Things are not going well for dyke mums

[ILiveAgainParticipant]

http://www.breitbart.com/london/2015/05/07/attack-of-the-killer-dykes/

[RoyDalParticipant]

That article tells me the mainstream media has been lying to us for years, and I am not the least surprised.

Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?

[Anonymous 42]

I thought it was common knowledge? Two cats in a box together? I’ve seen bull dykes that make Norman Bates seem like a caring pacifist! Women hold the title on going psycho! Two of them together??? PSYCHO PSYCHO!!!
PSYCHO bitch 1 (immovable object) meets PSYCHO bitch 2 (unstoppable force) and the rest is history…………………….

[The Moth Attracted to the FlameParticipant 2982]

Of course this was never going to be a good idea. Never thought it could work morally.

[uchibenkeiParticipant 7965]

I read statistics off wikipedia that stated the most at risk person for domestic violence is bisexual women. Must be her male partner, right? Nope. Number 2 on the list was lesbian women. Of course, feminists will spin the stats and just say women are the most at risk group. They wouldn’t be lying, just bending the truth, and everyone will jump to the wrong conclusion that that must mean men are the biggest perpetrators of domestic violence. If you have seen these dykes at protests and rallies, you won’t be surprised by this information. violent is an understatement.

I bathe in the tears of single moms.

[BeerParticipant 11832]

I always got a chuckle out of “research,” often funded by some form of homosexuality supporting group, always finds that gay parent’s don’t have a higher chance of turning out a gay kid.

I’d say at least 50% of the kids I’ve met over the years growing up with gay parents have turned out gay/bi/confused…way, way, way more than kids growing up in traditional 2 parent households.

[Elric GreenstoneParticipant 1637]

Universities tend not to release honest results nowadays. Almost all research is sponsored, and unsponsored research is basically designed to get sponsored research . . . and it’s all about keeping one’s clients happy. “Social science” research was always just pure bulls~~~, but it’s spread to the hard sciences as well (think climate change and pollution). It’s always amusing reading the actual papers and looking at the sample sizes and whatnot. If you’d really really like to freak out a modern researcher, ask for copies of their surveys or the like – they completely lose it. No, two women together is not just twice the crazy, but crazy to the second power. All of the lesbian couples I’ve known a) have zero sex – literally zero, and b) have more drama and insanity than dozens and dozens of single men.

Camille Paglia, a very honest and generally quite good essayist (who is herself bi-, and mostly lesbian) feels that homosexuals are basically stuck at a prepubescent phase, and that in essence they are developmentally off-track. She includes herself in this. She feels her relationships with men are saner, but more difficult. She cheerfully criticizes the lgbt community (as well as the straight community), which is why she’s become somewhat marginal. Very much worth reading for mgtows, actually.

"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."

[Anonymous 11]

Damn, that’s not how they portray the world of dykes in the children’s book “Heather Has Two Mommies”.

[Robert HallamParticipant 696]

Never stick a strap-on in crazy.

[Elric GreenstoneParticipant 1637]

Anonymous wrote:

Damn, that’s not how they portray the world of dykes in the children’s book “Heather Has Two Mommies”.

“Heather Has Two Single Moms, And Was The First Kid In Junior High To Use Heroin” was too long a title. Also, it didn’t market well, and Common Core wouldn’t pick it up as an approved book for the School Soviet.

"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."

[Author]

Posts