

Coexist my ass! I hate those murdering goat f~~~ing rag heads more than I hate my ex-wife. The only free s~~~ they are ever going to get from me is a copper jacketed Sierra 168 gr. HPBT between the eyes.

[Author]

Posts