If they want terror we can bring it to them

[BlacqueJacqueShellacqueParticipant 6890]

It’s three minutes and fifteen seconds long. You’ll have to read the translation on the bottom of the screen. Sorry if posted before.

And a second one, a little longer, but if you liked the first one …

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Libya is actually something I know a bit about. Under Gaddafi much of the radical element was jailed. He was very progressive, especially for that part of the world, and was friends with Nelson Mandela. He Supported Anti Apartheid in South Africa, ended much racism towards Black Libyans in his country, and kept his promises with the West in regards to not pursuing Nukes.

Wow! The man sounds like a saint. You sound real educated on him indeed!

You left a few MINOR details out of your remarkable tribute to such an innocent man.

Before there was Osama Bin Laden, there was Moammar Gadhafi. For years he was Public Enemy No. 1 in the U.S., feared and loathed for bankrolling terrorism and revolution around the globe.

A Newsweek cover story in 1981 branded him “the most dangerous man in the world.” To President Ronald Reagan, he was “the mad dog of the Middle East.”

And that was before his regime’s most dastardly deed of all: the 1988 bombing of Pan Am Flight 103 over Lockerbie, Scotland, by Libyan agents who planted explosives in a suitcase. The crash killed 270 people, most of them Americans.

Unchecked by any of the normal restraints of governance, Gaddafi was able to take his anti-imperialist campaign around the world, funding and supporting militant groups and resistance movements wherever he found them.

He also targeted Libyan exiles, dozens of whom were killed by assassins believed to belong to a global Libyan intelligence network.

If governments were prepared to shrug off Gaddafi’s human rights violations in Libya, and persecution of dissidents abroad, it was a different matter when it came to him supporting groups that used terrorism on their own patches.

A bombing of a nightclub used by US soldiers in Berlin in 1986, blamed on Libyan agents, proved a decisive moment.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/libya-colonel-gaddafi-supported-terror-149208

“Settle down cowboy” isn’t a refute or a position in a debate. Neither is calling everyone who disagrees with you Zionists, PragerU students, brainwashed CNN zombies, fake patriots etc.
If anyone needs to settle down it is you.

[GrumpyParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

I see you take the PragerU approach here.

I am out guys! The uninformed hatefest may continue now.

Really Joe?
I actually take a pragmatic approach, you know Sir Isaac Newton’s 3rd law of motion.
Actually all 3 of his laws of motion can be applied to warfare.
Someone comes at me with a knife, I shoot them. Set fire or blow up my house, I flatten your village.
Trust me, I’ve had to abide by RoE’s, the Geneva Convention, Articles Of War, the f~~~ing U.N, Red Cross, and a f~~~ton of other rules by people not taking hostile incoming fire, excuse me I digress.

As for my part as a supposed uninformed party in this purported hate fest.
I’m fairly certain that my real life experiences, as well as the real life experiences of other men who have lived through combat, outweighs every written word or f~~~ing propaganda video produced and uploaded to youtube to be used as reference.

There was a time in my life when I gave a fuck. Now you have to pay ME for it

[Anonymous 14]

Grumpy wrote:

Joe Bauers wrote:

I see you take the PragerU approach here.

I am out guys! The uninformed hatefest may continue now.

Really Joe?
I actually take a pragmatic approach, you know Sir Isaac Newton’s 3rd law of motion. Actually all 3 of his laws of motion can be applied to warfare.
Someone comes at me with a knife, I shoot them. Set fire or blow up my house, I flatten your village.
Trust me, I’ve had to abide by RoE’s, the Geneva Convention, Articles Of War, the f~~~ing U.N, Red Cross, and a f~~~ton of other rules by people not taking hostile incoming fire, excuse me I digress.

As for my part as a supposed uninformed party in this purported hate fest.
I’m fairly certain that my real life experiences, as well as the real life experiences of other men who have lived through combat, outweighs every written word or f~~~ing propaganda video produced uploaded to youtube and used as reference.

I came back just because I thought the second half of what I said may have been taken as directed at you. I did not mean it for you at all Grumpy, was just rolling train of thought on my way out the door. Much respect to you my friend, I apologize greatly.

O.K., now I am out! lol

[KeymasterKeymaster]

53ClicksUp wrote:

Coexist my ass! I

It’s OK. She doesn’t really mean it.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Keymaster wrote:

53ClicksUp wrote:

Coexist my ass! I

It’s OK. She doesn’t really mean it.

“Celebrating my birthday in Manchester as news of the Manchester Arena bomb broke. The anger is monumental. 
For what reason will this ever stop?

Manchester mayor Andy Burnham says the attack is the work of an ‘extremist’. An extreme what? An extreme rabbit? 
In modern Britain everyone seems petrified to officially say what we all say in private.

Theresa May says such attacks ‘will not break us’, but her own life is lived in a bullet-proof bubble, and she evidently does not need to identify any young people today in Manchester morgues.
Also, ‘will not break us’ means that the tragedy will not break her, or her policies on immigration.
The young people of Manchester are already broken—thanks all the same, Theresa.

Politicians tell us they are unafraid, but they are never the victims. How easy to be unafraid when one is protected from the line of fire. The people have no such protections.

Sadiq Khan says, ‘London is united with Manchester’, but he does not condemn Islamic State—who have claimed responsibility for the bomb.”

– Morrissey

[Manspread MansplainerParticipant 4222]

If women ran the world = It would become the shithole you are seeing.

[The Batman 2020Participant 2112]

Poorly done hoax. They learned the pics of “injured” do not work as we will smell a rat. Do no video or pics on this one. Pathetic. I miss the good ole false flag days.

Your 20's are for learning, your 30's are for earning.

[Can’t Stump TrumpParticipant]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

“Settle down cowboy” isn’t a refute or a position in a debate. Neither is calling everyone who disagrees with you Zionists, PragerU students, brainwashed CNN zombies, fake patriots etc.

Ah yes, “brainwashed,” the ultimate comeback from libertarians and atheists with their heads up their asses.

Women are better at multitasking? Fucking up several things at once is not multitasking.

[Anonymous 14]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

“Settle down cowboy” isn’t a refute or a position in a debate.
Neither is calling everyone who disagrees with you Zionists, PragerU students, brainwashed CNN zombies, fake patriots etc.
If anyone needs to settle down it is you.

You are correct, “Settle down cowboy” is not a refute or a position in a debate, nor was it meant to be.

I was not calling anyone here anything. Nor have I ever called anyone here a Zionist, nor a PragerU student. CNN and State Department shills, yes, fake patriots, yea, and that is my prerogative to do so. You want to drag s~~~ from other threads in here and make s~~~ up at the same time, please, keep on going if you like.

My refute came in the form of presenting you with facts that showed that, yes, things were much more stable under Gaddafi, better for the region, better for Libyans, and better for the world, as I am sure Manchester is not liking this much right now. I suspect that terrorism will continue to rise in parallel to the levels of destabilization in once formerly relatively stable countries like Libya as Gaddafi had most of the real bad guys locked up. U.S. freed many of them and now they run loose not only in Libya but in Syria as well fueling a war with now over 350k dead. The kid who did the Manchester attack had just went to Libya to be trained, likely by the types that now roam free who before were locked up… Things will not get better via destabilizations, they will get worse, for everyone. Noting that Gaddafi has funding things in the past is cute, in comparison to U.S./Israel/Saudi Arabia he was a kitten in this arena.

Do you have a counter to my now twice made argument or would you like to continue to make it about something else?

Either way, I won’t be back on again tonight to try to make my point a THIRD TIME.

I am getting the idea this site has slowly been creeping towards Christian Neo-Con echo chamber for quite some time as Muslims, Libertarians, and Atheists are attacked here more often than other groups by the majority for the most part. You can even see coalitions forming… It would be sad to see this place become that narrow, but to be honest it has been creeping in this direction for quite some time.

If some here were to say things about Christians or Jews in the same tone some here do about Muslims the place would go bats~~~. And here I get called out for calling people Zionists… lol never have, but even if I did, would that be as bigoted as things Blade says daily?

Edit- Thanks Blade, good timing, so good I am giving you a +1.

[Anonymous 14]

Can’t Stump Trump wrote:

Pedal, run, row wrote:

“Settle down cowboy” isn’t a refute or a position in a debate. Neither is calling everyone who disagrees with you Zionists, PragerU students, brainwashed CNN zombies, fake patriots etc.

Ah yes, “brainwashed,” the ultimate comeback from libertarians and atheists with their heads up their asses.

You would have a point, if he had a point…

[bladeParticipant]

As if goat f~~~er pedophiles give a s~~~ about there own countries . All these refugees go on about is converting to s~~~lam . F~~~ them .

THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

You are correct, “Settle down cowboy” is not a refute or a position in a debate, nor was it meant to be.

It was a bulls~~~ tactic to discredit what I said, as if it was just some emotional tantrum. The move of a c~~~ or a punk. Which are you?

Anonymous wrote:

I was not calling anyone here anything. Nor have I ever called anyone here a Zionist, nor a PragerU student. CNN and State Department shills, yes, fake patriots, yea, and that is my prerogative to do so. You want to drag s~~~ from other threads in here and make s~~~ up at the same time, please, keep on going if you like.

You have been doing it for quite some time. As well as taunting all the cowards who won’t argue with you etc. “Where are they all Yumbo? They are scared of me!” NO, we just don’t give a s~~~ about your worthless, unsubstantiated, west-hating biased and hateful opinions. We are here for fellowship and some healthy debates when appropriate.
You are here for something much different.
Don’t hide behind this “that was other threads” or “you’re making s~~~ up” crap. You have a clear pattern of behavior in these politics threads. You have constantly used that CNN and PragerU crap instead of making counter points.

Anonymous wrote:

My refute came in the form of presenting you with facts that showed that, yes, things were much more stable under Gaddafi, better for the region, better for Libyans, and better for the world, as I am sure Manchester is not liking this much right now. I suspect that terrorism will continue to rise in parallel to the levels of destabilization in once formerly relatively stable countries like Libya as Gaddafi had most of the real bad guys locked up. U.S. freed many of them and now they run loose not only in Libya but in Syria as well fueling a war with now over 350k dead. The kid who did the Manchester attack had just went to Libya to be trained, likely by the types that now roam free. Things will not get better via destabilizations, they will get worse, for everyone.

Your opinion of what a great man that evil, murderous f~~~ Ghaddafi was is hardly a refute.
Libya has itself and the Libyan people to blame for the mess they are in. After decades of sponsoring terrorism and cheering in the streets for the murder of innocent people in the west, I couldn’t give a s~~~ about them.
Their chicken have come home to roost.
Your trying to shift blame onto the US and the west shows how f~~~ed up you truly are. Are you Muslim? Or just a f~~~ing traitorous asshole?

Anonymous wrote:

Do you have a counter to my now twice made argument or would you like to continue to make it about something else?

I made a direst response to a point you made about Libya having never done anything to the west etc. You don’t get to dictate that your moronic rambling are not allowed to be countered, and what the debate will be about.
If you don’t like it, don’t say stupid s~~~.

[Anonymous 14]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

Your trying to shift blame onto the US and the west shows how f~~~ed up you truly are. Are you Muslim? Or just a f~~~ing traitorous asshole?

Not trying to shift blame, trying to balance it, as this place becomes more and more of an echo chamber by the day. Not too long now and it will be pretty much just be White Christians here. Men from around the world will have no voice here, just Western Christians who want to see Muslim blood. I kind of had a different idea of this place when I got here, more global and inclusive I suppose, maybe I am naïve and that is what my real problem is.

I am not a Muslim. If I were I would hate most men here. I am an American Patriot, an Atheist, and a Libertarian. I believe nearly all of what the U.S. has done of late has made things worse, not better, so much to the point that it feels like making it worse is the plan…I do not fall prey to letting other men decide who my enemy is, this seems to be a real problem for many here. Gang behavior is all I see it as, no thanks. Would I fight for the U.S. if invaded? Yep. Would I go fight in other people’s lands to collectively punish them for what a few did? Never.

[Anonymous 14]

I would really like to know who the one guy is that gives me +1’s in all these debates that I seem to be getting my face kicked in from all sides all the time, because if and when I leave this place for good I could always have a smile when I think about this phantom dude. lol Likely not the same guy all the time, but man would it be funny if it was.

[Anonymous 14]

It’s me.

Me and you have never crossed swords at any time, so I guess it is possible. (at least maybe some of em) lol

[Manspread MansplainerParticipant 4222]

Have any members of the religion of peace condemned this attack (false flag, hologram or real?) or just whined about persecution.

A video is circulating showing a training exercise for a similar situation that people point to as proof of a psy-op. Others claim the video is in fact old from a different training exercise.

This extremist s~~~ is going to far, IDGAF if it’s globalists pulling the strings. They are flooding Europe with savages who do NOTHING except take, take, take, take, take and complain. And take.

You want a PSY OP?

Cosmo ran a story saying ‘muslims giving free taxi rides afterwards’ It was a Sheik man!

If women ran the world = It would become the shithole you are seeing.

[Manspread MansplainerParticipant 4222]

I remember a while back there was a f~~~you Muslims thread, then somebody made a f~~~you Christians thread, I think a f~~~you God thread, I think maybe even a f~~~you atheist thread can’t remember, but were all up here still going on some how.

Let’s just agree to f~~~ f~~~ers who f~~~ f~~~ing f~~~ of all f~~~s.

No f~~~s given. 🙂

If women ran the world = It would become the shithole you are seeing.

[Anonymous 14]

Pedal, run, row wrote:

You have been doing it for quite some time. As well as taunting all the cowards who won’t argue with you etc. “Where are they all Yumbo? They are scared of me!” NO, we just don’t give a s~~~ about your worthless, unsubstantiated, west-hating biased and hateful opinions. We are here for fellowship and some healthy debates when appropriate.

Still making s~~~ up. I never said any of that. What I did say was along the lines of “notice how the official narrative types never show up in your threads Yumbo?” Meaning, they don’t like to even address Yumbo’s info. It had ZERO to do with me, not once did I say “They are all scared of me” Or anything like what you are saying here. I was pointing out how guys who only spit up official narrative will not enter a Yumbo thread and engage him/or the thread, had nothing to do with me personally.

At what point do you stop making s~~~ up?

Or at what point do I just write you off as an asshat may be the better question.

Think I am going to do it riiiiiiiiight abooooouuuuut…

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

Pedal, run, row wrote:

You have been doing it for quite some time. As well as taunting all the cowards who won’t argue with you etc. “Where are they all Yumbo? They are scared of me!” NO, we just don’t give a s~~~ about your worthless, unsubstantiated, west-hating biased and hateful opinions. We are here for fellowship and some healthy debates when appropriate.

Still making s~~~ up. I never said any of that. What I did say was along the lines of “notice how the official narrative types never show up in your threads Yumbo?” Meaning, they don’t like to even address Yumbo’s info. It had ZERO to do with me, not once did I say “They are all scared of me” Or anything like what you are saying here. I was pointing out how guys who only spit up official narrative will not enter a Yumbo thread and engage him/or the thread, had nothing to do with me personally.

At what point do you stop making s~~~ up?

Or at what point do I just write you off as an asshat may be the better question.

Think I am going to do it riiiiiiiiight abooooouuuuut…

I am not going to play your bulls~~~ games, you little liar.
I am not scrolling through all your retarded posts about terrorism and the middle east, where you say stupid s~~~, act like you have it all figured out, ignore all the facts people present against you, ignore that they are getting all the upvotes and you keep getting your 1 or 2 auto votes from god knows who, and act like you are hitting the ball out of the park every time.

You have consistently done exactly what I said you have done. Maybe the quotes are not exact, but correct in tone, intent and message.

Yes, for your ego’s sake chalk me up to just another CNN or state dept. drone, and pretend you proved your point about Libya never having done anything to the west. So F~~~ing retarded. Complete historical ignorance.
Unlike you, I watched the news as a 747 was bombed out of the air and crashed in Lockerbie Scotland, killing hundreds of innocent people, by Libyan terrorist, and the people dance in the street in Libya. So f~~~ off with your bulls~~~.
Because you are a lost cause for any meaningful conversation or debate on terrorism and the middle east.
You bring nothing factual to the table. Just a steady stream of pro- arab/ anti US sentiment and bias.

[Author]

Posts