Booty Boycott- Verification Women View Pussy as Their Highest Power

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

I was going to post this in the “how women control men” thread, but I thought it worthy of its own.

In response to violence in Chicago, one woman is attempting to create a pussy strike- men get no pussy until the violence stops. This just shows they view their pussy as their highest resource.

” Lawson said she was inspired to start the petition because she is tired of the violence in the city and thinks “you have to hit people where it hurts.”

In other words- men cant live without sex, in her estimation.

In a patriarchal society, a problem will not be addressed until it directly affects men,” the petition says.

“I vow to keep my affections for men vocal, spirit filled and non-sexual until all children on the south side are safe to play outside their doors. I vow to stay celibate until black men organize and create a strategy to keep the peace in our neighborhoods.”

http://www.fox5dc.com/news/national/50897327-story

Resident cynic.

[TaxGuyParticipant]

She stole the idea from Spike Lee. It’s the premise of his next movie. Bitch couldn’t think of it on her own, it’s a man’s idea.

Nice to know that she agrees with Spike that a woman’s only asset is her cuchy.

Order the good wine

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Its also interesting to note that a woman activist attempts to change something by what she decides NOT to do. Does she decide to speak on the subject and persuade people by her words? Does she decide to start a charity group to help troubled youth? No. She decides to NOT spread her legs. Apparently THAT is much more of a difficult task for her than the afore mentioned.

Resident cynic.

[Anonymous 18]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

pussy strike- men get no pussy until the violence stops.

Allow me.

Men who act violently are also likely to be the real rappers, errr, I mean rapers/rapists.

Withholding sex wouldn’t quite make any difference to the violent man. In fact he may appreciate using force-enabled ejaculation.

“neurons necessary and sufficient for inter-male aggression are located within the ventrolateral subdivision of the ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus (VMHvl), a structure traditionally associated with reproductive behavior.”
Biol Psychiatry. 2012 Jun 15; 71(12): 1081–1089.

In other words, brain structures responsible for violent tendencies overlap brain regions stimulated by sexual behavior. Ever wonder why people who are angry succinctly feel calmer after using sexual-expletives?

F~~~ off bitch /sarcasm

So in conclusion the rape instances would likely rise due to men who have violent tendencies. Violence would still remain high. If not higher.

For men who are otherwise not satisfied sexually, they may feel frustration but the reduction in stimulation of sexually stimulated regions would reduce stimulation of overlapping violence-associated regions of brain. Hence, overall less violent tendencies.

Her friends would be fish without the bicycle. Perpetually wet with nothing to ride.

This bitch needs to travel to Nepal and meet some monks.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Men who act violently are also likely to be the real rappers, errr, I mean rapers/rapists.

My initial thought when reading the article was that the men who are out violently killing other men in the streets, arent in a relationship where the female wears the pants/makes the decisions.

Its just pure irony that women think so much of their pussy that their answer to ending violence is to stop spreading their legs. Thats the most she can do? That is the pinnacle of her power by her own estimation?

What a cheap sex object she self admittedly is.

Resident cynic.

[Anonymous 3]

TaxGuy wrote:

She stole the idea from Spike Lee. It’s the premise of his next movie. Bitch couldn’t think of it on her own, it’s a man’s idea.

Nice to know that she agrees with Spike that a woman’s only asset is her cuchy.

Then Spike Lee stole it from Ancient Greece. There is a play called Lysistrata with that very plot, the women of Sparta whine that the men go off to war and they become old maids that nobody wants. So they want to stop war.

Goes to show you, AWALT, thousands of years of AWALT…

[Anonymous 18]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

arent in a relationship where the female wears the pants/makes the decisions

Are we accounting for their single mothers?

Most single mothers have to drop their pants more than wear them to secure a beta champ to provide for the spawns. But I assume these women pretend to be tough around/towards their kids.

Women have no grasp of leadership. Those considered to be ‘leaders’ are surrogates; supported by matriarchy bullying. Some man somewhere knows how to push her buttons right. Those panties drop, one way or another.

I digress, back to the topic.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Are we accounting for their single mothers

My point is that the type of men committing violence wont be dictated to by a woman in the first place, let alone by some dude who isnt their father but is f~~~ing their mom.

Resident cynic.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Actually, the more you think about this the more ridiculous this becomes.

Either the women in question were willingly f~~~ing men who are killing people in the streets, or they expect normal law abiding men to somehow put an end to violence simply because they arent getting pussy. How the f~~~ could they be expected to do that?

Resident cynic.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Anonymous wrote:

Then Spike Lee stole it from Ancient Greece. There is a play called Lysistrata with that very plot, the women of Sparta whine that the men go off to war and they become old maids that nobody wants. So they want to stop war.

Goes to show you, AWALT, thousands of years of AWALT…

I find it deeply ironic that someone would mention the Lysistrata play, here on the MGTOW forum.

In the Lysistrata play, women try to withhold sex from men to stop a war. Where as, we MGTOW are walking away from women, many withholding sex from women, as a way to force women to stop their war on men.

The situation is thick with irony.

[FrankOneParticipant 1417]

Phoenix: I was going to note Lysistrata by Aristophanes also, I read it as a teenager in the 1980’s. Also, keep in mind, it was a COMEDY. She organized the women to withhold sexual privileges with husbands and lovers, but ultimately it only inflamed the battle of the sexes. The opening line:

LYSISTRATA
There are a lot of things about us women
That sadden me, considering how men
See us as rascals.
CALONICE
As indeed we are!

For the record, I support the sex strike in that it will decrease the welfare rolls. But, somehow, the scantily clad women in the photo don’t look to me to be the type that can keep up the ‘sex strike’.

[Anonymous 3]

Faust For Science wrote:

phoenix wrote:

Then Spike Lee stole it from Ancient Greece. There is a play called Lysistrata with that very plot, the women of Sparta whine that the men go off to war and they become old maids that nobody wants. So they want to stop war.

Goes to show you, AWALT, thousands of years of AWALT…

I find it deeply ironic that someone would mention the Lysistrata play, here on the MGTOW forum.

In the Lysistrata play, women try to withhold sex from men to stop a war. Where as, we MGTOW are walking away from women, many withholding sex from women, as a way to force women to stop their war on men.

The situation is thick with irony.

Historically, withholding sex from women was in fact something men did to punish women. But that doesn’t work now because men aren’t men, but are thirsty as all hell, and women can just get sex from any of the thirsty men out there. There are no repercussions at all for that, and society seems thoroughly uninterested in allowing any.

But this thirst seems to not be confined to just Western men, outside of Japan I think it’s all men. Maybe I am wrong though. Just I hold such a dim view of my common man these days.

Women have value because they have a pussy in this society, and men have zero value but create value for themselves for access to it. It’s supposed to really be the other way around.

Feminists had to push the fish and bicycles theme because women needing men was at one point common sense. Now it’s a joke to think that. Now it’s the opposite, MGTOW is so radical and seems like such a departure from the current social norms precisely because we think men don’t need women, rather we know we don’t. But we are so small in number.

I really don’t think society notices us. Only a few women notice and whine because deep down they understand MGTOW are the highest quality males out there, but they’re still not willing to concede that or anything else really.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

Historically, withholding sex from women was in fact something men did to punish women.

Thats intriguing but it seems counter intuitive. I would love to see some historical examples of this. Thats not a “challenge”. I would honestly like to know the history of this if its out there.

Resident cynic.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Historically, withholding sex from women was in fact something men did to punish women.

Thats intriguing but it seems counter intuitive. I would love to see some historical examples of this. Thats not a “challenge”. I would honestly like to know the history of this if its out there.

http://www.avoiceformen.com/feminism/feminist-lies-feminism/women-complaining-about-lack-of-available-slavemasters/

The women had tyrannical laws passed that seized property, imprisonment, restrictions on travel, and high taxes on bachelors, to force men to marry the bitches.

Always the stick, never the carrot.

Well, guess what. This time is different.

Back then, these were times when men could still have the piece of the pie. And getting married was not complete slavery to the wife, both during the marriage, and after the divorce. And at those times, the courts did not always side with the woman.

Right now, MGTOWs are burnt out, and those with the minimalists have little to lose. Such tyranny will push men over the edge.

It will come down to live as a slave, or die free. It is never wise to force people, whom have nothing to lose, make such decisions.

[Anonymous 3]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Historically, withholding sex from women was in fact something men did to punish women.

Thats intriguing but it seems counter intuitive. I would love to see some historical examples of this. Thats not a “challenge”. I would honestly like to know the history of this if its out there.

I understand AW my friend. And I wish I had sources to give you. But I sincerely doubt they exist on the internet.

I am I guess what you’d call well-read. Long before the internet knowledge was mostly out of books, and I read a lot. Fiction, historical texts, plays, plenty of things. Some of it is reading between the lines, sometimes it is stated fairly outright. Unfortunately, the passage of time and the inherent nature of offline sources have well removed any real opportunity for me to cite anything.

Hopefully someone else can, and then maybe we can sticky the sources, as this is indeed a topic that does come up occasionally.

I would suggest looking at the Victorian era, as well as some Roman text. One Emperor iirc exhorts men to marry and admits nobody would marry willingly. The Ancient Greeks I recall seemed to think men and women were in fact sexually incompatible. Aristotle considered carnal desires fairly shameful, and passed that belief onto Alexander the Great. I think even the Arabs have some literature to a similar effect as well.

Sometimes on the internet nowadays you do see wives claiming men refuse to have sex with them, usually beyond the age of 30. That, if it’s a good source at all, you can probably read with some google-fu. I’m not sure there aren’t better explanations however for that in the modern world.

I am personally more of the mind of Paul, who talks of the “gift of celibacy” or “singleness” in Corinthians (and I think Matthew). He does state most men and women however are better off married, as those with that gift are few. And it’s a gift to do God’s work. But I digress.

[AncientwisdomParticipant 6089]

He does state most men and women however are better off married, as those with that gift are few.

Ya, but how many times in proverbs does it say

it is better for a man to dwell on a roof top than with a contentious wife.

I remember living with a Christian friend who was dovorced, and he would quote this verse in the most comical, grunting man voice possible; in effect to state that men have always been miserable when living with women. LOL it was pure comedy gold.

No worries if you cant find a source online for what you mentioned. It just seems counter intuitive. Id love to hear more if anyone has anything about this.

Resident cynic.

[BritGHOWParticipant 2566]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

Its also interesting to note that a woman activist attempts to change something by what she decides NOT to do. Does she decide to speak on the subject and persuade people by her words? Does she decide to start a charity group to help troubled youth? No. She decides to NOT spread her legs. Apparently THAT is much more of a difficult task for her than the afore mentioned.

Of course, everything you suggest would take actual effort and commitment, why would they bother to do that when they can simply mobilise an army of pussy hungry simps and manginas to do the donkey work for them?

Faust, thank you for that link, had a quick skim and will delve deeper after work.

[HitmanParticipant]

Ancientwisdom wrote:

“I vow to keep my affections for men vocal, spirit filled and non-sexual until all children on the south side are safe to play outside their doors. I vow to stay celibate until black men organize and create a strategy to keep the peace in our neighborho

thanks for the quote ! how long will that take ?

[RoyDalParticipant]

Spike Lee stole it too. It is the plot of Lysistrata, by Aristophanes.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[bigboy83Participant 11312]

How ironic for women to stop spreading their legs, after men decided not only walk away from women, but not even interested in sex. The damaged is already done anyways, bastard children and STDS they like to spread because they hate men.
Fantastic job c~~~s, you did a quit a service for society.

Shit Tested, Cunt Approved.

[Author]

Posts