"Unmarried men are a problem to society" – Huffington post

[Oz-BlokeParticipant 3233]

neverAgain wrote:

I’ve never heard of VMS before. Great acronym. Where did you hear this or did you come up with this yourself?

I came up with this term about a year ago NeverAgain. Was looking for a simple descriptor to encapsulate the whole ‘entrap a man by getting pregnant, lay claim to his resources, divorce-rape him, garnish his wages, freeload for 18 years, rinse-and-repeat‘ scam that I see executed by so many women, sometimes with my friends as the victims.

I have tagged the term/acronym in several MGTOW posts – /forums/search/?bbp_search=vms

Thankfully I am seeing many more men becoming wise to scam and calling it out in various arenas and forums, private and public. Men are swapping notes and war-stories. In panic that their scam has been exposed and is discussed in very public forums such as this, women have turned to trying to shame men with suggestions they should ‘man-up’, embrace their slavery and remain on the plantation – with little to no success.

Fortunatley the statitics show young women have less success nowadays executing the Vagaina Monetization Scam (VMS), but there’s been an uptick in the older sistershood initiating the scam as they approach ‘The Wall’ in their 30s. Studies show these women select their victims based on the ‘resources’ the men have rather than on physical appearance –
.

.

.

#ManOut

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Anonymous wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

phoenix wrote:

I feel safer with women in charge than blue pill cucks. At least women have some lines they don’t cross, the manginas have zero shame whatsoever.

When women get hired to turn something around, the first thing they tend to do is fire all the part-time women workers. I’ve seen it time and time again.

Me too.
I would be rather judged by a female conservative judge than by a mangina judge.
Blue pill cucks would be even ready to support a reduction of male offspring in order to have more chances to get laid, while most women would probably reject such solution.

I support the reduction of male off spring. If there was a way to ensure only females are born, I think that would be best. That way no more young boys have to suffer under gynocracy or disposable utility under a so-called patriarchy.

It would be the end.
Women are different from men, they wouldn’t be view the fewer men as precious: it’s against their biology to see all men as precious. If there will be 10 men and 90 women, then all women would still go for top 20% men: they would go for 2% population. Since those low numbers the other women would be frustrated and turn in feminist man-hating monsters blaming 8% population, the men who aren’t top 20% men.
Everything male would be erased.
Men would be erased in the end.

To the cuck Ian something.
9/11 happened, but that wasn’t the main event.
Then, October 2001, China entered the WTO: that was the main event.
GAME OVER.
The old world ended there, there’s no turning back.

The last battle to save the old world had been lost less than three months before that

I’ll leave Ian the cuck with a song from such last summer of the old world

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

This Duncan Smith is a piece of work.

First, I am unmarried because it’s in my best interests to be unmarried. I don’t really care if my unmarried status is a problem to some feminist or mangina. Let them do what’s in their own best interest.

Second, I am not a problem to society. Mr. Smith, I am far more successful and far more educated than you will ever be. And by the way, how many lives did you personally save this week?

And finally Mr. Smith, it is manginas like yourself who are the real problem to society. You support socialism. You have your foot on the neck of those people who would endeavor to live a life of freedom and self-reliance. Thank God I can ignore people of your ilk.

[Blue SkiesParticipant 15665]

I’ve seen a few of you say that you are a problem to the gynocentric society and are proud of it. I agree 100%. Why care about a society that doesn’t care about men.

MGTOW is not a movement, it is a way of life.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Ian Duncan Smith is a relic of the past, and he caused the problem: him and his ilks (including Tony Blair, they’re the same under two different labels) opened to globalism. The resurgence of feminism and more generally identity politics came later, and it’s a consequence of the west losing the race it started and crumbling.
Now those fools think that they can save the old world, that is already gone, by upholding SOME of its rituals. Morons.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[FrostByteParticipant 19005]

Blue Skies wrote:

Unmarried men often grow into “dysfunctional” human beings and become “a problem” for society, Iain Duncan Smith has claimed.

Raised by single mothers is how men become dysfunctional.

If you rescue a damsel in distress, all you will get is a distressed damsel.

[Anonymous 3]

Eric Lauder wrote:

phoenix wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

phoenix wrote:

I feel safer with women in charge than blue pill cucks. At least women have some lines they don’t cross, the manginas have zero shame whatsoever.

When women get hired to turn something around, the first thing they tend to do is fire all the part-time women workers. I’ve seen it time and time again.

Me too.
I would be rather judged by a female conservative judge than by a mangina judge.
Blue pill cucks would be even ready to support a reduction of male offspring in order to have more chances to get laid, while most women would probably reject such solution.

I support the reduction of male off spring. If there was a way to ensure only females are born, I think that would be best. That way no more young boys have to suffer under gynocracy or disposable utility under a so-called patriarchy.

It would be the end.
Women are different from men, they wouldn’t be view the fewer men as precious: it’s against their biology to see all men as precious. If there will be 10 men and 90 women, then all women would still go for top 20% men: they would go for 2% population. Since those low numbers the other women would be frustrated and turn in feminist man-hating monsters blaming 8% population, the men who aren’t top 20% men.
Everything male would be erased.
Men would be erased in the end.

To the cuck Ian something.
9/11 happened, but that wasn’t the main event.
Then, October 2001, China entered the WTO: that was the main event.
GAME OVER.
The old world ended there, there’s no turning back.

The end of Western civilization. And not even all of that. The US is evil, spreading feminism and fiat banker schemes all over the rest of the world. Either the citizens overthrow that evil or we will go down with it. Most seem unwilling to admit the pure evil this once great nation has become.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22539]

This is just another blame shift/guilt shaming angle the gynocentric society is using to demonize mgtow and redpill guys. i throw redpill guys in as well because they are working to change things and so they are overt targets to the gynocentric overlords.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22539]

I would be rather judged by a female conservative judge

Maybe three weeks out of the month.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[MonkeyMindParticipant 5340]

It’s the same old crap. This will never be fixed because they keep blaming men for everything instead of looking at the wider issues of why men aren’t getting married in the first place.

[freedomParticipant 5129]

sure cause married men who eventually spend millions to society in mental care, high blood pressure medicines and some go on a rampage and shoot people after the court and the wife made them insane, are probably awesome for the world.

Anyone who wants single guys to join the marriage trend should make it worth something for us, I am not a salesman but I’m smart enough to know that it’s a very bad deal

[Cú ChulainnParticipant 3910]

Unmarried men are a problem to society” – Huffington post

Yes, yes they are. Whatcha gonna do about it??

[AttonParticipant]

These conservatives have the power to institute positive and comprehensive reform. They have the power to make a system fair and free it from all forms of abuse. The have power to make this something that punishes those who do wrong and empowers those who do right.

They have what they need to get there agenda into law, but no the simply wish to pander to white women and pretend this is a fault of men. These people are as bad if not worse than feminists, the English language doesn’t have words to describe how pathetic these people are.

A MGTOW is a man who is not a woman's bitch!

[Fr JackParticipant 926]

A British politician lecturing men about morality, give me a f~~~ing break.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Atton wrote:

These conservatives have the power to institute positive and comprehensive reform. They have the power to make a system fair and free it from all forms of abuse. The have power to make this something that punishes those who do wrong and empowers those who do right.

They have what they need to get there agenda into law, but no the simply wish to pander to white women and pretend this is a fault of men. These people are as bad if not worse than feminists, the English language doesn’t have words to describe how pathetic these people are.

That’s why I always warn about embracing tradcon bulls~~~: it’s stuffed with gynocentrism, about certain matters (in example criminalization of men who buy sexual services, or pornography) they’re the same as radfems – notice I wrote “radfems” not “feminists” since liberal feminists are better than tradcons and radfems about such matters.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Blue Skies wrote:

He went on to claim men out of wedlock were “released to do all the things they wouldn’t normally do” such as committing crimes, drinking too much, taking drugs and fathering multiple children.

If we want to do that we can as that is our choice not theirs to make. If i want to do drugs i will do drugs, if i want to drink ill drink etc.

The whole ideal here is that a wife would restrict drug use as she would divorce rape a man for not conforming thereby this f~~~head does not want to fix the goddamn problem. He simply wants men to get married so that the bitches will tame us instead of expressing and releasing our animal nature for his benefit not ours.

Blue Skies wrote:

He went on: “The answer I think is because cohabitation suits one of the partners more than the other. Almost invariably it suits the man, because they have to make good on their commitment and when that commitment is facing them they then withdraw.”

While cohabitation is not some foolproof plan the idea behind this one is that it does not automatically give a woman access to the man’s resources. If you marry a bitch she gets your money either way and the reason he is against it is that it does not fully guarantee the woman will get access to his wealth.

The whole point is this cuck/c~~~ wants men to get forced into supporting c~~~s and will shame single men with whatever tactic the person sees fit in order to try to get them back into the bulls~~~ deal of marriage without fixing the deal (revoking womens liberation aka taking away their rights).

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Anonymous 3]

I wonder what his quotes actually were. The quotes listed in the article all mention cohabitation. The writer, a woman named Rachel Wearmouth, might have taken liberties on the headline and the introductory paragraph.

It’s hard to know. Here we have a woman AND a mangina combining together, the chances of them saying anything important or any truth being in there are next to nothing.

It’s also an old article, and of course it’s on here to cause a bunch of people to rage around. I don’t know what the value of these types of articles or videos even is. A good reminder sometimes, but is there really a point in a 7 month old article? I can see a week or less, but why drag out a 7 month old one, just to bait the posters on here?

Anyway whatever, just some thoughts. I think sometimes these articles and videos are overdone, and it creates a sort of echo chamber or skewed perspective where we think the media is constantly out to get us, when it’s really a few articles a year being pulled from all over the place. A lot of times we get repeats too.

[Jim01Participant 6678]

Eric Lauder wrote:

phoenix wrote:

Eric Lauder wrote:

phoenix wrote:

I feel safer with women in charge than blue pill cucks. At least women have some lines they don’t cross, the manginas have zero shame whatsoever.

When women get hired to turn something around, the first thing they tend to do is fire all the part-time women workers. I’ve seen it time and time again.

Me too.
I would be rather judged by a female conservative judge than by a mangina judge.
Blue pill cucks would be even ready to support a reduction of male offspring in order to have more chances to get laid, while most women would probably reject such solution.

I support the reduction of male off spring. If there was a way to ensure only females are born, I think that would be best. That way no more young boys have to suffer under gynocracy or disposable utility under a so-called patriarchy.

It would be the end.
Women are different from men, they wouldn’t be view the fewer men as precious: it’s against their biology to see all men as precious. If there will be 10 men and 90 women, then all women would still go for top 20% men: they would go for 2% population. Since those low numbers the other women would be frustrated and turn in feminist man-hating monsters blaming 8% population, the men who aren’t top 20% men.
Everything male would be erased.
Men would be erased in the end.

To the cuck Ian something.
9/11 happened, but that wasn’t the main event.
Then, October 2001, China entered the WTO: that was the main event.
GAME OVER.
The old world ended there, there’s no turning back.

The last battle to save the old world had been lost less than three months before that
<iframe width=”500″ height=”375″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/3XDifMd781Y?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>
I’ll leave Ian the cuck with a song from such last summer of the old world
<iframe width=”500″ height=”375″ src=”https://www.youtube.com/embed/AZ7oROlf5ys?feature=oembed” frameborder=”0″ allowfullscreen=””></iframe>

This would happen

and this is the episode where women are in charge and all of the men are manginas (one of the best of the whole Sliders run)

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10911]

I could care less what this blue pill asshole has to say. Same goes to the c~~~ that wrote the article. Currently unmarried men seem to be a problem to WOMEN and manginas. Less resources for women to exploit and the manginas that are left have to do MORE work on the plantation to please the princesses.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

The blue pill c~~~ should be put in a cage in the ground, so that green-haired naked-chested tattooed feminists can squat down and urinate on him as they walk by. He’d probably call it “rain”.

It’d be a perfect metaphor for the current state of the West.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Author]

Posts