World Overpopulation: Self Correcting

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

I posted this in another thread but the graph is so cool that I wanted to post this as it’s own post.

Notice how the entire world is going toward a fertility rate that is below replacement.

We are self correcting the population. Another disaster warning debunked.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[PuniShredderParticipant 2268]

This is why I do not believe a DAMN thing TPTB ever say or predict. Pretty much everything I’ve ever been told has either been proven wrong or happened differently than predicted. So many scientific theories have changed as well since I was in school. I don’t think we know S~~~ about anything:)

Be professional be polite but always have a plan to kill everyone you meet.

[Psl47Participant 678]

” The world is okay , thats the human is f~~~ed up ”

.

[MecklotParticipant 608]

You want to know what’s funny?

One group in society wants rising birth rates so it can have more tax slaves to contribute to the system, and yet at the same time, another group in society also wants less people on this earth due to competition for jobs and increasing STD rates that may doom further human reproduction.

It’s almost as if a select elite who run the world (Illuminati or whatever you want to call them) are at odds with one another. I can imagine them at a round table or having a video conference bitching at each other and debating about what to do.

If there is an elite group that runs the world, it makes me wonder how often they communicated with each other and how much thought they put into their plan, because it sure as hell isn’t going the way they planned.

[FunInTheSunParticipant 8286]

I once watched a video about Bill Gates discussing world population. He stated that college-educated, married couples tend to have less children. Many of them wait until they have financial stability before they have kids, and they usually have no more than three.

Nations that give rights to women would probably have more contraceptives available and abortions. These women wouldn’t have to submit to arranged marriages either. As more women enter the workforce, globally, they will demand more rights from their governments. The feminism in Europe, Australia, and the USA could spread across the Asian and African continents.

"I saw that there comes a point, in the defeat of any man of virtue, when his own consent is needed for evil to win-and that no manner of injury done to him by others can succeed if he chooses to withhold his consent. I saw that I could put an end to your outrages by pronouncing a single word in my mind. I pronounced it. The word was ‘No.’" (Atlas Shrugged)

[JollyMisanthropeParticipant 3356]

For starters stop propping up third world populations through aid. It’s cruelty masked as kindness. If they can’t support the current population size on their own, increasing it will just lead to more starvation, disease, famine, and suffering.

The Children of Doom... Doom's Children. They told my lord the way to the Mountain of Power. They told him to throw down his sword and return to the Earth... Ha! Time enough for the Earth in the grave.

[FreedomParticipant 965]

JollyMisanthrope wrote:

For starters stop propping up third world populations through aid. It’s cruelty masked as kindness. If they can’t support the current population size on their own, increasing it will just lead to more starvation, disease, famine, and suffering.

Yep…we fell for this s~~~ before in 1985. Not gonna be taken for my cash again.

These famines exist mostly due to civil war and used as a way to control the population.

And the land can’t support the birth rate.

She cheated on me ..... my fault. I showed an interest in another woman......my fault.

[Chris1234Participant 353]

Yep, people who can least afford to breed have the most kids. Even in my country (Australia) the poorer less educated people (usually immigrants) have a lot more kids than the people who are on a higher incomes. They see the kids as a source of income due to the welfare benefits, there should be no additional benefits after 2 kids.
It makes me so angry as I’ve made the conscious decision to not have kids however the government expects me to subsidise others to have kids through my taxes. Its just a never ending cycle, they have 5 or more kids then their kids end up doing the same.
In a few generations the world will be f~~~ed, glad I’ll be dead by then haha.

[BoarParticipant]

JollyMisanthrope wrote:

For starters stop propping up third world populations through aid. It’s cruelty masked as kindness. If they can’t support the current population size on their own, increasing it will just lead to more starvation, disease, famine, and suffering.

And war.

Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

[narwhalParticipant]

I personally don’t like these sort of extrapolations. It assumes certain conditions about the future (or past) which may or may not be true. So I don’t put much fail in this sort of predictions.

However, that also means I don’t think we should be preparing for some sort of population crisis in the future either.

The world governments have many tools at their disposal to encourage or discourage population. So does nature.

Ok. Then do it.

[rorickParticipant 682]

It seems like the top level people (Elite’s) want to control the population of lower level people, however they themselves will have more kids so they can distribute the power and wealth only among themselves.

Less people means less threat to the government(Elite’s). And with automation being the future, man power is less required.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

The geographic time graph above shows a graph similar to the spread of modern infanticide choice by women, feminism. Maybe feminism is the end result of overpopulation, a matter very much in the public eye at the start of feminism.

Maybe the right to kill your young has been driven by an unshakable belief that the planet is overpopulated. It seems the most first world you are the less likely to have a high fertility rate.

Back then they “knew” that there would be a world wide food shortage. Given what was known at the time that seemed reasonable.

They never counted on chemical growth enhancers, crop rotation, insect repellent. This changed the face of the farming industry and made food widely available. It’s one of the biggest exports from the US.

So, like someone said above, some technological invention might occur that changes everything.

Like a male birth control pill.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[GeraldParticipant 3638]

JollyMisanthrope wrote:

For starters stop propping up third world populations through aid. It’s cruelty masked as kindness. If they can’t support the current population size on their own, increasing it will just lead to more starvation, disease, famine, and suffering.

I think it was Kinnison who said send em Uhaul’s not aid, we”ll make one trip… nothing grows here, nothing will, grab your kids, grab your s~~~ and let’s go.

No longer can we walk away, we must run. Remove the motive power.

[AttonParticipant]

It is a simple rule of that which increases quickly generally decreases quickly.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[MutineerParticipant 1467]

African countries are still reproducing well above replacement levels. In Nigeria alone, the reproduction rate is 5.6 children per woman. Whereas European countries have fallen below replacement levels. We’re living a lot longer which is why the population is projected to reach 9 Billion by 2050. I don’t see the self-correcting mechanism myself.

"The secret to happiness is freedom... And the secret to freedom is courage." - Thucydides

[Elric GreenstoneParticipant 1637]

I think the hubris of the globalists is just astonishing.

It’s because they are essentially Satanists. They hate G-d. Hate G-d. So they want to pretend that they are the end-all, be-all of human history and civilization.

Overpopulation is definitely self-correcting, and every good analysis I’ve read says that – shortly – it’s going to self-correct.

There are regions of the world that are wildly overpopulated. Wildly so. Much of Africa, the Indian subcontinent, Asia . . . to the point where they can’t feed themselves without promoting soil exhaustion elsewhere.

While it’s possible that a particularly bad harvest does this (leading, of course, to an instant nuclear war if the grain stops coming East), it’s much more likely that the planet will self-regulate its human host the old-fashioned way:

Plague.

India has 40+% of the population without access to toilets. In Africa that’s often 70% or 80%. We’ve got a famine about to happen in Yemen and Somalia, which we will treat in the same idiot fashion we always do, by dumping grain and thus destroying the economic incentive to grow next year’s crop as well.

Of course, the globalists feel they’re beyond history, and totally safe in their little enclaves. Which is cute, because small quarantined populations re-entering plague-affected zones immediately get sick, as background viruses *don’t ever f~~~ing go away*. Read about the Influenza outbreaks of 1918. One island in Brazil, maybe, maybe, avoided it (I myself blame s~~~ty recordkeeping rather than magic).

No, populations correct themselves to suit their environment through the magic of the environment being a system. Overpopulated deer without predators develop diseases to control their population. The level of complexity of this planet is beyond any imagination (but G-d’s), any modeling, any mathematical prediction.

But basic historical patterns are worth studying for the obvious reasons: human history is repetitive, and knowing the past helps predict the future.

The West reduced population through a variety of means: it probably won’t be enough. The stressed parts of the globe are just too stressed. Gaia *will* respond. Go visit Haiti, if you want to see chaos just in this hemisphere. The environmental damage is almost beyond belief. The planet will only tolerate this for a brief period before responding.

For those new to this line of thinking, I recommend Guns, Germs, and Steel as a good introductory text on the subject. Back in the day, college freshmen were given this work. I understand today with the collapse in critical thinking, it’s now a graduate- or doctoral- level text.

"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."

[Anonymous 5]

FunInTheSun wrote:

I once watched a video about Bill Gates discussing world population. He stated that college-educated, married couples tend to have less children. Many of them wait until they have financial stability before they have kids, and they usually have no more than three.

Nations that give rights to women would probably have more contraceptives available and abortions. These women wouldn’t have to submit to arranged marriages either. As more women enter the workforce, globally, they will demand more rights from their governments. The feminism in Europe, Australia, and the USA could spread across the Asian and African continents.

Mecklot wrote:

You want to know what’s funny?

One group in society wants rising birth rates so it can have more tax slaves to contribute to the system, and yet at the same time, another group in society also wants less people on this earth due to competition for jobs and increasing STD rates that may doom further human reproduction.

It’s almost as if a select elite who run the world (Illuminati or whatever you want to call them) are at odds with one another. I can imagine them at a round table or having a video conference bitching at each other and debating about what to do.

If there is an elite group that runs the world, it makes me wonder how often they communicated with each other and how much thought they put into their plan, because it sure as hell isn’t going the way they planned.

They’ve confused the populace. It’s all about putting us against each other, so we won’t put our hands together, and break the puppetry string, they’ve used to control society for so long.

Don’t be deceived, these Satanist have deep knowledge of things that we wouldn’t even begin to comprehend.

Look at the world, 99% of the population is blue pill. We’re​ divided by religion, political views, sexes, country, skin color, and even f~~~ing sports.

I don’t know, but these elites don’t seem confused to me, WE ARE. They’ve established a system were we’re slaves, and they’re gods.

Women are tools that the elites​ use to control blue pill men. That’s why sex is overrated in our society.

[sidecarParticipant 35859]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

Notice how the entire world is going toward a fertility rate that is below replacement.

Fertility rate and the earth’s carrying capacity is only a small part of the whole picture. Who is having children is vastly more important than how many are having children. And do you really want to live on a planet that’s near its carrying capacity? Especially when most of them are useless devolved mouth breathing welfare parasites?

Isn’t freeway traffic bad enough already?

[MichaelSpectator 544]

This is a terrible map based on 2D statistics and should not be trusted. There is no way it could be even 33% accurate.

[Author]

Posts