For Mgtaoist: Interpreting MGTOW: the wisdom behind the malace

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Viciouscunningtreacherous wrote:

Without the imperatives of survival, we become complacent,arrogant and lazy.

Great insight. I believe the human race is still neck deep in trying to survive though, even if we don’t think so. There is no shortage of things to fix. Maybe in 200 years, if AI robots and UBI become a reality, we’ll need to create artificial struggles for humans to conquer. I’m unsure if we can produce convincing obstacles for ourselves to overcome though, humans tend to know when they have a safety rope. Wonderful brainstorming.

It’sallbs wrote:

As for AWALT and MONK you are wrong Gravelpit

I’m laying out the million year old Ape case, I’m fully in the AWALT camp. No one can outrun their genetics. Women can’t even pretend to overcome million year old instincts. The NAWALT is still a fools errand

I hate going down this road because, like I said, it’s semantic quicksand. All it is, is an acronym. When we say, “the exception proves the rule” are we not admitting there is an exception? Evolutionarily speaking, of course not, AWALT.

But there are freak occurrences where a tiny minority of men are getting on with women seamlessly. These are lottery winners.

Those men and women, their specific personalities and environments are like planets aligned, creating a rainbow.

The trouble is that the other 99% of people think they’re the ones who are going to land on that. Aint gonna happen.

I wouldn’t make videos like this homage to Stardusk, if I wasn’t absolutely monk AWALT.

It’sallbs wrote:

If you fully understand AWALT and fully accept it then not being monk is just an inablity to control urges caused by chemicals in the brain

There’s the rub right there. Emphasis on your quote; the words understand and inability to control. Some men, through a combination of genes or memes, are too dumb to understand sexual dimorphism, some are simply too horny and can’t even consider their biology. They are going to keep buying lottery tickets (pursuing ‘NAWALT’). And a very few of them will hit the jackpot such as a woman that is literally too dumb to make the phone call, like dating a retarded girl or one that was heavily brought up in a strict religion.

Imagine a dog chasing it’s tail. There is no freewill, it’s just a stupid biological machine, automated to keep circling, to keep prodding along chasing the carrot dangling on a stick. Some breeds of dog are pretty smart though and through anomalies in nature, the right circumstances occur where they actually get to eat the carrot, maybe the carrot falls off the string… Even a broken clock is right twice a day. Some idiots stumble into near perfect relationships with women. Is it going to happen for us? Likely not. We have more chance of being hit by a meteor than marrying a NAWALT and living happily ever after.

Anyway, people really make too much of it. The people who argue for NAWALT are desperately looking for a way to excuse themselves back into chasing pussy. They need a justification, anything, to save their delusion. This is why we’re so adamant about AWALT and pointing out the biology, which they never want to listen to. I’m perfectly willing to accept the 1% of women who are great while those pussy beggars are the ones denying the 99%. They are the ones who miss the entire point because they want to believe in the fairy tale so badly, they abandon logic and won’t listen.

[It’sallbsParticipant]

Gravel Pit wrote:

like I said, it’s semantic quicksand

No, it’s fundamental. It’s their nature their are no exceptions.

Gravel Pit wrote:

The people who argue for NAWALT are desperately looking for a way to excuse themselves back into chasing pussy

Yes 100% as I’ve said many times on here and taken much s~~~ for saying it.

http://www.leavemeansleave.eu

[Anonymous 3]

This thread is getting even better with time.

This is Top Gun material.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Gravel Pit wrote:

When we say, “the exception proves the rule” are we not admitting there is an exception?

This is the semantic quicksand.. shouting over and over again, ALL WOMEN ARE LIKE THAT and plugging your ears, ignoring the quote above.

Just because we invent cute acronyms, that doesn’t tie a pretty pink bow around human psychology. There are over 150 trillion synapses in the brain. To say that two brains out of several billion people, can’t possibly be wired in such a way that they get along perfectly, defying 99% of the rest of the world, that is absurd. Even if 0.000001% of women are born retarded, as fluke NAWALTs, that is 3000 unicorn women right there. They exist pal.

There are exceptions. There are married men on this website right now living contently with women. They are usually older men, from a different time and generation, and living in places that are vastly different form the urban areas we live in. They are a dying breed at this point.

If there is one thing I can’t stand, its intellectual dishonesty. We all know the point of the acronym AWALT (All Women Are Like That). There is no need to cling to it dogmatically at the expense of alienating people in the room right now who are literally an exception.

It’s almost to the point, people rabidly screaming AWALT, that they miss the entire point of NAWALT in the first place. It’s a semantic game, an abbreviated way of describing a deflection and bad argument. It’s a simple acronym to describe people chasing a delusion. There is no need to take it further than that and ignore facts. No one here is excusing the truth about women. No one here is saying, “you can be the lottery winner man, NAWALTS are everywhere, go get her.”

The precious berries that provide perfect sustenance DO exist. They’re just hiding in a field of nettles and amongst many identical poisonous berries. You will not find them, and if you go looking, you will be injured.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Gravel Pit wrote:

I’m perfectly willing to accept the 1% of women who are NAWALT while the simps deny the other 99% of women, the AWALTs.

It’s this simple. It’s just an acronym, not some testament we carved on a tablet and carried down from Mt. MGTOW.

When people use the NAWALT argument, just call them out for using a deflection that explains nothing. That’s it.

[Author]

Posts