So, we're all "lonely virgins" now, huh?

[NioZenParticipant 856]

Dr Phibes wrote:

What the f~~~?? If every guy involved with a relationship with a sexual anorexic started banging dudes, then you wouldn’t be able to walk into a public men’s room anywhere without seeing some of that action going on. Even if a man’s completely hopeless with women and legal paid sex is not an option, there’s always porn or his own imagination. Turn queer? Please. I wonder why Mr. Forney brought that up._____* I invoke the Fair Use standard to include snippets of the linked article for the purpose of review and commentary.

The correct response to Mr Forney’s suggestion, as provided by Mr Mike Tyson:

We only dream this bondage. Wake up and let it go. - Vivekananda

[Anonymous 42]

Anonymous wrote:

I honestly don’t think there is anything women can now do to get at least me back to the table.****** I just don’t care. The worst of the worst Westerners now have kids, while the best men refuse to play the game.

Hey Pheonix, my negotiating table was broken down for fire wood years ago, and my chair for representation at that table sits in a broken pile!

As for societies ailments, I no longer give a f~~~, Western women have belittled and degraded their men for many decades, and now they have no “real men” only varying degrees of mangina.

If you’re looking for Team Real Men, they’re all right here! We’re the best of the best, the brightest of the bright, we’ve dusted ourselves off from the soot of feminism along with society it has poisoned!

We’re the only thing afloat in a vast sea of death!!!

[ScandinavianParticipant 590]

People like Mr Fatt Horny (© KM) will not, and quite frankly cannot, understand our stance because it is not in his mental contra emotional capacity. Getting angry and arguing against him would be like getting angry at and arguing with a 5-year old because he calls you stupid for saying there is such a thing as imaginary numbers. He’s just not there yet, and without interest or incentives he may never come to that point either. Just like Mr Horny.

As for sex, I think I’ve had my fair share. I still enjoy it occasionally, once or twice per year is plentiful for me, but does this mean I cannot get laid more often? Of course not! Getting sex is easy as f~~~ (literally!). And it just keeps on getting easier and easier with age. Never had any problems in my 20s though it could go dry a year or so, early 30s were “worse” as I was working so much I simply did not have the time (except for two years in a steady relationship), but now almost 37? The women hitting the wall are so numerous that I usually stay at home in the weekends not to get run over by the stampede!!
If he thinks getting sex is hard at our age (he looks like 35+) then he really is doing something SERIOUSLY wrong! And my hunch is that he is, because no man with plentiful access to (or potential access to) pussy would be so hung up on it.

[Cap285Participant 6007]

Ah, good ol’ Fat Horny.

A guy who mocks people eating Doritos while his fat body reflects he does it, if not more.
A guy who claims to lift weights. See above.

Funny how he’s completely blind to his own double standards and hypocrisy……kind of like……women.

Hmmmmmmmm…

We know that you are powerful, mighty Forney, and that your anger with MGTOW must be equally powerful.

Fuck this planet.

[Frank V.Participant 2445]

Dr Phibes wrote:

I’ll close with another “gem” from Mr. Forney:
I wouldn’t be surprised if some “migtows” start advocating “political homosexuality” in the future. After all, since women are evil, ball-cutting, divorce-raping succubi, the only safe relationships are to be had with other men.
If you bang a dude, he won’t jam you for child support or falsely accuse you of rape, and you certainly won’t be “worshipping pussy” if you pack fudge (You’ll just be exposing yourself to HIV and drug-resistant gonorrhea, but hey, you gotta take the good with the bad).
What the f~~~?? If every guy involved with a relationship with a sexual anorexic started banging dudes, then you wouldn’t be able to walk into a public men’s room anywhere without seeing some of that action going on. Even if a man’s completely hopeless with women and legal paid sex is not an option, there’s always porn or his own imagination. Turn queer? Please. I wonder why Mr. Forney brought that up._____* I invoke the Fair Use standard to include snippets of the linked article for the purpose of review and commentary.

I noticed that too !

Shaming, false accusations and finger pointing at other men and bringing up homosexuality out of nowhere is a very familiar pattern of behavior.

I know “closet cases” who did that to others in High School to take the attention off of them. The fact he seems obsessed with young lonely men and anal sex reminds me of a lot of how many politicians or preachers act before they are “outed” after being caught trolling for gay sex on Grindr (hook-up app for gay men) or something like that.

Point – accuse – draw attention away from yourself.

Frank V.

[BrainPilotParticipant 7640]

I’ll admit not having read the article from the first post, but I can surmise that its message is that mgtow is something negative. My response to that, and all the other crap like it is this: the reason that author can’t remember me calling him to get his approval and permission for my decision to go mgtow… is that I don’t really need it. Neither its presence or absence from the equation has any impact on my decisions.

And this is exactly the point. Any man who needs permission or approval from someone else for the decisions he makes about the way he runs his life… is almost certainly already owned by someone who dispenses that permission and approval based on how well he serves that person’s needs. I can meet all my needs without being owned by someone else, or being addicted to their approval or its benefits. In fact, I have not only survived, but have survived to be richer, happier, healthier and more secure and free than at any time when I once valued the approval of anyone else.

So I would make the same response to whatever is in that article that I make to all the women who disapprove of my decision to put my needs first and let them fend for themselves: What do you have to offer me in exchange for your approval?

Is he gonna write an article next week about what a ‘real man’ I am if I do whatever it is he says will gain his approval? He misses the point that a ‘Real Man’ does not grovel for the approval of another man, or a woman…

Look, it's not my fault that tornado dropped a house on your sister. Now get back on your broom and get your ass out of here... and take your monkeys with you

[Anonymous 11]

Dr Phibes wrote:

And despite their whinnying, the average Doritos-munching “migtow” would go “pussy worshipper” in a flash if a cute, agreeable girl was dropped in his lap.

I don’t eat Doritos, but I’d give her my alias name f~~~ her brains out in a hotel room with a glove on, of course. If she pegged my crazy meter, I’d just ignore her. On second thought, I probably just ignore her anyway just to f~~~ing bring her down a few notches.

A pasty dweeb like Matt whatever giving out advice on pussy is like a Wal-mart scooter jockey giving free nutrition advice. Worthless!

[Anonymous 42]

BrainPilot wrote:

I’ll admit not having read the article from the first post, but I can surmise that its message is that mgtow is something negative. My response to that, and all the other crap like it is this: the reason that author can’t remember me calling him to get his approval and permission for my decision to go mgtow… is that I don’t really need it. Neither its presence or absence from the equation has any impact on my decisions.
And this is exactly the point. Any man who needs permission or approval from someone else for the decisions he makes about the way he runs his life… is almost certainly already owned by someone who dispenses that permission and approval based on how well he serves that person’s needs. I can meet all my needs without being owned by someone else, or being addicted to their approval or its benefits. In fact, I have not only survived, but have survived to be richer, happier, healthier and more secure and free than at any time when I once valued the approval of anyone else.
So I would make the same response to whatever is in that article that I make to all the women who disapprove of my decision to put my needs first and let them fend for themselves: What do you have to offer me in exchange for your approval?
Is he gonna write an article next week about what a ‘real man’ I am if I do whatever it is he says will gain his approval? He misses the point that a ‘Real Man’ does not grovel for the approval of another man, or a woman…

@brainpilot, you’re as good at waking up brains as you are at putting them to sleep! You’re a man’s mental health expert too! The kind psychologists with a swinging dick need! You’re a locksmith for the mind! YOU’RE AWESOME BRO!

[Anonymous 5]

Article Sounds like “fear” to me.

[Dr PhibesParticipant 155]

@lucifer:
I’ll bet that video inspired Forney to write what he did.

@scandinavian:
Yep, pussy is like air to many guys. It’s only important when you’re not getting any. But, me, I’d rather have air.

@frank V.:
First, we’re lonely virgins. But, wait, now we’re incipient homosexuals! Forney should make up his mind.

@brainpilot:
Hear, hear! Never seek validation from others. It’s a fool’s errand.

@DukeToga:
I agree. Forney shouldn’t be worried, though. We’re leaving all the “cute, agreeable girls” to him!

"The wisest follow their own direction." -- Euripides

[Mr. SpockParticipant 10907]

Keymaster wrote:

He’s talking about himself. Believe it. The “you can’t get laid” argument is used as an attempted insult to others, because that’s the most devastating tragedy to him: never getting laid. He uses it on others …. because it would actually work on him.

Yeah, it’s that argument/insult that starts young boys on the wrong path of chasing pussy and thinking it’s a big accomplishment that they MUST achieve to prove something to somebody. This way of thinking causes 14 year old boys to trip over themselves to shower some undeserving little tramp with attention to boost her ego. It fuels the ability of young women to hone their craft of manipulating and using men. At the onset of puberty it was an insult. Now it’s just funny.

Feminism isn't about equality with men, it's about leverage over men.

[IGMOW (I Go My Own Way)Participant 2572]

All one needs to know about anything coming out of ReturnOfKings.com, is that it is the transitioning from PUA to Neo-Masculinity, because Roosh V found the way of the PUA didn’t give his life meaning and satisifaction. So, he is now pushing Neo-Masculinity, with the likes of Matt Forney, in order to create a “real man” academy where they can get men to feel guilt and “man up” to pay them so they can end up learning their place in the pecking order, get a woman that matches the man’s place, and end up making babies with the woman, and taking the leadership role the man is supposed to take. With this the reclaiming of the original and “REAL” MGTOW way of “installing masculinity in men, feminity in women, and smaller government” can come about. And most men can spend their time with women who are so messed up that they shouldn’t of married, and the man’s mission of fixing his broken woman, can be complete. After all, that is what he is for, and he MUST do it, in order to prove he is a “real man”.

And with all this, by getting the natural order restored, Matt Forney finds out he didn’t waste his life being on Return of Kings and doing a YouTube channel, because he successfully helped to push the neo-masculinity revolution. Yes, is activism will pan out.

And with this, you see why AVFM and ROK end up going after MGTOW. MGTOW just doesn’t do anything for their agenda, so they turn on it.

"I am my own thang. Any questions?" - Davis S Pumpkins.

[Author]

Posts