Home › Forums › Computers, Games and Technology › What kind of fool thinks developing these is a good idea
This topic contains 89 replies, has 21 voices, and was last updated by It’sallbs 1 year, 11 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
Anonymous54Are you less skeptical than me?
Could it be?Hahah
I’m telling you, It really read my mind
It sort of can it learns how you think and predicts what ads to show you and when-i’m not good at explaining it.
At university courses they call it consumer behaviour.
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu
Anonymous54And the vidio wasnt trying to sell anything.
It was about how to use them.
No particular brand.
Anonymous54Are you less skeptical than me
I doubt it.
Yes.
Some one stop us!!!!
Hahah
Anonymous54Its your thread, you win.
Hajaj
It was about how to use them
Well that in itself is a sales technique that is as old as the hills.
Whitepapers
How to guides
…,…,…
http://www.leavemeansleave.eu
Anonymous54I admire your Competetive Spirit!!!
I don’t even own a smartphone, yet. I guess I’m way behind the curve.
Anonymous54I don’t even own a smartphone, yet. I guess I’m way behind the curve.
Stay there. Life is better there!
When younger and growing up I believed that tech would make our lives cooler, simpler, easier! thinking and projecting onto a future that would be for the betterment of Mankind! But.. Tech is like fortunes you become enslaved to it.. I blame the Computers for enslaving us all. And the more power they acquire the more it will enslave mankind. We’ve created a monster by creating machines that are taking over our lives.
What kind of fool thinks developing these is a good idea
You must own a better Crystal ball than II don’t think you guys have thought this through very well.
Freaking out about the growth of robotic and AI technology and going on about how we shouldn’t pursue it is itself a fool’s errand. It is in the nature of technology that someone somewhere will pursue it, and each country’s military arm then has to consider the effects of their avoiding it when hostile countries will not.
Ever played the prisoner’s dilemma? How, exactly, do you define “winning” in that scenario?
Anonymous54I don’t think you guys have thought this through very well.
Freaking out about the growth of robotic and AI technology and going on about how we shouldn’t pursue it is itself a fool’s errand. It is in the nature of technology that someone somewhere will pursue it, and each country’s military arm then has to consider the effects of their avoiding it when hostile countries will not.
Ever played the prisoner’s dilemma? How, exactly, do you define “winning” in that scenario?
First of all, I dont freak out.
And I do think things through
Far far into the future.
You only see countries figtting each other.
There wont be countries
The elite, and the enslaved.
Anonymous54I bet I could f~~~ it up!
You could save the Planet.
I just had a Vision.
This is what a future world War will be about.
Standing up agaianst the Ilunimaties Machines…….
The self driveing car will take away your freedom.
You will not be able to decide for yourself where you want to go.
In the future, not now…
Invest your $ in technology that fights back.
If we lose, your f~~~ed anyways.
If we win…$$$$$$
THIS is thinking it through
I don’t think you guys have thought this through very well.
Freaking out about the growth of robotic and AI technology and going on about how we shouldn’t pursue it is itself a fool’s errand. It is in the nature of technology that someone somewhere will pursue it, and each country’s military arm then has to consider the effects of their avoiding it when hostile countries will not.
Ever played the prisoner’s dilemma? How, exactly, do you define “winning” in that scenario?
First of all, I dont freak out.
And I do think things through
Far far into the future.
You only see countries figtting each other.
There wont be countries
The elite, and the enslaved.
Fair enough.
I still don’t buy the idea of preventing the tech’s development, though. I mean, what are we supposed to do in response to the perceived threat? Can we take it as a given that the technology simply will be developed, be it wise or foolish? Because I say it indeed is a given. Assuming that much, then the question of how to respond to its inevitable emergence is reasonable. But what the thread looked like to me was more along the lines of “Wow, this is a bad idea. Humanity definitely should not go and build these robots.” That, to me, is like the placard-waving kids who think it’s actually possible to get all humanity to get rid of all nukes.
Your investment ideas seem reasonable, but I’d also advocate investing in Boston Dynamics and others like them; before any money is around to be made on tech for resisting “The Machines” (the whole Skynet idea is baked IMO, owing to Church’s theorems) a WHOLE LOT of money will be made on the robots themselves.
I am inclined to agree regarding the self-driving cars, too, but not for your cited reason. The vulnerability of their software to hacking is what makes me think they’re a bad idea, and that’s why I still won’t buy a car with any kind of connectivity. The only signals mine will ever take are the radio and the battery-operated remote for un/locking it.
Anonymous54Agreed. You can not stop progress.
Its just a matter of who controls it.If you look at the globelist agenda.
The EU
Unrestricded imigration
Feminisin undoing Capitalism.
They want to rule the World.
There is great Evil at play.
Thats what concerns me.
But Ill be Dead by then.
Let me know how it turns out! Hahah
The investmemt part is far in the future.Just a gerneral statememt.
I had over 50 years to understand where this is Going!
I don’t think you guys have thought this through very well
You must own a better Crystal ball than I
Anonymous54Tech guys.
Do you think there is technology to read our thoughts yet?
Anonymous54No responce.
Ill take that for a yes. Hahha
I can read minds.
Surley they can figure out how to do it.Say hi to the MIT Boys!
Tech guys.
Do you think there is technology to read our thoughts yet?
I’m not a tech guy as I work more on the theoretical end, but I do keep up with the applied stuff a bit. I don’t think these are what you’re referring to, but in them you can see the beginnings of such a thing eventually might be achievable. The trick, though, is that the mind to be read would need to be connected to the hardware:
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678