Women are not evil.

[chirParticipant]

Can’t call them evil. A hurricane which floods your house is not evil. A tornado which relocates your home a county over is not evil. A mudslide which buries your home in 300 feet of concrete mud is not evil.

Just a natural force. So too is woman. They give no thought to the damage wrought on you, your children or themselves. Their focus is a singular genetic response to “need / have / control”. It never ends because they are NEVER happy, not with themselves, you, their children or their home. There is a hardwired need for them to seek happiness, sabotage it when they come close to it and pine for it when it is just out of reach by their own hand.

Men on the other hand, can be happy with a drink, hot dog on a stick and a campfire. I have YET to meet a woman who is contentedly happy.

So don’t consider women to be evil, rather consider them a typhoon of desperate needs you can never meet so it destroys you. Its a force of nature which has no control over its destructive forces.
The best insurance policy is to carefully avoid them and give them no cause to turn their destructive forces on you.

Focus on your happiness because there is no possible way you can make a woman genuinely happy. “But my GF said I made her happy!” Well she is lying. Like a tornado, while sucking the will to live out of you, she is setting her funnel sights on the next man she thinks will make her happy.

It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

[HitmanParticipant]

A tornado or hurricane are great analogy ‘ s. .
A woman is similar in many ways. .
The damage is very real. .
Evil ?
No..
Psychotic?
Yes!
Ever see the crazy son of a bitch who goes out surfing during a tsunami, while everyone else is being evacuated?
That’s the guy who thinks he can have a nice relationship with a woman. ..
hahaha! !!

[SnakeSpectator 2080]

chir wrote:

They give no thought to the damage wrought on you, your children or themselves.

Really?

chir wrote:

Its a force of nature which has no control over its destructive forces.

Women have no agency? Where have I heard this before? Stop allowing women to get away with stuff.

Women are evil. Stop being a dumbs~~~.

[SnakeSpectator 2080]

How about this…don’t give them the chance to be evil.

Like fry guy at Mcdonalds? Just doing his job?

You would have to move way out into the country and have no contact with them.

[SnakeSpectator 2080]

Oh, please, just shut the f~~~ up, you f~~~ing pussybegging retards. Got one here telling us women are just a tornado or hurricane, they are just acting on their nature like apes, they aren’t to blame, they aren’t committing evil acts, it’s just their nature.

Then you got this other stupid MARRIED f~~~~~, who’s VISION is to rent out to FEMINISTS telling us DON’T GIVE THEM THE CHANCE.

JUST SHUT THE F~~~ UP. Seriously. Sick and tired of reading this F~~~ING nonsense by you stupid f~~~~~s day in and day out.

[chirParticipant]

Snake, calm… Find your calm.

I never said they cannot be held accountable for their behavior. True, in our current gynocentric western society they often get a pussy pass.

Yes, some women, like all humans, can commit acts of premeditated evil.

However, biologically speaking women as a whole are wired like a natural disaster. You have seen it. Constantly needing, always searching for their next social validation, constantly needing, better body, better diet, better hair, better skin, better man, better house, better car, better me, more me, better drugs, never happy. In my younger years I spent time being a “good listener” to a few women. None of them were happy. Always so much drama and there are always men who go willingly into that razor-blade storm of neediness.

We are mgtow, we are watching the circus from the stands.

It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Oh look, it’s the tired old argument that women can’t help it.

Well even if it’s true, what of it? So the scorpion may sting you anyways because it’s in its nature? So what? Why should that stop you from squashing the scorpion flat before it gets the chance to sting?

But I think women can help it. They’re just not required to. So they don’t. So does that give them a pass? After all, it’s not necessarily their fault that nobody forces them to not be evil.

Of course it doesn’t. Regardless of whether or not they face consequences for their choices, they are still making the choice.

Squash that scorpion.

[Anonymous 22]

Just like barking is natural behavior for dogs, it’s natural for (western) women of all ages to act like teenagers. If a typical woman today has an IQ of 60 or 70 (that would be my guess), they cannot act like someone whose IQ is 120. It would be impossible.

Women are quite stupid; you can see that when you observe their behavior in public places. But I’m not sure if all of them are evil. Maybe. Hard to trust any of them though.

[SnakeSpectator 2080]

chir wrote:

I never said

Don’t try and be clever. The name of the thread is Women Are Not Evil. If you commit evil, you are the slave of evil(John 8:34). i.e. you are evil. And Solomon said there are no good women(Ecclesiastes 7:28). Women are evil.

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Anonymous wrote:

Just like barking is natural behavior for dogs,

A dog can be taught not to bark.

[Anonymous 3]

Claiming it’s impossible for women to be evil is the same as saying it’s impossible for them to be good. It means they lack judgment and free will, which are hallmarks of being human.

If your argument is women are incapable of being evil, then you are arguing that women are in fact not human.

I tend to agree with Snake on this in general. Unfortunately, I’d say a good chunk of this site are genuinely just losers that suck with women. They are one blowjob away from condemning MGTOW and throwing all of it under the bus.

[The LudophileParticipant 187]

Anonymous wrote:

Claiming it’s impossible for women to be evil is the same as saying it’s impossible for them to be good. It means they lack judgment and free will, which are hallmarks of being human.

If your argument is women are incapable of being evil, then you are arguing that women are in fact not human.

I tend to agree with Snake on this in general. Unfortunately, I’d say a good chunk of this site are genuinely just losers that suck with women. They are one blowjob away from condemning MGTOW and throwing all of it under the bus.

F~~~ you. F~~~ you two times sideways. You had such a strong start. I agree that @chir‘s argument denies women their agency, and therefor gives them a pussy pass on their misdeeds.

But f~~~ you for saying the majority of MGTOW don’t have conviction. F~~~ you for throwing the rest of us under the bus. F~~~ you *AND* Snake for freaking out over a simple 3-Bargaining mistake. I would wager that this is Sargon’s Law right here. *YOU* are one blowjob away from going blue pill and posting that we’re all sad losers who can’t laid.

Oh wait, you already did that. Why don’t you go give the “loser nerds” some swirlies and high-five your bros.

F~~~ing really.

"There is no bad weather; only wrong clothes." ~ Scandinavian saying "I'm happy to see that the U.S. is abandoning the savagery and lies of religion more and more each year. I'm sad to see that politics and feelings are taking religions' place." ~ Me "Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. And, above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty." ~ OldBill

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

Anonymous wrote:

I tend to agree with Snake on this in general. Unfortunately, I’d say a good chunk of this site are genuinely just losers that suck with women. They are one blowjob away from condemning MGTOW and throwing all of it under the bus.

Very controversial statement in your part but in my defense I would say that the whole MGTOW philosophy is putting energy and resources on yourself instead of just using your same energy and resources on women in general that might not even go no where in the long run. So in the end, I might be a loser now, but I might not be in the near future through MGTOW because MGTOW preaches self enlightenment. I do not give a sh*t that I just embarrassed myself, Phoenix here just potentially offended a portion of the members in this forum. I also never seen so many autistic people in one place before and even though those Asperger autistic people are probably smarter than me, I am smart enough to know that whatever you say in the forums might offend a portion of this message board in general. I am sure that there are people in this forum who are not even working right now and I am careful not to say anything to offend them also because God only knows how many people are not working in these forums which is not even my business I might add since I got my own sh*t to think about.

edit: I said I “might” be a loser now, it doesn’t mean I am a loser

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[SnakeSpectator 2080]

@phoenix

The impossibility of a woman to be good is not the same as saying it is impossible for them to be evil. If virtue, selflessness, and self-reflection are higher levels of consciousness, it could be simply unattainable for them(a pyramid, not a circle). A human to me is a homo-sapien; a tool-using primate with language and art. A woman can be human, but not able to be virtuous.

[The LudophileParticipant 187]

chir wrote:

Can’t call them evil. A hurricane which floods your house is not evil. A tornado which relocates your home a county over is not evil. A mudslide which buries your home in 300 feet of concrete mud is not evil.

Just a natural force. So too is woman. They give no thought to the damage wrought on you, your children or themselves. Their focus is a singular genetic response to “need / have / control”. It never ends because they are NEVER happy, not with themselves, you, their children or their home. There is a hardwired need for them to seek happiness, sabotage it when they come close to it and pine for it when it is just out of reach by their own hand.

Men on the other hand, can be happy with a drink, hot dog on a stick and a campfire. I have YET to meet a woman who is contentedly happy.

So don’t consider women to be evil, rather consider them a typhoon of desperate needs you can never meet so it destroys you. Its a force of nature which has no control over its destructive forces.
The best insurance policy is to carefully avoid them and give them no cause to turn their destructive forces on you.

Focus on your happiness because there is no possible way you can make a woman genuinely happy. “But my GF said I made her happy!” Well she is lying. Like a tornado, while sucking the will to live out of you, she is setting her funnel sights on the next man she thinks will make her happy.

I, too, as a part of 3-Bargaining held this belief for a short while. That given the structure of society and the understanding of human biology/psychology, the acts of women were inevitable.

But to take this stance excuses their actions and removes female agency. No longer are they conscious, intelligent, willful agents *CHOOSING* to exploit others. Instead, they are likened to tornadoes, earthquakes, or the coffee table at night. Being angry at them is futile and predicting their behavior is nigh impossible.

No. These actions may be largely biologically motivated, but every woman has a choice in how they act. No different from men in controlling their dominance instinct. Suicide bombers are not “natural disasters”. Building skyscrapers doesn’t “just happen”. These are the results of conscious, intelligent, skillful manipulation within systems built over centuries, motivated by biology and psychology. Why would female behavior be treated any differently? This is another unfortunate “pussy pass”. Leave this ideal behind and realize that the underlying structures facilitate women’s impulses and allow them to eschew reason in favor of instinct. This is not “inevitable”. It is simply not controlled. Women, like men, *can* be evil. Some are. Be aware.

"There is no bad weather; only wrong clothes." ~ Scandinavian saying "I'm happy to see that the U.S. is abandoning the savagery and lies of religion more and more each year. I'm sad to see that politics and feelings are taking religions' place." ~ Me "Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. And, above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty." ~ OldBill

[globemasterParticipant 443]

chir wrote:

Can’t call them evil. A hurricane which floods your house is not evil. A tornado which relocates your home a county over is not evil. A mudslide which buries your home in 300 feet of concrete mud is not evil.

Thats why hurricanes are named after women.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

Everyone, take a deep breath.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

Are women evil? Are they pretending to be worthless? Should they be accountable? Or are they totally lacking in reasoning ability and just acting out of their nature?

On any given day you’ll read both points of view on this site, sometimes from the same person. “Women can’t logic, they’re idiots and don’t deserve authority or the right to vote.” and then “All women are evil manipulative bitches and f~~~ing with them is suicide.” So which is it? Skilled manipulative con-artists or six year old retards? Can they be both at the same time?

The answer is “It just doesn’t matter.”

Who honestly f~~~ing cares WHY women do what they do. Would it make any difference at all? Would understanding them change anything? Is it possible to educate them or unmask them or both and if you could, would you even bother?

No, it just doesn’t matter.

When you get a Nigerian 419 scam email, do you analyze it, try to figure out what the author intends to achieve by it, how they came to be a con artist or how successful they are at it? No. You delete it. If you do anything else, you’re a moron and you will most likely get scammed.

When a tiger gets loose in the zoo, do you analyze it, try to figure out what it was that made it leap the fence, claw a kid’s face off and then go on a lunch murder spree? No, you get the f~~~ out of its way. If you do anything else, you’re a moron and you will most likely get eaten.

This is what MGTOW means to me. It’s not about understanding women, it’s not about changing women… it’s not even about bitching about women (though that can be fun and cathartic at times). It’s about deleting concerns for them from your life and staying the f~~~ away from the dangers they represent to the extent that you need to in order to maintain your own health and sanity.

You want to chat with the scammer? Have at it. You want to pet the tiger? Have at it. Take those risks if you want (I occasionally do, myself) but honestly, don’t be surprised when the women you engage with turn out to be six year old retard con artists with big sharp pointy teeth. None of us who claim to have taken the red pill should be anything more than mildly amused by reality confirming what we already know.

[RedDawnParticipant 1391]

I concur with Doc, though clearly Chir was offering a means of dealing with the suffering and ire that inevitably arises from taking the red-pill.

The point of MGTOW is to obtain a greater level of control over one’s life and by changing the way one perceives things, in our case women, then we gain a greater level of control over our emotions and thus our behaviors and decisions.

This is the basis of sovereignty.

Courage is the key to life itself - Morgan Freeman

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

I was just getting a rant on. Doesn’t mean anything. The red pill rage is real and we all go through it to some degree or another.

Just try to stay focused on the light at the other end… where you finally let go of the dream and embrace the truth that none of it was real in the first place.

[Author]

Posts