Women don't want sexbots. Now, who could see this coming?

[ArturParticipant 71]

Joey Alfio wrote:

I’ve already mentioned women will team up with the state to suppress any tech that can make men more sexually independent than vice versa.

They’re already spreading propaganda and looking for alternatives to Western plantation slaves.

While negative birth rates in the West have been an issue for years, now I see articles about it every other day. Japan is often cited as an example, where 70% of men and 60% of women between ages of 18 and 34 are single, and about 50% of married people don’t f~~~. Then you also hear stories about sperm donor apps or women f~~~ing migrants in refugee camps, the latter of which might offer some insight into why the EU migration crisis hasn’t been solved yet.

[Duke TogoParticipant 2664]

Artur wrote:

Apparently this is old news, but I just read about it today.

In the wake of increasing sexbot sales and advancing technology in the field, a campaign’s been launched by some lady called Dr Kathleen Richardson, who argues that “such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable” and it will “contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women”. Well, at least she’s right about the second part.

Feminists and manginas “contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women”, but nobody is attemptin to ban them.

StandUpGuy wrote:

Take away their vibrators and dildos as well. Oh wait, the loons would say that we are oppressing women. So I call BS and leave it at that.

Note: When the loons are treated like loons and rightfully ignored we win.

Double standards in play.

[Anonymous 11]

Artur wrote:

looking for alternatives to Western plantation slaves.

Rapefugees are p~~~ poor alternatives to Western plantation slaves.

[Anonymous 54]

Anonymous wrote:

Who gives a f~~~ what women want, they can f~~~ a 9-iron for all I care!

The’ll be happy about the “Fore”play!

[Anonymous 54]

Women are detraMENTAL to relationships.

[TuneoutParticipant]

Anything that decreases their SMV they are against.

Thats the real reason some women are against prostitution-not because of human trafficking and
underage girls (as they like to say) but because it
lessens their pussy power and control.

Women could care less about each other except when they are competing.

Lifes a bitch,but you don't have to marry one!

[AttonParticipant]

Are they that insecure are they that incapable?

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Duke TogoParticipant 2664]

Atton wrote:

Are they that insecure are they that incapable?

Yes to both questions.

[ArturParticipant 71]

Anonymous wrote:

Rapefugees are p~~~ poor alternatives to Western plantation slaves.

Yeah, but the really f~~~ed up part is that it is the rapefugees that are supposedly getting raped here.

Besides, the deal with women raping refugees is similar to the deal with women dating men who earn less than them. It’s a temporary thing. It’s just like Chris Rock said: “Nothing dries up a pussy quicker than a woman reaching for her wallet” (3:45). Why would they not do it? They have no morality or anything like that. After all, feminists who, together with the mangina establishment, are now in power say that it’s totally okay to whore around until they are sore and then some. When they get knocked up, they’ll just go to the mangina government and get money, and go on vacation… because the West has negative birth rate and, therefore, strongly supports it.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

My sexbot would have a flat head so I could eat a sandwich while getting a blow job and an audio feature just so I could enjoy turning it off.

I just did a little research and damn, these things are great. Serious competition of especially older woman as older men turn away from their craggled up skin and baby passageway for playtime.

Watch these video’s for a while, the sexbots are incredible.

I especially liked Android-F (for f~~~able?) at 1:38, I think I’m crushing on her.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Anonymous wrote:

Who gives a f~~~ what women want, they can f~~~ a 9-iron for all I care!

Took the words right out of my mouth.

The female opinion on this is totally irrelevant and it’s MEN having the last word. They will now be forced to accept it. Men have the last word on this topic. It is not open for discussion.

Women will stop being like we care “what women want”.

“WE WANT!!! WE DON”T WANT!!!”

“We don’t care. They are not being created FOR YOU. Get over yourself.”

Men already invented dildos for fuglies and loudmouth bitches nobody wants to screw, and now the ONE LAST THING that a woman has left to offer a man…… is being replaced.

Dr Kathleen Richardson is now forced to accept that “sexbots” were not man’s first choice. But WOMEN – and their false “rape” accusations, sperm jacking, and outrageous lunatic demands – have actually made women SO undesirable than an inanimate fake one with a hole to screw is an IMPROVEMENT over the real thing.

It’s now official.

Women have over-leveraged, and priced themselves right out of the market.

Women don’t want sexbots? Who f~~~ing cares.
Women were directly involved in establishing a need for them.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 11]

Artur wrote:

Yeah, but the really f~~~ed up part is that it is the rapefugees that are supposedly getting raped here.

An overwhelming percentage of the of these “refugees”/jihadists are military aged men. There’s an old saying that you “cannot rape the willing”. The sex fiend refugee helper wenches are just simply extracting a resource from them, in this case c~~~, and fulfilling some odd fetish they possess.

Chads are the only known males who can possess lesser economic status than a woman and not be rejected. This type of Chad will never have her “pussy dry up”. Women will merrily support parasitic Chads forever. A woman would never deign to give a normal man with less money than her even the time of day and even degrade him for daring to ask.

The entire World is overpopulated. A negative birthrate for the next 200 years would be beneficial for long term survival of many species not just mankind. I’m talking about everyone in the World not just the cream of the crop.

[Anonymous 54]

Whatching the vidio I can see why there freaked out. To be as despesnable as Men are to them is very new for them. Men have been replaced by govt, women replaced by robots.I dont know if I could really have sex with a machine, but I must admit I find the facial expressions apealing. Imagine seeing a smileing female face when you got home from work. Fasinateing

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Puffin Stuff wrote:

My sexbot would have a flat head so I could eat a sandwich while getting a blow job and an audio feature just so I could enjoy turning it off.

Until then you could hot glue a fleshlight to your TV set.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Anonymous 18]

A true MGTOW moment:

Being 85-year old wealthy man and paying pretty 20-something blondes to clean/recharge/dress/do-her-hair/etc my sex bot.

That is societal advancement.

No divorce courts, no lawyers, no fat slobs collecting pay checks and alimonies.

Women being independent and strong working in factories overtime manufacturing parts for sex-dolls.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

The sex bot thing has been a serious work in the making since Westworld, Cherry 2000 etc. Women were a pain in the ass then. The part I find so funny is a woman’s SMV is easily replaced with technology, whereby a mans SMV (aka a wallet) is not.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Anonymous 3]

Good, I hope this is a battle they keep trying at and keep failing at. That way they’ll be too busy to bother me on anything.

I used to wonder why in the past so many cultures were so obsessed with male masturbation. Constantly mocking, attacking, assuming and shaming any male they could, with some of the most ridiculous claims such as a man would go blind. Not women mind you, just men. Women were assumed to be these angelic beings that are too good for sex, although that makes you wonder why a man would marry such a creature if his primary motivator was access to sex.

Eventually I realized that is the type of thing that develops when you have manginas in power and a culture is moving more towards a gynocracy.

In a masculine culture, men are given freedom and men are not supposed to spy on each other or their children. Men set the rules and have authority, and as such society can be built and women are not able to destroy things and annoy everyone around them all the time. I consider this stage 1 of a society, this is where society is built and things operate smoothly, albeit there isn’t much wealth, people have freedom and in general are content in life.

Then slowly that starts to transform, to stage 2, where society starts listening to women, and women’s idiotic ideas begin to take hold. Since women are obsessed with sex, and controlling men through it, the first thing they always want to do is start shaming boys and controlling them. They refuse to allow their sons the tiniest bit of freedom and attack them constantly.

This then moves civilization into stage 3, the feminism stage, where the majority of men grow up as manginas and white knights. We’re towards the end of stage 3.

Stage 4 is the backlash and men opting out. I think we’re entering stage 4 now. In this stage men are fed up with the ridiculous gynocracy, and begin to question the laws and gender relations, and why it is society exists purely to pander to women. Since those in power refuse to cede any of the ridiculous rules they have in place, this eventually leads to collapse when the gynocracy doubles down and eventually pushes men to defend themselves.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Anonymous wrote:

I dont know if I could really have sex with a machine

If a man is married, he probably already has.

“fix the bathroom tiles honey, or there will be no nookie for you tonight”.

That’s a machine. A whore machine.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[Anonymous 18]

Keymaster wrote:

If a man is married, he probably already has.

I rather f~~~ a machine with metal and screws than come to terms of f~~~ing a woman after I have completed my assigned chores.

And machines are meant to be upgrade with new models coming out each year.

And mangina’s definition of 2040 looks something like a married man buying a used/older model of sex bot from a mgtow because his wife won’t f~~~ him. And he can’t buy a new unused one because it’s beyond his budget – or pocket money his wife allocates to him.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

She’s directly attacking Italy
Tutto il sesso che sarà meglio non fare con un robot by Kathleen Richardson
It’s perhaps due actually Italy is the third country in the world for robotics, after Japan and South Korea: Richardson knows that she cannot directly attack Japan and South Korea, there’s too much request for sex robots (due widespread “herbivores”) so she’s attacking the third most important developer of such technologies: she knows that Italian men are way more easily shamed than Japanese and South Koreans.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Author]

Posts