Women getting promoted and paid for NOT working

[ArcParticipant 350]

Rhino wrote:

If a man who built up a successful business is dumb enough to let this happen to his company he deserves everything he gets when the time comes to file for bankruptcy.

But looking at the dynamics of this type of policy that is starting to creep into the corporate sector this is planned and coordinated in my opinion. No sane man who has built up a company would let this happen within his company unless there was a safety net for him. No, bigger players like Soros and the Buffets of the world are pulling the strings for this type of corporate change.

Soon you will see this creep into government positions as well this is the continuation of men being pushed out the door of management and into more mundane roles. It won’t work because men are the ones that build up the companies and if enough women take over we all know how that will turn out when men get fed up and walk away leaving them to burn everything to the ground.

Pretty much, as soon as you let any woman get in she will try to subvert everything. Probably the biggest culprit is our “Human Resources” department. Nothing but a bunch of old, walled-out, “second-wave” (not that there’s a difference) feminists that have nothing positive to contribute to our organization but were compulsory diver-s~~~ty hires.

The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"... and I'll whisper "no."

[ArcParticipant 350]

iMickey503 wrote:

I wonder how much chinese money is behind this? Something doesn’t smell right.

Honestly, almost all of this lies squarely on leftist, hippie, gynocentric bulls~~~ policies. However, China is getting a massive benefit as people leave these companies and go to where almost all the manufacturing is. They get a s~~~ ton of skilled, knowledgeable labor that can use their industrial base more effectively. They basically get a free update on techniques and technology and they don’t have to do any of the leg work involved in getting it.

But something seems fishy.

It’s all the corporate women…just saying

The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"... and I'll whisper "no."

[MaverickParticipant 811]

Arc wrote:

Policies like these are just a black hole for money with no gains or returns. How can a major corporation just throw this much money away? They are killing themselves.

743 roadmaster wrote:

Something like that will take a business out. Going to guess not a single stock holder knows about this new policy. That would go over like a ton of bricks.As a worker I would be looking for the exit.

Nah. If it’s a big enough company, it will file for bankruptcy and get bailed out.

[MaverickParticipant 811]

Arc wrote:

What’s worse, they keep the guys like me in the less important roles because we still keep the wheels turning. We even wind up doing the managers’ work for them because they don’t know what to do, so they ask us ALL the time.

I can relate to this!

[Anonymous 38]

Arc wrote:

come again? Not privileged by gynocentrism? People are hiring these women almost exclusively in STEM. They are also promoting them far and beyond and they keep guys like me “working in the trenches” even though I’m keeping things going literally because vagina. I’m sure everyone else here would tell you just how privileged women are in the court system, where they can get away with fraud, treason, and even murder. You sound like a thot to me right now.

The point is that moaning about unfairness is going to achieve f~~~ all for you. It wouldn’t even achieve anything if all men did it, I reckon. No, it’s wiser to focus on them as individuals, judging them entirely on their merits – as you would a man. Issuing no passes for inferior performance or malevolent behaviour, pulling no punches about their worth as a human being. No doors held open, no smiles, no boring small talk. If they’re dumb as s~~~, treat them as such.

I hate to say it but it’s a s~~~ test we must pass. If we moan about it we fail the s~~~ test. The only way to pass is to refuse to serve, treat them as equals, utterly dominate them while hiding in plain sight. As we are seeing, this causes them to go haywire and eventually they will utterly malfunction.

[ArcParticipant 350]

Anonymous wrote:

The point is that moaning about unfairness is going to achieve f~~~ all for you. It wouldn’t even achieve anything if all men did it, I reckon. No, it’s wiser to focus on them as individuals, judging them entirely on their merits – as you would a man. Issuing no passes for inferior performance or malevolent behaviour, pulling no punches about their worth as a human being. No doors held open, no smiles, no boring small talk. If they’re dumb as s~~~, treat them as such.

I hate to say it but it’s a s~~~ test we must pass. If we moan about it we fail the s~~~ test. The only way to pass is to refuse to serve, treat them as equals, utterly dominate them while hiding in plain sight. As we are seeing, this causes them to go haywire and eventually they will utterly malfunction.

Right now, in order to survive we have to keep our mouths shut and keep going on. I understand this. However, facts are facts. What I had said before remains to be true and the vast majority of them have proven to be idiotic, malevolent, and selfish. I wont forgive them, until they actually do SOMETHING to right the wrongs feminism and their collective kind has done. Until then, all NAWALT and individualist arguments mean nothing to me, but a poor excuse to get one’s nuts out of the fire that is utilized when ever it is convenient. Part of the problem is that many men will never hold women accountable which is precisely what you are asking me to do. To me, your stance is that there will never be recourse so “why bother”? I understand today’s culture and climate wont hold women accountable, but I don’t give up on the idea that this would be the just and fair thing to do. If you give up, it most certainly will never happen.

The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"... and I'll whisper "no."

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

Arc wrote:

Right now, in order to survive we have to keep our mouths shut and keep going on. I understand this. However, facts are facts. What I had said before remains to be true and the vast majority of them have proven to be idiotic, malevolent, and selfish.

Yes, you have to be silent, invisible, not a target. The strong men, the capable men, the ones who can…they become targets. The art of war is to be ruthless when you are strong, and to not be a target when you are weak. Right now, we are not “strong.”

Western civilization doesn’t value equality, it values women. It irrationally values women to the exclusion and detriment of men. You can try and hold women accountable all you like, but you will have less than zero traction–you will put a target on your back. On the rare occasion that I “jokingly” talk about rolling back a hundred years of progressive agenda and fixing voting rights in the US, I get dog-piled faster than I can swat away the stupidity and I have to strategically pretend that I wasn’t fully serious.

Arc wrote:

I wont forgive them, until they actually do SOMETHING to right the wrongs feminism and their collective kind has done. Until then, all NAWALT and individualist arguments mean nothing to me, but a poor excuse to get one’s nuts out of the fire that is utilized when ever it is convenient. Part of the problem is that many men will never hold women accountable […] To me, your stance is that there will never be recourse so “why bother”? I understand today’s culture and climate won’t hold women accountable, but I don’t give up on the idea that this would be the just and fair thing to do.

The ONLY shot you have at a meritocracy (as opposed to our current gynocracy) is an insular community that forcefully resists external authority, like Muslim communities in Dearborn and Hammtramck (as well as the many no-go zones all across Europe).

Sadly, it will be other men who enforce the gynocracy. If you want your insular community, you have to be willing and able to enforce it. The women will fall in line, but you have to deal with the droves of western white knights who will descend on you like a plague, and the only thing these weak, pathetic, estrogenic losers respect is violence. You can’t reason with them–their mothers have stripped that faculty from them. You can’t persuade them–they are completely emotional and programmed by women to come to the immediate and irrational defense of any perceived slight against women. These giant emotional husks of withering testosterone will even defend the hive from gender traitors–look at Cuck Norris.

If you expect women, collectively or individually, to assume any responsibility for anything they do, you need to reconsider that foolish notion. The only time women will assume responsibility is when doing so gives them direct and immediate benefits–even the venerated “4%” of women who are capable of actually taking care of themselves and succeeding on their own steam. And sadly, things won’t change as long as the current laws and government exist and women collectively hold the reigns.

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[ArcParticipant 350]

JustAnotherGuy wrote:

The ONLY shot you have at a meritocracy (as opposed to our current gynocracy) is an insular community that forcefully resists external authority, like Muslim communities in Dearborn and Hammtramck (as well as the many no-go zones all across Europe).
Sadly, it will be other men who enforce the gynocracy. If you want your insular community, you have to be willing and able to enforce it. The women will fall in line, but you have to deal with the droves of western white knights who will descend on you like a plague, and the only thing these weak, pathetic, estrogenic losers respect is violence. You can’t reason with them–their mothers have stripped that faculty from them. You can’t persuade them–they are completely emotional and programmed by women to come to the immediate and irrational defense of any perceived slight against women. These giant emotional husks of withering testosterone will even defend the hive from gender traitors–look at Cuck Norris.
If you expect women, collectively or individually, to assume any responsibility for anything they do, you need to reconsider that foolish notion. The only time women will assume responsibility is when doing so gives them direct and immediate benefits–even the venerated “4%” of women who are capable of actually taking care of themselves and succeeding on their own steam. And sadly, things won’t change as long as the current laws and government exist and women collectively hold the reigns.

Despite all this, it still must be done. This s~~~ isn’t sustainable, that is why the insular communities like the Muslims are coming to conquer us. Turd Flinging Monkey said that, in the end, it will be men who win when our society collapses. I would disagree. Women would still win, because when society collapses and becomes invaded by a stronger culture; it will be us who get culled and the women who will be spared. Something has to be done, I know that women will more likely than not, never take responsibility for their actions. Egalitarianism was a dirty lie to give power and authority over our society to a group of people who have never been obligated to contribute to it, nor have ever had any loyalty to it.

The accumulated filth of all their sex and murder will foam up about their waists and all the whores and politicians will look up and shout "Save us!"... and I'll whisper "no."

[JustAnotherGuyParticipant]

Arc wrote:

Despite all this, it still must be done. This s~~~ isn’t sustainable, that is why the insular communities like the Muslims are coming to conquer us. Turd Flinging Monkey said that, in the end, it will be men who win when our society collapses. I would disagree. Women would still win, because when society collapses and becomes invaded by a stronger culture; it will be us who get culled and the women who will be spared. Something has to be done, I know that women will more likely than not, never take responsibility for their actions. Egalitarianism was a dirty lie to give power and authority over our society to a group of people who have never been obligated to contribute to it, nor have ever had any loyalty to it.

The other problem with building an insular community in the west is all the baggage from living in the west. You will have strong, empowered, independent women who still refuse to cooperate and think they can attract better men by having a better education themselves. You will still have that 80/20 rule in effect, and because the insular community is still geographically contained within a gynocracy, all it takes is one or two people going OUT of the community to destroy it. Look at what happens in a lot of prepper circles where the “wives” get into spats that end up ripping these intentional communities apart.

I’m not saying it can’t be done, but you have to factor in human nature and culture.

Cupcakes are Cold. MGTOW is Absolute Zero.
“Let us wait a little; when your enemy is executing a false movement, never interrupt him” –Napoleon Bonaparte, 1805

[ChatterParticipant 63]

Part of me is happy about this decision as the company will die due to incompetent hiring of people just because they fit a pic agenda.

However, thinking ahead, if a company does die because of these practices nobody will have the b~~~~ to hold women to account. Nobody will say this feminist policy and positive discrimination (there is no so thing btw, discrimination is discrimination) destroyed the company as it was led by these incompetent women. Women will just, as always, play victim. women will NEVER accept responsibility for the damage they cause.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

most women are nothing but overhead

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Author]

Posts