She's dating "violent felon" whose drunken crashes kills her…whose fault???

[HammerheadParticipant 362]

Car crash victim’s family to sue state because driver should have been in prison
By Q13 Fox Seattle
Published January 11, 2017

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/01/11/car-crash-victims-family-to-sue-state-because-driver-should-have-been-in-prison.html

The family of Lindsay Hill, left, planned to file a suit over the mistaken release of Robert Jackson.

Investigators said the man driving the car was Jackson, a man who the Washington Department of Corrections mistakenly released from prison before he completed his prior sentence. Lindsay Hill was dating him at the time, and was a passenger in his car when he drunkenly crashed into an electrical utility box in Bellevue.

SO…the state mistakenly released him a few months early and that makes it their fault that she was riding in a car with her BOYFRIEND, the drunken convicted felon???

The apple didn’t fall far from the tree in that family…so much for logic.

[Pedal, run, rowParticipant]

No accountability for them at all. So fierce, empowered and independent, but when something happens they have no agency whatsoever.
Her F~~~ing family ought to be looking itself in the mirror on how they raised her for her to make such poor life choices, and try to “fix” whatever children they have left.

PS I always shake my head when I see some t~~~ riding helmetless on a bike with her arms wrapped around her tattooed thug BF, weaving in and out of traffic at high speed. In Florida they would frequently end up bouncing their head off the pavement – game over – while the thug had a new GF within a week.

[Anonymous 42]

In Massachusetts they would be suing the criminal’s parents for making him, the State for releasing him, the electric company, the manufacturer of the electrical box, the car manufacturer, the road designer, and all other engineers, companies, corporations, entities, their agents, affiliates, and subcontractors, just about everyone!

And that’s only one of many lawsuits in a an endless stream of lawsuits, but not here in B.C.F.C., we’re all ready mowed over and condemned, I told you guys the Justice System is really f~~~ed up here and I’m not kidding!

Everything is to be AVOIDED here in Grassachusetts, starting with the nastiest, meanest, lawyering’est up’est, law suiting’est, man munching women on the entire PLANET!

Every man here I know that got married also got divorce raped! The old ONE TWO!

The old court houses from yesterday are now cathedrals several stories high!

Staying away from women is only the beginning if you want to preserve any quality of life whatsoever and not be a slave pressed into service building these monstrous cathedrals of INJUSTICE!

You could almost base jump the lobby!

Modern men are nothing more than Soylent Green for the parasites in the legal system!

[surferdudeParticipant 159]

you better put seatbelts on , if you´re gonna ride the c~~~ carousel

[OrlandoParticipant 833]

The problem is the cost of defense. At times, it’s much cheaper to just settle than defend against a lawsuit. States will often do that even against seemingly ridiculous lawsuits, especially since most are cash strapped.

The taxpayer loses either way, as usual.

[Eric LauderParticipant 12053]

Hammerhead wrote:

Car crash victim’s family to sue state because driver should have been in prison
By Q13 Fox Seattle
Published January 11, 2017

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2017/01/11/car-crash-victims-family-to-sue-state-because-driver-should-have-been-in-prison.html

The family of Lindsay Hill, left, planned to file a suit over the mistaken release of Robert Jackson.

Investigators said the man driving the car was Jackson, a man who the Washington Department of Corrections mistakenly released from prison before he completed his prior sentence. Lindsay Hill was dating him at the time, and was a passenger in his car when he drunkenly crashed into an electrical utility box in Bellevue.

SO…the state mistakenly released him a few months early and that makes it their fault that she was riding in a car with her BOYFRIEND, the drunken convicted felon???

That’s a clear plot by the patriarchy: they’re releasing felons, they’re releasing them willingly and knowingly that women are going to date them because the patriarchal pressure.
That’s also rape, and it’s the state’s fault, because they had intercourse and women cannot consent under patriarchy.
The state should be sued even for helping a rapist.

😀

SUPREME LEADER KIM JONG-UN'S FASHION STYLIST - if you want a new look or if you're a very beautiful trans you can call me, phone number +85079255312 / mobile 01921421211. The worth of a man isn't the usefulness that women get from him. Avoiding living with a woman, a man isn't rejecting a lot of sex: he's rejecting sexual starvation. MGTOW IS TACKLING DOMESTIC VIOLENCE IN COMPLIANCE WITH CONVENTION OF ISTANBUL: http://www.coe.int/en/web/conventions/full-list/-/conventions/rms/090000168008482e --- Article 4, Section 4 "Special measures that are necessary to prevent and protect women from gender-based violence shall not be considered discrimination under the terms of this Convention". WHAT I LEARNT FROM A GENDER STUDIES CLASS IN LUND, SWEDEN: every time feminists accuses men of doing something, odds are likely either them or persons associated with them are doing the exact same thing but a lot worse. WHO I'M RIGHT NOW https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=J1okpAj7Fhw Basically my former life have been a conflict between this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yz_RQVkvke4 and this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dFIMeyTK-sU That's, more or less, all about me.

[Anonymous 11]

And another hybristophile bites the dust.

[Elric GreenstoneParticipant 1637]

This is an especially cute lawsuit because she was voluntarily with him. He hadn’t kidnapped her. She was dating him.

Pedal, run, row wrote:

So fierce, empowered and independent, but when something happens they have no agency whatsoever.

They want it both days. They want to be equal before the law, which is fine, but then they also want special privileges. They can’t have both. The real problem is that they aren’t equal in reality – they’re inferior in every way – and they hate men for it. Giving them political power totals society, as any number of failed empires have demonstrated. No, they don’t have agency. They never stop being children.

Anonymous wrote:

In Massachusetts they would be suing the criminal’s parents for making him, the State for releasing him, the electric company, the manufacturer of the electrical box, the car manufacturer, the road designer, and all other engineers, companies, corporations, entities, their agents, affiliates, and subcontractors, just about everyone!

I lived in Worcester for almost a decade. Lovely old mill town. I liked the people, a lot. Good place. Then I moved to Boston, and routinely prayed for a first strike to kill me and every asshole around me where I stood. Boston is everything wrong with this country.

"You can either love women, or understand women. You can't do both. Because once you understand women, you realize that there is really nothing to love."

[Author]

Posts