Wikipedia Definition of MGTOW

[DDJParticipant 1880]

Maybe I’m the odd man out…but this seems like a very artistic troll. MGTOW should be supported on the regular Wikipedia, not alternatives.

Here is an article about Rationalwiki that might be worth a read, to get an idea of my concerns.

Here is what Wikipedia thinks of Rationalwiki.

Every woman is a slut, if you catch her on the right day.

[ToadParticipant 271]

Let’s not forget that wikipedia time ago, asked for people to support women writing in his page because the lack of feminine authors in it, like it had another “crystal wall” on internet as in real life too…
Be careful with what you put in your definition

[KeymasterKeymaster]

DDJ wrote:

Maybe I’m the odd man out…but this seems like a very artistic troll.

I can see why you would say that.

When you start looking for an “acceptable” definition MGTOW, you defeat the purpose.
The entire concept of “MGTOW” has never been acceptable. That’s actually part of the charm.

So why start now?

Had an interesting comment from a respectful website visitor a couple of days ago. He didn’t *agree* with MGTOW, but he did appreciate the mammoth effort here and held the entire body of work in generally high esteem. Then he asked “is it OK if I join the forums….. if you don’t mind an opposing view?”

We responded to this effect:

MGTOW ARE “the opposing view”. The unfashionable opinion. The forums are not for “the opposing view”. If we wanted “the opposing view” we could just turn on our TVs, open a magazine, watch Wendy Williams, The View, The Talk, or read “TIME” magazine. The MGTOW forums is a lions den where the opposing view gets chewed up and properly spit out. MGTOW already KNOW there are opposing views. The attitude towards that is “take a number and get to the back of the line. Because we don’t care what the opposing view is”. There are plenty of other websites for people to perpetuate the opposing view of MGTOW. That’s the other 99.9% of websites.

You can’t teach MGTOW anything. They have already learned.

Men everywhere are already DROWNING in it.
This place is designed to give them a place away from that s~~~.

If you keep doing what you've always done... you're gonna keep getting what you always got.

[ToadParticipant 271]

MGTOW ARE “the opposing view”. The unfashionable opinion. The forums are not for “the opposing view”. If we wanted “the opposing view” we could just turn on our TVs, open a magazine, watch Wendy Williams, The View, The Talk, or read “TIME” magazine. The MGTOW forums is a lions den where the opposing view gets chewed up and properly spit out. MGTOW already KNOW there are opposing views. The attitude towards that is “take a number and get to the back of the line. Because we don’t care what the opposing view is”. There are plenty of other websites for people to perpetuate the opposing view of MGTOW. That’s the other 99.9% of websites.

You can’t teach MGTOW anything. They have already learned.

Men everywhere are already DROWNING in it.
This place is designed to give them a place away from that s~~~.

Masterly answer… can’t imagine something more concise…

[Tim PattenParticipant 660]

I’m not sure if you guys can read and change the page on wikipedia?

Here it is an the sandbox area : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sandbox

Sandbox meaning testing stage…

Can anyone help further on the page?

[Cap285Participant 6007]

Nice work, but can’t they change it?

Fuck this planet.

[Tim PattenParticipant 660]

I have submitted the page for review.

Let’s see what they say. May take weeks.

Here is the sandbox page again:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jdcinsf/sandbox

[Author]

Posts