Threatens Police

[AutoliteParticipant]

Anonymous wrote:

may 7 2020 wrote:

matrix

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3435317/Tried-sex-crime-brushed-past-film-star-rush-hour.html

this guy.

Thanks man,

THIS needs out there again.

It came as little surprise to Mr Pearson – though he was profoundly relieved and grateful – when the jury of nine women and three men unanimously rejected the woman’s story after deliberating for little more than 90 minutes.

Indeed it needs to be “out there”. Just the fact that it took them 90 minutes to reach a decision is unsettling…

[Anonymous 42]

Vlad wrote:

I had an epiphany after this, that going MGTOW is really the best option for me in life. The drama and potential anxiety a female can deliver is massively not worth the sex.

Thanks, Vlad, you hit the nail on the head! Before there was police we had respect, honor, and a code of “ethics” among men, now we’re all numbered sheep only ONE phone call away from slaughter!

Women with speed-dial-911 play the role of cow rustler with the police to get the bull in the corral, then the slaughterhouse hive takes it from there!

Marriage has become an industrial machine that transfers more wealth from one set of people () to another () than any other industry in EXISTENCE!
Just sign on the dotted line of any marriage certificate and your life as you know (and relate to it) is over!

Just look at all lawyers, judges, police, social workers, jails, prisons, psychiatrists, pharmacy, and all the laborers needed to keep the HIVE (Rogue 1 Death Star) running and it’s death ray firing!

[SamsquanchParticipant 4226]

You’ll be fine Vlad, no need to consult an attorney or freak out over this. You got your dose of red pills for the week. Have a good weekend brother.

[OldBillParticipant]

Autolite wrote:

Just the fact that it took them 90 minutes to reach a decision is unsettling…

Ever served on a jury? In the US, there are procedural requirements that can easily take up to an hour or more. Seeing as the US system is derived from the UK’s, I would think the same holds true there.

You don’t walk into the jury room and immediately begin deliberating. The bailiff explains how voting should work, the charge(s) and associated legal definition(s) are reviewed again, you’re reminded of your oath and sometimes take it again, if needed transcripts are passed out with requisite chain of custody forms. Only then to deliberations start.

When you come to verdict, the paperwork starts all over again. The charge is reviewed again. All notes, ballots, and transcripts collected with chain of custody procedures. Each member of the jury signs the verdict sheet and is witnessed doing so. It’s all very formal and very much documented because any goofs can result in a mistrial.

Everything is painstaking, legal, and involves lots of paperwork.

I’ve served on juries but a friend of mine’s jury duty should illustrate what I’m talking about nicely. She was empaneled on a manslaughter case and it was a slam dunk. While all the parts of the trial lasted from jury selection Monday to sentencing Friday, the trial itself lasted one full day and jury deliberations one hour on one morning.

The defendant had sold the methadone meant to wean her off heroin to another junkie who subsequently overdosed and died. The sale took place in the parking lot of a drug store directly in front of a high-def security camera recording in color. My friend said the camera looked right into the car through the windshield and showed the two women exchanging the drugs and money. You could even see a ring on the defendant’s hand, a ring she was considerate enough to wear to trial.

My friend said there was no actual deliberation. They convicted unanimously on the first ballot and also decided to watch the tape again “just to make sure”. The whole process took over an hour because of the procedures and paperwork involved. Deciding the case only took the few minutes needed to fill out and count ballots.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[AutoliteParticipant]

OldBill wrote:

Ever served on a jury? In the US, there are procedural requirements that can easily take up to an hour or more.

I guess then it would be more appropriate to say that anything longer than ‘1 hour + 12 seconds’ would be unsettling…

[OldBillParticipant]

Vlad wrote:

I was naive…

Naive? More like willfully ignorant and reckless.

Have you been paying attention? Have all the One Phone Call threads somehow escaped your notice?

The next time you’re feeling horny jerk off. Poking women with sticks isn’t a “mitigation tactic”, it’s self destructive idiocy.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[XSDBSParticipant 3598]

You could “pretend” it was a wrong number…
if she texted “I’m calling the police”, text back “why would you call the police <random name>?”.
Spin it as if you texted the wrong number/person by accident…

If anybody questions it, simply ask “You’ve never dialed a wrong number by mistake?”

[ZarathustraParticipant 2246]

I am not a lawyer but I don’t think one text can be construed as harassment in the current legal climate… a climate they are trying hard to change for the worse.

[AutoliteParticipant]

Zarathustra wrote:

I am not a lawyer but I don’t think one text can be construed as harassment in the current legal climate… a climate they are trying hard to change for the worse.

I can see it going either way though. It could just depend on the individual. If the ‘perp’ has a clean nose and isn’t known to the local Gestapo then there is likely nothing to worry about.

OTOH if you’re a local PITA to the cops, and they know who you are from previous encounters, they could very well take any opportunity to f~~~ you over if they don’t particularly like you.

I only mention this because it is EXACTLY what I’ve seen happen to a guy.

It’s best to try and keep a low profile with the local cops. Even on minor things like a traffic stop or a dispute with a neighbour, you should always try to be courteous and cordial when dealing with the police.

P~~~ off a local cop and they will go out of their way to f~~~ you up the ass at any available opportunity…

[OldBillParticipant]

Zarathustra wrote:

I am not a lawyer but I don’t think one text can be construed as harassment in the current legal climate…

What you’re failing to understand is that you don’t need to be convicted. The accusation itself is more than enough for an arrest and a stay in jail while you await bail.

Read some of May 7th’s posts and pay attention. He’s done nothing and has been convicted of nothing, but his ex-wife continues to use the police and courts to make his life a living hell.

One phone call is all it takes.

Do not date. Do not impregnate. Do not co-habitate. Above all, do not marry. Reclaim and never again surrender your personal sovereignty.

[Author]

Posts