Women are offended by adjectives

[Anonymous 0]

This is a true story that happened to me at work about a year ago, after retiring, while re-hired to work a temporary contract job. I’m not an english major and I’m struggling to remember the exact details, but this needs to be said here.

I had a meeting at work with my boss and a female manager from another department. Before each meeting, our company requires a brief “safety minute”. The female manager volunteered to do the “safety minute” and proceeded to give a little speech about how men offend women by the adjectives they use. I can’t remember all of the examples she gave, but it’s something like this: When a man has an issue, it’s usually referred to by other men with an adjective that depicts his situation in a temporary light. Whereas, a woman with the same issue, is usually referred to by other men with an adjective that shows a more permanent nature. Like a man might be “having a bad day”, whereas, a woman is very “sullen” or “depressed”. So, my mind is thinking “bitch, is bitch a noun? Yes, I think so. Ask her how she feels about nouns.” Of course if I actually said anything like that, I would have been fired, so I just STFU and sucked it up.

[KeymasterKeymaster]

Women are offended by everything.

How they feel about nouns is f~~~ed up too. The offended c~~~s at PRINCETON “university” actually want to ban the word “man” on campus because they are such weak triggered inferiors. You can still take a women’s studies course at Princeton, though. This is the new unfathomable low women have reduced institutes of higher learning to.

This is why you tell that bitch “I don’t speak to women at work about anything other than work”.

You can say this directly to HR c~~~face too. It’s a place of business not a place to socialize or chat with anyone about anything other than work. Anyone who as a problem with is UNPROFESSIONAL. They can either promote you for that, or get back to work.

I have had to say “I don’t speak to women at work about anything other than work”. 8 or 10 times in a row once to get a woman to stop prodding for personal details and what did over the weekend….. etc.

“Like a man might be “having a bad day”, whereas, a woman is very “sullen” or …..”

“Thats never a problem when you don’t speak to people at work about anything other than work.”.

That’s the end of the conversation. Her issue is now a non issue. It doesn’t exist. If she is talking about “having a bad day” or being “sullen and depressed” then she is not working .

…. and must be fired.

🙂

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[ZeitgeistParticipant 175]

So how did adjectives get into a safety meeting you ask. Let me explain.

In the gynocentric society we live in today everything is a threat to women’s safety and words mean what women say they mean. For example, if you use logic and reason on a woman it is considered assault and battery. If you look at a woman with your “mangaze” it’s rape. And then there’s manspreading. well manspreading is the worst. You might just as well have knocked her to the ground and f~~~ed her right in the pussy.

Any man who truly understands the nature of women can not love a woman.

[President CamachoParticipant 941]

Women can easily pretend to be offended by anything if there’s a chance they’ll benefit from persecuting others for no good reason. It’s part of their nature and completely irreversible.

A Western marriage that survives in the current year is an act of mercy and compassion by the woman.

[narwhalParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

e each meeting, our company requires a brief “safety minute”. The female manager volunteered to do the “safety minute” and proceeded to give a little speech about how men offend women by the adjectives they use

My company does the same thing, except they are sent out every morning by email. They aren’t stupid enough to let individuals come up with their own safety moment.

I honestly don’t pay attention to them much as I’m an office worker, and field worker safety rarely applies to me, but I can’t imagine something like ‘adjective selection’ would ever come up.

HR may do something like that, but even then, they would come up with some subtle word choice like that.

Ok. Then do it.

[Point Of No ReturnParticipant 4074]

Soon a belch will land you in court accused of assault (has probably already occurred).

Know when it is your duty to give them zero explanations for your actions.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

We’re talking about a group of people who got p~~~ed off by the word “too”… so put adverbs on the list as well.

[AwakenedParticipant 35200]

Anonymous wrote:

So, my mind is thinking “bitch, is bitch a noun?

Yes, bitch is a noun, but I think if you threw out the adjective “Bitchy”, then you would have satisfied the adjective requirement.

Your case would be strengthened by also supplying an example to the female manager; “The “Bitchy” female manager had a “Bitchy” tone to her voice as she attempted to talk down to me.”

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

I don’t get it? Safe from what? What is the nature of the “threat”?

[ZeitgeistParticipant 175]

PistolPete wrote:

I don’t get it? Safe from what? What is the nature of the “threat”?

Threat doesn’t have to be real. Anything that makes a woman feel uncomfortable, like using adjectives, or reason or logic or looking at them is worthy of outrage.

Any man who truly understands the nature of women can not love a woman.

[PistolPeteParticipant 27143]

OK So:
When women feel uncomfortable they get outraged
Women are always uncomfortable

Therefore

Women are always outraged

Got it

[ZeitgeistParticipant 175]

PistolPete wrote:

OK So:
When women feel uncomfortable they get outraged
Women are always uncomfortable

Therefore

Women are always outraged

Got it

Bingo!

Any man who truly understands the nature of women can not love a woman.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

PistolPete wrote:

OK So: When women feel uncomfortable they get outraged. Women are always uncomfortable therefore women are always outraged. Got it.

Exactly. I was just having a similar conversation with a female the other day regarding her calling some guy a “creeper”.

“What’s the difference between romance and creeping?”

“I don’t know, what?”

“How dry your vagina is.”

“Women base everything on feels. There is no objective reality. One guy stares longingly into your eyes and you think it’s wonderful because you want to f~~~ him. Another guy stares into your eyes and it’s creepy because you don’t want to f~~~ him. Nobody can know in advance how any action will be received by you until they do it. Society demands we take the risks of interacting with you but we have no way of knowing if you’re going to sploosh your panties or call the cops on us.”

“It’s our prerogative.”

“Well, it’s OUR prerogative to leave you to spend the rest of your life sad and alone and end up being eaten by cats.”

Women are literally offended by everything and anything that doesn’t give them tingly feels. It’s just their nature and no amount of arguing will change it.

[ExecrationParticipant 1496]

I think Women arent offended in actuality by much of anything. Anything to get a reaction out of a blue pill man will be tested, tried and disproven or proven to work.

Tradcons are now testing their way back into the house.

Now that shaming Isnt working-out its time to keep trying for those it does or its time to change up the tactics.

[Cap285Participant 6007]

Remember when adjectives and pronouns were like this?

What the f~~~ happened?

Fuck this planet.

[AkhilleusParticipant 2486]

What in c~~~-Dom doing to this world just…..my god

Aloha means family you don't leave family behind. Who will be the next Draconarius for MGTOW? MGTOW = brothers = acceptance = belonging

[Anonymous 0]

Thanks for posting the vid. Now I know that I could say she was “bitchy” and “c~~~ish”. I love adjectives. LOL

[SolidParticipant 7520]

Being offended by something is a trend, women love trends, so make the connection.

Don’t matter what you said, matters if she didn’t like you, how she can face that as offensive.

Say “hey girl, come here”, can turn into a riot, “girl” and “come here”, she can complain a lot, saying how you didn’t face her as an adult, why you ask her to come there, you are a rapist, you want abuse her, you think that is women obligation to do what men say, etc…

But also, you can say “I wanna fill your dirty ass with my cum”, and she will find that great, that your relationship is in a level where you can dirty talk to her, how things are good between you two.

Her reaction, will only depends on how much she wants you dick (or any favor) or how much money and power you have. As you wise president said once, “if you have the money, you can grab’em by the pussy” !

[KeymasterKeymaster]

PistolPete wrote:

When women feel uncomfortable they get outraged

It’s not that absolute. It depends on how she DECIDES to “feel”.
…. like how a woman thinks she can decide what’s appropriate, offensive or even hostile.

EXAMPLE:

“Romance” doesn’t exist unless she WANTS it to exist.

When a woman is feels like she’s “in love” with a man and moves to Paris, and he decides to buy a plane ticket to come and visit her, he is now the most romantic™ man in the world.

If she decides she is NOT in love with him… POOF! He’s a STALKER.

In both situations, the man has done nothing different – or even wrong – he merely wants to be with her. His gesture and actions have nothing to do with it. So the line between “most romantic” and “stalker” is purely drawn in her head. That’s why outrageous romantic stunts to please and appease women are complete bulls~~~.

It doesn’t exist unless she WANTS it to exist.
Like her “uncomfortable feelings” are all perception.

She doesn’t even decide to feel neutral, in the middle, or unaffected about it.
He is either “THE MOST” romantic… or “SUCH A CREEPY” stalker.
She flips a coin and it’s one radical extreme or the other.

Neither are true. He just bought a plane ticket to visit her. She needs to snap out of it. Anything else is her own perception. You can also send two random women a dozen roses anonymously. One has an admirer who put forth the grand romantic gesture. The other might think she has a stalker and will tell all her friends that.

( TIP: The one who thinks she has a stalker hates herself. But that’s an episode for another day. )

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[RockmaninoffParticipant 1641]

Keymaster wrote:

When a woman is feels like she’s “in love” with a man and moves to Paris, and he decides to buy a plane ticket to come and visit her, he is now the most romantic™ man in the world.

If she decides she is NOT in love with him… POOF! He’s a STALKER.

In both situations, the man has done nothing different – or even wrong – he merely wants to be with her. His gesture and actions have nothing to do with it. So the line between “most romantic” and “stalker” is purely drawn in her head.

". . . elle, suivant l’usage des femmes et des chats qui ne viennent pas quand on les appelle et qui viennent quand on ne les appelle pas, s’arrêta devant moi et m’adressa la parole"—Prosper Mérimée

[Author]

Posts