This is why I AM a MGTOW

[tsParticipant 109]

Poor guy! I remember when I was teenager I saw documentary movie about this topic in TV. The poor dude had to pay alimony to some bitch but the kid wasn’t his. He wasn’t married to this women and he didn’t even f~~~ her (!) so he was sure the kid wasn’t his.

How does this happen? Paying alimony to random strangers?

[…Spectator 1165]

Deus: Of course it was f~~~ing meticulously planned. She went to the hive and got advice from random strangers and built a strategy on that. Then when she’s not scratching her ass she opens her legs and creates more drama. And people wonder why men are p~~~ed off. Gimme a f~~~ing break.

[IronSoldierParticipant 55]

KeyMaster and Deus Ex Machina, you guys both just made the new Purple Patches thread, recognizing excellence in posting.

KeyMaster’s winning post included this brilliant passage:

 Realize, women treat “children” like property, and they use them as leverage for their own selfish ends with no regard for the child’s well-being. How could they be fit to parent, if they want sole custody and fight in court over sole visitation to deny the child access to one of the parents? That’s inhumane and unacceptable. Any woman who does that (but still happily takes his f~~~ing money) is unfit to parent. Punto Finito.

And DEM offered this sharp-witted analogy:

spiteful c~~~s …. have the kid, say “f~~~ you” to the father and expect child support!!. That’s like me telling my boss:

“hey, boss?, go f~~~ yourself bro!, by the way, I’ll come to work when I damn well feel like it, and send my paychecks on the 1st and 15th you piece of s~~~”.

[Deus Ex MachinaParticipant 1068]

Thanks Ironsoldier!

"If You have the Tooth of a Whale, You must have the Whale's Jaw to hold it". (i.e. One Must have the right qualifications for leadership) -Hawaiian Proverb

[GoneGaltParticipant 361]

Keymaster: that’s horrifying, about the presumed paternity – I didn’t know that! I just check the Kansas statutes and it’s even worse than I thought – if I am reading this correctly, any child born up to 300 days AFTER a divorce decree can still be considered yours and apparently with no positive DNA test result:

http://kansasstatutes.lesterama.org/Chapter_38/Article_11/38-1114.html

Statute 38-1114: Presumption of paternity.

(a) A man is presumed to be the father of a child if:

(1)   The man and the child’s mother are, or have been, married to each other and the child is born during the marriage or within 300 days after the marriage is terminated by death or by the filing of a journal entry of a decree of annulment or divorce.

[Author]

Posts