Why your Girlfriend/Wife Wants to Cheat on You

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Another excellent article based on evolutionary science that shows that women want to cheat.
I’m pleased at the current trend here where the brothers are posting studies based on hard science that offer irrefutable proof of female behavior. I’m proud to be part of this trend.

http://evolvify.com/why-your-girlfriend-wants-to-cheat-on-you

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

Well whores will be whores. Let STD’s run rampant!

are you a chia pet in man drag

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

bobphilo wrote:

Another excellent article based on evolutionary science that shows that women want to cheat.

Everyone. Woman. Man. Everyone deals with temptation. Those that are emotionally mature will acknowledge this temptation and move on from it. While the emotionally immature will give into temptation.

Unfortunately, with princess mentality (both spoiling girls, and abusing boys by boys having mothers with princess mentality), many women, and some men, are still emotionally immature enough to give into temptation.

[Anonymous 3]

Typical PUA “science” and a dogged worship of the word.

I thought this would have been something similar to my upper level biology courses on the subject decades ago, but alas it was a lame dumb version of the usual PUA crap, the same /r/theredpill stuff PUAs have been spouting for ages. He even cites Neil Strauss and Mystery. I guess he doesn’t know about Strauss’ blue pill apology tour. Now that Strauss has found a post wall hag that wanted to marry him.

This type of stuff does about as much harm to men as feminism probably does to women.

[Jan SobieskiParticipant 28791]

You only have to worry about Chad if you are interested in females. If you don’t date them or marry them who cares if they ride the carousel.

If they aren’t in your life it doesn’t matter.

Love is just alimony waiting to happen. Visit mgtow.com.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

Anonymous wrote:

Typical PUA “science” and a dogged worship of the word.

How does this advocate PUA philosophy? It does not tell men how to be pick-up artists by advocating men become rock stars or athletes to pick-up women. The very title of the article shows it is directed at guys with girlfriends as a warning against being cheated on by their girlfriends with PUAs. It is actually ANTI-PUA. What it does do is show a strong evolutionary basis for female infidelity debunking the myth that women rarely cheat. It is a valuable warning to men to beware.

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

An exhaustive study was done in Germany showing the behavior of married women during their ovulatory cycle. It found that during their fertile period the wives had a strong desire to go to clubs without their husbands where they could meet studly men. The also dressed and danced more provocatively with these men.
Interestingly husbands seem to sense this and are more guarding of their wives during this time.
This supports the theme of this article.

[bomwaParticipant 488]

We know that this is woman’s nature. But it seems that some MGTOWers go their own way due to having been/fearing being cheated on. This seems illogical to me. If you know that this is woman’s nature, then why get upset when they behave accordingly?

It seems far better to simply accept the distinct possibility of being cheated on. You don’t have to be a mangina to do this. A mangina is someone who can’t accept it, yet still puts up with it. But if you accept it, and it really doesn’t bother you, then is anything wrong with that?

[Anonymous 3]

bobphilo wrote:

phoenix wrote:

Typical PUA “science” and a dogged worship of the word.

How does this advocate PUA philosophy? It does not tell men how to be pick-up artists by advocating men become rock stars or athletes to pick-up women. The very title of the article shows it is directed at guys with girlfriends as a warning against being cheated on by their girlfriends with PUAs. It is actually ANTI-PUA. What it does do is show a strong evolutionary basis for female infidelity debunking the myth that women rarely cheat. It is a valuable warning to men to beware.

It would take way too long to explain it if you don’t see it.

You also seem incredibly defensive of this article, did you write it by any chance?

[a bananaParticipant 288]

ive always preferred sluts since all i want from women is sex

also completely agree with jan
“if you don’t date them or marry them who cares if they ride the carousel.”

[AFTParticipant 2722]

I don’t see the problem with getting laid on a casual basis, it’s the mentality of wanting to own one in a relationship that brings problems.

When the war cemeteries are half full of the corpses of dead conscripted women, only then will women have earned the right to speak of equality. Sidecar “A man is a success if he gets up in the morning and goes to bed at night and in between does what he wants to do.” - Bob Dylan

[RealityBitesParticipant 2198]

The thing about science is to follow the data wherever it may lead, sometimes it leads to answers that are counter intuitive: ones that we reject out of hand.

The thing about the PUA community is that they have studied the psychology of women and have become very good at exploiting it (manipulating women who are natural manipulators). People frequently make decisions based on compulsions: these compulsions may be psychological or biological (horny).

For a woman to cheat on her husband it makes perfect sense: women frequently play a double mating game. Screw an Alpha male when she is ovulating, then pass the kid off as her husbands.

My father who is in the field of reproduction says that statistically the conservative estimate for paternity fraud is 15% of the population. Since women frequently don’t get pregnant from the first screwing session…this translates into a VERY HIGH percentage of women CHEATING: even more so since there is a 20 year window of fertility for a woman (15-35). After 22 their fertility starts to gradually decline, by the time they hit 35 it is a fraction of what it was when they were 28 and it is in free fall.

Biologically it makes perfect sense for a woman to cheat: acquiring the best and different genes than those in her own group. And it makes perfect sense for women to be very good liars, since getting caught jeopardizes her offspring’s access (and her own) to resources produced by the cuckolded male.

So yes…she is going to cheat and she is going to lie and her survival depends on being skilled at manipulation and exploitation of men.

[HitmanParticipant]

bomwa wrote:

. But if you accept it, and it really doesn’t bother you, then is anything wrong with that?

yes, there is a lot wrong with that .
unless you are in an open relations~~~, why the F~~~ would you accept that ?
you kick that bitch to the curb in a heartbeat .
never EVER tolerate that kind of s~~~ from a woman .
if the bitch strays, cut her loose immediately.
if it doesn’t bother you , you better question your value system .

[bomwaParticipant 488]

But why is there a lot wrong with it?

What seems wrong to me is getting upset with a woman for being a woman. And I don’t mean that in a way that defends the woman. I mean that it seems delusional to know that women want to cheat, and yet expect them not to.

It is harmful to the man to entertain such delusions. It’s going to make him angry and bitter.

Shouldn’t MGTOW be a way of moving toward a better life, not away from a poor one. If it is the latter, then you may just move from one poor life to another. But if you are moving toward a better way of living, then won’t you have the strength to brush the bulls~~~ aside?

I’m not talking about tolerating the behaviour. That is what a mangina will do. I’m talking about not caring at all. Isn’t that the idea of MGTOW? Having the strength to take the pussy when you want it, and then totally forget about it when it’s not there. Doesn’t MGTOW have room for taking pussy 100% on your terms?

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

bomwa wrote:

We know that this is woman’s nature. But it seems that some MGTOWers go their own way due to having been/fearing being cheated on. This seems illogical to me. If you know that this is woman’s nature, then why get upset when they behave accordingly?

It seems far better to simply accept the distinct possibility of being cheated on. You don’t have to be a mangina to do this. A mangina is someone who can’t accept it, yet still puts up with it. But if you accept it, and it really doesn’t bother you, then is anything wrong with that?

Can I f~~~ your wife? If I get her pregnant, would you have a problem with that? We’re programmed to breed and attract the opposite sex. That’s true. We are also programmed to prevent our partners from cheating. Men don’t want a cheating wife because they want to perpetuate their own dna and use their resources for that, not another man’s children. Women don’t want a cheating man because he may fall in love, leave her and dedicate his resources to another woman and the children he has with her. There is supposed to be a mutual benefit to being faithful but the physiological urge to find new mates doesn’t go away just because you have a wedding.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[bomwaParticipant 488]

But aren’t we talking about MGTOW here? Where the idea is not to get a wife in the first place?

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

bomwa wrote:

But aren’t we talking about MGTOW here? Where the idea is not to get a wife in the first place?

The whole point of this theme is to give further proof of why it is dangerous to have a wife. How is this different from members posting of the horrors of their marriages?

[bobphiloParticipant 1772]

AFT wrote:

I don’t see the problem with getting laid on a casual basis, it’s the mentality of wanting to own one in a relationship that brings problems.

Every single successful society in our history, back to prehistoric times has practiced monogamy. Open marriages have a high rate of failure as the need for fidelity is deeply ingrained in our DNA. A man needs to know that his wife is faithful and the children are his before allocating his resources to raising them.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

worst part I don’t miss about being married is that every time my pretty young wife left for work at a cellphone store – I knew she’d be hit on by multiple guys daily. And I knew that her rejection skills were weak, and that one day she’d be mad at me and would fall for it. And that there was nothing I could do to prevent that. F~~~ that s~~~

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Anonymous 42]

In my lifetime, over and over again, I’ve seen only men rise above the animal nature. It’s the man throughout history that stood the high ground. We have better foresight and wisdom to guide us over the hurdles of temptation. We’ve learned by conditioning all things have their price, we’ve been held “responsible” all our lives, while women and girls have been given a mythical pass to do whatever they want, and not have to suffer the consequences, throwing the cost of their foolishness onto the man as usual. Until MGTOW.
Free yourselves from the tyranny of irresponsible women, GYOW!
For a change, let them suffer the damages they caused while holding the sacred pussy-pass riding the c~~~ carousel. Girls will be girls.
Dismiss them from your life as a high level biological hazard… It just may save your life….

[Author]

Posts