Survival of the fittest

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

bob__ wrote:

anonymousyam wrote:

I do not believe that women are the fittest since without male labor society would not exist. See women would not make the best cops or soilders in a society without women using men as a labor horse they would not survive.

That’s why real MGTOWs go Galt.

I generally don’t like the term real since it is commonly used in the no true scotsman fallacy but i do agree with Galt however.

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

Photon_Man wrote:

They need to be put back in their place.

Photon_Man wrote:

Indians are even supposed to burn their widows, but unfortunately this practice was stopped

Photon_Man wrote:

Too bad widows are no longer outcast in the feminist West.

Photon_Man wrote:

They should not leave the house and their only duty is to serve & please their lords. Wife beating should be legalized again and STRICT RESTRICTIONS should be placed on women…. punishable by death

Photon_Man wrote:

A woman’s purpose is cooking, cleaning and serving men like me.

Photon_Man wrote:

Women should be confined to the house and public places should outright ban them from entry. No dogs allowed… No women allowed!!

It’s tempting to say, “tuna” but there are just so many varieties of idiots out there…

Either shut up and learn from wiser men, or just f~~~ off.

[experiencedParticipant]

punt

"It seems like there's times a body gets struck down so low, there ain't a power on earth that can ever bring him up again. Seems like something inside dies so he don't even want to get up again. But he does."

[Anonymous 3]

Shiny wrote:

It’s tempting to say, “tuna” but there are just so many varieties of idiots out there…

Either we have some agitator with intent to soil mgtow, or this is a real opinion. Either way the problem is the same:
lack of respect for others.

Either lack of respect for the right of MGTOW men to go their way, or lack of respect for women to go their own destructive ways.

MGTOW is not about telling anyone what to do. Its about living our own lives in our own way, free from the dictatorship of others and society.

We go our way, it is our right. Everybody else has the same right to go their way.

[Faust For ScienceParticipant 22521]

Anonymous wrote:

Either lack of respect for the right of MGTOW men to go their way, or lack of respect for women to go their own destructive ways.

Exactly. MGTOW is about walking away and letting nature take its course.

MGTOW is about improving oneself, not dirtying one’s soul with violence.

[Prefer Peace to PieceParticipant 10809]

Interesting discussion.

Feminists often label “social Darwinism” as being “phallocentric”. In some colleges back East, “Feminist Darwinism” is being taught in lieu of “social Darwinism”.

I’m not exactly sure what women want. They seem to want both alpha and beta males at the same time. They want resources, which probably come from the beta male. So they have an interest in bagging the beta guy. At the same time, they want to shag the confident, obnoxious alpha guy. If you are a “nice guy”, you can bet your loving wife/girlfriend has her eye on the bad boy down the block.

[Photon_ManSpectator 47]

Keeping women in check has been done 99% of the time by 99% of humans around the world. Evolutionary principles dictate that males must dominate and so do the principles of a man who believes in morality. Feminism is just bulls~~~ that is neither supported by evolution nor religion/cultural morals. Maybe you didn’t know but until 500BCE over 70% of the world’s population used to live in East Asia and the Indian Subcontinent…. both of which never had illegal slavery. It was mostly criminals were used as slaves (this happens everywhere today as well in the form of imprisonment) but sometimes a broke person would volunteer as well. The Persian empire (Achaemenid) during the time of Ancient Greece also had rules banning slavery. We in Europe had practised slavery since 1000BC but we have also come from the same Indo-European family of peaceful vegetarians. If you read the central text of Abrahamic religions (Old Testament) it says “He who kidnaps a man, whether he sells him or he is found in his possession, shall surely be put to death.” There was not much slavery in the world unlike that found from the 16th to the 20th centuries. “Keeping the women in line ~ Slavery of men” is a bogus comparison made by feminists. Most men who came before mostly condemned illegal slavery. This is a fact that feminists want to hide…. like many other inconvenient facts. Slavery aka imprisonment still exists everywhere for criminals.

But to be a woman MEANS to submit. While there has been little illegal slavery since time began, with women, this is just how it has ALWAYS BEEN. Women have always been known to be the worst creatures of them all, and the biggest enemies of good in the world. They have always been known to be defective and evil beings. Women are human beings and women are people is the same s~~~ feminists have been spouting for over a century. Women are lesser humans. It is a scientific fact that women are significantly closer to our lesser-evolved, ape ancestors. On top of that they are evil… evil as f~~~. I’m not giving my opinions, I’m just telling you the facts. Women are considered people now but before feminism “people” used to refer to men. Women don’t deserve reference.

Anybody who does not support the patriarchy is a feminist and a traitor to mankind. You are brainwashed radicals who believe women should be given status like men. Your traitorous and radical ideology WILL come to an end.

This is a man’s world. Women should bow down and serve us men!! Look around you everything has been built, made and created by men. How can women be allowed to reap the benefits of this world or roam free here? Either they can get out and go to the jungles where they belong (and where they will never be able to do anything… they haven’t ever done anything except destruction and savagery) or have the esteemed pleasure of living in a house and serving a man. They should be kept on their leash. All women are DAMN DOGS and they need to be trained like DOGS. Women should know not to fall out of line!

Women have always been hated…. and rightfully so!! I’ll leave you with the words of St. Albert the Great:

“Woman is a misbegotten man and has a faulty and defective nature in comparison with his. Therefore she is unsure in herself. What she herself cannot get, she seeks to obtain through lying and diabolical deceptions. And so, to put it briefly, one must be on one’s guard with every woman, as if she were a poisonous snake and the horned devil…. In evil and perverse doings woman is cleverer, that is, slyer, than man. Her feelings drive woman toward every evil, just as reason impels man toward all good”

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Photon_Man wrote:

1 – Rich men are fitter than poor men.

I’m beginning to think that you don’t understand what “fit” actually means.

So women seeking them out is JUSTIFIED and accepted in feminist society.

Repeating the same falsehood does not make it true.

Once again, women do not specifically seek out rich men. They seek out rich men’s wealth. There is a difference. If they can get the rich man’s wealth without taking on the rich man himself as well, they will happily do so. And feminism is in the business of permitting women to take rich men’s wealth without taking on the man himself. what the f~~~ do you think feminism’s no-fault divorce and alimony are all about?

You’ve obviously haven’t been to a nightclub, bar or under-30 party in a long time.

This is me laughing at you because you have no idea. You really don’t.

The top 1% of men or 0.1% are the fittest of us all, but I was referring to 99% of women being fitter than 99% of men in the west.

There you go using that word “fittest” again without understanding what it means. because if you did understand what it means you would not be trying to use it in that context.

I said easily. Each woman can give birth to 30+ children if required.

Lolno. A woman ovulates at most twelve times a year. If she gets pregnant she is looking at a minimum of nine months downtime, and more likely a full year or more as nursing tends to inhibit ovulation (though not 100%). As such, a woman at full reproductive capacity, ignoring rare occurrences like multiple births as statistically insignificant, will produce no more than one offspring every year during her fertile years. Without advanced medicine and exposure to hormones those years range on average from about 15 (menarche) to 45 (menopause). Some females start younger than 15, it’s true, but without advanced medicine they tend to die much more in childbirth. The same goes for women past the age of 45; those who do get pregnant tend to produce far more non-viable offspring. So the thirty year range from 15 to 45 is the practical period of a woman’s fertility, and at one offspring per year that gives women on average a total of thirty chances to reproduce her genes, which means she can at most reproduce her entire genome 15 times.

It’s basic math.

7 is too little, the birth rate in African countries is already 7 and they are not even pushing it.

No, seven is the correct number. Well technically it’s 7.5, but you can’t have a half a baby, so round down to 7. At one infant per year and 15 years before the next generation even begins to be reproductively viable that means each generation cycle a female breeder will only increase the female population by 7.

Again, basic math.

To add to this, in the reverse situation females would not be able utilized as one man cannot control so many women and the bitches would never do it themselves.

You don’t need to control a woman to impregnate her. Where the f~~~ are you getting this?

but they have always been slum dwellers who were spit upon…. and rightfully so!!

Now you’re just being ignorant. Google the cult of Ishtar.

They need to be put back in their place.

And where, exactly, do you think that would be?

Across regions like Africa, India and China the practice of outcasting widows prevails,

I believe you are, perhaps intentionally, misunderstanding practices like ubasute, which involve specifically elderly childless women, and men, not specifically widows, and then only in times of hardship. Younger possibly fertile or propertied widows remain socially viable prospects.

you seem fixated on your idea that men are naturally slaves of women

Don’t be stupid. Nobody said anything about slavery.

and have always sacrificed themselves for the queens.

Nor did anyone say anything about queens. Where the f~~~ do you get this s~~~?

But yes, men have traditionally practiced self sacrifice, be it through standing outside the homestead door with rifle in hand, or going off to war, or going down with the ship, or even just working a s~~~ty job for decades on end. But they don’t do this for any “queens” or other such straw man bulls~~~ like you are spouting. They sacrifice themselves to protect their own genetic investment.

Actually the nature of women has been accurately pointed out by almost every religion and culture in every millennia since the beginning of time… no matter which corner of the earth men came from

Even a broken clock is correct twice a day. But no, most religions get it wrong. And Augustine, that creepy gold grubbing pedophile opportunist, got things particularly wrong.

So we were cavemen till the 19th century?

No, just you. Though I’m thinking you’re more australopithecine, at best. Calling your ridiculous philosophy “caveman” is an insult to neanderthals.

So I become like you and keep spouting the same old feminist bulls~~~ that men are disposable?

It’s not feminist. It’s just biology. Thirty ova versus countless quintillion of sperm. Do the math.

Fact is that we can save the species from extinction and revive societies if 99% of both males and females are wiped out

Not while in competition from other societies. Those that lose their females go extinct. Those that protect their females don’t. Males, meanwhile, get sent off to wars and down mine shafts, and on rockets to the moon, because reproductively the society doesn’t need any individual man nearly as much as it needs to preserve women.

In nine months nine men with one woman can only produce one baby. But in the same nine months nine women with one man can produce nine babies. How can you continue to fail to grasp this simple concept?

(as I have empirically demonstrated above)

Is that what you think you were doing while you were failing at basic math and reading comprehension?

Women are machines for producing children and MUST be treated as such. They should not leave the house and their only duty is to serve & please their lords. Wife beating should be legalized again and STRICT RESTRICTIONS should be placed on women…. punishable by death

Seriously, you’re twelve years old and haven’t ever actually been around any women, have you?

Who the f~~~ has the time for all that s~~~? I have much better things to do that micromanage a bunch of women. And if you have to beat a woman to get what you want from her then you’re a stupid incompetent idiot. Seriously.

The patriarchy NEEDS to be resurrected in the west.

Don’t be stupid. The “patriarchy” is a feminist lie. Never existed.

Why do you subscribe to so many feminist lies?

[sidecarParticipant 35837]

Jan Sobieski wrote:

I’m thinking Tuna. Anybody else?

I’m thinking twelve years old, completely inexperienced with women, and very VERY stupid.

But then I’m giving “him” the benefit of the doubt here.

[Zuberi TauParticipant 10606]

The tables are turning.
The fastest growing poverty demographic is single moms, which also happens to be the fastest growing demographic in the US.

[Photon_ManSpectator 47]

Women were burnt to the ground after the death of the husband in India because they were known to be the cause of death. Today we know for a FACT that nagging by women causes the early death of men. The one who has caused death also, surely, deserves to be put to death. Outcasting widows and whores is also done with good reason.

Men have been allowed to beat their wives and daughters to death in several places like Ancient Rome. If you cause death you get death. It’s just that straightforward. That’s why women should be seen and not heard.

If there is a lack of resources there is NO REASON to feed women. Like in many cultures (Ancient Greece and Indian culture for example) women should only eat after the man’s had his lion’s share. If there are no leftovers except crumbs… bitches will survive on the crumbs!! There is no problem if the sex ratio becomes 130 males to every 100 females or even more.

.
.
.

@sidecar nice try, but you fail so hard!! A woman actually gave birth to 69 children (world record) and 15 is an easily achievable number.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_people_with_the_most_children

I won’t even bother replying to the rest of your fanatical and FACTUALLY ignorant crap, but I’ll give you some facts:

This is how widows live in India even today. This still happens in other parts of Asia and Africa as well but has been discontinued in the feminazi west. They are supposed to be confined to the place and not seen outside, but they are somewhat less restricted today thanks to western degradation. Safe to say nobody will touch them or associate with them. They are outcasts who should remain like that. Unfortunately this culture has been stopped in the feminazi west.

Prostitues even in the late 19th century (when feminism had begun) used to reside in slums. Entire streets in late-19th century London were slums where prostitutes lived and behind them or closeby was the brothel. Most prostitutes had always lived in poverty. Of course, now they are rich in the west and feminist dominated areas… but look at the places where things are still very much in their place.

Mesopotamia just like all others, was a patriarchal society in which marriages were arranged by fathers and women were confined to the house & had to be veiled. Virginity was expected. Extant Sumerian texts clearly state that an adulterous woman should be put to death. Concubines were not uncommon. It was not so strict though, because women would own property in rare cases. As per the Hammurabic code, women are not only supposed to be maid-servants to their husbands but are to be forced to serve the mother-in-law if the husband commands it. Bad wives had their children & dowry taken away from them, and outcast from society. In fact the husband was called “bellum” which means “master”. Also in Assyrian records it is shown that the husbands would whip their wives and even pull their hair out.

Wife beating was only outlawed in the mid to late-19th century in the West. In most countries like China, Arabia and India marital rape is not a crime. Thank goodness!!

Wake up, you fanatic. Learn something from others and get off your high horse. Just because we are white doesn’t mean we can’t make a mistake. This time we’ve made the biggest mistake of them all. Here’s an excerpt from a 2200 year old Indian law-book:

“Under no circumstances should women be allowed to assert themselves independently.”

“Women must constantly worship and serve their husbands.”

“In case a woman violates her duty towards her husband, the King shall arrange to have her thrown before dogs at a public place.”

Stop being such f~~~ing feminists. Women MUST be controlled. The first step towards this would be stripping women of their voting rights and stop sending girls to school. A strict dress code should be enacted and no woman should be seen in a public place without reason. The property/wealth rights should be revoked and it should go to their closest male relative.

[Photon_ManSpectator 47]

sidecar wrote:

I’m thinking twelve years old, completely inexperienced with women, and very VERY stupid.

But then I’m giving “him” the benefit of the doubt here.

So you’ve started shaming and name-calling like a feminist in the face of inconvenient facts.

Punishing and restricting women is the only way to solve this mess. Try this:

All men should beat their wives. Even physically weak men should strive to control their women. A woman’s place……. is in submission!! In China it is customary to break the woman’s feet at a young age, though unfortunately, this practice has stopped due to feminist/western domination.

Don’t feel sorry for her! She deserves it…. As per the central pillar of Abrahamic religions, the old testament, a woman who dares to have pre-marital sex should be stoned to death. In Ancient Egypt adulterous women would be burned to death.

Women who dare to practice witchcraft are burned everywhere. Of course not today. Witchcraft is the fastest growing religion in the west.

[ShinyParticipant 2307]

There’s so much wrong with everything you’re saying, and without wanting to sound like an echo chamber (love and kisses Snake!) Sidecar is making soooo much sense you really should listen to him.

Let me quickly give you my objections:

They have always been known to be defective and evil beings. Women are human beings and women are people is the same s~~~ feminists have been spouting for over a century. Women are lesser humans. It is a scientific fact that women are significantly closer to our lesser-evolved, ape ancestors.

Utterly ridiculous. You have female DNA in every X chromosome in your body. What does that make you???

You seem to know your history – kudos – but here’s a quick history of the “they’re not people” mentality:

– middle ages: idiot churchmen (I’m sad to say) debated over whether women had souls and whether they were human. They were celibate idiots who avoided women and argued about them like they argued about how many angels on the head of a pin. An embarrassment to later Christians.
– renaissance: idiots argued over whether black people were human. Because they wanted to enslave them.
– modern era: Goebbels famously said, “Jews are human beings, of course, but they’re not people like us.” Because he wanted to exterminate them.
– currently: feminists support abortion with the, “a foetus isn’t a person” (debatable but incorrect) and, “a foetus isn’t a human being” (idiocy) arguments. Because they want to exterminate them.

Great company you’re in.

Re men dominating women – no, no, no. A man is the head of his household. In this, he models God, as all fatherhood comes from God (St Paul :)) Does God dominate us? Does he treat us as slaves? No, he treats us as heirs and as his children. The position of head of the house is not a position of dominance but of responsibility.

Society no longer values that responsibility men have long shouldered: it is not respected, it is not acknowledged, it is not followed. So, just as in any area, if you take on responsibility only to be disrespected and shamed, you think, “to hell with this” and you walk away. Men are walking away. So they should. You should too. Stop thinking about women, look at the mess you’re in!

As for St Augustine and Albertus Magnus, I’m a big fan. Also a big fan of St Catherine and St Teresa, likewise Doctors of the Church. There have been many good and indeed great women in history. Dozens.

Try this.

No thanks. Women aren’t that important to me.

[Photon_ManSpectator 47]

Shiny wrote:

Utterly ridiculous.

Your rejection of hard scientific fact is what is utterly ridiculous. Then again, what else can be expected from products of feminist society?

Yes, God orders people to do certain things. If we don’t do them we are put in hell. We are constantly under the threat of going to hell if we fall out of line. We are dominated.

Doesn’t change anything, ie, the fact that they were women who are below men. Despite the odd female saint, women have always been kept in their place. Female religious heads are far below males, which is exactly why women can’t be bishops or cardinals…. let alone a pope or an archbishop. LOL

Menstruating women are NOT allowed to attend Orthodox communion. In fact, are you even aware of what has been said of women’s menstrual blood?

[AnthonyParticipant 2281]

Photon_Man wrote:

All men should beat their wives.

You’re a f~~~ing c~~~. I’m definitely with Jan on this. You’re a tuna!

Once you have a Fleshlight real vaginas become worthless.

[Anonymous 3]

Photon_Man wrote:

Your rejection of hard scientific fact is what is utterly ridiculous.

Yes, God orders people to do certain things. If we don’t do them we are put in hell. We are constantly under the threat of going to hell if we fall out of line. We are dominated.

You have just shown you true colors.

You cannot stand for hard scientific facts and believe literally in God’s word according to the bible.
They are in full contradiction many times.

Therefore you are using one or both ways as tools for your agenda.

And probably your agenda is to soil MGTOW to proceed with your feminist crusade.

Be gone

[Anonymous 22]

Smells like tuna. I can’t stand that smell so have to stop reading this thread.

[Photon_ManSpectator 47]

Anonymous wrote:

You have just shown you true colors.

You cannot stand for hard scientific facts and believe literally in God’s word according to the bible.
They are in full contradiction many times.

Therefore you are using one or both ways as tools for your agenda.

And probably your agenda is to soil MGTOW to proceed with your feminist crusade.

Be gone

Oh ffs, I was illustrating a point.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12043]

Zuberi Tau wrote:

The tables are turning.
The fastest growing poverty demographic is single moms, which also happens to be the fastest growing demographic in the US.

Source about that?
That’s interesting.

About Photon “man”: she’s a feminist c~~~, already reported her in the other thread.

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[anonymousyamParticipant 4605]

Okay man i do agree with one thing you said which is that evolution had men dominate women but going as far as to say that men should beat women (when not during sex or in self defense from a crazy bitch) is not what mgtow supports.

And i also get showing a chick that you are the dominate one and not a weak cuck but we just can’t go and support this you troll.

@keymaster how the f~~~ do they keep getting in?

Just an east coast asshole who likes to curse, If you get offended by words like fuck, cunt, shit, piss, bitch or any racial slurs then you just scroll down.

[Author]

Posts