UTOPIA what would a women’s society look like?

[Cheeky BastardParticipant 323]

A true representation of the feminist agenda. You won’t believe.
This will be going in the new archive when completed.

UTOPIA what would a women’s society look like?
Published October 7, 2014 Free women and feeling freedom , Our movement , Wildness ,Women’s survival 117 Comments

https://witchwind.wordpress.com/2014/10/07/utopia-what-would-a-womens-society-look-like/

I haven’t been writing in a while, and it’s not because I don’t like writing any more but things have accelerated elsewhere in my life and I can’t be involved everywhere at once. As this isn’t paid work, obviously I can’t afford to put blogging first.

Anyway, there are still many posts waiting to be finished. In the meantime, I’ll start another one.

I often muse about all the things that we’d need to change about patriarchy if we abolished men’s rule over women and the earth. Everything and every single aspect of social organisation is so much the opposite of how it should be, it’s dizzying to even begin to think about all the things we should stop / change.

Mostly it’s about men stopping from doing harm. But stopping men isn’t enough because beyond that there is the entire world to relearn, to heal, and our entire society to rebuild. We would be faced with the immense task of replacing all the misogynist, genocidal, biocidal practices men have ordered our society with for eons. So many of us now are acculturated, cut from land, nature and from one another.

If we managed to overcome men’s tyranny over us, how would we rebuild our world? I just want to throw some ideas here that I often come across these days. I dream for concrete, down-to-earth, simple and easily applicable measures of stepping out of patriarchy into a female-loving, biophilic world. This isn’t by any means a realistic plan of how to achieve it, but just reading it makes me feel happy. It makes it feel more real, more possible. Enjoy!

SOCIAL STRUCTURES

Men’s position in society

Before we do anything, the very first measure to adopt is to take all men out of all positions of decision-making immediately, and actually out of any kind of social, professional position whatsoever.

Major serial killers, serial torturers, pimps, pornographers, severe domestic abusers, serial rapists, genocide planners, biocide planners and pedocriminals across the world will simply be euthanised: the decisions will be taken by women in a mass world tribunal for patriarchal crimes. This is by far the best solution, and is the most legitimate, ethical way of reducing male population to more reasonable levels. Such men would otherwise forever pose a threat to women, children, animals, the earth and society as a whole, and we know they have no chance of ceasing their violent behaviour after having reached such an advanced stage of sadism and sociopathy. It would be reckless to spend space, resources and energy in keeping them alive in prisons.

All of men’s (alive and euthanised) belongings, property, resources and land will be confiscated from men and handed back to female care and supervision – property rights over land will be abolished. You can’t own land!

All men at least above 15 (or younger if very asocial) should live separately from women and children, on their own in small huts or studios, isolated from one another and scattered around so that women can keep an eye on them (they should never be in groups or packs, that would be illegal). So it would also be illegal for male adults to impose their presence on females, girls and children. Men would have to care for themselves on their own: food, laundry, etc. No male above his age of puberty would be allowed to receive any kind of service from a female. Their life expectancy would probably drop to the age of 40, but that’s how things should be. Women’s life expectancy without men would rise to 130 years at least.

PIV would be illegal too of course, as well as the initiation of any verbal or physical contact to women and girls or boy children, unless solicited by a woman for specific matters. I’m not sure what to do about boy children. Obviously you know my opinion, but let’s say that’s up to the mother to decide what she wants to do before he turns of age to leave the female family circle.

In order to keep all men and post-pubescent boys busy, we’d send them to clean up the vast amounts of detritus, pollution and toxic wastes men have littered and almost killed the world with. Much of the damage to the earth is irreversible, however with a great deal of effort and genius, women will find sustainable, natural and simple ways of healing a lot of the damage men have caused, and send men off to do the dirty work. No man will be allowed to take any decision without female guidance. We know what happens when men decide on their own! DISASTER.

Family, child-raising and reproduction

Fathers’ rights will cease to exist. There is no such thing as fatherhood — as we all know, it’s a myth. Men will necessarily lose all and any power to dominate and control women’s reproductive capacities.

It’s the inalienable right of each woman to control every phase of her reproduction and life creation. Abortion will be possible at any stage of pregnancy, however there will hardly be such a thing as undesired pregnancy since there won’t be any men forcing pregnancies on us any more. Abortion will nonetheless be recognised for the trauma, mutilation and loss of life that it is. The number of children and human population will naturally decrease to sustainable levels, so will the number of males born. Women will be free to experiment parthenogenesis or procreation with two female eggs.

The nuclear family will be abolished, in particular the parent’s property rights and absolute power over her child. Children will be considered as persons in need for autonomy and all form of punishment, authority or educational manipulation over children will equally be abolished. Raising and caring for children will be a collective responsibility for women, and motherhood / childcare and especially capacity to be empathetic towards children will be taken very seriously, as something that needs to be (re)learned and studied over years before being fully competent for this immense task.

Schools as we know them as punitive reclusion centres for grooming into male domination and female subordination (as well as selection system for elite executors of patriarchal institutions) will be abolished. Boys would definitely not be around the girls, certainly not most of the time, and never beyond the age of puberty. And obviously no adult male would be allowed near children.

There will be no such thing as “teachers” with positions of authority over children. “Guiders” could learn also from the children or students as much the students from them. We’d learn anything we’d want from languages to sciences to art to music to medicine to building to witchcraft to swimming (etc) without restriction of age or time, as long as it’s adapted to our capacities, level and availability. Learning would be autonomous, with guidance when needed, instead of enforced and dictated. They’d be no need for external reward, marking or punishment because the process of learning in itself is so rewarding and fascinating that it’s self-sufficient. Anyway I could go on and on, non-patriarchal learning is truly riveting.

Social structures between women.

All relationships of authority, domination and subordination will be abolished between all women of all ages. We will be able to recognise each other’s strengths, expertise, guidance and capacities (or lack of) without it implying superiority, inferiority, veneration or lack of respect. We would find each other beautiful. We would live our friendships, love and affection for women unhindered.

MEN’S INSTITUTIONS

All oppressive male institutions will be abolished after men have been retrieved from them. We obviously won’t keep these institutions. They will return to the nothingness that they belong, just as a distant, bad memory.

Military:

No more military, no more army, no more wars! It would be illegal for men to hold weapons. Global peace would be the immediate consequence. Most weapons will be destroyed (or recycled into something else), such as weapons of mass destruction, anti-personnel mines, tanks, machine guns, all manners of terrestrial, marine and air-bombers, and all the many disgusting things men have invented. For the remaining weapons such as guns or blades, women will hold exclusive right of use over them in order to defend ourselves from men, from the risk of them taking power over us again.

State:

States, borders, nations, laws would be abolished and totally dispensed with. Laws mentioning the number of prohibited acts will be kept for men only. Women do not need laws to contain ourselves. Laws were created by the male elite to protect their property from other men. Laws are rigid and static, that’s because their purpose is to hold existing patriarchal powers in place. Our own society would be in constant evolution, improvement, creative renewal, yet grounded in reality and adapted to our needs and circumstances.

Women would be able to move freely.

Societal structures and decision-making assemblies wouldn’t exceed roughly 300 women (representing no more than themselves). Keeping numbers low for cooperation is important because the greater the size of the unit, the more horizontal cooperation becomes difficult and requires vertical hierarchy. Possibilities for peaceful, cooperative organisation between women are infinite – as long as they respect the individual integrity of every female – the group should never weigh over the individual but be a source for support and efficient organisation of collective life and space. There could easily be associations of exchange between different groups and peoples in order for women to cooperate regionally and globally where necessary. There would be no limit in age of participation in decision-making for women and girls, which means adapting the format to different ages and capacities.

Medicine:

Men would be permanently banned from any kind of medical practice. All woman-hating, genocidal institutions such as gynecology, psychiatry, obstetrics, big pharma, the torture of living beings in the name of “scientific experimentation” will be banned. Men’s fragmented, objectifying, sadistic view the human body will be part of history, replaced by biophilic medicine. Medical science will no longer be monopolised by a small elite but available to all at any age where appropriate. The (female) doctor’s role will be to guide the patient in her own healing, never to exercise authority over her or take decisions at her expense. Special healing spaces (where surgery is necessary, etc) will be so nice, warm and welcoming that just being there will make you feel better. The soul and life conditions of a person will always be considered part of the body, and symptoms will always be understood in a holistic way. There will be no more chemical, synthetic and toxic products with often worse side effects than the illness itself it claims to heal.

Perfect health would be the normal state of women anyway, as we will learn by experience and observation what we should eat and do to stay healthy at all seasons and times. Most women will have rediscovered our healing, divination and extra-sensory communication powers.

Religion:

Patriarchal religions will crumble down with men’s oppressive system. Religious ideologies, along with its hierarchies and vacuous rituals will cease to exist. I believe a woman’s world would be spiritual. Spiritual connection isn’t based on faith but on critical observation and experience, on a real personal connection to the elements, beings and spirits that surround us, and on the real magnetic power of beings.

Economy (tied to ecology):

Obviously, Slavery, men’s exploitation of women, men’s capitalist systems will be abolished too. The most important aspect of male economy is that it’s based on men’s competitive accumulation of resources (by killing, destroying, commodifying, taking control over, extracting the greatest possible amount of life) and based on production of poisonous, addictive, programmed obsolescent goods — in order to win the patriarchal game of achieving greater domination over women and girls.

This necrophilic relationship to the world and the environment will be abolished, to be replaced by biophilic ecological and economic principles. This will encompass every single process of our life activities, from house building, to food consumption, to communication, travelling, furniture making, cooking, etc. They will have to be carefully designed and thought out in a way as to never endanger the survival of any species, never pollute any environment, never require the use of poisonous, non-recyclable materials, never to require indentured labour or exploitation in order to be maintained. This would obviously impact the nature and scale of our activities. “Work” (exploitation and division of labour) as we know it would disappear. It would be the responsibility of each individual or group to sustain herself more or less autonomously.

We should learn to observe our environment and deeply understand the interconnectedness of all beings around us, as well our own impact before deciding whether or how to transform it. Our lives have no more or no less value than those of a rabbit, fly, tree, plant, fish, seashell or stone. For instance, if we pick leaves of some plants, it’s important not to rip the whole plant off, to take only parts of it so it can grow again. Or to only take a few plants (or seashells, whatever) where there are many, so to respect the survival of the species where it is settled. If we cut trees to build our house, replant them. There are also infinite ways of making the most of materials for energy, food or production while using it as efficiently as possible. Building houses in ways that don’t require heating in winter or cooling in the summer. It is now widely known that energy such as electricity can be infinitely renewable if we use wind power, magnetic power, water power… And everything can be made DIY.

We will learn to be autonomous again and make our own clothes, food, furniture, houses, soaps, detergent products – or maybe someone else will make them but most things can be handmade and it’s so much more rewarding.

In a biophilic world, nothing is garbage, nothing is pollution. Everything is conceived so as to be part of a life cycle. This doesn’t mean we should keep the same toothbrush for 50 years or never improve on our machines, technology and infrastructure, but there’s no such thing as a dump, or toxic spilling. All materials should be harmless, recyclable or biodegradable, given back the earth if we no longer need them.

Industrial agriculture and farming:

Genetic modification of plants, pesticides, monoculture, field ploughing and consequent aridification of the land will be considered criminal. Our right to self-sustenance would no more be confiscated by mega food corporations – as they will no longer exist.

Agriculture should always be small-scale, local, and as much as possible be modelled on wildlife, self-growing / self-renewing conditions (the less work and intervention, the better), and especially be conceived so as to nourish and sustain rather than deplete wildlife and environmental balance. Again, possibilities are infinite, we have so much to learn.

And seriously, killing animals you’ve raised yourself in a farm or keeping animals enclosed is cruel. I’m for the liberation of all farm and domestic animals. It’s up to them to decide whether they want to live with us or not, and they should be able to come and go freely. Maybe after a few decades, after the human population has stalled, male population has decreased, and after we’ve made serious efforts for reforestation and restoration of wildlife on the earth, it would probably be fairer to hunt animals occasionally. Right now, given the extinction rate of animal species, I find it criminal to hunt or fish. We don’t need to eat that much meat anyway.

This post is already too long!

I hope you got the point of it though. It isn’t so much as dictating what women should do but establishing basic principles of respect of life and female integrity along which we can devise an infinite number of possibilities.

Sincerely
Cheeky Bastard
Neuroscience and technology

CEO Cheeky Industries Technology Fabricator

ABN 71 247 061 775

and
23 year gaming icon Cheeky Bastard

www.cheekyindustries.biz

cheeky.bastard@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/CheekyIndustries

[UntamedParticipant]

It would look a bit like this

Don't let them Blame, Shame or Tame you!
Give 'em NOTHING, not even an answer!
#GenderSegragationNow!

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

They are so funny. Lets pretend for a second that they are actually capable of this bs. If women are so superior, on mind, body, and spirit, why the f~~~ haven’t they done this sooner? This sound like the wishful thinking of some fascist, which of course, is not surprising due to the fact that that’s exactly what women are. Not to mention they don’t have the drive to create, they have the drive to f~~~ already created s~~~ up if there isn’t a man there to tell them to shut the f~~~ up and calm the f~~~ down about s~~~ they don’t understand. .

are you a chia pet in man drag

[Cheeky BastardParticipant 323]

The childish nature of this document is the first thing would hit you.

The one I like the most is “magnet power” yes apparently magnets create power on their own without having to be in a wind turbine?!

Sincerely
Cheeky Bastard
Neuroscience and technology

CEO Cheeky Industries Technology Fabricator

ABN 71 247 061 775

and
23 year gaming icon Cheeky Bastard

www.cheekyindustries.biz

cheeky.bastard@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/CheekyIndustries

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

I’ve actually been working on some breakthroughs as far as electricity generation. I don’t want to post too much before I get actual results, but, it has to do with the fact that you don’t need to “create” electricity. It’s already “there” you just need to tap into it. That means you don’t need any moving parts to obtain it.

I also notice that their “Utopia” still involves them doing no actual work.

are you a chia pet in man drag

[Cheeky BastardParticipant 323]

James Watt, Nikola Tesla, Thomas Edison, Einstein, Harold D. Babc~~~, Hans Bethe, and especially Felix Bloch have already proved this in the experiments.

They concluded that the only way to harnesses energy is to have a contained nuclear reaction or artificial extreme gravimetric distortion. Both are very dangerous.

Sincerely
Cheeky Bastard
Neuroscience and technology

CEO Cheeky Industries Technology Fabricator

ABN 71 247 061 775

and
23 year gaming icon Cheeky Bastard

www.cheekyindustries.biz

cheeky.bastard@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/CheekyIndustries

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22592]

Jackinov wrote:

They are so funny.

No. Not funny. The woman that wrote that piece was serious. And I highly suspect the woman whom wrote this piece of sexist dogma was rubbing one out as she wrote this monstrous article. Writing this is a power trip article for her. She fantasied making this a reality, and it turned her on.

Her idea of utopia is for the men to be enslaved, forced to be isolated from everyone, including over men, and made to live in huts. While men were also forced to clean up toxic waste, and forage for plants for food, because they would not be allowed to hunt, grow food, nor receive food from others.

This woman’s thinking is what leads to gulags, and death camps. She thinks in such absolutes there fanaticism would be an understatement for her. She believes that all men are evil, because they have a male reproductive system. And all women are good because they have a female reproductive system.

I am not going to call her disillusion, because when she is finally called on her believes, she would use that as an excuse. Instead, I will called her what she really is, a cold blooded, sexist bigot whom hates men not because what what men have done, but what her teachers have falsely taught her that men have done.

And if you don’t believe that women are serious about doing this, read the comments on the link. Most of the women whom commented support that tyrannical plan.

[Cheeky BastardParticipant 323]

Faust For Science; So she is calling for things to be the same as they are now.

It seems by the description this utopia already exists. It’s called Western culture.

Sincerely
Cheeky Bastard
Neuroscience and technology

CEO Cheeky Industries Technology Fabricator

ABN 71 247 061 775

and
23 year gaming icon Cheeky Bastard

www.cheekyindustries.biz

cheeky.bastard@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/CheekyIndustries

[JackinovParticipant 5229]

Oh no no no no no, when I say something is “funny” I don’t mean it at all. Every single comment on her page supports this downright tyrannical psychoticness, proving for the upteenth time that women are not all this kind and loving bulls~~~ we’ve been taught.

are you a chia pet in man drag

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22592]

Cheeky Bastard wrote:

Faust For Science; So she is calling for things to be the same as they are now.

It seems by the description this utopia already exists. It’s called Western culture.

No. What she is calling for is a lot worse. Right now us men can walk away from the toxic society and the toxic materialism that women create.

Read the comments from the article, you blood will go cold. It did for me.

Jackinov wrote:

Oh no no no no no, when I say something is “funny” I don’t mean it at all. Every single comment on her page supports this downright tyrannical psychoticness, proving for the upteenth time that women are not all this kind and loving bulls~~~ we’ve been taught.

I know. This is what many women really feel towards men. They hate us because they were taught to hate us. This is like a nazi hating a jew. You cannot talk to them. You cannot reason with them. And they blame all their problems on men.

[NioZenParticipant 856]

Hahahahahaha! I’d love to see them try. Everything would be great right up to the point where they have to lift something heavy, fix some plumbing, install an OS or back out of a driveway.

I love the way she instantly assigns all the violence in the world to men. I’ve experienced quite a bit of physical violence from women over the years, as compared to the amount I’ve dished out to women (i.e f~~~ing ZERO). HUMANS are violent you stupid t~~~. What a deluded moron, she’s either lying to herself or has no clue what the f~~~ she is talking about.

Yeah, f~~~ off, hahahaha. They still think they’re some kind of prize, that we’re all drooling mindless horny monkeys and unable to restrain ourselves from violence. Ok, we’ll be over here in Manland, drinking beer, having fun, and building f~~~ing supercomputers and spaceships..

We only dream this bondage. Wake up and let it go. - Vivekananda

[Cheeky BastardParticipant 323]

Faust For Science: I was being facetious. Indicating this closely resembles the life men lived today.

Sincerely
Cheeky Bastard
Neuroscience and technology

CEO Cheeky Industries Technology Fabricator

ABN 71 247 061 775

and
23 year gaming icon Cheeky Bastard

www.cheekyindustries.biz

cheeky.bastard@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/CheekyIndustries

[MattNYCParticipant 2329]

Funny. They tried this on a small scale & it had a predictable & humorous result. Article at ROK, text below:

http://www.returnofkings.com/32053/this-accidental-experiment-shows-the-superiority-of-patriarchy

This Accidental Experiment Shows The Superiority Of Patriarchy

Patriarchy has been extremely successful, despite its recent vilification. Most cultures worldwide are patriarchal – to find examples of successful matriarchal societies you either have to turn to ancient history, remote outskirts of the world or feminist fiction. However, this hasn’t stopped the feminist collective from queefing out books and even a hashtag hailing the end of patriarchy in a textbook example of incestuous amplification.

What patriarchy, after its apparent downfall, will be replaced with remains to be seen. Hamsterizations aside, there is surprisingly little data available about what life would be like in a society made up of only men or only women. An enterprising social scientist might want to perform an experiment where groups of men and groups of women are left to their own devices, having to work together to survive against the elements and build a civilization from scratch. However, this scientist would have a very hard time convincing ethical review boards that the inevitable suffering of his participants would weight up against the value of the data.

Luckily, reality television is not bound by ethical constraints and once in a while, in its never ending quest for viewer ratings, reality TV accidentally performs a very interesting experiment that social scientists would never be allowed to do.

Quite a few years ago, I had the pleasure of watching the Dutch version of Survivor (Expeditie Robinson) with my feminist roommate. That particular season would have two islands, one populated by men and one populated by women. My roommate had been promoting that particular series to me and the other students in the house for weeks because it would show us, according to her, what a society run by women – free from the evils of patriarchy – would be like.

And it did. Oh it did.

Here is what happened: initially both groups were dropped on their respective islands, given some supplies to get started and left to fend for themselves. In both groups there was some initial squabbling as people tried to figure out a local hierarchy. The men pretty much did whatever they felt was necessary – there was no leader giving orders. Men who felt like hunting, foraging or fishing did so. Another guy decided he was fed up with sitting on sand and started making benches. Others built a hut that gradually grew and evolved. Another guy cooked every night. Within days a neat little civilization was thriving, each day being slightly more prosperous than the previous one.

The women settled into a routine as well. The hung up a clothesline to dry their towels, then proceeded to sunbathe and squabble. Because unlike men, women were unable to do anything without consensus of the whole group. And because it was a group of at least a dozen women, consensus was never reached. During the next few episodes, the women ate all their initial supplies, got drenched by tropical storms several times, were eaten alive by sand fleas and were generally miserable. The men on the other hand, were quite content. There were disagreements of course, but they were generally resolved.

Eventually, the people running the program decided something had to change. In order to help the women out, three men would be selected to go to their island. In return, three women would take their place at the men’s island. The look on my feminist roommates face during this episode was priceless.

nitially, the three men selected for the women’s island were ecstatic, for obvious reason. But then they arrived at the island and were greeted by the women.

‘Where is your hut?’, they asked.

‘We have no hut’

‘Where are your supplies?’ they asked, dismayed

‘We ate all the rice’

And so on. The three men ended up working like dogs, using all the skills developed by trial and error in their first few weeks – building a hut, fish, trying to get the women to forage. The women continued to bitch and sunbathe. The three women who were sent to the men’s island were delighted – food, shelter and plenty of male attention was freely available. They too continued to sunbathe.

And that my friends, is what patriarchy is. My former roommate, unsurprisingly, is no longer a feminist.

Now this might all be a fluke, a white raven, an exceptional case not representative of society as whole. But that particular season of Dutch Survivor is not unique. CBS broadcast several Survivor seasons in the US, where men and women started off in separate groups. In most cases (the Amazon and One World), the result was the same. The men quickly got their act together, getting access to food, fire and shelter while the women spent a lot of time and energy on petty little squabbles, eating their meager supplies, getting drenched in storms and generally being pathetic. The opposite situation, where men didn’t get their act together while women quickly built a functional micro society, has not yet been observed outside of feminist fiction, and it probably never will.

[Elric GreenstoneParticipant 1637]

MattNYC wrote:

Because unlike men, women were unable to do anything without consensus of the whole group.

Holy f~~~. You’ve summed it up. That’s it in a nutshell.

Masculine societies are generally anarcho-capitalist. Feminine societies are generally fascistic/communistic.

F~~~.

You have no idea how crucial that is. Just . . . just wow.

Thank you.

My comment was going to be that a feminist society would be generally starving, and its members dying in their twenties and thirties, and would lose all technology instantly, and would be Hell. That was a guess. Apparently the Dutch proved it.

"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."

[Cheeky BastardParticipant 323]

Bear Grylls did this with a series called the island.

The population of men started living reasonably comfortable without assistance by halfway through their allotted time.

Women had to be given advice and assistance twice and only were able to create adequate shelter five days before their allotted time. Though this was only achieved a week before ending their shelter that they built was reasonably sound. But they nearly died twice getting to that stage

Sincerely
Cheeky Bastard
Neuroscience and technology

CEO Cheeky Industries Technology Fabricator

ABN 71 247 061 775

and
23 year gaming icon Cheeky Bastard

www.cheekyindustries.biz

cheeky.bastard@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/CheekyIndustries

[Soldier-MedicParticipant 2566]

interesting that this article does not list an author.

Aside from that:
Religion:

Patriarchal religions will crumble down with men’s oppressive system. Religious ideologies, along with its hierarchies and vacuous rituals will cease to exist. I believe a woman’s world would be spiritual. Spiritual connection isn’t based on faith but on critical observation and experience, on a real personal connection to the elements, beings and spirits that surround us, and on the real magnetic power of beings.

The use of critical observation and experience implies a mind that uses logic and the scientific method.

Feel free to draw your own conclusions.

"I asked you a question. I didn't ask you to repeat what the voices in you head are telling you" ~ Me. ........Yes I'm still angry.

[Cheeky BastardParticipant 323]

Soldier-Medic: As to not talking about the scientific method comment. The author openly lists magic as an academic curriculum. So if I was to draw my own conclusions it would say observations = seeing ghosts or into the spirit realm by magic is not covered under the scientific method.

Sincerely
Cheeky Bastard
Neuroscience and technology

CEO Cheeky Industries Technology Fabricator

ABN 71 247 061 775

and
23 year gaming icon Cheeky Bastard

www.cheekyindustries.biz

cheeky.bastard@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/CheekyIndustries

[chirParticipant]

The closest thing to a feminist utopia would be Sweden. A Utopian welfare state. The country is on borrowed time. Invaded by Muslims who apparently know how to handle their women because the birth rate for Muslims is 4 times that of native swedes.

Male students are leaving left and right for better jobs in *GASP* more capitalist countries.

It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, it is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed, the hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning; it is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

[RennieParticipant]

It would probably resemble a hippy camp(think the occupy movement) and be a complete dump.

There would be no electricity, no running water, no sewer, only fires for heat, toxic and bio-hazardous garbage and junk would pile up everywhere, they’d be killing each other over petty things, any government that did exist would probably be communist- since women think like communists, life expectancy would be short due to lack of essential dietary aspects and lack of work would probably bring about early dementia in many, theft of everything would be rampant. I don’t think I need to add any more because those alone are enough to ensure your dream world will never happen…ever.

It’s quite foolish and very arrogant of them to think that they could do better than us, because we know they’d never even come close. Of course it’s written by a witch…which is where wicca’s and feminist trash is energized from.

[Cheeky BastardParticipant 323]

The radically stupid thing about all this Moslem invasion is the fact that once she law is implemented in one of these capitalist utopia where they can make more money the capitalist system dies and then they wonder why they are not making money and more.

I don’t understand why does Sweden looked like Syria and Iraqi we just escaped for better lives and more money? Well it’s because your system and religion doesn’t work it just f~~~s things up.

Sincerely
Cheeky Bastard
Neuroscience and technology

CEO Cheeky Industries Technology Fabricator

ABN 71 247 061 775

and
23 year gaming icon Cheeky Bastard

www.cheekyindustries.biz

cheeky.bastard@hotmail.com

https://www.facebook.com/CheekyIndustries

[Author]

Posts