UK National Sperm bank has just 9 donors

[RagDollRatParticipant 57]

well its only so few because
1.it takes a special kind of guy to do it
2.high requirements at least in the usa no diseases, perfect eye sight, good immune systems, n genetic disorders, high level of education
3.in the usa their are caases of the donation system being abused and the woman or their children seeking out said doner and trying to force them to be a father.

[Binary LogicParticipant 2351]

Lucan wrote:

They should allow men to state their preferences in terms of who can use the sperm. So say, women of equal or greater IQ, women with good incomes, women with no genetic abnormalities on inheritable illnesses, family histories of cancer etc. In fact. they could make the women give passport photos too. So basically, then, if you’re a male and you deem yourself of good stock, there’s kind of something in it for you.

That’s a damned good idea… still, it’s far easier to just walk away and watch it all burn to the ground. It was the foolishness of their actions that caused our (lack) of reaction. It would seem then that Newtons Third Law also applies to the human condition. I foresee in the near future, more tells like this abounding.

Funny, isn't it? How women thrive on a mans time, attention and resources, while simultaneously telling him he isn't enough...

[UintatheriumParticipant 1861]

Fact: Most sperm banks do not allow redheads.
That’s basically racist.

MGTOW: because you can (and should) say anything about a woman as long as she isn't within earshot

[Anonymous 1]

Well, isn’t it the case here in the USA that if a male so much as provides any monetary support at any time during a woman’s pregnancy he is on the hook for the next 18 years even if he is not the father?

[solitudeParticipant 346]

She told the Guardian: “If I advertised saying ‘Men, prove your worth, show me how good you are’, then I would get hundreds of donors.

Any men falling for that trick should be embarrassed. Try offering cash for sperm like the US. Wait for the floods of men showing up to make a deposit.

[hollowtipsParticipant 681]

No married man would be allowed to donate his precious sperm by his wife
And no single man would be dumb enough to donate his precious sperm to a woman. You gotta work hard for that s~~~.

[OzguyParticipant 182]

The irony will be that those 9 sperm donors either;
1) have incurable diseases yet to be diagnosed…
2) are psychopaths wanting to take over the world…

[Escape VelocityParticipant 33]

MonkeyMind wrote:

It;s been posted here before, but the bottom line is that it’s their own fault for removing the anomynity of the donors along with paying a pittance for the man’s contribution.

Every man saw this coming as soon as the annonymity waiver was announced some years back. I suspect affirmative consent laws are going to do for sex what this did for sperm donations.

holy s~~~ that’s a horrible idea to begin with. that easily makes you a target wtf.

"Where the female can derive no benefit from association with the male, no such association takes place."-Robert Briffault

[CatsPawParticipant 423]

I think, with all thats going in the world today, even the Joker from “the dark knight” would freak out.
9 donors, Jamie Lannister would approve.

[Y_Participant 4591]

I sent in some dog sperm via UPS for the horny bitches.

[CataphractParticipant 2656]

I wonder how much child support those nine guys are paying for now?

Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

[Author]

Posts