Why women sucks at playing chess?

[TwistParticipant]

Branched off wrote:

Trigger weights are not all that heavy -even my hunting rifle is only 1.7lbs, match rifles are a fraction of that

Seems the standard for divorce rape is a hair trigger. They seem to have no problem pulling that one.

[narwhalParticipant]

Eric Lauder wrote:

My idea is that feminists aren’t 100% wrong when they talk about “differences due socialization”, but they’re extremely exaggerating the importance of socialization.

I’d say that socialization, or influence of culture in how a person behaves and develops in a society, is best when it matches well with biology. By ‘best’, I mean how well does it lead to product and happy group of people and individuals.

A culture that prohibits women from playing chess would lead to a society that has some unhappiness in it. There are women who are biologically built to play chess, and would therefore would be unhappy if they cannot do so, or perhaps not able to participate in other similar logic based activities. Society is missing out in general as well from not letting these women play chess. At the same time though, pushing women to play chess, or some other activity that they are not biologically built for would lead to much greater unhappiness since more women are not built for chess and would be unhappy in doing so, especially at the expense of doing something that does bring them happiness.

As an extreme example, a society that dictated that all women must play chess, and no man could play chess (or similar such restrictions) would be doomed to familiar.

You could make the argument that Feminism, is such a failure, as is socialism, because it pushes people to work and live in ways that don’t fit their biology. Women who aren’t built to lead are told they must take leadership positions in work and home life, while men are built to lead are suppossed to take a back seat in everything.

That’s not to say that all biological instincts should be supported, as certain instincts are destructive to society and individuals. There are limits for sure, and laws and cultural restrictions should be in place to prevent harm.

Ok. Then do it.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

narwhal wrote:

A culture that prohibits women from playing chess would lead to a society that has some unhappiness in it. There are women who are biologically built to play chess, and would therefore would be unhappy if they cannot do so, or perhaps not able to participate in other similar logic based activities. Society is missing out in general as well from not letting these women play chess. At the same time though, pushing women to play chess, or some other activity that they are not biologically built for would lead to much greater unhappiness since more women are not built for chess and would be unhappy in doing so, especially at the expense of doing something that does bring them happiness.

This.
And gender quotas and “positive discriminations” are much closer to your second example than to the first example.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[ZarathustraParticipant 2246]

I am a “semi-professional” Chess player in that I play in strong competitive tournaments internationally and just graduated from the “under 2000” category to play in the open categories. (ELO Rating currently 2080) While intelligence is certainly an asset other attributes such as calmness, being in good physical condition, being able to concentrate for long periods of time, being able to channel your emotions correctly, being objective, assessing risk etc…. Play a great role and if I would hazard a guess I think it is these areas where women are lacking that contribute to less female chess success. I participate in a CHESS club weekly and oddly I find there is little difference in boys and girls before, say the age of 10, and if anything the girls might, on general, be better than the boys. Perhaps menstruation play a role, I don’t know, but if you are flooded with Hormones and have trouble maintaining an even keel you will not be a good chess player. Also, I have done a lot of drugs in a life time and having measured my IQ at different life stages I know I have dropped probably 10 IQ points since my youth and yet I am now a better player. Mostly because, although dumber, I have spent time developing some of the other attributes I mentioned.

[SandalsParticipant 4253]

iMickey503 wrote:

Hou Yifan, a Chinese Grand Master.

Wouldn’t that be Grand Mistress?

Eric Lauder wrote:

The women’s champion ranks 56th in the mixed ranking because she’s exceptional, for a woman: no other female player have ever been able to enter in the top 100.

I certainly wouldn’t want to date her.

[Puffin StuffParticipant 24979]

Zarathustra wrote:

I find there is little difference in boys and girls before, say the age of 10, and if anything the girls might, on general, be better than the boys. Perhaps menstruation play a role

Perhaps exposure of the brain to testosterone plays a role. It will be very interesting to see if we have a first pre-pubertal testosterone woman to male tranny, one given testosterone right around puberty, to become world chess champion or close.

Now that so many teens, male and female, are given abnormal hormones around puberty we may have a natural experiment on our hands.

#icethemout; Remember Thomas Ball. He died for your children.

[743 roadmasterParticipant]

Chess to me is about as interesting as watching mud dry. Women are well known for not doing well at strategic games, thus why it is an issue to have them in command in the military. Like in politics women are just loud and wanting there way with out strategic moves to make it long term.

mgtow is its own worst enemy- https://www.campusreform.org/

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

743 roadmaster wrote:

Chess to me is about as interesting as watching mud dry. Women are well known for not doing well at strategic games, thus why it is an issue to have them in command in the military. Like in politics women are just loud and wanting there way with out strategic moves to make it long term.

The main thing women are good at, and that they have in common with sociopaths, is making an emotional map of a potential victim they want to exploit and coming up with a way to emotionally manipulate them. That is the largest extent of female strategy: acting, lying and conning.

If a woman voluntarily interacts with a man, it is fair to assume she is probably looking for money, sperm, or a beast of burden.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Ranger One wrote:

743 roadmaster wrote:

Chess to me is about as interesting as watching mud dry. Women are well known for not doing well at strategic games, thus why it is an issue to have them in command in the military. Like in politics women are just loud and wanting there way with out strategic moves to make it long term.

The main thing women are good at, and that they have in common with sociopaths, is making an emotional map of a potential victim they want to exploit and coming up with a way to emotionally manipulate them. That is the largest extent of female strategy: acting, lying and conning.
If a woman voluntarily interacts with a man, it is fair to assume she is probably looking for money, sperm, or a beast of burden.

Empathy is about instinctively understanding others’ feelings, not about having a superior morality.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

Eric Lauder wrote:

Ranger One wrote:

743 roadmaster wrote:

Chess to me is about as interesting as watching mud dry. Women are well known for not doing well at strategic games, thus why it is an issue to have them in command in the military. Like in politics women are just loud and wanting there way with out strategic moves to make it long term.

The main thing women are good at, and that they have in common with sociopaths, is making an emotional map of a potential victim they want to exploit and coming up with a way to emotionally manipulate them. That is the largest extent of female strategy: acting, lying and conning.If a woman voluntarily interacts with a man, it is fair to assume she is probably looking for money, sperm, or a beast of burden.

Empathy is about instinctively understanding others’ feelings, not about having a superior morality.

That sounds more like “emotional intelligence”.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Author]

Posts