Sex Robots Will Kill You!

[SolidParticipant 7520]

This is ultra feminist bulls~~~

– Shame men who have fleshlights
– Try anything to stop sex robots
– Try anything to stop better male contraceptives

Women have monopoly over one thing, their wet holes ! They will fight hard as they can so they won’t lose the only valuable thing that they have.

Face sex robots, or any human-like robot as a machine, you can write programs for it, as well you can audit programs made for it. Without getting into technical details, when this kind of technology becomes available, you will have to put a program, or a collection of computer programs to make it work.

Just audit it, make sure that it is safe. I’m really engaged in this cause, and I’m willing to put a lot of time and effort on this, once released, to make it secure and to replace c~~~s with it. The world would have more teslas and newtons if young men stopped chasing pussies and start studding harder !

[Anonymous 3]

It cannot kill:
-if it has an open-source software, reviewed and validated by many to be safe
-if it’s force is limited
-if it has no internet or computer connection directly, all communications must be in speech and vision, like with humans. That cannot contain an exploit script or virus so easily.
-Future desktop PC processors will be enough to operate a useful AI, no need for external servers, also better privacy.
-and an emergency stop function for sure is necessary.

Compare to real women:
-open source? nope. No one fully understands chaos of hamster wheel and emotion-driven logic, backward rationalization. Even in my Pua years it was damn hard to guess the contents of a woman’s thoughts.
-Women are also reviewed by many to be exactly unsafe when they go crazy. I’d prefer a BSOD over drama and bitching and police call.
-force: women know how to use force multipliers like kitchen knife or weapons, know how to call police, know divorce laws, know how to annoy the s~~~ out of a man. this can be omitted from software of sex robots.
-internet and cloud connection: women are connected 100% of the time to fakebook and other women, men have no real privacy around them.
-You cannot reset a relationship to a known working state if you fail somehow, while backing up and resetting settings of a sexbot or any software may be easy.
-No emergency stop on women. Once they are “not happy” run as fast as you can, you are doomed.

Summary, if a sexbot runs Linux, I’d prefer taking chances on it rather than women.

[KevinStylesParticipant 2580]

We’re all going to go out sometime, may as well go out happy! 😉

[harpo-my-“SON”Participant 2410]

Could you imagine your little robotic Betty going black screen in the middle of chomping your sperminators.

Damn that line made me laugh so hard.
Puffin you are funny.

I was bound to be misunderstood, and I laugh at those who misunderstand me. Kind mockery at the well intentioned, but unfettered cruelty towards those would be prison guards of my creative possibilities. This so as to learn as much from misunderstanding as from understanding. Taking pleasure in worthy opponents and making language fluid and flowing like a river yet pointed and precise as a dagger. Contradicts the socialistic purpose of language and makes for a wonderful linguistic dance, A verbal martial art with constant parries that hone the weapon that is the two edged sword of my mouth.

[SolidParticipant 7520]

Anonymous wrote:

-if it has an open-source software, reviewed and validated by many to be safe

Imagine, being able to download sex positions, recipes, different kinds of massages, anything that you can imagine.

Be able to create activities that the bot would execute and use it as an lab assistant. There are infinite possibilities.

[surfdude12Participant 4103]

Struck Out wrote:

I’d be worried that a sex robot could chew a testicle off.

Women already chew off men’s testicles
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5217591/Wife-accidentally-bit-husbands-testicle-sex.html

[J.R. “Bob” DobbsParticipant 521]

Struck Out wrote:

I’d be worried that a sex robot could chew a testicle off.

Probably less likely than a real bitch doing it:

http://www.breitbart.com/national-security/2017/12/28/report-woman-accidentally-bites-off-husbands-testicle-during-lovemaking/

Quote from a former boss: "Don't get married...the fucking you get ain't worth the fucking you get."

[Secret Agent MGTOWParticipant 22555]

It is a bogus argument, they are trying to take another angle of attack.

Women are already bying male sex dolls and make up at least 6% of buyers now.

We could also say all their sex toys could electrocute or stun gun them in the crotch, we have to get rid of them for their safety.

See how quickly that gets dismissed by women. No we women want our solo sex toys, but you men, you cant have yours.

Women want everything, but want responsibility and accountability for nothing.

[Anonymous 3]

I guess they are not worried about safety with Chad Thunderbot!

[SkeptiskParticipant 3679]

You forget that the sex-bot won’t be connected to WiFi or Bluetooth. So, how to hack? As long as your presence is the password, then they can’t get hacked.

"Expecting to find a decent woman on a dating site is like dumpster diving and expecting to come out with a gourmet meal." Won'tGetFooledAgain

[sidecarParticipant 35857]

In related news, dildos cause global warming.

Which makes about as much sense.

Seriously, of this were actually a thing, Disney’s Hall of Presidents would have gone terminator decades ago.

[Author]

Posts