Home › Forums › MGTOW Central › These Are the Risks Men Take
This topic contains 25 replies, has 17 voices, and was last updated by 
Anonymous 4 years, 2 months ago.
- AuthorPosts
tl;dr:
Guy buys the fairytale bulls~~~, marries, goes off to a warzone. Comes back maimed. Govt gives him >$1,000,000 for therapy & medical care. Wife blows the $1,000,000, then divorces the guy. Then extracts more $$$ from him via court system.
This is like playing Russian roulette. This is the “risk” part of the Risk Versus Reward equation. This is the cost, while trying to find that Reward of love or companions~~~ or whatever the f~~~ Disney sold to our generation, and is trying to sell to subsequent generations.
I can’t imagine the level of rude awakening this guy’s getting. I hope he soon sees the light & joins us here. His story is a powerful one for guys who have already made the mistake of marriage; more powerful still for guys who haven’t.
ARTICLE TEXT:
How can a wife be so heartless? After Simon was maimed by a Taliban bomb, his wife walked out, squandered much of his £1million compensation – then took him to court for MORE
Simon Vaughan was awarded £1.1m after his vehicle hit by bomb in Afghan
31-year-old soldier was left brain-damaged and in a wheelchair after blast
Wife Donna, 33, walked out on him in 2013 after ‘squandering’ his payout
She then took him to court for more money and he tried to strangle himself
His mother Lynne says he is improving but has hit out at Donna’s actions
Lynee Baugh recalls the man her son Simon once was: strong, physical, active.
She reads from a framed Army citation on the wall. Simon was ‘universally liked, very capable… a highly professional commando-trained soldier, also excellent fun’.
Seven years ago, while serving in Afghanistan, Corporal Simon Vaughan volunteered to lead a reconnaissance patrol and was blown up by a Taliban bomb. He came so close to death that he was flown home with an obituary pinned to his bag.
Today, Simon still needs round-the-clock care. He is in a wheelchair and his speech is halting and indistinct. Yet despite everything, the accolade from his commanding officer cheers his mother.
‘He said Simon was one of his scruffiest soldiers, but also among the best and most conscientious — selfless in his commitment.
‘I was proud,’ adds Lynne, ‘but also broken-hearted.’
Were it not for his implacable spirit, Simon might have perished. But Simon is a fighter, and his stubborn will and humour are undiminished — qualities he has needed during a court battle with his former wife, Donna, over money.
Lynne suspects that even as Simon fought for his life in intensive care, Donna ‘was working out how much would be paid out if he died’.
Then, on Valentine’s Day 2013, after ten years of marriage, a pregnant Donna, 33, walked out, taking their son. She didn’t even tell Simon she was leaving. In the messy aftermath, he tried to strangle himself.It later emerged that Donna had ‘squandered’ — in the words of Simon’s mother — a large part of the £1.1 million compensation money that was intended for his long-term care and rehabilitation.
She bought a bungalow in rural Shropshire for £295,000 without a survey, then found it was structurally unsound. It was demolished and rebuilt by her father, at a cost of £300,000, but still failed to meet building regulations.By the time Donna took him to court in September, Simon’s compensation pot had been whittled down to £200,000.
She was demanding almost all the money he had left, plus a one-third share in the bungalow, which was specially adapted for his needs — even though he was still paying the mortgage on their former home in Telford, which is in negative equity.
As Lynne remarks bitterly: ‘She seemed quite happy to make him sell the bungalow — his home — because she wanted a share in it.’
Could Donna’s excessive demands possibly be justified? Last month, after a three-day hearing, a judge decreed that they could not; that Simon should keep his bungalow; and that his former wife should not be granted a share. Happy at least about this decision, Simon is nonetheless still worried about the future.He must find £1,500 a month in maintenance for his children, aged 13 and two — payments he does not begrudge because ‘taking care of their needs was always my priority’.
What rankles is a raft of further payments he must find. Donna was granted ownership of the house they had shared in Telford and Simon was ordered to pay her £30,000 to offset the negative equity on the property.
Not only that, he had to give her another £10,000 for expenses such as buying a car.
Incredibly, he must pay her £84,163 legal bill and his own £28,615 court costs, and on top of that foot the £20,000 cost of putting right his new home — a sum he believes his former father-in-law, who built it, should have found.
Left with around £28,000 and unable ever to make more, he can no longer afford the thrice-weekly intensive physiotherapy sessions or the hydrotherapy and speech therapy that was improving his quality of life.
He had taken his first tentative steps with a walking frame, but can now afford only one physio session a week, so progress will be curtailed.‘It’s a setback because he was making such progress,’ says Lynne. ‘We had hoped he’d be walking with a frame within two or three years.’
Lynne has become his carer. She does not claim the government allowance to which she is entitled because her husband Kevin, 55, a maintenance engineer, earns enough to meet their needs and those of their children, Abbie, 17, and Dylan, 14.
The family is close-knit. When Donna left, Lynne, Kevin, Dylan and Abbie moved in with Simon, Lynne’s son from her first marriage.
She is clearly dismayed by Donna’s stance, but strives to remain measured. ‘It can’t have been easy,’ she says. ‘I know how I felt when Simon was so badly injured. I don’t know how I’d have coped as his wife.
‘He was the money earner and an absolutely brilliant dad; physically strong — her protector and provider. In the blink of an eye, all that was gone.
‘But it is the way Donna has acted that hurts. Her love of money took over.’
Donna was invited to respond to this article, but chose not to. Her solicitors said: ‘This has been a difficult process for the Vaughan family, but Mrs Vaughan is pleased that a satisfactory outcome to the case for herself and her children has been reached.’
Simon and Donna married in 2002. ‘When our son was born I loved it,’ says Simon. (Lynne, attuned to the cadences of his voice, helps to interpret his speech.)Even then, there were problems with money. He returned from six months in Iraq in 2003, expecting to find several thousand pounds in their bank account. In fact, it was overdrawn, and the couple rowed.
But the rift was healed. In the years that followed, Simon was posted to Northern Ireland and Plymouth, and then to Afghanistan in September 2008. Before he left, he doubled his personal accident insurance and discussed his will with his mother.
She recalls: ‘That conversation will never leave me. He said: “I don’t think I’ll be walking off the plane when I come home.”
‘He wanted to make sure the mortgage was paid off and the rest of his money put in trust for his son. He specified he didn’t want Donna to have charge of any payout.
‘Then, before he left, he went to see everyone who meant anything to him, to say goodbye.’ There was an awful prescience about his actions.
Two months later, Simon was stretchered off the homebound plane with brain damage, a shattered pelvis, a broken back and collapsed lungs.
‘When the casualty officer rang, I thought: “It’s come true,” ’ says Lynne.
‘I said: “Please just tell me he’s not dead.” I felt as if I was being strangled.The officer heard the sound I made. He said: “Would you like us to come and explain?” — and he came round with Donna.’
The path to even partial recovery was arduous. Simon was in intensive care for 44 days and then spent more than two years in hospitals and undergoing rehabilitation at Headley Court in Surrey.
In September 2009 — long before he was able to go home, in April 2011 — Army compensation of £570,000 was paid into Simon and Donna’s joint bank account.
Other sums, including payouts from his personal injury policies, and charitable donations, brought the total to £1.1 million.
But far from salting the money away for her husband’s future, Donna switched it into accounts in her sole name. Just two months later, she bought the bungalow for £295,000 in cash and registered it as her own.
In court, Simon’s barrister Richard Sear — who waived his fee — was scathing about Donna’s actions. She had spent Simon’s money without his consent, he told the court, because he could not at the time communicate — though she claimed otherwise — and was mentally incapable of agreeing to buy the bungalow.
‘It was your decision not to have a survey before purchasing the property,’ said Mr Sear. He pointed out that when problems emerged with the house, ‘you were advised by the Army to demolish it, sell the land and cut your losses’.Her lawyers argued that Donna felt she was acting in her husband’s best interests. Instead, having commissioned her father to demolish the bungalow, she spent a further £300,000 on a replacement.
‘That was a terrible amount of money to have gone from the total compensation,’ said Mr Sear.
Donna’s financial decisions appeared to be injudicious at best, reckless at worst. Almost £600,000 was spent, yet Simon today has a property valued at just £410,000.
‘So much of Simon’s long-term compensation money was squandered because Donna flouted the good advice she was given by Simon’s Army medical liaison officer,’ says Lynne.
Moreover, Donna claimed she had put the remaining cash in a trust fund for Simon, when she had invested it in two bonds in her own name, according to his lawyers.
When Lynne saw a copy of Simon’s bank statements, there was only £4,000 left. ‘What I thought about Donna is unprintable,’ she says.
Donna also applied for a charitable donation from the Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen & Families Association — while failing to mention the bonds she had in her name.
‘There were lots of charity events,’ says Lynne. ‘Simon’s father gave £15,000 to Donna from a golf day. We’ve no idea how that was spent.’
Lynne is now calling on the Ministry of Defence to ensure all injury compensation it pays out is protected.
‘The MoD should appoint an independent trustee for every injured soldier until they pass a mental capacity test,’ she says.
‘If they’d done that for Simon, as I suggested repeatedly when he was in hospital, I believe he would have proper money for his future.’As it is, Lynne looks after her son — whose condition is greatly improved, she says — with the help of two paid carers.
‘His personality is fundamentally unchanged — his cheekiness and humour, his stubborn determination to improve. Just every now and then his brain injury kicks in and he gets frustrated and angry. When he can’t deal with himself, no one else can. We just retreat.’
A motto on the wall sums up Simon’s philosophy: ‘Take pride in how far you have come and have faith in how far you can go.’
Unsurprisingly, at one point he did sink into depression. Lynne would distract him by putting him on the sit-on mower to cut the grass or giving him a brush to paint garden furniture.
‘They showed me life wasn’t over by making me do manual labour!’ jokes Simon.
In his days with the Royal Electrical and Mechanical Engineers, he was a joker. He played rugby and loved a party. No wonder his wheelchair felt like a prison.
He was in respite care when Donna left him, says Lynne, who received a call from Donna’s mother to say she had gone. She said she hoped Lynne would be the one to tell Simon what had happened.
It was ‘horrendous’, says Lynne. ‘I would put him to bed and every night he’d ask when Donna and his son were coming back. I had to say: “She’s left.” His brain didn’t seem to process the information.
‘Then one night he crumpled. He said: “They’re not coming back, are they?” It was the end of everything he had post injury.’
The first he knew of his daughter’s birth was seeing her photo on Facebook. Amid disputes and confusion over access to his children, and refusing to take anti-depressants, he reached a nadir.
His carer went in one morning and found the electric cable that adjusts his bed wrapped round his neck, his face purple. She managed to unwind the lead just in time.
Did Simon intend to take his life? ‘I think it was a stupid cry for attention,’ he says now. ‘Perhaps I wanted to die. I can’t remember.’
Today, he is optimistic, consoled that his home at least is safe.
Lynne, who used to work in accounting, is still worried. ‘I’ll never let him go into a home, but now his compensation has been eaten away, I fear for him when I’m not around.
‘Just who will be his voice when I’m not here?’tl;dr:
Lynne suspects that even as Simon fought for his life in intensive care, Donna ‘was working out how much would be paid out if he died’.
Then, on Valentine’s Day 2013, after ten years of marriage, a pregnant Donna, 33, walked out, taking their son. She didn’t even tell Simon she was leaving. In the messy aftermath, he tried to strangle himself.You know the answer to this one, because vagina.
I can imagine that as soon as she realised he was going to survive she was looking at how to get away from him. Lets be honest, she jumped straight back on the c~~~ carousel as soon as he was home and I would bet money that the second child is definitely not his.
For women, everything eventually boils down to Alpha Fucks, Beta Bucks.
Anonymous3Well that’s what you get for fighting for the criminal West. The society hates you but these men deny women’s nature and the State’s nature, delude themselves, fight anyone that tries to help them, then get crushed by both.
Oh and now suddenly Mommy thinks it’s unfair. Hey Ma, why didn’t you warn him when he was getting married, or when he signed up for the military and to go off to war? You didn’t give a f~~~. Heck, even now you show sympathy to this woman “Oh it must have been hard to be his wife!”
Women don’t care about men. They’ve laughed and cheered each other on as they’ve destroyed their husbands, fathers, uncles, brothers and sons, and even down to grandsons and nephews. They won’t stand up and stop it. Because deep down they find it funny even when it’s their own blood getting destroyed.
These types of articles are nice reminders. Don’t fall for the unicorn bulls~~~, shaming or belief in love. Women are heartless, utterly incapable of decency or love. That is why every single successful civilization in world history had to put restrictions on women and put men above them. For if a woman is made “equal” to man she will in fact be his superior, and destroy everything she can.
<red pill rage color=”red as f~~~”>
Truly one of the most sickening stories I’ve read so far on MGTOW. This is the true nature of the female coming out: the ruthless female rampage has no boundaries. They always bail on a man, when he is at his weakest, because she knows he can’t put up a fight right know. Hell I even bet she cheated on her husband while he was in Iraq, or she made sure she had Randy and Cleve from the block ready replace him. Making sure she is all good and settled.
If I knew this guy, I would not hesitate to support him and make sure his kids know, and they will in time, what selfless c~~~ their mother truly is.
I’ve seen women walk out on sick or injured men before, IT ALWAYS HAPPENS. Hell, even my own mother nearly divorced my dad because he got cancer. But she knew I would never look at her again if she would. Why is this? Is it because there is no attraction left? Because he’s not half the man he used to be? Because they can no longer provide -even more- income? Because the roles are now turned, and she needs to take care of HIM instead of the other way around?
Women are always sugarcoating love and warmth of relationship. They shame every man that wants sex and consider them abusers of women. But when a man actually needs a woman, because he got hit by a f~~~ing bomb while defending the country, they bail. Where is the “love”? To me marriage seems all about taking advantage, about selfless, egoistic female behavior.
These kind of women are feeding and nurturing MGTOW to become a vast, intergalactic entity of manlihood and masculinity. In 25 years there will be 10 women for 1 guy because they all went MGTOW.
</red pill rage>
Anonymous3<red pill rage color=”red as f~~~”>
These kind of women are feeding and nurturing MGTOW to become a vast, intergalactic entity of manlihood and masculinity. In 25 years there will be 10 women for 1 guy because they all went MGTOW.</red pill rage>
I do not know the timeline, but this is indeed prophesied in the Bible. I mean it’s literally in there, not an analogy or anything cryptic but in very plain words. I don’t know how men can be MGTOW and read the Bible and not thing “Whoa, it’s all in there, and this is thousands of years old, maybe there is something to religion after all.”
Anonymous18He may have been brain damaged and wheelchair bound, but fighting the court system where the c~~~ was in full bitch mode was where he likely felt truly helpless.
A very dark part within me wants to sit back and have men ruin their lives so I could justify never marrying. The guilty pleasure is the blue pill men pointing and laughing at any discourse on true female nature only to later learn it the extremely hard way.
If anything these stories provide a daisychained link to awareness that men being f~~~ed by a unique snowflake turned mega bitch isn’t isolated incident. Nor an exception.
A man can be an outright murderer and leave evidence to face punishment and death.
Only a woman would stoop to extreme lows hiding behind any cover she can find to do the maximum damage. So long she can find/be provided an excuse for her behavior.
Plausibile deniability. Leave them alone to try and deny the silence.
This.is one.of that best.proof.that show women dont give a damn.about.men ,all they care.is themself ,blue.pillers always will be Blue.pillers.until they get screw ,i bet she.probably f~~~ing several.other men while demanding more.money from.this poor blue.pill guy nahhh.il.pass f~~~.marrriages
Glad this came up since Cameron just announced he is going to send British warriors like this guy to stop the “women-rapists” of ISIS. My first thought was, “and under what circumstance would a Syrian woman give her life for a British airman?”
IS are well worth destroying with cruise missiles and drones, but as much respect as I have for soldiers – and it’s immense – I don’t see any wars on the horizon that are worth one single man’s life.
They’re for protecting women like Donna.
Dafuq!
and this absolutely sickening c~~~… WON the lawsuit?
What The F~~~.
This just takes the cake. Money CLEARLY to keep this guy ALIVE and LIVING… and she just takes all of it…
W.T.F.The injustice is just so absolutely blinding.
My Goal: To Leave Society.
I will tell you how – “prophecies” are generally vague and open to interpretation, and unspecific as to timing. If I were to give, say, the winning lotto numbers for next week’s Powerball, or the price of the 1000oz silver contract for Jan 2016 delivery on 21 Jan 1130 EST on the CME, then this data is easily verified and my prediction may be deemed correct or incorrect.
Therefore, apologists like you and AncientBulls~~~ can put whatever spin what you please on these sand-blasted scrolls and say “look, look, we are right.” I say this as one having read many of said scrolls in their original Greek. A broken clock is right twice a day unless it is a 24hr clock; that does not mean that it is a valid timepiece.
To directly answer your question – some MGTOW have IQs above 90; that is why they do not have such a reaction.
I do not know the timeline, but this is indeed prophesied in the Bible. I mean it’s literally in there, not an analogy or anything cryptic but in very plain words. I don’t know how men can be MGTOW and read the Bible and not [think] “Whoa, it’s all in there, and this is thousands of years old, maybe there is something to religion after all.”
That woman should be shot for what she did to her husband. She literally destroyed his life while he was at his weakest point. She robs him of his recovery money, his property, and then after the divorce, still goes for more through child support. Face it guys, all a man is to a woman is their personal ATM machine. What’s sad is that courts are so corrupt that the man has no rights at all.
https://themanszone.webs.com/
Therefore, apologists like you and AncientBulls~~~
In a different thread you DEMANDED an apology and a retraction from someone who merely disagreed with your opinion. What – do we need “abuse” buttons like facebook for a member like you?
You created a thread entitled “In praise of Homosexuality” in an attempt to bait members who disagree with you.
When faced with evidence ( i.e the Center for Disease Control link I posted showing the government statistics that homosexual men comprise 2% of the population but over 50% of those with HIV) within an argument you created for the mere purpose of baiting and being offensive, you ignore the evidence; and routinely relegate yourself to:
– name calling
– personal insults
– insulting other members faith/religious beliefs
– “DEMANDING” apologies and retractions of opinionsI dont know where you get your ill-founded, inflated, insufferable, and imperious ego ( you sound like a key board cowboy to me) but its getting old; quick.
Anyone who knows your history can attest to this. All of your tactics are those that men commonly come here to complain that they experience with women. Rather annoying to come to a forum designated for men and experience petty name calling, DEMANDS for apologies and retractions for disagreeing with your opinion, mocking other mens spiritual beliefs, and other tactics.
Most members come here to identify and contribute. You come on here to vent and make emotional combat with members via name calling and the afore mentioned methods.
Since youre so fond of name calling/insults, and that is the only feminen tactic you seem to identify with, Ill tell you the new name and honor youve earned in my mind – The Mens Forum C~~~.
Entirely insufferable.
Pathetic.
Resident cynic.
Anonymous3Therefore, apologists like you and AncientBulls~~~
In a different thread you DEMANDED an apology and a retraction from someone who merely disagreed with your opinion. What – do we need “abuse” buttons like facebook for a member like you?
You created a thread entitled “In praise of Homosexuality” in an attempt to bait members who disagree with you.
When faced with evidence ( i.e the Center for Disease Control link I posted showing the government statistics that homosexual men comprise 2% of the population but over 50% of those with HIV) within an argument you created for the mere purpose of baiting and being offensive, you ignore the evidence; and routinely relegate yourself to:
– name calling
– personal insults
– insulting other members faith/religious beliefs
– “DEMANDING” apologies and retractions of opinionsI dont know where you get your ill-founded, inflated, insufferable, and imperious ego ( you sound like a key board cowboy to me) but its getting old; quick.
Anyone who knows your history can attest to this. All of your tactics are those that men commonly come here to complain that they experience with women. Rather annoying to come to a forum designated for men and experience petty name calling, DEMANDS for apologies and retractions for disagreeing with your opinion, mocking other mens spiritual beliefs, and other tactics.
Most members come here to identify and contribute. You come on here to vent and make emotional combat with members via name calling and the afore mentioned methods.
Since youre so fond of name calling/insults, and that is the only feminen tactic you seem to identify with, Ill tell you the new name and honor youve earned in my mind – The Mens Forum C~~~.
Entirely insufferable.
Pathetic.
It’s really getting unbearable. This is a great forum because we don’t have to deal with this s~~~. And this guy comes along and ruins it with his womanly tactics.
If I wanted to put up with this s~~~ I’d just post anywhere else on the internet. Not on a men’s forum, where I expect (and see) much better.
Sometimes Ancientwisdom makes a great point. Sometimes I make a great point. Sometimes phoenix makes a great point. Sometimes Cipher makes a great point. I just get drunk and troll and carry on. I don’t hate women, I hate female bulls~~~. If a woman poster posted her arguments logically, I wouldn’t have a problem responding, but if it’s shaming tactics and other nonsense, it’s best to just kick them to the litter box. I guess what I am trying to say is…troll on. The internet…it f~~~ing OWNS(but, yeah ancient wisdom……)
Anonymous3I will tell you how – “prophecies” are generally vague and open to interpretation, and unspecific as to timing. If I were to give, say, the winning lotto numbers for next week’s Powerball, or the price of the 1000oz silver contract for Jan 2016 delivery on 21 Jan 1130 EST on the CME, then this data is easily verified and my prediction may be deemed correct or incorrect.
Therefore, apologists like you and AncientBulls~~~ can put whatever spin what you please on these sand-blasted scrolls and say “look, look, we are right.” I say this as one having read many of said scrolls in their original Greek. A broken clock is right twice a day unless it is a 24hr clock; that does not mean that it is a valid timepiece.
To directly answer your question – some MGTOW have IQs above 90; that is why they do not have such a reaction.
I do not know the timeline, but this is indeed prophesied in the Bible. I mean it’s literally in there, not an analogy or anything cryptic but in very plain words. I don’t know how men can be MGTOW and read the Bible and not [think] “Whoa, it’s all in there, and this is thousands of years old, maybe there is something to religion after all.”
Well you’re certainly not one of them. You post like a 14 year old woman, following people around thread to thread calling people names.
I thought maybe KM had a talk with you and warned you to chill the f~~~ out, but I guess he didn’t.
You are as dumb as a pile of bricks. You are the quintessential college liberal that thinks he’s intelligent regurgitating the nonsense the left plays 24/7. I don’t know what a guy like you is even doing here, you should just get married and go away.
She literally destroyed his life while he was at his weakest point.
This is a recurring pattern in male-female relations. It fits my story, and countless other men’s too.
Beware, young man on the dating scene, that angel is only acting a role until she has her talons in your torso.Society asks MGTOWs: Why are you not making more tax-slaves?
Glad this came up since Cameron just announced he is going to send British warriors like this guy to stop the “women-rapists” of ISIS. My first thought was, “and under what circumstance would a Syrian woman give her life for a British airman?”
IS are well worth destroying with cruise missiles and drones, but as much respect as I have for soldiers – and it’s immense – I don’t see any wars on the horizon that are worth one single man’s life.
They’re for protecting women like Donna.
Actually, ISIS has 3 battalions of women fighters/police to keep all the women in check and ensure ISIS version of Sharia Law is strictly adhered to. But of course the media doesn’t report that openly, do they.
http://www.vox.com/cards/isis-myths-iraq/isis-female-soldiers
Anonymous11That’s one f~~~ed up tale!
I’ll share this one about women screwing over soldiers.
An acquaintance of mine knows of a guy who returned from Iraq after being deployed on a rotation of a year.
Upon returning home, he found where his very own mother and sister conspired to sell 40 odd acres of pine trees off land he owned. Instead of having a nice fat nest egg of harvestable pine trees, he found upon return that they had all been clear cut and sold. The money was squandered.
Anonymous42I’ll say it in only two words……
DISPOSABLE UTILITY
Imagine, at one time he went down on his knee before her begging for this s~~~! MGTOW defined: Knee-pads with inverted nails and broken glass, guaranteed to stop a man from kneeling!
I do not know the timeline, but this is indeed prophesied in the Bible. I mean it’s literally in there, not an analogy or anything cryptic but in very plain words. I don’t know how men can be MGTOW and read the Bible and not thing “Whoa, it’s all in there, and this is thousands of years old, maybe there is something to religion after all.”
http://biblehub.com/isaiah/4-1.htm%5B/quote%5D
Thank you. I had never quite gotten that passage before (nor, honestly, spent much time on it). It is very clear now.
I do often have the sinking feeling we’re in End Times.
"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."
- AuthorPosts
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.
921526
921524
919244
916783
915526
915524
915354
915129
914037
909862
908811
908810
908500
908465
908464
908300
907963
907895
907477
902002
901301
901106
901105
901104
901024
901017
900393
900392
900391
900390
899038
898980
896844
896798
896797
895983
895850
895848
893740
893036
891671
891670
891336
891017
890865
889894
889741
889058
888157
887960
887768
886321
886306
885519
884948
883951
881340
881339
880491
878671
878351
877678
