The Awalt will become redundant .. it's inevitable

[hmskl’dParticipant 6408]

When horse and buggy were the standard mode of transport .. they laughed at the first motorized vehicles. Yes, it’s true that they could not compete with the flesh and blood animals .. the early automobiles broke down frequently, couldn’t navigate uneven terrain .. or the muddy rut filled roadways.

Fast forward to today .. as you jet along inside your completely and totally man made inorganic vehicle .. surrounded by a complex controlled environment, GPS navigation .. finely tuned computer controlled engine .. chatting through your integrated systems .. and essentially wired to your vehicle. You’d smile, actually laugh at the thought of going back to animal transport.

This will also happen with sexuality and relationships .. you are probably smiling right now and thinking “no way, Jose” .. and that is perfectly understandable ..
the thing is, at some point in the “not too distant future” the inorganic Bots will totally outperform the traditional.. or should we say “classic” organic Awalt .. when that day arrives we will not even consider going back to the hassle and issues of human-human interaction

.. we will move ahead, the Awalt will become an oddity .. redundant .. something that only classic-relationship-hobbyists encounter

just as with the horse and carriage .. compared to the “totally-man-made” automobile .. there will be no thought of going back .. at least, not without a smile and a laugh.

…. and it’s just on the horizon.

[SpiderHerderParticipant 3766]

hmskl’d for President !

That was an inspiring post, man.

The awalt will be replaced by a newer, less-costly, almost hasslefree technology. It will be welcomed.

[AwakenedParticipant 35202]

hmskl’d wrote:

the inorganic Bots will outperform the traditional or should we say “classic” organic Awalt .

Besides being better looking and providing sex WITHOUT having to play stupid ritualistic games, I’m sure that they will be designed to be LESS; demanding, talkative, combative, confrontational, passive aggressive etc. etc. etc.

Imagine ALL THIS, and they won’t be spending YOUR CASH either, but the BEST part of all is that they come with an OFF switch.

In a World of Justin Beibers Be a Johnny Cash

[Anonymous 38]

Yup. Already there bro.

I was asked yesterday if I was seeing anyone by a couple of younger guys. They were genuinely in awe of me saying I had no plans to be in a relationship even though they acknowledged that male female relations were f~~~ed.

They certainly nodded when I said I cannot be controlled by a woman, and for that reason I will probably remain single.

The younger man often knows what we know, it’s just that he has to be burned to believe it fully.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

It is going to happen. And it’s slowly, slowly starting to take hold. I don’t get it. They can make a Segway stand up straight. Why not a robot?

We already got the looks mostly down and realistic. Just a little more work, and WOMEN have no chance in hell.

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[Gravel PitParticipant]

hmskl’d wrote:

This will also happen with sexuality and relationships human reproduction … the inorganic Bots (paid surrogates and eventually Artificial Wombs) will totally outperform (real women have ceased performing, population levels below replenishment) …. we will never go back to the hassle and issues of human-human interaction sexual reproduction

Sorry to jack with your words bro, just making a point.

This may seem shocking or beyond belief, perhaps even startling and horrific to certain political or faithful individuals. Never the less, out of sheer necessity for the our survival of our species, we will have to find a new way to make people. The current model of procreation has failed and is not sustainable. Anyone who argues against that fact is simply wrong.

We may be able to kick the can down the road for another century, stumbling into the future as nether-apes, but eventually something will give, either modernity will collapse us back into a hunter-gatherer society, or we will outgrow our primal beast-like reproduction techniques which steal immense resources and man-power form our potential as a species.

[SwimcatParticipant 3589]

You may rest assured they will fight tooth and nail, hammer and tongs to the last dog dies keep sex robots out of the hands of men. They’re latest feminazi bulls~~~ is that it leads to violence. Yeah sure. Bulls~~~, they are terrified of a lose of control.

[Anonymous 38]

Swimcat wrote:

You may rest assured they will fight tooth and nail, hammer and tongs to the last dog dies keep sex robots out of the hands of men. They’re latest feminazi bulls~~~ is that it leads to violence. Yeah sure. Bulls~~~, they are terrified of a lose of control.

They know it’ll make them redundant. You can be sure to count on this MGTOW to do all he can to spread the word to other men about the benefits.

[Anonymous 38]

Gravel Pit wrote:

We may be able to kick the can down the road for another century, stumbling into the future as nether-apes, but eventually something will give, either modernity will collapse us back into a hunter-gatherer society, or we will outgrow our primal beast-like reproduction techniques which steal immense resources and man-power form our potential as a species.

Spot on.

[MonkParticipant 16995]

Sexbots and VR mean that vagina is already well on the road to becoming redundant. Research into artificial wombs, GM and cloning is progressing, so the writing is on the wall there too.

I foresee a genderless future in which there is neither male or female, all sexual functions and characteristics having been eliminated.

[iMickey503Participant 12465]

Monk wrote:

Sexbots and VR mean that vagina is already well on the road to becoming redundant. Research into artificial wombs, GM and cloning is progressing, so the writing is on the wall there too.
I foresee a genderless future in which there is neither male or female, all sexual functions and characteristics having been eliminated.

Nonsense! How will women play the rape card and get money if there is no rape?

You are all alone. If you have been falsely accused of RAPE, DV, PLEASE let all men know about the people who did this. http://register-her.net/web/guest/home

[StealthParticipant 5340]

Do you mean “obsolete”?

"Once you’ve taken care of the basics, there’s very little in this world for which your life is worth deferring." -David Hansson. "It’s not when women are mean or nasty that anything is out of the ordinary. It’s when they are NICE to you that you have to be on high alert..." -Jackinov.

[hdvrodParticipant 1109]

iMickey503 wrote:

Nonsense! How will women play the rape card and get money if there is no rape?

1. Neglect rape
2. Rape by omission
3. Mental rape
4. Emotional rape
5. Non-promotion rape
6. Mansplaining rape
7. Sitting with your knees apart rape
8. Word rape
9. Silence rape
10. Eye rape

Need I go on? These skanks will be insufferable.

Anyway communication, real open communication, is not wanted or even required in a relationship. Women cannot handle fully open and honest communication, plus most perceive it as a weakness on the part of a man. All that is required is catering to her whims, and even then nothing is certain. There is no way to be sure of having a successful relationshit with a woman. MGTaoist

[Gravel PitParticipant]

hdvrod wrote:

Need I go on? These skanks will be insufferable.

You forgot FART RAPE. That is a big one

[Gravel PitParticipant]

Fart Rape is actually a real thing I guess. I laughed at first but it makes sense, Men can make loud, BIG aggressive wind, whereas women have only little squeakers. They feel oppressed. And ours stink better too. LOL

[narwhalParticipant]

I disagree. I don’t think a robot, tools, your hand, etc, can fully replace a woman. It can temporarily satisfy urges, but it’s not the same thing. I’m not saying that men will always need women, or anything like that. I’m saying that modern tech will be enough to get a man by, so that he can avoid the dangers of relating to women sexually.

Humans need interaction from other humans, in one form or another. You can’t replace that with a touch of a robot, who has no choice. The robot can’t decide it wants you or it doesn’t want, thus it can’t give you the feeling of being wanted. Robots and such are just a fantasy, perhaps with more realism. It is pretend, not the real thing. I’m not knocking it as fantasy has it’s value, and it’s much better to fantasize about something that is ultimately destructive than to actually live it out. I’d much rather dream about jumping out of a plane with no parachute than actually doing it.

Ok. Then do it.

[Ranger OneParticipant 16836]

narwhal wrote:

Humans need interaction from other humans, in one form or another. You can’t replace that with a touch of a robot, who has no choice. The robot can’t decide it wants you or it doesn’t want, thus it can’t give you the feeling of being wanted. Robots and such are just a fantasy, perhaps with more realism.

A woman doesn’t decide whether or not she wants vagina tingles for Chad at a particular time and place; she just does. Women are just biological machines and they are no more real than a mechanical machine.

My gf at various times acts like she “wants” me. I understand women, so I don’t feel wanted.

narwhal wrote:

It is pretend, not the real thing. I’m not knocking it as fantasy has it’s value, and it’s much better to fantasize about something that is ultimately destructive than to actually live it out. I’d much rather dream about jumping out of a plane with no parachute than actually doing it.

Or you could compromise as I did, by jumping out of a plane with a parachute, and getting a gf that you keep at arms length that doesn’t cohabitate.

All my life I've had doubts about who I am, where I belonged. Now I'm like the arrow that springs from the bow. No hesitation, no doubts. The path is clear. And what are you? Alive. Everything else is negotiable. Women have rights; men have responsibilities; MGTOW have freedom. Marriage is for chumps. If someone stands in the way of true justice, you simply walk up behind them and stab them in the heart-R'as al Ghul.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

I don’t think a robot, tools, your hand, etc, can fully replace a woman.

I’d have to agree. They have a long way to go before I hump a robot. LOL Im up for experimenting with one but Im waiting for the next-level s~~~. Like the Playstation 16 model LOL

[narwhalParticipant]

Ranger One wrote:

A woman doesn’t decide whether or not she wants vagina tingles for Chad at a particular time and place; she just does. Women are just biological machines and they are no more real than a mechanical machine.

As are men. But like men, they do have the freewill to act on those urges or not. A machine has no freewill.

Ranger One wrote:

My gf at various times acts like she “wants” me. I understand women, so I don’t feel wanted.

So sex with your girlfriend isn’t an emotional bonding experience, it is truly just mechanical, or near as much. I get that feeling, and these have typically been relationships I exit pretty quickly. The reasons being that the lack of a challenge quickly gets boring and I don’t want to find myself in a situation where guilt and obligation compels me to do things I don’t want to do. Admittedly, that is a weakness other man may not have, but one I know I don’t want to mess around with.

Whether it’s a tool, your hand, a robot, or FWB, it’s all about meeting an immediate urge as opposed to emotional bonding or something deeper. And that’s all fine, not knocking it. My point is that an inanimate object is never going to give you a sense of being loved, cared for, and that you matter. It’s not capable. Women are still capable of this, but fail at such a high frequency that men are not willing to risk. I’ve given up the desire to risk. What physical needs still remain can be meet by tool/hand/robot/fwb, but it’s not a full replacement.

Ok. Then do it.

[Gravel PitParticipant]

narwhal wrote:

hey do have the freewill to act on those urges or not.

How much freewill do you really think you have? How free are you, to stop being compelled to respond to comments right now? How free are you to considering options that haven’t occurred to you yet? or perhaps options that you’re incapable of having them occur to you at all? You’re not free to choose those options are you?

Only what can happen will happen. Only what occurs to you, is what you’re ‘free’ to do. And those thoughts come out of no where. You dont choose them. You’re not able to choose the influences and events that shaped your nuero-physiology. And fMRI confirms (among other examples) that you do not choose before your brain has already decided.

We are no different from a machine at all. We’re infinitely more complex in “design” but the physics are the same. For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. Things were set in motion for you and I a long time ago my friend. And as everything unfolds, it appears new and spontaneous to us, yet an outside observer would see that it’s all going according to an unchanging plan.

narwhal wrote:

Humans need interaction from other humans, in one form or another. You can’t replace that with a touch of a robot,

Anyway, I agree that humans need touch. However, I think a robot can suffice, up to a point. The care that a child needs would be extraordinary hard to imitate well enough. (speaking about a “mom robot”) That would be like difficulty setting 10 to accomplish. Yet to build a passable sex-doll is like difficulty level 1. HAHAHA. To build a walking talking sex-robot capable of stimulating a male emotionally, sexually … that is like difficulty level 5. She just needs to be able to recite wikipedia and do a reverse cowgirl and we’re in business. (and she must be capable of cooking, laundry and dishes).

[Author]

Posts