The women who basically claim to be statistical freaks out of convinence

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

I would like to give an example about a guy I know but then I decided that I do not want to post his story in the forum because I think that it would be disrespectful, but I will tell you the nature of what I wish to talk about.

Let’s say someone you know is dating a statistical freak, where the woman he is dating is claiming to be like several things that you can only go by their word that they are those things. Now I am going to do some math. Let’s say one thing she claims to be, she has a 1/1000 chance of being that, the second thing she claims to be, a 1/100 chance of being it, and the third thing she claims to be, a 21/100 chance of being that person. The probability of her actually being all three things at once is like 1/1000 multiply by 1/100 multiply by 21/100 which means that she probably has around a chance to be that person by a factor of around 1/500000 odds which is really crazy. Even if he even knows for sure that she is at least 1/1000 chance of being that person in one thing by the way, it is really sick how she can still be 1/100 multiply by 21/100 equals 21/10000 which goes to around 1/500 chance that she could still be another two things along with the thing that has a factor of 1/1000 odds basically, which is really crazy.

Now the thing is that he really wants to be serious with this girl and they are even talking about what they would do in the future. But let’s say I am right that it is almost impossible to date a statistical freak of the factoring of 1/500000 odds. If she is pretending to have ALL three of those things that we would all go by her word basically and no concrete evidence, she would basically be a pretender or she would be lying to herself. And if she is lying her herself, what would make you think that she would not be lying to anyone else? I say that she is doing all this out of convenience, but in the end, she is still pretending. And someone who is pretending along with a person with a lot of charm could be a really dangerous combination in my experiences, because you are not even falling in love with a real person which would really screw you up mentally when you realize that many of the things that you know about the woman you love is a lie and even the relationship itself is a lie which would basically have your world fall apart, because that girl friend was your world.

Now my question is, should I feel real good of my chances that I am right that it is almost impossible for a person like the guy I know’s girlfriend can actually just pretend that she is all three things out of convenience? Can we actually say that there is a monster in the closet and that there can actually be a person that you are dating that is actually the sort of statistical freak that I have just pointed out also? Remember, I am using math to make my case, not feelings or if I even like her or not personally. Just pure math, and you really cannot disprove math much, because math is pure logic basically.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[StargazerParticipant 12505]

The probablility of your typical woman being ANYTHING that she claims to be is statistically nill.

Women, particularly in their early 20s, talk about being all sorts of things. “I’m spiritual. I’m a great communicator. I’m strong and independent. I’m healthy. I’m intellectual. I’m into science. I’m giving and loving.”

Then you spend a few weeks around them and you find out that they have no ethical or moral virtues, cant e press themselves, are broken and needy, treat their bodies like s~~~, neglect their mental development, believe the most irrational things and are narcissistic sociopaths.”

The only thing a woman says about herself that you can believe is that she is emotionally attached to her cat or dog. And whether she says it or not, you can also believe that she loves to drink, do drugs, f~~~ around and generally live a consequence-free hedonistic lifestyle on someone else’s dime.

The statistical probability of that being true is asymptotic.

[RusskyParticipant 13503]

I wouldn’t go as far as multiplying those probabilities. Sometimes odd attracts odd.
For example if a guy is weak, unattractive, a virgin, writes code, collects vintage consoles and likes anime porn – that doesn’t mean that chances of meeting all those features in the same guy need to be multiplied as independent probabilities.

I don’t know what you’re talking about so it’s hard for me to say anything. But if some girl is a virgin philosopher biochemist whose parents are mormons and she lives in the mountains – one thing leads to another – you know what I mean?

proud carrier of the 'why?' chromosome

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

Russky wrote:

I wouldn’t go as far as multiplying those probabilities. Sometimes odd attracts odd.
For example if a guy is weak, unattractive, a virgin, writes code, collects vintage consoles and likes anime porn – that doesn’t mean that chances of meeting all those features in the same guy need to be multiplied as independent probabilities.

I don’t know what you’re talking about so it’s hard for me to say anything. But if some girl is a virgin philosopher biochemist whose parents are mormons and she lives in the mountains – one thing leads to another – you know what I mean?

Yes, but the thing that I am trying to point out is that she is just those three things based on her word alone. If you seen her parents being mormons and that you see that she lives in the mountains, at least she is not those things by her word alone because you see it and have proof on it. There is a difference.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[SolidParticipant 7520]

I really love math and statistics but statistics doesn’t work for women, AWALT, seriously, 1 in 1 chances of that girl be exactly like other girls.

Now my question is, should I feel real good of my chances that I am right that it is almost impossible for a person like the guy I know’s girlfriend can actually just pretend that she is all three things out of convenience?

Women have an surreal imagination and self image, seriously, very often you will see a girl ranked in 3, with makeup and photoshop she look like a 7 on facebook, acting like an 10 on real life. The real world don’t matter, her self image comes from facebook likes and her sick mind. She is what she is, what she told you about her, is what he wants to be or her self image.

[Anonymous 1]

No disrespect but I don’t understand the post.

You’re making up odds, applying them indiscriminately and drawing unfair conclusions (based on fictional statistics)

I get the gist, but the math doesn’t work because its made up.

Again, no ill meaning, just doesn’t work.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

Anonymous wrote:

No disrespect but I don’t understand the post.

You’re making up odds, applying them indiscriminately and drawing unfair conclusions (based on fictional statistics)

I get the gist, but the math doesn’t work because its, well, made up.

Again, no ill meaning, just doesn’t work.

I imagine those odds like something

– Really smart and have Phd in something
– Rich as f~~~
– Virgin
– Want to marry and have a family
– 10 good looking
– Make good sandwiches

Those kinds that if you found one of those items, it would be 1 in 10000 girls.
Is just an example about my interpretation on this post.

IMHO AWALT, just that, whatever minor characteristic wouldn’t made a difference in the fact that is a woman.

[Anonymous 1]

Solid wrote:

IMHO AWALT, just that, whatever minor characteristic wouldn’t made a difference in the fact that is a woman.

I don’t need fictional statistics to tell me AWALT is a perfect science.

Including long odds for arguments sake might be useful, but it depends who you’re trying to convince and if they’re willing to believe it.

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t need fictional statistics

The numbers that I brought up for the case of someone I know’s girl friend are actually real statistics of the three things she has. I just did not tell you guys what the three things are out of respect for the guy. Thanks for helping me realize that I have to add that to my post also to make my point better.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[Anonymous 1]

Enjoy The Decline wrote:

The numbers that I brought up for the case of someone I know’s girl friend are actually real statistics of the three things she has

I get it now.

Btw – like the new avatar.

[TriviumParticipant 1029]

The best way to figure out what women really are like is to simply wait till their beauty wears off. My ex used to talk about doing stuff and being stuff all the time too… it was all just hot air. She never made work of her dreams, she never used the skills she claimed to have. I am fairly sure she only considered it important that everyone believed her lies.
The sad part is even if they do have talent they never seem to do anything with it.

Realistically you can add bulls~~~ to bulls~~~ or multiply bulls~~~ with bulls~~~ or add multiplied bulls~~~ to fractions of bulls~~~ it’s all still bulls~~~.

And as George Carlin would say: It’s all bulls~~~ and it’s bad for you.

"Listen to all, Follow none"

[SolidParticipant 7520]

Anonymous wrote:

I don’t need fictional statistics to tell me AWALT is a perfect science.

Seriously, I’m no a psychologist but I would find very interesting if some psychologist wrote a scientific paper on this topic, analysing several cases that we have here.

Just to map, give it a fun technical term names, and give us scientific reference to say

“AWALT” – B~~~~, A guy with – 2016

When you hear “why are all good men gone ?”, answer with “you are just suffering for post-cat-lady-post-feminist-post-wall-traumatic-disorder, is what happens when you are a bitch and ride the c~~~ carousel”.

[Anonymous 1]

You did a mistake, you are doing math with claims. Now, from a personal experience, when a girl claims that she is a NAWALT she has already placed herself in a redflag zone for my standards. I thank you for this topic because I have met during my life one of the worst girls that lives on this planet.

The girl I am talking about is the perfect example of hypergamy, she is a serial liar, she even lies to herself several times, and the proof is that she changes her ideas each day with a different one(one day it is black, the other one it is white and so on). Her parents divorced, and other bad things happened to her. Anyway I did not notice many red flags until I had my heavy doses of red pills. And just to be clear, I am writing about a smoker, with tattoos, who likes men that treat her like s~~~. THE PERFECT AWALT PICTURE.

The best one was one day while she was claiming “I would like a guy to be honest and just tell me that he wants only sex”. Since I know her, I am positive that a thing like that wont work with her(and with 99.99% of women), so I told her “no one will ever do that because it will not work, you girls do not want a straight proposal for sex, that turns you off” and so she goes “I am not like the others” RED FLAG! To me that affirmation is like a guy saying “Nah I am not turned on by a pussy, I just do not want sex, I am not like the other guys”, f~~~ that!

Anyway, when you hear a girl that tells you she is not what her nature is, focus your mind on a giant redflag. I believe that a girl that understand her nature and fight it, will show it with facts and not with words, because I have done the same thing, I work on my control over my sexual drive, and when I say no it is no, no matter what the offer is.

Now, do I go to girls and tell them that? Hell nahw, because controling my sexual drive does not mean that I cannot fall for a pussy, I would be a fool claiming that, so I just let my actions speak for me.

There are no NAWALTS, there are probably women that understand their nature and work on it, but I estimate them to be something like 0,001% of the women population or maybe less.

A girl will convince herself that she is not like that(while all the signals point to that), I call it bulls~~~, as I have accepted that I am a man driven by my nature they have to accept the same thing, and try to fix what is wrong with them, like I do with myself, otherwise they can GTFO.

In the old times men fixed women, now they want to fix themselves, see how well it is working out?

[KillmandrillParticipant 497]

Anonymous wrote:

No disrespect but I don’t understand the post.

Same for me, you could go at least a little bit into the 3 things she owns or claims to have, without compromising your friend. Of what nature are these properties..?
Also pretty much math to prove someone is lying /s

Ah, women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent. Friedrich Nietzsche

[Enjoy The DeclineParticipant 1719]

To Math, just to gives you some statistics on a guy I have been reading books on and even watching youtube videos of named Aaron Clarey, he claimed that out of all the 300-340 girls he dated, only like 3-4 of them to his eyes are actually unicorns, or those NAWALT girls. That is like a 1 percent of the females he dated. I made a post on this a long time ago. I even made a post that just because you are dating a unicorn, it doesn’t mean that she would stick around with you for the long term. Those unicorns are usually of high caliber and they would do what every rational woman would do which is to marry a decent looking multimillionaire male, because they can. By the way, when he says about that only 3-4 girls he dated are unicorns, he says that because he really has high standards for women in general that he dates. Maybe other people’s standards are a bit lower, but judging by your statistics, I think that your standards are really high as well. I believe that the girl friend Aaron Clarey is dating now is some sort of CPA, so the woman he is dating now is obviously making a lot of money.

To killmandrill, man, if I give any clues at all, it would only give people clues on where to look for in what are the three things that the girl friend is claiming to be. I hope that my real statistical numbers that this girl friend has that I brought up in my first post would be enough to make people understand what I am trying to point out more. Remember, those three things she is is only what she claims she is and for what I know, there is no concrete evidence if those three things are actually true or not, because you are basically going by her word only. Sorry if this is not the answer you are looking for.

"Question everything" - Albert Einstein

[MgtowWaveParticipant 4352]

So many women have lied to me about their personalitys and liking things i like that my best advice is do not believe a word they say.

Better yet is just dont be in a situation where you listening..

Walk away and stay away.

MGTOW.

frankly my dear i don't give a damn

[President CamachoParticipant 941]

I have an affinity for statistics and percentages. I’m good at mental math.

From one gender I usually hear things like “wow, that’s really cool, how do you do that in your head?”

From the other I usually hear things like “is that all you do all day? Calculate things in your head?”

Guess which one is which.

A Western marriage that survives in the current year is an act of mercy and compassion by the woman.

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

When I was younger, I used mathematical statistics to predict the outcome of how many suitable women there would be for me, and out of the billions, the number I came up with was four… Not sure why I stayed positive, though…

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[Silverstone the SecondParticipant]

Stargazer wrote:

The probablility of your typical woman being ANYTHING that she claims to be is statistically nill.

Women, particularly in their early 20s, talk about being all sorts of things. “I’m spiritual. I’m a great communicator. I’m strong and independent. I’m healthy. I’m intellectual. I’m into science. I’m giving and loving.”

Then you spend a few weeks around them and you find out that they have no ethical or moral virtues, cant e press themselves, are broken and needy, treat their bodies like s~~~, neglect their mental development, believe the most irrational things and are narcissistic sociopaths.”

The only thing a woman says about herself that you can believe is that she is emotionally attached to her cat or dog. And whether she says it or not, you can also believe that she loves to drink, do drugs, f~~~ around and generally live a consequence-free hedonistic lifestyle on someone else’s dime.

The statistical probability of that being true is asymptotic.

I’m inclined to agree with your diagnosis doc. You’ll notice this to be especially true with women’s attraction to Facebook and social media. Women are fake, period. You notice how the biggest whores have quotes about family and values on their Facebook page. They want to sell themselves to you, like you might sell yourself to an employer. You make yourself sound as good as possible, the difference being that women have nothing to offer.

Feminism is a movement where opinions are presented as facts and emotions are presented as evidence.

[CataphractParticipant 2656]

In theory, a True NAWALT is a decent woman who will not seek to divorce you for some weak-ass BS reason and even if a divorce does still occur, it will be amicable one but merely lacking the worse negative traits that women typically have is not enough, she would need to a lot of positive traits that would bring true value into your life.

Such a woman would be an extremely rare statistical outlier and the odds are, women like that would already have found someone and even if she haven’t yet, the overwhelming odds are, you wont be the one to find her.

CONCLUSION: Unless you want to waste vast amounts of your time and money attempting to locate that ultra-rare mystical unicorn NAWALT, you are better off going MGTOW.

Marriage: About as appealing as wood-chipper diving.

[Author]

Posts