Booty Boycott- Verification Women View Pussy as Their Highest Power

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Faust For Science wrote:

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Historically, withholding sex from women was in fact something men did to punish women.

Thats intriguing but it seems counter intuitive. I would love to see some historical examples of this. Thats not a “challenge”. I would honestly like to know the history of this if its out there.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-lies-feminism/women-complaining-about-lack-of-available-slavemasters/

The women had tyrannical laws passed that seized property, imprisonment, restrictions on travel, and high taxes on bachelors, to force men to marry the bitches.

Always the stick, never the carrot.

Well, guess what. This time is different.

Back then, these were times when men could still have the piece of the pie. And getting married was not complete slavery to the wife, both during the marriage, and after the divorce. And at those times, the courts did not always side with the woman.

Right now, MGTOWs are burnt out, and those with the minimalists have little to lose. Such tyranny will push men over the edge.

It will come down to live as a slave, or die free. It is never wise to force people, whom have nothing to lose, make such decisions.

Thanks for the link- it was an interesting read. But the article was discussing women who chose not to marry. Not men who witheld sex.

Resident cynic.

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

I’ve thought on this …. Long … and … Hard … ladies … and my ponderings have produced this answer:

Hahahahaha … you stupid fking retard.

That’s all I came up with ?

[John Woods 13Participant 2855]

Faust For Science wrote:

I find it deeply ironic that someone would mention the Lysistrata play, here on the MGTOW forum.

In the Lysistrata play, women try to withhold sex from men to stop a war. Where as, we MGTOW are walking away from women, many withholding sex from women, as a way to force women to stop their war on men.

The situation is thick with irony.

It would be ironical if that were true, but the part in bold is not true, in most cases at least. That is what MRAs try to do. MGTOW do not have an agenda towards women.
Our happiness does not depend of what women do or what we force women into doing. MGTOW have won the moment they decided to go their own way. Weather they stop the war or not is irrelevant. MGTOW have left the battlefield are are enjoying life in the free neutral zone called SANITY.

The answer is NO. “I could but I won’t”. Memini murum!

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Thanks for the link- it was an interesting read. But the article was discussing women who chose not to marry. Not men who witheld sex.

Yes. But, the article offered the answer of what women did when men stopped marrying.

John Woods 13 wrote:

It would be ironical if that were true, but the part in bold is not true, in most cases at least. That is what MRAs try to do. MGTOW do not have an agenda towards women.

Actually, should you think about it, what it is true.

MGTOW have a deep revolutionary undercurrent going. But, it is not a militant hateful revolutionary approach like feminists have towards men.

Nor, is the MGTOW violent. We preach non-violence, outside of self-defense.

MGTOW are revolutionaries like Gandhi, and John Galt (Atlas Shrugged). We believe in change by removing ourselves from the machine, to hasten the collapse of the society that is harmful to us. We have chosen not to contribute, nor aid, in any way, those that harm us, and those that exploit us.

That is why so many MGTOW eventually go minimalist. Because we stop seeing women as being the sole cause of our problems, and we realize society is also the problem. Thus, we remove ourselves, as much as possible, from the machine that hurts us.

And what makes MGTOW so difficult to deal with is we are leaderless, and we are not openly protesting. Instead, we are quietly protesting with our feet, and leaving it out the back door, while everyone else is looking at the front door.

It is easy to count the number, identify, and attack those that openly protest. It is much harder to make an accurate accounting of those that just quietly walking away. Because they are not announcing, they are doing. And people usually don’t miss them until they are long gone.

[Elric GreenstoneParticipant 1637]

I really like Indian food. I really, really do. I enjoy it so much that, like opera, I made a conscious decision not to try to learn anything about it, so as to not spoil my enjoyment with knowledge or analysis. This may seem odd to some . . . but I really, really, really like Indian food. I cheerfully go to Indian restaurants, tell them I enjoy it, and to just bring me something awesome, with nan bread. Yay Indian food!

If you told me that, if I wanted Indian food, I’d have to risk getting a disease that could kill me, or give me painful viral outbreaks on my face or genitals, I’d probably start to give it a second thought as a pleasure.

If you told me that, if I wanted Indian food, I would risk being falsely accused of rape – or forced into parenthood and indenture for the rest of my goddamn life, or have to live with a crazy person to get Indian food, or an immature, parasitic, whining lunatic just for Indian food – and that the Indian food would taper off after the first couple of years to just Indian food once or twice a month but still I’d have to endure the lunatic and the financial slavery and the children I was tricked into and the drama. . .

I’d probably go find something else to do with my time other than eat Indian food.

There are worse analogies.

"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."

[Author]

Posts