Women don't want sexbots. Now, who could see this coming?

Topic by Artur

Artur

Home Forums MGTOW Central Women don't want sexbots. Now, who could see this coming?

This topic contains 63 replies, has 35 voices, and was last updated by ,  , 3 years, 4 months ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 64 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #311224
    +7
    Artur
    Artur
    Participant
    71

    Apparently this is old news, but I just read about it today.

    In the wake of increasing sexbot sales and advancing technology in the field, a campaign’s been launched by some lady called Dr Kathleen Richardson, who argues that “such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable” and it will “contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women”. Well, at least she’s right about the second part.

    #311227
    +13

    Anonymous
    54

    There afraid they cant even compete with a robot. How pathetic.Women need to look in the mirror.

    #311238
    +12

    Anonymous
    42

    Who gives a f~~~ what women want, they can f~~~ a 9-iron for all I care!

    #311240
    +13
    Blade
    blade
    Participant

    Relationships are already detrimental. ….To men.

    THE PLANTATION HAS NOW TURNED INTO THE KILLING FIELDS . WOMAN ARE NOW ROLLING CAMBODIAN STYLE .

    #311246
    +9
    StandUpGuy
    StandUpGuy
    Participant
    334

    Take away their vibrators and dildos as well. Oh wait, the loons would say that we are oppressing women. So I call BS and leave it at that.

    Note: When the loons are treated like loons and rightfully ignored we win.

    #311247
    +16
    Max Power
    Max Power
    Participant
    2721

    I agree with her. Male-female relationships are absolutely perfect right now. Why on Earth fix something that aint broken?

    Love, respect, fairness, all perfectly balanced in women today. Things have never been better, and you don’t have to be Brad Pitt for all your dreams to come true…

    Oh, wait… f~~~.

    #311248
    +8
    Antipathy
    Antipathy
    Participant
    4901

    There afraid they cant even compete with a robot. How pathetic.Women need to look in the mirror.

    Words of wisdom.

    If one has nothing to offer that a robot can’t take care of, then they are full of empty.

    #311257
    +6
    Eek
    Eek
    Participant
    1162

    “contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women”

    Sounds like a great reason to ban Feminism, but that will never happen.

    #311262
    +7
    Xenon
    xenon
    Participant
    2007

    Nine-iron sounds about right to me as well. Probably prefer a wood driver though. Either way…off they go. Out of sight, out of sound, out of mind. Best way forward for any of us.

    #311264
    +4
    Honorable_Juice_Box
    Honorable_Juice_Box
    Participant
    591

    In the wake of increasing sexbot sales and advancing technology in the field

    Dr Kathleen Richardson, who argues that “such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable”

    Clearly she doesn’t understand basic economics supply/demand. What a shock. . .

    #311271
    +9
    Boar
    Boar
    Participant

    Well, if whimyn came with mute buttons, I am sure there would be some demand for them…maybe.

    Untamed wrote: Quit complaining and Go Your Own Way in whatever manner suits you best.

    #311276
    +4
    Antipathy
    Antipathy
    Participant
    4901

    Well, if whimyn came with mute buttons, I am sure there would be some demand for them…maybe.

    LOL OH THE DAY, the thing is though, they could still sit on the couch with a bag of dorito’s getting hugely obese while posting bulls~~~ on social media.

    #311290
    +9

    Anonymous
    11

    Feeling threatened are we? Why don’t they just try being decent caring human beings?

    As for banning sexbots, that is the typical female response to anything thing that threatens their power. This one may be a little more difficult though. Their blue pill and white knight stooges may not be too keen on supporting them with this issue.

    Once they develop a sexbot that can make a sammich, vacuum, cook, wash dishes and do the laundry women are finished. Domestic work and work that requires caring are the only things women are fit to do anyway. That’s why they make p~~~ poor CEOs.

    Yes, Marissa Mayer you are a p~~~ poor CEO. Though, I did learn you office is extremely well decorated and renovated. Typical c~~~, she spent millions of a failing company’s cash to redo her office into a palace. To hell with spending it on dare say keeping your user’s data secure.

    #311300
    +6
    Antipathy
    Antipathy
    Participant
    4901

    Once they develop a sexbot that can make a sammich, vacuum, cook, wash dishes and do the laundry women are finished. Domestic work and work that requires caring are the only things women are fit to do anyway. That’s why they make p~~~ poor CEOs.

    Yes and the majority of them, are so destroyed, they refuse to do any of that. Take a peek in chicks cars sometime,completely trashed, full of fast food wrappers, sour baby bottles, candy wrappers, drink containers with at least 2 oz of fluid still in them in every drink holder.

    Take a gander at their laundry rooms too, piled up sky high. I used to live with a bitch that would literally buy new outfits to avoid doing her wash … then when i needed to do mine, it would remind her that our appt still had a washer/dryer and she would fight me for the washer.

    #311312
    +6
    Hmskl'd
    hmskl’d
    Participant
    6412

    As far as the views of Ms. Richardson; I’m afraid she’s arrived too late at the party; there’s no turning back from the exciting new era of bots and holograms. The demand is great.

    #311313
    +8
    Joey Alfio
    Joey Alfio
    Participant

    I’ve already mentioned women will team up with the state to suppress any tech that can make men more sexually independent than vice versa. I also laugh at the fact that the one card c~~~s had over betas and manginas can now be trumped with sexbots and other devices.

    And can that bitch honestly tell me, with a straight face, that it’s men’s fault marriages and relations~~~s are losing their value and dissipating in the west?

    Δεν υπάρχει τίποτε αδύνατο γι’ αυτόν που θα προσπαθήσει. - Μέγας Αλέξανδρος

    #311325
    +7

    Anonymous
    11

    Naw, nothing can ever be a woman’s fault. They are so perfect and pristine even after they’ve had 2,500 different c~~~s run through them.

    Feminism has bound women into chains. Slaves to nefarious forces of ill will. They face a future of cats. Are you really better off under feminism an ideology of hatred?

    Living alone with 30 cats or a foot licking beta mangina, Sweet cheeks, that’s just not life. Look at the bright side, honey. Sex robot technology will offer male versions too.

    No more two pump chumps for you, Cupcake.

    I fail to see how sex robots will “contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women”. Modern women are next to useless.

    Sex robots are Men’s liberation. You can’t just take that Cupcake. Can you?

    #311331
    +5
    Old Rottweiler
    Old Rottweiler
    Participant
    1520

    Maybe women need to understand the concept of fairness and value added? Naaa… who am I kidding.

    I love how the European women welcomed the army of Muslim men, who have the right to 4 wives with no rights. When I was growing up, the women in my grandparents generation of eastern European background were terrified of their husbands. The man ruled. That was 60-70 years ago. A man can’t do that now. The women were just as crazy then, but they weren’t allowed to run amuck.

    #311335
    +4
    Eric Lauder
    Eric Lauder
    Participant
    12043

    Apparently this is old news, but I just read about it today.

    In the wake of increasing sexbot sales and advancing technology in the field, a campaign’s been launched by some lady called Dr Kathleen Richardson, who argues that “such a use of the technology is unnecessary and undesirable” and it will “contribute to detrimental relationships between men and women”. Well, at least she’s right about the second part.

    Highly advanced robots would be harmful for the society, but not because the competition faced by gold-diggers and man-hating women like Kathleen Richardson.
    Highly advanced robots would take away 50% available jobs, and by so half the population would be poor.
    The first jobs disappaering due automation are:
    Supermarket cashiers (at least 90% women)
    Employees to highway pay tolls (roughly 50:50 women and men)
    Then bus drivers and taxi drivers (at least 90% men).

    Sexbots have a lot of problems – they:
    Take too much space
    Are expensive
    Are likely to be dangerous in case of malfunctioning (it’s a robot of the dimensions and weight of an average woman, perhaps even physically stronger than a woman)

    I think it’s good that they’re focusing on sexbots: by this way they’ll fail to tackle the real threat for women – the combo robot vacuum cleaners + fleshlight (I have both): women will be totally irrelevant when such combo will further improve with the addition of: a cooking machine/robot, a more advanced cleaning robot, a very advanced tool for virtual porn (basically just like Oculus Rift but with higher definition and more frames per second: 3840×2160 at 288 fps would be perfect, it would be 4 times both the best definition and the best fluidity actually achievable).
    No need of sexbots.

    Tomorrow I’ll depart, job transfer, in a hotel: I’m not going to hire escorts, because I’ll have the fleshlight and the lube with me.
    I couldn’t go carrying with me a sexbot…

    SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

    #311346
    +1
    Artur
    Artur
    Participant
    71

    I’ve already mentioned women will team up with the state to suppress any tech that can make men more sexually independent than vice versa.

    They’re already spreading propaganda and looking for alternatives to Western plantation slaves.

    While negative birth rates in the West have been an issue for years, now I see articles about it every other day. Japan is often cited as an example, where 70% of men and 60% of women between ages of 18 and 34 are single, and about 50% of married people don’t f~~~. Then you also hear stories about sperm donor apps or women f~~~ing migrants in refugee camps, the latter of which might offer some insight into why the EU migration crisis hasn’t been solved yet.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 64 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.