What percentage/numbers of men are single/not in relationships (MGTOW)?

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

Grumpy wrote:

Wolf wrote:

Far too many young men have failed to make a normal progression into adult roles of responsibility and self-sufficiency, roles generally associated with marriage and fatherhood.

Obviously I am a moron…. Since when was “responsibility and SELF-sufficiency” associated with a group (family/fatherhood) setting. It means SELF as in oneself. What fat-assed, dildo sucking, parasitic, hamster loving, fruitbat came up with this analogy??

Tradcons who see the net end in life is for civilization to produce family units who will prevent the need for any semblance of welfare, or something like that.   I can be seen, on the natural and biological level, if you aren’t procreating and having kids, you are fairly useless to the human species.  BUT, humans are humans for rising above the level of animals, so that tradcon bull is bull.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Anonymous 3]

There’s still pressure for men to be in relationships, although before the pressure was marriage and then that got stepped down. Perhaps in the future even that pressure will be removed.

It is rather funny that the actions women and the government are taking are designed to destroy the family but then they start complaining when they achieve the result they worked to create. Women are that stupid, but I think the government are insidious liars and so while they pretend it’s a problem I don’t think they actually think it is. The government always lies, it’s actually one of the best ways to tell a young inexperienced person from an older experienced person: young people are stupid enough to believe the lies whereas old people know the government is lying.

Case in point watching all the dumb young people vote for Obamacare and support it, or cheer for Obama to tell them to go into debt with student loans. School used to actually help but also only cost about what you could make working a minimum wage summer job. Nowadays you pay a lot more for school and it gets you nowhere, unless you’re a white female I suppose. But even many white females struggle with debt (at least they are employed I guess).

Also, I need to point out there are 7B+ people in this world, and even the US exploded from about 40M people to over 310M. More people does not equal more prosperity, it is the very opposite. Think of it like a stock. You want to buy stocks at a low price, when there are less buyers. This is where the stock actually has room to grow and run. Once everyone thinks it’s a great stock and it’s trading at sky high levels, that is when it’s actually failing to grow and isn’t a good stock. People say we need high population, but all the prosperity and growth happen with low population, and then stall at high population.

There is a reason why the Pilgrims left the old world and sailed across the world and killed all the inhabitants, it’s because there was no opportunity because there were too many people. The same reason the US then expanded westward. There were too many people.

People need to be able to spread out, and men need to be able to challenge new frontiers and build things for themselves. When a society becomes rich all it does is cannibalize the young and prevent any opportunity, as well as females begin to dominate and take over in a comfortable, safe environment.

Men build society, then are devalued and pushed out and women destroy it. Once daddy government can’t use the male gender to protect and provide for women as an aggregate, women lose the ability to take advantage. Nature intended it this way, women were made weak and incompetent, so men’s role was to provide and protect, women have very low natures and need to be kept in check or they destroy everything. If they are coddled and protected they just destroy everything.

[Author]

Posts